M
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
David Eather wrote:
Phil craves attention. It doesn't matter what kind of attention, but
he refuses to be ignored.
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:31:40 +1000, Phil Allison <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:
"David Eather"
If you keep calling people names, i will tell them WHY you think
'autistic' is the worst possible insult.
** For the umpteenth time, fuckhead - is not being used as an insult
!!!!
The REASON Terrell continually makes ridiculous reading errors like
this
one IS because he IS autistic !!!!
It is one of the classic symptoms of autism to interpret other people's
words absurdly LITERALLY.
It relates to an absence of having a working " theory of thought " when
reading or listening to people's words.
FFS pal - YOU have the SAME problem.
And it is genetic.
Get over it.
.... Phil
" ** For the umpteenth time..is not being used as an insult "
Show me ONE other time! You have NEVER said that it is not an insult. In
fact your favorite variation is to use it as "you vile autistic pig". Are
you trying to say you are so out of it that you really think a four legged
pig with trotters can type on a keyboard and you are just providing an
anthropologically accurate description? And the "vile"?
You are rather badly caught out in a story of your own making. Do you
really think anyone will believe your fantasy edit of your *years* of bad
behavior?
And in this thread you did say "you need a scope to fix a scope" which
does because of the absoluteness of the statement also means you can't
fix a scope without one - and that is incorrect.
Someone corrected you - which is not a big deal, just a nit-pick as
everyone knew your statement was 90%+ correct - most of the time you do
need a scope to fix a scope - but you went, typically for you,
over-the-top-life-or-death-rant-rave-insult-and-spit-venom.
It's not even a big deal except you made it so.
Read that bit again. YOU made it a big deal. No one else would have cared
at all, they would have seen the comment correcting you as a nit-pick, a
very small thing, and your comment as 90%+
You called me autistic so ...
(I sniped what I was going to say and put in what follows instead. Let me
know if you want me to put the original back and explain what is going on
to anyone who has not managed to connect the dots)
If I had autism I could do this: (I am not making any sort of
recommendation - there are easier ways to achieve the same thing)
I could announce the fact plain and simple, and the response would be
exactly this:
From one or maybe two posters who already have rather severe personality
disorders a post or two of ridicule until they got board. Who in the
entire news group gives a shit about what they think anyway?
And...
and nothing.
Despite what you might think, in a technical newsgroup with the level of
interpersonal relationship that requires, autism makes no difference. All
I have to do to be perfectly productive is remember not to rail when
people don't use or read with the same precision I normally do and on the
rare occasion that I am not 100% correct and someone might nit-pick me, NO
ONE EVEN *BOTHERS* to judge me unless I make an issue of it.
Phil craves attention. It doesn't matter what kind of attention, but
he refuses to be ignored.