M
Mac
Guest
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:11:27 +0000, Dan Major wrote:
For the OP, a thermocouple is just what he wants (but not what he
proposed), as far as I can tell.
--Mac
Wow. Thanks. That's very interesting.Mac <foo@bar.net> wrote in newsan.2004.10.15.05.43.37.714210@bar.net:
I think it will be hard to get any kind of signal out of a microwave
oven via wires. The wires will experience very high voltages and
self-destruct spectacularly.
This just ain't so. I work with a group researching nanomaterials and
their properties. We use a donated microwave oven as a reactor to create
silver nanowires. It's a cheap home-type oven. The rotary timer was
replaced with a solid state relay. The relay is controlled via an Omega
temperature controller. The controller uses a simple (J-type?)
stainless-clad thermocouple. The thermocouple is grounded to the oven
chamber. The turntable mechanism was removed from the bottom of the
oven, and the only problem we have had is some slight sparking where the
mesh shielding covering the hole where the turntable was removed was not
in suffecient contact with the oven chamber. Scraping paint off and
tightening the screws solved that problem. The hole in the top of the
chamber where the thermocouple is inserted is covered by a Farday cage.
As long as you insure that whatever you stick into the oven chamber is
grounded to the chamber, you will minimize problems. Otherwise, you will
need some sort of ferrite (beads, rods, etc) to reduce RF feedthrough
into your measurement circuit.
For the OP, a thermocouple is just what he wants (but not what he
proposed), as far as I can tell.
--Mac