GC-Prevue Jump to Component

D

David Novak

Guest
Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
trying to locate.

It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
information that it needs.

Thanks,
David
 
David Novak <novakd@dajacdeletethis.com> wrote:
: Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
: GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
: find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
: trying to locate.

: It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
: information that it needs.

GC Prevue is a Gerber viewer. Gerbers are files which tell a
photoplotter how to draw lines and shapes. A Gerber file has no
independent concept of a component or a refdes. As far as a Gerber
file is concerned, the thing which you see as a refdes is just a bunch
of lines drawn in one of your files. Therefore, GC Prevue can't
jump to a component since it has no concept of what's a component and
what is not.

I don't know why GC Prevue has a "jump to component" menu item, but I
suppose that if you use a more sophosticated cam file (ODB++ or
something like that), then GC Prevue knows what to do. Or maybe if
you provide additional information to GC Prevue, then it can
understand that a bunch of lines and apertures is really a component.
But I don't know how you would input that information into GC Prevue.
In any event, plain Gerber is too dumb a file format [1] to hold the
information you want.

Stuart

[1] I am not saying that it is a bad or unintelligent file format.
Rather, it is "dumb" in the sense that it doesn't hold any more info
than simply how to draw lines.
 
But I don't know how you would input that information into GC Prevue.
In any event, plain Gerber is too dumb a file format [1] to hold the
information you want.
Click to expand...
That was my understanding as well, but since GC-Prevue has the jump to
component feature, I assume there is a way to tell it about reference
designators.

I didn't see a way to import an ODB++ file. What other file format might
be useful for telling GC-Prevue how to interpret the lines in the drawing?

Thanks,
David
 
Stuart Brorson wrote:

David Novak <novakd@dajacdeletethis.com> wrote:
: Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
: GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
: find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
: trying to locate.

: It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
: information that it needs.

GC Prevue is a Gerber viewer. Gerbers are files which tell a
photoplotter how to draw lines and shapes. A Gerber file has no
independent concept of a component or a refdes. As far as a Gerber
file is concerned, the thing which you see as a refdes is just a bunch
of lines drawn in one of your files. Therefore, GC Prevue can't
jump to a component since it has no concept of what's a component and
what is not.

I don't know why GC Prevue has a "jump to component" menu item, but I
suppose that if you use a more sophosticated cam file (ODB++ or
something like that), then GC Prevue knows what to do. Or maybe if
you provide additional information to GC Prevue, then it can
understand that a bunch of lines and apertures is really a component.
But I don't know how you would input that information into GC Prevue.
In any event, plain Gerber is too dumb a file format [1] to hold the
information you want.

Stuart

[1] I am not saying that it is a bad or unintelligent file format.
Rather, it is "dumb" in the sense that it doesn't hold any more info
than simply how to draw lines.
Click to expand...

This may be a bit far-fetched but it could theoretically do that by
OCR-reading the designators off the silk screen layer(s). I'd doubt it
though, considering that it can't even display layers in "see-through"
style. Other than that it's a nice program.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
David Novak wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
trying to locate.

It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
information that it needs.
Click to expand...
Just went to the Graphicode web site because a client of mine will soon
need a Gerber viewer. I also checked out the higher (not free) versions.
Lo and behold GC PreView Plus does have silkscreen OCR. Pretty cool. But
it seems a bit pricey at $495.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
Stuart,
I believe you are correct. With additional work from the user, GC-prevue
can probably be instructed as to what constitutes each component. Grouping
the particulary Gerber data back into a component for the purposes of
reverse engineering Gerber data.

Even if GC-Prevue doesn't support components, it would be very likely
that their full feature version sold to fabrication shops would.
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

David Novak <novakd@dajacdeletethis.com> wrote:
: Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
: GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
: find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
: trying to locate.

: It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
: information that it needs.
Click to expand...
 
Brad Velander wrote:

Stuart,
I believe you are correct. With additional work from the user, GC-prevue
can probably be instructed as to what constitutes each component. Grouping
the particulary Gerber data back into a component for the purposes of
reverse engineering Gerber data.

Even if GC-Prevue doesn't support components, it would be very likely
that their full feature version sold to fabrication shops would.
Click to expand...

Doesn't need extra work. It's commonly done via silkscreen OCR. The full
feature version of GCPreview appears to have that.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
Joerg,
My comments were specific to reconstructing (reverse engineering if you
prefer) components from Gerber data. Yes I would never design components in
Gerber given a ACD alternative but there is a lot reverse engineering that
goes on even within a single company's older files.

I still don't see a great deal of usefulness in the silkscreen OCR
because as I mentioned designators are a quickly dying breed in most
designs. Initially I was probably also concentrating on the command that
David mentioned, "Jump To Component", thus made me think of reverse
engineering the Gerbers to reconstruct components prior to reading the
Gerber back into a CAD system for further edits/design.

--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
news:llJZh.3312$HX7.2048@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net...
Gerber files should generally not be edited and that is not what David
wanted to do. AFAIU he wants to be able to quickly go to C172 or U56 to
see how they are routed, without a priori knowledge of where they are.

Making components should always happen in CAD and then the Gerbers get
generated when this process is complete. In my case I never do layouts, I
contract that out. If my Gerber viewer had silkscreen OCR that would
greatly help me in hopping to the critical nodes. I guess that's also what
David is after. Unfortunately this currently means having to shell out
$495 which I find a bit steep since I don't need the editing features. Oh
well, there's other OCR programs, even my office scanner came with one.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Click to expand...
 
Brad Velander wrote:

Joerg,
My comments were specific to reconstructing (reverse engineering if you
prefer) components from Gerber data. Yes I would never design components in
Gerber given a ACD alternative but there is a lot reverse engineering that
goes on even within a single company's older files.

I still don't see a great deal of usefulness in the silkscreen OCR
because as I mentioned designators are a quickly dying breed in most
designs. Initially I was probably also concentrating on the command that
David mentioned, "Jump To Component", thus made me think of reverse
engineering the Gerbers to reconstruct components prior to reading the
Gerber back into a CAD system for further edits/design.
Click to expand...
I don't think designators will die out. On the denser SMT boards with
0402 that we do mostly there will be no silkscreen on the top. But it is
still generated by the layouter. I don't really see any other way for an
expedient layout check. Same for troubleshooting, proto-assempbly etc.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
On 5/2/2007 10:10 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:
Brad Velander wrote:

Joerg,
My comments were specific to reconstructing (reverse engineering
if you prefer) components from Gerber data. Yes I would never design
components in Gerber given a ACD alternative but there is a lot
reverse engineering that goes on even within a single company's older
files.

I still don't see a great deal of usefulness in the silkscreen OCR
because as I mentioned designators are a quickly dying breed in most
designs. Initially I was probably also concentrating on the command
that David mentioned, "Jump To Component", thus made me think of
reverse engineering the Gerbers to reconstruct components prior to
reading the Gerber back into a CAD system for further edits/design.


I don't think designators will die out. On the denser SMT boards with
0402 that we do mostly there will be no silkscreen on the top. But it is
still generated by the layouter. I don't really see any other way for an
expedient layout check. Same for troubleshooting, proto-assempbly etc.
Click to expand...
For the boards that are so dense you can't read the silk screen or there
is no silk screen, the jump to component is even more important.
I often put the Ref Des on another non-printed layer. A assembly layer
or some such in the center of the component. This gives me two
ref-designators. One in the center on a 2nd assy layer and one on the
silk layer (that is often poorly placed due to density).

The next part of that is tool specific. I use PADS PCB and CAM350. I
export from PAD PCB to CAM350 using the CAM export feature. From the CAM
file I can export Gerbers or just leave it alone as intelligent gerbers
in the CAM format. Think of this as Gerbers with component and net
info. I then give my clients the free CAM350 viewer and if they can't
figgure out where a component is from the silk they can use CAM350 to
jump though the gerbers to look for the component.

Hawker
 
Hawker wrote:

On 5/2/2007 10:10 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:

Brad Velander wrote:

Joerg,
My comments were specific to reconstructing (reverse engineering
if you prefer) components from Gerber data. Yes I would never design
components in Gerber given a ACD alternative but there is a lot
reverse engineering that goes on even within a single company's older
files.

I still don't see a great deal of usefulness in the silkscreen
OCR because as I mentioned designators are a quickly dying breed in
most designs. Initially I was probably also concentrating on the
command that David mentioned, "Jump To Component", thus made me think
of reverse engineering the Gerbers to reconstruct components prior to
reading the Gerber back into a CAD system for further edits/design.


I don't think designators will die out. On the denser SMT boards with
0402 that we do mostly there will be no silkscreen on the top. But it
is still generated by the layouter. I don't really see any other way
for an expedient layout check. Same for troubleshooting,
proto-assempbly etc.


For the boards that are so dense you can't read the silk screen or there
is no silk screen, the jump to component is even more important.
I often put the Ref Des on another non-printed layer. A assembly layer
or some such in the center of the component. This gives me two
ref-designators. One in the center on a 2nd assy layer and one on the
silk layer (that is often poorly placed due to density).
Click to expand...
Yes, that's what I mean, a non printed layer. It really helps when doing
a dozen boards by hand somewhere.


The next part of that is tool specific. I use PADS PCB and CAM350. I
export from PAD PCB to CAM350 using the CAM export feature. From the CAM
file I can export Gerbers or just leave it alone as intelligent gerbers
in the CAM format. Think of this as Gerbers with component and net
info. I then give my clients the free CAM350 viewer and if they can't
figgure out where a component is from the silk they can use CAM350 to
jump though the gerbers to look for the component.
Click to expand...
My layouter uses PADS as well but delivers Gerbers and pho files right
away. He is doing a layout for me right now and this time we do the
back-and-forth via screen shots. But will have to move over to pho
pretty soon as density to board size is a bit thick.

But I shall not complain. Just think about it: 20 years ago we were
doing the Rubylith and razor blade thing. Now we open an email
attachment on our laptops and do the layout check while at a coffee
shop. The only downside is that we sit too much and move too little.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
On 5/2/2007 11:22 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:
My layouter uses PADS as well but delivers Gerbers and pho files right
away. He is doing a layout for me right now and this time we do the
back-and-forth via screen shots. But will have to move over to pho
pretty soon as density to board size is a bit thick.
Click to expand...
If your layout dude is using PADS then ask him what version.
Most PADS versions can do a CAM350 Export. Apparently somewhere in V2005
they broke this and fixed it again in 2007 (I'm using 2004).
(tools/CAM350 / create file only / CAM Documents including parts and nets)

If you can get a CAM file you may find this better than checking gerbers
or screen shots.
You can get a free CAM viewer from downstream technologies (see other
link in this thread). In this way you can view his PADs database, nets,
components etc with more intelligence than gerbers, but actually be
looking at the final gerbers. This is way better than looking at gerbers
or screen shots and easier for both you and the layout dude.

Hawker
 
Hawker wrote:

On 5/2/2007 11:22 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:

My layouter uses PADS as well but delivers Gerbers and pho files right
away. He is doing a layout for me right now and this time we do the
back-and-forth via screen shots. But will have to move over to pho
pretty soon as density to board size is a bit thick.


If your layout dude is using PADS then ask him what version.
Most PADS versions can do a CAM350 Export. Apparently somewhere in V2005
they broke this and fixed it again in 2007 (I'm using 2004).
(tools/CAM350 / create file only / CAM Documents including parts and nets)

If you can get a CAM file you may find this better than checking gerbers
or screen shots.
You can get a free CAM viewer from downstream technologies (see other
link in this thread). In this way you can view his PADs database, nets,
components etc with more intelligence than gerbers, but actually be
looking at the final gerbers. This is way better than looking at gerbers
or screen shots and easier for both you and the layout dude.
Click to expand...
Looks like his can't, it'll all be regular Gerber. But that's ok, so far
the bitmap format works fine for us.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
On 5/2/2007 2:41 PM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:
Hawker wrote:

On 5/2/2007 11:22 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:

My layouter uses PADS as well but delivers Gerbers and pho files
right away. He is doing a layout for me right now and this time we do
the back-and-forth via screen shots. But will have to move over to
pho pretty soon as density to board size is a bit thick.


If your layout dude is using PADS then ask him what version.
Most PADS versions can do a CAM350 Export. Apparently somewhere in
V2005 they broke this and fixed it again in 2007 (I'm using 2004).
(tools/CAM350 / create file only / CAM Documents including parts and
nets)

If you can get a CAM file you may find this better than checking
gerbers or screen shots.
You can get a free CAM viewer from downstream technologies (see other
link in this thread). In this way you can view his PADs database,
nets, components etc with more intelligence than gerbers, but actually
be looking at the final gerbers. This is way better than looking at
gerbers or screen shots and easier for both you and the layout dude.


Looks like his can't, it'll all be regular Gerber. But that's ok, so far
the bitmap format works fine for us.
Click to expand...
If he is using PADS then there should be no reason why he can't export
CAM350 files, unless he does not know how. You must have all your CAM
(PADS word for Gerber Generating scripts) written before you attempt the
CAM350 export though.

Hawker
 
Hawker wrote:

On 5/2/2007 2:41 PM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:

Hawker wrote:

On 5/2/2007 11:22 AM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the
following:

My layouter uses PADS as well but delivers Gerbers and pho files
right away. He is doing a layout for me right now and this time we
do the back-and-forth via screen shots. But will have to move over
to pho pretty soon as density to board size is a bit thick.


If your layout dude is using PADS then ask him what version.
Most PADS versions can do a CAM350 Export. Apparently somewhere in
V2005 they broke this and fixed it again in 2007 (I'm using 2004).
(tools/CAM350 / create file only / CAM Documents including parts and
nets)

If you can get a CAM file you may find this better than checking
gerbers or screen shots.
You can get a free CAM viewer from downstream technologies (see
other link in this thread). In this way you can view his PADs
database, nets, components etc with more intelligence than gerbers,
but actually be looking at the final gerbers. This is way better than
looking at gerbers or screen shots and easier for both you and the
layout dude.


Looks like his can't, it'll all be regular Gerber. But that's ok, so
far the bitmap format works fine for us.


If he is using PADS then there should be no reason why he can't export
CAM350 files, unless he does not know how. You must have all your CAM
(PADS word for Gerber Generating scripts) written before you attempt the
CAM350 export though.
Click to expand...
My layouter is pretty well versed with PADS but right now I don't want
to bother him with too many detailed questions. This layout is one of
those fast track projects. Don't we all love those?

He said he prefers to generate the big stack of files at the end and not
bother investing that time right now. Which is fine for me as long as
the bitmaps provide all the info I need for communicating with him.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
Brad Velander wrote:

Joerg,
But how does a silkscreen OCR know which other Gerber elements to tie
together making a whole component once more. A designator does not make a
component. Sorry, there is no automatic feature that could reliably do that
for all component types, mountings, considering varied silkscreen practices
and hidden designators. There is more to making a component then just
reading a silkscreen designator, a designator is a designator not a
component.
Click to expand...

Gerber files should generally not be edited and that is not what David
wanted to do. AFAIU he wants to be able to quickly go to C172 or U56 to
see how they are routed, without a priori knowledge of where they are.

Making components should always happen in CAD and then the Gerbers get
generated when this process is complete. In my case I never do layouts,
I contract that out. If my Gerber viewer had silkscreen OCR that would
greatly help me in hopping to the critical nodes. I guess that's also
what David is after. Unfortunately this currently means having to shell
out $495 which I find a bit steep since I don't need the editing
features. Oh well, there's other OCR programs, even my office scanner
came with one.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
I would have just bought PCB CAD software with a gerber viewer module.

www.ckp-railways.talktalk.net/pcbcad21.htm
 
On 4/29/2007 9:07 PM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:
David Novak wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I am
trying to locate.

It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
information that it needs.


Just went to the Graphicode web site because a client of mine will soon
need a Gerber viewer. I also checked out the higher (not free) versions.
Lo and behold GC PreView Plus does have silkscreen OCR. Pretty cool. But
it seems a bit pricey at $495.
Click to expand...
Interesting.
I wish CAM350 had that. Oh well.
That is the first REAL usable feature that I have heard from that
product that I could not do in CAM350

Hawker
 
Hawker wrote:

On 4/29/2007 9:07 PM, The digits of Joerg's hands composed the following:

David Novak wrote:

Can anyone tell me how to get reference designator information into
GC-Prevue? Whenever I use Jump to Component, I get the message "Can't
find a component called xx", where xx is the reference designator I
am trying to locate.

It appears that GC-Prevue does not have the reference designator
information that it needs.


Just went to the Graphicode web site because a client of mine will
soon need a Gerber viewer. I also checked out the higher (not free)
versions. Lo and behold GC PreView Plus does have silkscreen OCR.
Pretty cool. But it seems a bit pricey at $495.


Interesting.
I wish CAM350 had that. Oh well.
That is the first REAL usable feature that I have heard from that
product that I could not do in CAM350
Click to expand...
Question: Does CAM350 have semi-transparent layer representation so you
can see through to at least one layer down? None of the viewers I tried
had that. Beats me why because it is a rather mundane but critical
feature. Without it one has to constantly hide/unhide layers. I've got a
huge layout coming and I am always thankful when I made it through one
without carpal tunnel problems.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
Joerg,
But how does a silkscreen OCR know which other Gerber elements to tie
together making a whole component once more. A designator does not make a
component. Sorry, there is no automatic feature that could reliably do that
for all component types, mountings, considering varied silkscreen practices
and hidden designators. There is more to making a component then just
reading a silkscreen designator, a designator is a designator not a
component.
--
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
news:KhmZh.3909$H_.2842@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
Brad Velander wrote:

Stuart,
I believe you are correct. With additional work from the user,
GC-prevue can probably be instructed as to what constitutes each
component. Grouping the particulary Gerber data back into a component for
the purposes of reverse engineering Gerber data.

Even if GC-Prevue doesn't support components, it would be very likely
that their full feature version sold to fabrication shops would.


Doesn't need extra work. It's commonly done via silkscreen OCR. The full
feature version of GCPreview appears to have that.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top