Greens back retailers' internet GST bid

[Petzl]

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:23:40 -0800 (PST), kreed <kenreed1999@gmail.com>
wrote:

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow comments wise.

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line
and they are published.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream media prints in
most cases its biased and propaganda.
Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.

If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.
Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this aus.electronics
group "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for teenage guys" and also
tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

Don't mind Rod he is often offensive that is his "style"
However he is knowledgeable and often annoyingly helpful
Known him or his pseudo since last millennium
Might pay to start an appropriate thread for aus.politics,aus.legal
and whatever. More likely target a group who can help
I'm reading this in aus.politics

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary must apply the law!

 

[terryc]

Don McKenzie wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between
Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

 

[Don McKenzie]

On 5/01/2011 12:12 PM, terryc wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at
a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

I just had a look around the Casuarina shopping centre here in Darwin this morning, 5th of January.

Most shops still have discounts with selected products, starting at 20% off, right up to 70% off.

Two shops are showing 50% off "all products store wide". Mantoman and Cotton.
Are they selling at a loss?

Cheers Don...


--
Don McKenzie

Site Map: http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
E-Mail Contact Page: http://www.dontronics.com/email
Web Camera Page: http://www.dontronics.com/webcam
No More Damn Spam: http://www.dontronics.com/spam

USB Isolator 1000VDC For Protecting Your PC OR Laptop
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/usb-iso-low-full-speed-usb-isolator.html

These products will reduce in price by 5% every month:
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/minus-5-every-month.html

 

[kreed]

On Jan 5, 8:01 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:

kreed wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:14 pm, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:54:35 -0800 (PST), kreed
kenreed1...@gmail.com
wrote:

Petzl

--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

The problem is, it seems QLD no longer has a constitution or is
under the Federal constitution
with this Brigalow Corporation scam that we are hearing about .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd3fH9P8394

This video has been "hacked" at start but comes right after a few
minutes?

It plays ok here. There is  bit of music at the beginning, and
momentarily stills of beattie and bligh then an intro graphic before
the lecture starts at 0.58.

Thanks for that very enlightening particularly following the other
chapters about loss of Constitutional rights being replaced by
"Corporation"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcYyldfC-4&NR=1

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

Another thing I was told by friend who saw this video and sent is is
interesting :

Go to the news.com.au website, it covers the major newspapers in
Australia, courier mail, sydney morning herald, herald-sun etc,

1> do a site search for "brigalow corporation" - you will find zero
results
2> go to the couriermail.com.au website, (QLD main newspaper) . You
probably could try it in your state newspaper if not in QLD, but it
might not appear as it is not relevant interstate ?

3> Find an article that accepts reader comments and make a general but
relevant comment about any subject other than brigalow (you can just
make up an email address, but something that is likely to actually
exist such as joh...@yahoo.com if you want to not risk spam etc).  As
long as it is a current article and there are recent reader comments
made within the last hour or so, your comment will probably have about
a 70-80% chance of appearing on the site.

4> Find a relevant article, probably one about QLD state matters that
accepts reader comments and post a reader comment that includes the
word "brigalow corporation" or a link to that you tube video link
above. You can try it over and over, try different names and email
addys You will find that it never gets into the comments.

5> Try the same in yahoo news (Australia) in a relevant QLD state
issue article.  same result.

This was tried by friends who sent this link, on 10 different
computers - using real emails that won't bounce, at different IP's.
Other comments had a very good chance of going on the board, but
brigalow related ones were censored every time.

I tried this same thing myself on home and work computer with the same
result.  Try if you want and tell me if you have any luck.
If this situation has any basis in fact, we have a very very serious issue here,

Nope, they have just decided that they dont want their systems clogged with brigalow shit.

You're welcome to discuss that stuff elsewhere.

that few seem to know about.

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow comments wise..

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line
and they are published.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream media prints in
most cases its biased and propaganda.
Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.

If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.
Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this aus.electronics
group "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for teenage guys" and also
tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

 

[Rod Speed]

kreed wrote:

On Jan 5, 8:01 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:14 pm, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:54:35 -0800 (PST), kreed
kenreed1...@gmail.com
wrote:

Petzl

--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

The problem is, it seems QLD no longer has a constitution or is
under the Federal constitution
with this Brigalow Corporation scam that we are hearing about .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd3fH9P8394

This video has been "hacked" at start but comes right after a few
minutes?

It plays ok here. There is bit of music at the beginning, and
momentarily stills of beattie and bligh then an intro graphic before
the lecture starts at 0.58.

Thanks for that very enlightening particularly following the other
chapters about loss of Constitutional rights being replaced by
"Corporation"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcYyldfC-4&NR=1

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

Another thing I was told by friend who saw this video and sent is is
interesting :

Go to the news.com.au website, it covers the major newspapers in
Australia, courier mail, sydney morning herald, herald-sun etc,

1> do a site search for "brigalow corporation" - you will find zero
results
2> go to the couriermail.com.au website, (QLD main newspaper) . You
probably could try it in your state newspaper if not in QLD, but it
might not appear as it is not relevant interstate ?

3> Find an article that accepts reader comments and make a general
but
relevant comment about any subject other than brigalow (you can just
make up an email address, but something that is likely to actually
exist such as joh...@yahoo.com if you want to not risk spam etc). As
long as it is a current article and there are recent reader comments
made within the last hour or so, your comment will probably have
about
a 70-80% chance of appearing on the site.

4> Find a relevant article, probably one about QLD state matters
that
accepts reader comments and post a reader comment that includes the
word "brigalow corporation" or a link to that you tube video link
above. You can try it over and over, try different names and email
addys You will find that it never gets into the comments.

5> Try the same in yahoo news (Australia) in a relevant QLD state
issue article. same result.

This was tried by friends who sent this link, on 10 different
computers - using real emails that won't bounce, at different IP's.
Other comments had a very good chance of going on the board, but
brigalow related ones were censored every time.

I tried this same thing myself on home and work computer with the
same
result. Try if you want and tell me if you have any luck.
If this situation has any basis in fact, we have a very very
serious issue here,

Nope, they have just decided that they dont want their systems
clogged with brigalow shit.

You're welcome to discuss that stuff elsewhere.

that few seem to know about.

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow comments
wise.

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line and they are published.

Irrelevant to their decision to flush the brigalow shit where it belongs.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream
media prints in most cases its biased and propaganda.

Everything is biased, stupid.

Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.

If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.

I am free to poke holes in the sillier claims you make too.

Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this aus.electronics
group "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for teenage guys" and also
tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

I never said that.

 

[terryc]

Don McKenzie wrote:

Are they selling at a loss?

You must be getting old and stupid if you have to ask that question

 

[kreed]

On Jan 5, 11:21 am, Don McKenzie <5...@2.5A> wrote:

On 5/01/2011 12:12 PM, terryc wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at
a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

I just had a look around the Casuarina shopping centre here in Darwin this morning, 5th of January.

Most shops still have discounts with selected products, starting at 20% off, right up to 70% off.

Two shops are showing 50% off "all products store wide". Mantoman and Cotton.
Are they selling at a loss?

They might be on some items, but you can be assured that they have
made a huge profit on the bulk of
the same item sold pre-"sale" price that would more than make up the
loss. Same with "clearance of discontinued items",
car dealers flogging off "2010 plated models" for a steep discount.
They have made enough on the other 90+ % they sold at full
price to offset the loss they may or may not make on these few
"outdated" or "discontinued" items.


If they stay open long term, then you can be assured that they are
making more profit than loss overall.

Cheers Don...

--
Don McKenzie

Site Map:            http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
E-Mail Contact Page:http://www.dontronics.com/email
Web Camera Page:    http://www.dontronics.com/webcam
No More Damn Spam:  http://www.dontronics.com/spam

USB Isolator 1000VDC For Protecting Your PC OR Laptophttp://www.dontronics-shop.com/usb-iso-low-full-speed-usb-isolator.html

These products will reduce in price by 5% every month:http://www.dontronics-shop.com/minus-5-every-month.html

 

[kreed]

On Jan 5, 11:02 am, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:23:40 -0800 (PST), kreed <kenreed1...@gmail.com
wrote:

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow comments wise.

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line
and they are published.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream media prints in
most cases its biased and propaganda.
Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.

If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.
Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this aus.electronics
group  "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for teenage guys" and also
tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

Don't mind Rod he is often offensive that is his "style"
However he is knowledgeable and often annoyingly helpful
Known him or his pseudo since last millennium
Might pay to start an appropriate thread for aus.politics,aus.legal
and whatever. More likely target a group who can help
I'm reading this in aus.politics

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary must apply the law!

 

[kreed]

On Jan 5, 11:34 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:

kreed wrote:
On Jan 5, 8:01 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:14 pm, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:54:35 -0800 (PST), kreed
kenreed1...@gmail.com
wrote:

Petzl

--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

The problem is, it seems QLD no longer has a constitution or is
under the Federal constitution
with this Brigalow Corporation scam that we are hearing about .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd3fH9P8394

This video has been "hacked" at start but comes right after a few
minutes?

It plays ok here. There is bit of music at the beginning, and
momentarily stills of beattie and bligh then an intro graphic before
the lecture starts at 0.58.

Thanks for that very enlightening particularly following the other
chapters about loss of Constitutional rights being replaced by
"Corporation"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcYyldfC-4&NR=1

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

Another thing I was told by friend who saw this video and sent is is
interesting :

Go to the news.com.au website, it covers the major newspapers in
Australia, courier mail, sydney morning herald, herald-sun etc,

1> do a site search for "brigalow corporation" - you will find zero
results
2> go to the couriermail.com.au website, (QLD main newspaper) . You
probably could try it in your state newspaper if not in QLD, but it
might not appear as it is not relevant interstate ?

3> Find an article that accepts reader comments and make a general
but
relevant comment about any subject other than brigalow (you can just
make up an email address, but something that is likely to actually
exist such as joh...@yahoo.com if you want to not risk spam etc). As
long as it is a current article and there are recent reader comments
made within the last hour or so, your comment will probably have
about
a 70-80% chance of appearing on the site.

4> Find a relevant article, probably one about QLD state matters
that
accepts reader comments and post a reader comment that includes the
word "brigalow corporation" or a link to that you tube video link
above. You can try it over and over, try different names and email
addys You will find that it never gets into the comments.

5> Try the same in yahoo news (Australia) in a relevant QLD state
issue article. same result.

This was tried by friends who sent this link, on 10 different
computers - using real emails that won't bounce, at different IP's.
Other comments had a very good chance of going on the board, but
brigalow related ones were censored every time.

I tried this same thing myself on home and work computer with the
same
result. Try if you want and tell me if you have any luck.
If this situation has any basis in fact, we have a very very
serious issue here,

Nope, they have just decided that they dont want their systems
clogged with brigalow shit.

You're welcome to discuss that stuff elsewhere.

that few seem to know about.

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow comments
wise.

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line and they are published.

Irrelevant to their decision to flush the brigalow shit where it belongs.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream
media prints in most cases its biased and propaganda.

Everything is biased, stupid.

Not absolutely everything, but its near impossible to identify the
tiny % that isn't

Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.
If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.

I am free to poke holes in the sillier claims you make too.

Im not making any claims, bringing up the subject for discussion
I would be more than happy for someone to prove conclusively that
brigalow is crap,
but living in QLD, the reality of life and where things are heading
makes me wonder.

In my opinion, People like Beattie and Bligh are the sort of pure evil
human beings who would
think nothing of doing something something like this.

Joh would certainly have been in on something like this even though he
isnt anywhere near as bad as the current government.


That is the wonder of the thing called "freedom of speech", but we
won't
have that if this turns out to be true.

Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this aus.electronics
group  "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for teenage guys" and also
tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

I never said that.

 

[Rod Speed]

kreed wrote:

On Jan 5, 11:34 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Jan 5, 8:01 am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:14 pm, Petzl <pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:54:35 -0800 (PST), kreed
kenreed1...@gmail.com
wrote:

Petzl

--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

The problem is, it seems QLD no longer has a constitution or is
under the Federal constitution
with this Brigalow Corporation scam that we are hearing about .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd3fH9P8394

This video has been "hacked" at start but comes right after a few
minutes?

It plays ok here. There is bit of music at the beginning, and
momentarily stills of beattie and bligh then an intro graphic
before the lecture starts at 0.58.

Thanks for that very enlightening particularly following the
other chapters about loss of Constitutional rights being
replaced by
"Corporation"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcYyldfC-4&NR=1

Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the
judiciary must apply the law!

Another thing I was told by friend who saw this video and sent is
is interesting :

Go to the news.com.au website, it covers the major newspapers in
Australia, courier mail, sydney morning herald, herald-sun etc,

1> do a site search for "brigalow corporation" - you will find
zero results
2> go to the couriermail.com.au website, (QLD main newspaper) .
You probably could try it in your state newspaper if not in QLD,
but it might not appear as it is not relevant interstate ?

3> Find an article that accepts reader comments and make a general
but
relevant comment about any subject other than brigalow (you can
just make up an email address, but something that is likely to
actually exist such as joh...@yahoo.com if you want to not risk
spam etc). As long as it is a current article and there are
recent reader comments made within the last hour or so, your
comment will probably have about
a 70-80% chance of appearing on the site.

4> Find a relevant article, probably one about QLD state matters
that
accepts reader comments and post a reader comment that includes
the word "brigalow corporation" or a link to that you tube video
link above. You can try it over and over, try different names and
email addys You will find that it never gets into the comments.

5> Try the same in yahoo news (Australia) in a relevant QLD state
issue article. same result.

This was tried by friends who sent this link, on 10 different
computers - using real emails that won't bounce, at different
IP's. Other comments had a very good chance of going on the
board, but brigalow related ones were censored every time.

I tried this same thing myself on home and work computer with the
same
result. Try if you want and tell me if you have any luck.
If this situation has any basis in fact, we have a very very
serious issue here,

Nope, they have just decided that they dont want their systems
clogged with brigalow shit.

You're welcome to discuss that stuff elsewhere.

that few seem to know about.

No one cares about what murdoch's shit rags choose to allow
comments wise.

If you look at some of the stories on there, many comments are total
shit, irrelevant, abusive and out of line and they are published.

Irrelevant to their decision to flush the brigalow shit where it
belongs.

and no, I don't particularly care what the mainstream
media prints in most cases its biased and propaganda.

Everything is biased, stupid.

Not absolutely everything,

Everything the mainstream media prints is.

but its near impossible to identify the tiny % that isn't

Im only passing on what was sent to me and making an observation.
If you don't like my comments, feel free not to read them.

I am free to poke holes in the sillier claims you make too.

Im not making any claims,

You clearly claimed that they delete comments that include brigalow.

bringing up the subject for discussion

I would be more than happy for someone to prove conclusively
that brigalow is crap, but living in QLD, the reality of life and
where things are heading makes me wonder.

Its hardly surprising that you do see some of that sort of thing.

In my opinion, People like Beattie and Bligh are the sort of pure evil human beings

Thats completely silly.

who would think nothing of doing something something like this.

Joh would certainly have been in on something like this even
though he isnt anywhere near as bad as the current government.

He was even worse, happy to accept bags of money quite literally.

That is the wonder of the thing called "freedom of speech",

You are free to discuss brigalow, just not free to do it in murdoch's shit rags.

I dont even read them unless there isnt anything else to read.

but we won't have that if this turns out to be true.

Thats completely silly. The most it affects is murdoch's shit rags.

Please also feel free to go to the other posts on this
aus.electronics group "hot bikini jungle videos" and "hot for
teenage guys" and also tell them to discuss their shit elsewhere.

I never said that.

 

[Andy]

Don McKenzie wrote:

On 5/01/2011 12:12 PM, terryc wrote:
Don McKenzie wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at
a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

I just had a look around the Casuarina shopping centre here in
Darwin this morning, 5th of January.

Most shops still have discounts with selected products, starting
at 20% off, right up to 70% off.

Two shops are showing 50% off "all products store wide". Mantoman
and Cotton. Are they selling at a loss?

Depends what they're selling, and what their usual mark-up over 'cost'
price is.

If their usual markups are 400%, they're still doing OK by 'slashing'
their advertised prices by 50%

--
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

 

[Petzl]

On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:34:12 +1100, terryc
<newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:


Are they selling at a loss?

You must be getting old and stupid if you have to ask that question

You DON'T believe in Christmas (sales)
--
Petzl
http://home.iprimus.com.au/petzl/Mono.htm

 

[terryc]

Petzl wrote:

On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:34:12 +1100, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:


Are they selling at a loss?
You must be getting old and stupid if you have to ask that question

You DON'T believe in Christmas (sales)

TANSTAAFL.
Shrug, if 99.99999% of it is crap, what is good about it?

 

[Don McKenzie]

On 5/01/2011 1:34 PM, terryc wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:


Are they selling at a loss?

You must be getting old and stupid if you have to ask that question

I may be old, I may be stupid.
I know the answer, but I was asking what you and others thought Terry.

I guess from your answer, you may not be sure at this stage.

Cheers Don...


--
Don McKenzie

Site Map: http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
E-Mail Contact Page: http://www.dontronics.com/email
Web Camera Page: http://www.dontronics.com/webcam
No More Damn Spam: http://www.dontronics.com/spam

These products will reduce in price by 5% every month:
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/minus-5-every-month.html

 

[Gillard = Rudd in a frock]

On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:33:20 +1100, Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote:

If it was just the 10% Bob, people would buy locally rather than overseas.
It is the up to 3 times the retail price in some cases, that is the real problem.

Lot of factors can cause that, particularly import duties charged in
Australia, freight, duopoly practices permitted by ALP to detriment of
consumer, etc.

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a
loss?

Yes.

 

[Gillard = Rudd in a frock]

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:03:28 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days
between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a loss?

Nope.

Wrong.

 

[Rod Speed]

Gillard = Rudd in a frock wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days
between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a loss?

Nope.

Wrong.

Nope.

 

[Rob]

On 5/01/2011 2:02 PM, Andy wrote:

Don McKenzie wrote:

On 5/01/2011 12:12 PM, terryc wrote:
Don McKenzie wrote:

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at
a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

I just had a look around the Casuarina shopping centre here in
Darwin this morning, 5th of January.

Most shops still have discounts with selected products, starting
at 20% off, right up to 70% off.

Two shops are showing 50% off "all products store wide". Mantoman
and Cotton. Are they selling at a loss?

Depends what they're selling, and what their usual mark-up over 'cost'
price is.

If their usual markups are 400%, they're still doing OK by 'slashing'
their advertised prices by 50%

One problem is retailers and importers have to hold lots of stock, this
is to get it cheaper in bulk. Having stock costs money, it was about
27.5% over three months.

We now have too many stores and shopping centres every place you go to
has the same stuff.

These business people have brought it on themselves and want someone to
blame = joe public.

 

[Rod Speed]

Rob wrote

Andy wrote
Don McKenzie wrote
terryc wrote
Don McKenzie wrote

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days
between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a loss?

No, it is a special SALE version.

I just had a look around the Casuarina shopping centre here in
Darwin this morning, 5th of January.

Most shops still have discounts with selected products, starting
at 20% off, right up to 70% off.

Two shops are showing 50% off "all products store wide". Mantoman and Cotton. Are they selling at a loss?

Depends what they're selling, and what their usual mark-up over 'cost' price is.

If their usual markups are 400%, they're still doing OK by 'slashing'
their advertised prices by 50%

One problem is retailers and importers have to hold lots of stock,

Nope.

this is to get it cheaper in bulk.

Its never worth buying more than you can sell at a profit.

Having stock costs money,

Not if you get the volume right.

it was about 27.5% over three months.

Oh bullshit. It never costs that much.

We now have too many stores and shopping centres every place you go to has the same stuff.

They should get a clue and order what they can sell at a profit.

These business people have brought it on themselves

Yes.

and want someone to blame = joe public.

And only a fool buys that line.

 

[Gillard = Rudd in a frock]

On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:21:41 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Gillard = Rudd in a frock wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

How can large retailers give you up to 70% off during the days
between Christmas and the new year. Are they selling at a loss?

Nope.

Wrong.

Nope.

Yep.
>