go bankrupt?” Musk said in the interview. Tesla In c.’s two newest car factories have been losing billions of dollars...

[a a]

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 10:00:59 UTC+2, Jasen Betts wrote:

On 2022-07-04, Ricky <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 7:30:00 AM UTC-4, a a wrote:
On Monday, 4 July 2022 at 02:45:54 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

fake
Australia has no money, no engineers
hydrogen is an old fake, which never worked fine

shipping anything out from Australia is just another fake to triple the price of such hydrogen

Australia may collapse within the next 5-10 years due to global crisis, doubled price of airline tickets



--
Jasen.
Jasen is idiot troll

Russian Ruble already collapsed -10%

Global crisis is on

Latest News
All Times Eastern


6:27a
Picks As inflation sits at a 40-year high, the personal savings rate in America has fallen to its lowest level since 2008. Here’s the age group feeling most ‘uncomfortable’ about their savings now.
6:21a
Tesla stock slips

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-inflation-sits-at-a-40-year-high-the-personal-savings-rate-in-america-has-fallen-to-its-lowest-level-since-2008-heres-the-age-group-feeling-most-uncomfortable-about-their-savings-now-01656519946?mod=mw_latestnews

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
snip
We don\'t need coal deposits to stay buried, nor are we running short on oxygen.
Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm

There\'s no immediate prospect that we will run out, but the climate change denial crew may yet work out how to engineer an even bigger ecological disaster.

--Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

fake

So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.

You can\'t inform us, but you may yet be able to entertain us.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[a a]

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
snip
We don\'t need coal deposits to stay buried, nor are we running short on oxygen.
Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm

There\'s no immediate prospect that we will run out, but the climate change denial crew may yet work out how to engineer an even bigger ecological disaster.

--Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

fake
So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.

You can\'t inform us, but you may yet be able to entertain us.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Columbia University is populated by the global agenda, globalists like my professor, like me, like Prof. Sachs

I studied global university systems at CU
Japanese-=American studies at Princeton University ( prof. Rice - promoted to Secretary of State)
Interactive Communication at MIT (Prof. Negroponte - promoted to Secretary of State)
Mobile Education at Shibuya University, Tokyo

Carbon Agenda is all no-science, political agenda, invented by Al Gore and his team like Prof. Mann and UNFCC
to force Europe, Asia, China to cut industrial production by 90%

40 years ago I worked for the R&D Project by US EPA ( Environment Protection Agency) to reduce emissions of pollutants, exhaust from industrial chimneys in Europe. Project was great success but it was not my intention to close 10,000 industrial plants in Europe, Asia, China to reduce carbon emissions.

-We all love Carbon, we all love CO2

-CO2 is welcome
-CO2 is Plant Food
-Plants are Animal Food
-Animals are Human Food

-More CO2 more Human Food
-to end the world hunger



Water (H2O) in the gaseous state is the only greenhouse gas due to its high heat of phase shift fluid - gas (water > steam)

https://sci.electronics.design.narkive.com/eMVDUFoy/we-all-love-carbon-we-all-love-co2

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:56:19 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
snip
We don\'t need coal deposits to stay buried, nor are we running short on oxygen.
Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm

There\'s no immediate prospect that we will run out, but the climate change denial crew may yet work out how to engineer an even bigger ecological disaster.

--Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

fake
So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.

You can\'t inform us, but you may yet be able to entertain us.

Columbia University is populated by the global agenda, globalists like my professor, like me, like Prof. Sachs.

You don\'t sound much like Jeffrey Sachs - he makes sense, while you post nonsense.

I studied global university systems at CU
Japanese-=American studies at Princeton University ( prof. Rice - promoted to Secretary of State)
Interactive Communication at MIT (Prof. Negroponte - promoted to Secretary of State)
Mobile Education at Shibuya University, Tokyo

And clearly failed to learn anything at all worth passing on.

> Carbon Agenda is all no-science, political agenda, invented by Al Gore and his team like Prof. Mann and UNFCC to force Europe, Asia, China to cut industrial production by 90% .

You can generate all the power you need from solar cells and wind turbines - giving up burning fossil carbon as fuel doesn\'t prevent you from sustaining and increasing industrial production. Al Gore didn\'t invent anything - he just popularised what science had worked out by around 1990, and Michael Mann\'s \"hockey stick\" results have now been replicated about two dozen times using a a very wide selection of climate proxies going back much further than he did in 1998 - the Greenland and Antarctic ice core data went back much further and some sedimentary data seems to have got back about 20 million years.

As fatuous assertions go, this outdoes John Doe and Flyguy. You\'ve made it down to comic fatuity, with ear-to-ear egg on your prat-fallen face.

> 40 years ago I worked for the R&D Project by US EPA ( Environment Protection Agency) to reduce emissions of pollutants, exhaust from industrial chimneys in Europe.

As the kind of idiot who reduced emissions by stopping anything happening under the chimney\'s. There are other ways of getting rid of offensive emissions, but you\'ve got to know what you are doing before you can get rid of only those components that are actually damaging.

> Project was great success but it was not my intention to close 10,000 industrial plants in Europe, Asia, China to reduce carbon emissions.

Closing industrial plants wouldn\'t per se reduce carbon emissions. Getting the power to keep them running without burning fossil carbon as fuel would do the trick - and in recent years it would also offer cheaper power - but clowns like you haven\'t noticed.

> -We all love Carbon, we all love CO2

\"We\" being gullible idiots like you.

<snipped moronic sloganeering>

> Water (H2O) in the gaseous state is the only greenhouse gas due to its high heat of phase shift fluid - gas (water > steam)

What a load of total nonsense. \"Greenhouse gases\" - and water vapour is one of a number of them, with CO2 and methane being well-known examples of others - have relatively strong near-infra-red absorbtion and emission spectra.. Oxygen and nitrogen don\'t.

This has absolutely nothing to do with their latent heat of vapourisation. Only a clown could imagine otherwise, and you really are a clown.

<snipped link to rubbish website>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[a a]

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 15:36:40 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:56:19 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
snip
We don\'t need coal deposits to stay buried, nor are we running short on oxygen.
Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm

There\'s no immediate prospect that we will run out, but the climate change denial crew may yet work out how to engineer an even bigger ecological disaster.

--Converting all the fossil carbon we\'ve dug up into CO2 has lowered the atmospheric oxygen concentration by a very small, but definitely measurable amount.

fake
So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.

You can\'t inform us, but you may yet be able to entertain us.

Columbia University is populated by the global agenda, globalists like my professor, like me, like Prof. Sachs.

You don\'t sound much like Jeffrey Sachs - he makes sense, while you post nonsense.
I studied global university systems at CU
Japanese-=American studies at Princeton University ( prof. Rice - promoted to Secretary of State)
Interactive Communication at MIT (Prof. Negroponte - promoted to Secretary of State)
Mobile Education at Shibuya University, Tokyo
And clearly failed to learn anything at all worth passing on.

Carbon Agenda is all no-science, political agenda, invented by Al Gore and his team like Prof. Mann and UNFCC to force Europe, Asia, China to cut industrial production by 90% .

You can generate all the power you need from solar cells and wind turbines - giving up burning fossil carbon as fuel doesn\'t prevent you from sustaining and increasing industrial production. Al Gore didn\'t invent anything - he just popularised what science had worked out by around 1990, and Michael Mann\'s \"hockey stick\" results have now been replicated about two dozen times using a a very wide selection of climate proxies going back much further than he did in 1998 - the Greenland and Antarctic ice core data went back much further and some sedimentary data seems to have got back about 20 million years.

As fatuous assertions go, this outdoes John Doe and Flyguy. You\'ve made it down to comic fatuity, with ear-to-ear egg on your prat-fallen face.
40 years ago I worked for the R&D Project by US EPA ( Environment Protection Agency) to reduce emissions of pollutants, exhaust from industrial chimneys in Europe.
As the kind of idiot who reduced emissions by stopping anything happening under the chimney\'s. There are other ways of getting rid of offensive emissions, but you\'ve got to know what you are doing before you can get rid of only those components that are actually damaging.
Project was great success but it was not my intention to close 10,000 industrial plants in Europe, Asia, China to reduce carbon emissions.
Closing industrial plants wouldn\'t per se reduce carbon emissions. Getting the power to keep them running without burning fossil carbon as fuel would do the trick - and in recent years it would also offer cheaper power - but clowns like you haven\'t noticed.
-We all love Carbon, we all love CO2
\"We\" being gullible idiots like you.

snipped moronic sloganeering
Water (H2O) in the gaseous state is the only greenhouse gas due to its high heat of phase shift fluid - gas (water > steam)
What a load of total nonsense. \"Greenhouse gases\" - and water vapour is one of a number of them, with CO2 and methane being well-known examples of others - have relatively strong near-infra-red absorbtion and emission spectra. Oxygen and nitrogen don\'t.

This has absolutely nothing to do with their latent heat of vapourisation.. Only a clown could imagine otherwise, and you really are a clown.

snipped link to rubbish website

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
-You can generate all the power you need from solar cells and wind turbines -

nope
30 years you could not since Gemrna manufacturers of solar panels, visited by me, offered solars at $1/1W
making prices prohibitive for individual or industrial consumers

Zero carbon emission agenda promoted by US exactly boosted production of solar panels in China at pocket prices:
and the prices has fallen from $1.0/1W in Europe to $0.5/1W in China down to $0.3/1W today

Turning China into No.1 Global Solar Factory

I am aware, Putin and Kremlin injected $Bs into pockets of so called eco pseudoscientists, pseudo-researchers to boost sales of natural gas to Europe, described as clean fuel

But today, following the money cut offs by Putin, Kremlin, mouths of Ts of carbon fakers got shut.

So We all love Carbon, we all love CO2

=-CO2 is welcome
-CO2 is Plant Food
-Plants are Animal Food
-Animals are Human Food

-More CO2 more Human Food
-to end the world hunger



--Water (H2O) in the gaseous state is the only greenhouse gas due to its high heat of phase shift fluid - gas (water > steam)

--https://sci.electronics.design.narkive.com/eMVDUFoy/we-all-love-carbon-we-all-love-co2

 

[whit3rd]

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 5:56:19 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.

Columbia University is populated by the global agenda, globalists like my professor, like me, like Prof. Sachs

\"populated by\" students and faculty, I can understand. But, not \"the global agenda\'\'
which seems to suggest that a spherical object has a few topics of interest. Speaking
of topics, it doesn\'t begin to explain any kind of fakery.

> Carbon Agenda is all no-science, political agenda, invented by ...

Meaningless drivel, just a word salad suggesting some kind of conspiracy with
dark (and incomprehensible) aggressive motives. Rather, consider that a worldwide problem
suggests the utility of international cooperation as a solution, so the United Nations
(with its known fixed agenda of nations acting in unity) is a natural candidate for
the leadership and coordination of effort.

 

[a a]

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 19:11:32 UTC+2, whit3rd wrote:

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 5:56:19 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

So the link to the Columbia University web-site is a fake? Do tell us how you think I could have faked that.
Columbia University is populated by the global agenda, globalists like my professor, like me, like Prof. Sachs
\"populated by\" students and faculty, I can understand. But, not \"the global agenda\'\'
which seems to suggest that a spherical object has a few topics of interest. Speaking
of topics, it doesn\'t begin to explain any kind of fakery.

Carbon Agenda is all no-science, political agenda, invented by ...

Meaningless drivel, just a word salad suggesting some kind of conspiracy with
dark (and incomprehensible) aggressive motives. Rather, consider that a worldwide problem
suggests the utility of international cooperation as a solution, so the United Nations
(with its known fixed agenda of nations acting in unity) is a natural candidate for
the leadership and coordination of effort.

UN is today no science, no money, no influence political agenda,
having nothing to do with science, research, Global Warming, Climate Changes

Visit one day SIDS New York , UN HQ ( Small Island Developing States)
or UNFCC Bonn
or UN Geneva, UN Wien

We worked really hard to shift Ts of Global Warming fakers to Climate Changes tautology and succeeded.

No more money from Putin, Kremlin into pockets of Climate fakers, promoting sales of natural gas in Europe.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 11:50:48 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:

On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 15:36:40 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:56:19 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

<snip>

-You can generate all the power you need from solar cells and wind turbines -

nope

A a doesn\'t agree, but he can\'t say why.

30 years you could not since German manufacturers of solar panels, visited by me, offered solar cells at $1/1W
making prices prohibitive for individual or industrial consumers.

That was then. About twenty years ago, Germany invested hugely in manufacturing solar cells in ten times the volume that anybody had before, and halved the until price.

Around 2013 a University of New South Wales development pushed up solar cell efficiency from about 19% to 23% with a cheap process, and the Chinese commercialised it in a large manufacturing plant, on ten times the scale of of the German investment, whence your $0.30 per Watt today.

If you actually build a solar farm the additional costs come closer to pushing that up to about a US dollar per Watt.

Zero carbon emission agenda promoted by US exactly boosted production of solar panels in China at pocket prices:
and the prices has fallen from $1.0/1W in Europe to $0.5/1W in China down to $0.3/1W today

Turning China into No.1 Global Solar Factory

They had to make a large capital investment to set the up up the really high volume manufacturing. By the time we get around to getting most of our power from solar cells, there\'s going to have to be another factor of ten scale-up in manufacturing volume which can be expected to halve the unit cost of the solar cells per Watt once again.

> I am aware, Putin and Kremlin injected $Bs into pockets of so called eco pseudoscientists, pseudo-researchers to boost sales of natural gas to Europe, described as clean fuel.

It\'s cleaner that coal, but not all that clean. You get about half the CO2 emission per kilowatt hour than get from burning coal - that\'s simple chemistry.

> But today, following the money cut offs by Putin, Kremlin, mouths of Ts of carbon fakers got shut.

A a doesn\'t have clue.

<snipped the usual recycled rubbish>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bertrand Sindri]

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 11:50:48 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 15:36:40 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:56:19 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 13:54:11 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:31:02 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 July 2022 at 03:07:39 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 10:23:19 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 8:05:02 PM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

snip

-You can generate all the power you need from solar cells and wind turbines -

nope

A a doesn\'t agree, but he can\'t say why.

And to which other resident group troll have you made nearly the
identical remark, over and over, for what seems like forever?

This is why I attribute \"a a\" as being a John Doe nym-shift.