A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Wednesday, April 12, 2023 at 3:21:46â¯PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
<snip>
Obviously not, but they aren\'t a feature of the solar system, merely a consequence of earth\'s orientation within the solar system.
And they don\'t have anything to do with the current episode of anthropogenic global warming either.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 8:15:32â¯AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 12:15:21â¯AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 05:32:19 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I just picked up our morning SF Chronic newspaper [1] and there is a
giant front-page headline about how current conditions are preventing
us from getting our usual fog. It has lots of technical and scientific
reasons. I could barely find the paper for the fog. Mt San Bruno is
gone in the mist.
When experts predict future states of chaotic systems the result is humor.
The solar system is chaotic, and people seem to be able to predict where most of the plants are going to be quite a way in advance. It does take a million years or so for the minor effects to build up enough to make the system unpredictable. Weather is chaotic but climate is predictable enough for farming to work.
John Larkin isn\'t any kind of expert but his attempts to tell us what experts can predict are pretty comical.
Hey Bozo, Milankovitch cycles AREN\'T chaotic.
Obviously not, but they aren\'t a feature of the solar system, merely a consequence of earth\'s orientation within the solar system.
And they don\'t have anything to do with the current episode of anthropogenic global warming either.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney