Frequency multiplying

[Phil Allison]

"Rod Speed" <..

"Phil Allison"
"David L. Jones"

I wouldn't think about KillFiling you Phil, you make me laugh.

Good - you can watch while I destroy you.

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, wanker.

** So says a notorious usenet Zombie.

No matter how many times he is shot full of holes he will not lie down.





.............. Phil

 

[Andy]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<4098c399$0$4544$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

"David L. Jones" <tronnort@yahoo.com

The disadvantage of using Google Groups - No PLONK!


** Is there no end to this snivelling little prick's Jone's hypocrisy ???

First he goes out of his way to personally abuse me for no good reason -
then has the fucking hide to whinge he has trouble ignoring me because he
choses to use Google Groups ????

Jim Rowe told me 13 years ago Jones was a wanker.




............. Phil

I'm sure if Jim Rowe wanted to voice his own opinion he could do so
without using you as his mouthpiece Phil. What are you trying to do
here?? - earn brownie points because you know Jim Rowe - who really
gives a shit. Are you his bum buddy or something?? - if so, I am sure
he would like to keep that private.
You are a desperate man if what you say is true - the only dirt you
can dig up on David is what someone "supposedly" told you thirteen
years ago - good one loser!! Not only can you not support this claim
with any facts but you have to go back more than a decade and
supposedly quote someone who you obviously hold in high regard to
support your "claim". Is Jim Rowe such a weak prick that he won't make
this claim himself in this public forum - or are you dreaming it up
(as usual - it is you that needs a break from stroking the penis).
Bring it on - let us see the "man himself" back up his own comments.
I,for one. am anxiously awaiting for a reply from Jim Rowe (but not
holding my breath).

Andy

 

[Phil Allison]

"Andy"

Phil Allison:

Jim Rowe told me 13 years ago Jones was a wanker.


I'm sure if Jim Rowe wanted to voice his own opinion he could do so
without using you as his mouthpiece Phil.

** So indeed he could - but that does not mean I am never entitled
quote his opinions under any circumstances.

What are you trying to do here??

** Just tell the truth - something a brainless, drunken TURD like you
would not be interested in.

- earn brownie points because you know Jim Rowe - who really
gives a shit.

** You seem to be mighty interested - now why is that ????



Are you his bum buddy or something?? - if so, I am sure

he would like to keep that private.

** Are you perhaps a serial rapist ??

If so, I would suggest you keep that private.

You are a desperate man if what you say is true - the only dirt you
can dig up on David ....

** Every one of DJ's posts here shows he is a wanker - same as with
yourself.

BTW This one is a real prize winner.


( snip drunken Queenslander's fuckwit drivel)

Is Jim Rowe such a weak prick that he won't make
this claim himself in this public forum ...

** An personal assessment of someone's character is not a "claim".

But as you have no character whatsoever yourself you would not appreciate
that distinction.

- or are you dreaming it up
(as usual - it is you that needs a break from stroking the penis).
Bring it on - let us see the "man himself" back up his own comments.
I,for one. am anxiously awaiting for a reply from Jim Rowe (but not
holding my breath).

** Jim Rowe expressed his opinions on several well known people during our
( mostly phone) conversations - as folk often do. Since he knew the
people concerned much better than I did ( having worked alongside them for
years in most cases) I bowed to his opinion. In David Jones' case I merely
pointed out how completely correct his private warning to me has turned out
to be.

I am sure that if he had ever met up with a dead cunt like you, Andy - he
would rate Jones to be a saint by comparison.

Enjoy your hangover - shame it is not fatal !!!!





.............. Phil

 

[Rod Speed]

Some completely unemployable fuckwit wanker claiming to be
Phil Allison <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:409a010f$0$6018$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
reams and reams of pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.

No wonder its completely unemployable.

 

[Andy]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<409a51d4$0$436$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

"Andy"

Phil Allison:

Jim Rowe told me 13 years ago Jones was a wanker.


I'm sure if Jim Rowe wanted to voice his own opinion he could do so
without using you as his mouthpiece Phil.


** So indeed he could - but that does not mean I am never entitled
quote his opinions under any circumstances.


What are you trying to do here??


** Just tell the truth - something a brainless, drunken TURD like you
would not be interested in.



- earn brownie points because you know Jim Rowe - who really
gives a shit.


** You seem to be mighty interested - now why is that ????



Are you his bum buddy or something?? - if so, I am sure
he would like to keep that private.


** Are you perhaps a serial rapist ??

If so, I would suggest you keep that private.


You are a desperate man if what you say is true - the only dirt you
can dig up on David ....


** Every one of DJ's posts here shows he is a wanker - same as with
yourself.

BTW This one is a real prize winner.


( snip drunken Queenslander's fuckwit drivel)


Is Jim Rowe such a weak prick that he won't make
this claim himself in this public forum ...


** An personal assessment of someone's character is not a "claim".

But as you have no character whatsoever yourself you would not appreciate
that distinction.



- or are you dreaming it up
(as usual - it is you that needs a break from stroking the penis).
Bring it on - let us see the "man himself" back up his own comments.
I,for one. am anxiously awaiting for a reply from Jim Rowe (but not
holding my breath).



** Jim Rowe expressed his opinions on several well known people during our
( mostly phone) conversations - as folk often do. Since he knew the
people concerned much better than I did ( having worked alongside them for
years in most cases) I bowed to his opinion. In David Jones' case I merely
pointed out how completely correct his private warning to me has turned out
to be.

I am sure that if he had ever met up with a dead cunt like you, Andy - he
would rate Jones to be a saint by comparison.

Enjoy your hangover - shame it is not fatal !!!!





............. Phil

I think you may be a bit confused as to which Andy you are addressing
- I believe some of your remarks may have been directed towards Mr.
Pearson - If you took your pills this would not happen.

I think this comment of yours is a ripper:
"Every one of DJ's posts here shows he is a wanker - same as
with yourself."

Please tell me what your posts show about you Phil (I am sure many
people will be happy to offer their views on this - arrogant,grumpy
old fart, or similar, will probably be common responses).

I think this is as close as David will get to an apology:
"I am sure that if he had ever met up with a dead cunt like you, Andy
- he
would rate Jones to be a saint by comparison."
I am sure that will make David feel better

Andy

 

[David L. Jones]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<409a51d4$0$436$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

"Andy"

Phil Allison:

Jim Rowe told me 13 years ago Jones was a wanker.


I'm sure if Jim Rowe wanted to voice his own opinion he could do so
without using you as his mouthpiece Phil.


** So indeed he could - but that does not mean I am never entitled
quote his opinions under any circumstances.

** Jim Rowe expressed his opinions on several well known people during our
( mostly phone) conversations - as folk often do. Since he knew the
people concerned much better than I did ( having worked alongside them for
years in most cases) I bowed to his opinion. In David Jones' case I merely
pointed out how completely correct his private warning to me has turned out
to be.

I am sure that if he had ever met up with a dead cunt like you, Andy - he
would rate Jones to be a saint by comparison.

Poor Jim, having his name plastered all around the place like this.
I'm honored to be up there up on Jim's "well known people" list from
13 years ago though, when no one had ever heard of me. :->
Strangely, I've never met Jim Rowe. The only contact I've ever had
with him is maybe two phone calls and a few emails and letters about a
few of my projects which he's published over the years. I found him to
be a nice guy and our correspondence has always been friendly and
polite.

Regards
Dave

 

[David L. Jones]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<4099f97d$0$25012$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

If I only had a dollar for every time I've heard the same and a lot
worse about you Phil...

** But you will not name them, none are not credible persons and they
have never had any contact with me.

Yes they have had contact with you Phil, personal and otherwise.
Of course I won't name them, I have more integrity than that.

I wouldn't think about KillFiling you Phil, you make me laugh.
** Good - you can watch while I destroy you.

ROFL!
Stop it Phil, you are cracking me up!!
Out of sheer morbid curiosity, how do you intend to "destroy" me?

BTW, I'm honoured that you created a new thread just for me. I thought
that was reserved for those that actually hurl abuse back at you and
call you various nasty things. What did I do to deserve this honour?
This all started with me offering some advice to a nice and polite
poster about frequency shifting and you then calling him a troll...
Oh, I get it now...

Regards
Dave

 

[Phil Allison]

"David L. Jones" <tronnort@yahoo.com>.

Poor Jim, having his name plastered all around the place like this.
I'm honored to be up there up on Jim's "well known people" list....

** So David Jones considers it an honour being in a list of "arseholes" and
"useless know nothings".

Pretty much sums the little turd up really.

Strangely, I've never met Jim Rowe.

** Not strange at all - you were someone best avoided.

The only contact I've ever had
with him is maybe two phone calls and a few emails and letters about a
few of my projects which he's published over the years.

** Plenty enough contact for him to sum you up as a tedious wanker - one
phone call is enough.

I found him to be a nice guy and our correspondence has always been
friendly and
polite.

** A magazine editor has to be polite to all the folk they deal with -
even if they loathe them.

David Jones was not even on the scale compared to some.




............. Phil

 

[David L. Jones]

agw@woodtech.net.au (Andy) wrote in message news:<ad702681.0405061457.3bed097@posting.google.com>...

I think you may be a bit confused as to which Andy you are addressing
- I believe some of your remarks may have been directed towards Mr.
Pearson - If you took your pills this would not happen.

I think this comment of yours is a ripper:
"Every one of DJ's posts here shows he is a wanker - same as
with yourself."

Please tell me what your posts show about you Phil (I am sure many
people will be happy to offer their views on this - arrogant,grumpy
old fart, or similar, will probably be common responses).

I think this is as close as David will get to an apology:
"I am sure that if he had ever met up with a dead cunt like you, Andy
- he
would rate Jones to be a saint by comparison."
I am sure that will make David feel better

It does indeed Andy, it sure brings a tear to the eye.

Apology accepted Phil

Regards
Dave

 

[Phil Allison]

"David L. Jones" <tronnort@yahoo.com>

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au

** But you will not name them, none are not credible persons and
they
have never had any contact with me.

Yes they have had contact with you Phil, personal and otherwise.
Of course I won't name them, I have more integrity than that.

** You have zero integrity - even rapists have more.

I wouldn't think about KillFiling you Phil, you make me laugh

** Good - you can watch while I destroy you.

Out of sheer morbid curiosity, how do you intend to "destroy" me?

** Just watch - you are doing most of the work yourself so far.

BTW, I'm honoured that you created a new thread just for me.

** No new thread on most newsreaders - that is a false impression created
by Google.

I thought
that was reserved for those that actually hurl abuse back at you and
call you various nasty things. What did I do to deserve this honour?

** So David Jones considers being called a "Jerk Off" an honour.

Maybe it is - for the likes of him.

This all started with me offering some advice to a nice and polite
poster about frequency shifting and you then calling him a troll...
Oh, I get it now...

** That is a totally false summation ( as usual ) - and YOU do not get
it.

David Jones never gets it.




............ Phil

 

[Andy]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<409b4615$0$4543$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

"David L. Jones" <tronnort@yahoo.com>.

Poor Jim, having his name plastered all around the place like this.
I'm honored to be up there up on Jim's "well known people" list....


** So David Jones considers it an honour being in a list of "arseholes" and
"useless know nothings".

Pretty much sums the little turd up really.


Strangely, I've never met Jim Rowe.


** Not strange at all - you were someone best avoided.



The only contact I've ever had
with him is maybe two phone calls and a few emails and letters about a
few of my projects which he's published over the years.


** Plenty enough contact for him to sum you up as a tedious wanker - one
phone call is enough.


I found him to be a nice guy and our correspondence has always been
friendly and
polite.


** A magazine editor has to be polite to all the folk they deal with -
even if they loathe them.

David Jones was not even on the scale compared to some.




............ Phil

Phil,

Dave gave a possible solution to the OP's question - yet again you
have to take it to the extreme and make a bloody great issue out of
"but what if". You thrive on trying to make something out of nothing
and then defend your argument with crap and then get abusive and start
calling names. But you cannot do it on your own, you have to involve
some other person that is obviously God to you (Jim Rowe) and repeat
his supposed comments - who gives a shit what he thinks of the man -
obviously you do as you hold him in such high regard and,if he did say
it then it must be gospel as Jim is the God of Australian Electronics
in your tiny, malfunctioning brain.
You are damaged goods Phil - piss off.

Andy

 

[Phil Allison]

"Andy" <agw@woodtech.net.au>

Phil,

Dave gave a possible solution to the OP's question ...

** The OPs question was so vague as to be meaningless so I asked him to
give details and explained why. The posting of vague questions is a major
time waster and cause of silly arguments on NGs - it is far better to make
the poster explain his question properly before offering any answers.

- yet again you have to take it to the extreme and make a bloody great
issue out of
"but what if".

** The only one throwing a tantrum is you - fuckhead.

You thrive on trying to make something out of nothing
and then defend your argument with crap and then get abusive and start
calling names.

** Anyone who reads the thread will see that that is what YOU did -
fuckhead.

But you cannot do it on your own, you have to involve
some other person that is obviously God to you (Jim Rowe)

** How did you get that idea - same way as all your others ??

You just invent then and then blow them out your stupid arse .

and repeat his supposed comments - who gives a shit what he thinks of the
man -

** Then why are YOU making such an issue of it - YOU must think it
matters.

obviously you do as you hold him in such high regard

** The only **obvious** thing is what a worthless turd YOU are Andy.






.................. Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"Mike Harding" <mike_harding1@nixspamhotmail.com>

Mike Harding

** Now here we have someone who REALLY deserves the title "Jerk Off"
!!!!




............. Phil

 

[Mike Harding]

On Sat, 8 May 2004 10:17:18 +1000, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

The posting of vague questions is a major time waster and cause of silly
arguments on NGs

Phil Allison is a major time waster and cause of silly arguments
on NGs.

Mike Harding

 

[David L. Jones]

"Phil Allison" <philallison@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<409b4615$0$4543$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...

"David L. Jones" <tronnort@yahoo.com>.
Strangely, I've never met Jim Rowe.

** Not strange at all - you were someone best avoided.

The only contact I've ever had
with him is maybe two phone calls and a few emails and letters about a
few of my projects which he's published over the years.


** Plenty enough contact for him to sum you up as a tedious wanker - one
phone call is enough.

Speaking of phone calls and being tedious...
Sounds as though you ignored Jim's supposed advice Phil. I remember a
phone call I received out of the blue from you in about 1998. Not sure
what it was for, but I remember you telling me in great detail all
about things like electrical safety, mains capacitors, batteries,
several well known electronics people and magazine editors, how you
exposed the Rod Irving and Dick Smith fake transistor scams etc etc
It sounded like you really needed someone to talk to, so I was
obliging and politely listened and listened and listened... Then over
an hour, or was it two hours?, yes I think it was closer to 2 hours
later I finally managed to get a word in edge wise and explain that it
was great talking to you but I had to go now (which I did BTW, but I'm
a nice guy and didn't want to be rude, so I let it slide for a good 45
minutes...).

I remember thinking after I put the phone down - geeze, that was
tedious...

Regards
Dave

 

[Phil Allison]

"David L. Jones" <

"Phil Allison"

Strangely, I've never met Jim Rowe.

** Not strange at all - you were someone best avoided.

The only contact I've ever had
with him is maybe two phone calls and a few emails and letters about a
few of my projects which he's published over the years.


** Plenty enough contact for him to sum you up as a tedious wanker -
one
phone call is enough.

Speaking of phone calls and being tedious...

** Which is yet another malicious misrepresentation of yours.

Sounds as though you ignored Jim's supposed advice Phil.

** There was never any advice given not to contact you.

I remember a
phone call I received out of the blue from you in about 1998. Not sure
what it was for, but I remember you telling me in great detail all
about things like electrical safety, mains capacitors, batteries,
several well known electronics people and magazine editors, how you
exposed the Rod Irving and Dick Smith fake transistor scams etc etc

** The juicy details of which you eagerly lapped up at the time.

It sounded like you really needed someone to talk to, so I was
obliging and politely listened and listened and listened...

** What a fucking lie.

Then over
an hour, or was it two hours?, yes I think it was closer to 2 hours
later I finally managed to get a word in edge wise

** You had plenty to say yourself as I recall - as two contributors to
EA magazine we had common experiences.

and explain that it
was great talking to you but I had to go now (which I did BTW, but I'm
a nice guy and didn't want to be rude, so I let it slide for a good 45
minutes...).

** A nice guy - you are NOT.

A self obsessed, pompous, stinking little shit - you ARE.

Jim Rowe is a master of understatement.





............. Phil

 

[The Real Andy]

On 6 May 2004 15:57:49 -0700, agw@woodtech.net.au (Andy) wrote:

( snip drunken Queenslander's fuckwit drivel)

............. Phil


I think you may be a bit confused as to which Andy you are addressing
- I believe some of your remarks may have been directed towards Mr.
Pearson - If you took your pills this would not happen.

Yeah, get it right!

The Origonal Andy