Electronics Books for sale on eBay

[John Fields]

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:18:42 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
<celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:lvh4f1580qisqt0i95egvb8vdqt4680n8k@4ax.com...
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:24:43 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:vu30f1152r5n6o0u53345slio5vbutt83m@4ax.com...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:16:17 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

---
Now _that's_ funny! I think what you meant to say was
"reprehensible" instead of "beyond reproach". Think about it.

In any case, I wasn't insulting your service and I apologize if you
took it that way. What I was trying to do was make the point that
if you fought for free speech and then want to deny me mine because
you don't like the way I write, you're on the same track as those
you fought against.

No Sir, You have an absolute right to speak you mind, as I said
before.
However, we must all keep in mind that free speech comes with a
responsibilty. I don't care if you stop or if you continue, I only
wish
you would choose your words with a little respect.

---
I have nothing but contempt for SPAMmers and, hopefully, my dialogue
will indicate that I feel that they should all be in their graves.

To belabor a point, the poster selling books wasn't interested in
helping anyone out but himself. Was there a student discount
offered? No. Was there a newbie discount offered? No.

Clearly, all he was interested in was getting rid of some stock he
acquired for next to nothing for something more than that.
---

It certainly seems that you are not an uneducated man. Why do you take
such
pleasure in putting others down?

---
Ah, the crux of the matter!

The fact is, I don't, but what rankles me is that when
self-important, know-nothing idiots start trying to fool everyone
into believing that their way is the right way and they can't back
it up with something other than opinion, then I like to challenge
that stance.

BTW, Apology appreciated.

---
My pleasure!

---
Oops, _serious_ grammar errors on my part. Do it matter?^)

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer


---------------


Now _that's_ funny! I think what you meant to say was
"reprehensible" instead of "beyond reproach". Think about it.

Yes, Reprehensible, I'll give you that.





The fact is, I don't, but what rankles me is that when
self-important, know-nothing idiots start trying to fool everyone
into believing that their way is the right way and they can't back
it up with something other than opinion, then I like to challenge
that stance.



We are all self-important, think about it.

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

If someone has a different understanding of a fact or even an incorrect
understanding that doesn't make he/she a know-nothing idiot, you like to
split hairs John, even a cockroach surely knows something.

---
LOL, in one breath you chastise me for splitting hairs and then you
do the same thing (split hairs) with your cockroach example.
Shouldn't it be tit for tat?
---

When you let fly with the insults you are no longer challenging their
stance,
your loosing control.

---
I suspect that what you're saying is that if _you_ let an insult fly
that would indicate a loss of control on your part. That may very
well be true for _you_, but it doesn't mean that _I_ have to suffer
with that limitation. I see insults as tools (or weapons, if you
like) to be used to evoke desired emotional responses from
opponents. Anger, primarily, accompanied by the opponent's
frustration in not being able to return a superior insult if the
received insult was crafted skillfully enough.

Did you feel a little twinge when you read the part about "suffering
with that limitation"? That's how it works, and normally it would
have been issued If I felt I had been challenged by your taking the
position that I don't know what I'm doing. In this instance,
though, it was just an example.
---

You do take pleasure in putting others down.
If there was no pleasure in it, why do it?

---
I take pleasure in being able to stand my ground and defend my
position, and in this medium, which is infested with bullies and
trolls, the only weapons we have to take them out with is words and
the effects they have on their minds.

I also take pleasure in banter, just for the sport of it, if it's
not insipid.
---

What comes around goes around. Life has a weird way of doing that.
Perhaps
this kid today, with the missing electrolyte, will be in a position to
make
a decision someday. Your name comes up as a potential contractor for a
new
design. He shit cans your proposal and you never know why you didn't get
the job. Sounds like I'm reaching, I know, but it happens more than you
might think. Or the guy with the dam books, maybe he works for Northrop
Grumman. Hell, how about me, you have no idea who I am....

---
Nor do I care.

I'm not here looking for a job or trying to be politically correct
because kissing someone's ass might be expedient for some pecuniary
gain downstream, I'm here to help out anyone I can who has a design
problem and needs a solution.

As far as that electrolyte thing goes, all that happened was that he
got pissed because I told him he was wrong and left it for him to
find out why. I do the asshole a favor, and he gets pissed because
I didn't do him a big enough favor? Fuck him.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

----------------
---
LOL, in one breath you chastise me for splitting hairs and then you
do the same thing (split hairs) with your cockroach example.
Shouldn't it be tit for tat?
---

I wasn't chastising you, I said, "you like to split hairs John", so I split
one too.

---
Not true. You used the hair-splitting comment in a pejorative way
and then, unknowingly split a hair, yourself, in order to try to
prove your point.

Had you known what you were doing, you wouldn't have hoisted
yourself on your own pitard.
---

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

You're starting to stutter. It could be sign of loosing control.. :^)
(Couldn't pass it up)

---
I don't understand what you mean by "stutter". Would you mind
explaining?
---

---
Did you feel a little twinge when you read the part about "suffering
with that limitation"? That's how it works, and normally it would
have been issued If I felt I had been challenged by your taking the
position that I don't know what I'm doing. In this instance,
though, it was just an example
----

No sir, I grinned.

---
Ah, Then it didn't escape you?
---

---
I suspect that what you're saying is that if _you_ let an insult fly
that would indicate a loss of control on your part
---

I meant what I said.

---
OK, but did you say what you meant?
---

----
As far as that electrolyte thing goes, all that happened was that he
got pissed because I told him he was wrong and left it for him to
find out why. I do the asshole a favor, and he gets pissed because
I didn't do him a big enough favor? Fuck him.
----

Was he? Seriously, I do not know.

---
Well, Here's the exchange:

"Alexander:

But at least ThanX for confirming my statement and not saying its
not true without giving a reason as someone else did.

You:

Your welcome, I thought you deserved a respectful reply..."

So _you_ figure it out.

Sounds to me like what you were trying to do was stroke your way
into his heart by declaring my reply disrespectful.
---

Electric current can be used to slow or even stop the corrosion. With the
absence of an electrolyte and a voltage applied with the correct polarity,
would the reaction happen?

---
What "correct polarity"?

You obviously don't know what you're talking about, since in the
absence of an electrolyte, corrosion wouldn't be possible.

To elaborate on your question, however, if you had two dissimilar
metals in contact with each other and you passed current through
their junction, first one way and then the other, what would happen
at the junction in each instance?

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[DBLEXPOSURE]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gbs4f1ladjtmgrrsdtm9060us80ko7rvhb@4ax.com...

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:18:42 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:lvh4f1580qisqt0i95egvb8vdqt4680n8k@4ax.com...
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:24:43 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:vu30f1152r5n6o0u53345slio5vbutt83m@4ax.com...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:16:17 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

---
Now _that's_ funny! I think what you meant to say was
"reprehensible" instead of "beyond reproach". Think about it.

In any case, I wasn't insulting your service and I apologize if
you
took it that way. What I was trying to do was make the point that
if you fought for free speech and then want to deny me mine because
you don't like the way I write, you're on the same track as those
you fought against.

No Sir, You have an absolute right to speak you mind, as I said
before.
However, we must all keep in mind that free speech comes with a
responsibilty. I don't care if you stop or if you continue, I only
wish
you would choose your words with a little respect.

---
I have nothing but contempt for SPAMmers and, hopefully, my dialogue
will indicate that I feel that they should all be in their graves.

To belabor a point, the poster selling books wasn't interested in
helping anyone out but himself. Was there a student discount
offered? No. Was there a newbie discount offered? No.

Clearly, all he was interested in was getting rid of some stock he
acquired for next to nothing for something more than that.
---

It certainly seems that you are not an uneducated man. Why do you
take
such
pleasure in putting others down?

---
Ah, the crux of the matter!

The fact is, I don't, but what rankles me is that when
self-important, know-nothing idiots start trying to fool everyone
into believing that their way is the right way and they can't back
it up with something other than opinion, then I like to challenge
that stance.

BTW, Apology appreciated.

---
My pleasure!

---
Oops, _serious_ grammar errors on my part. Do it matter?^)

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer


---------------


Now _that's_ funny! I think what you meant to say was
"reprehensible" instead of "beyond reproach". Think about it.

Yes, Reprehensible, I'll give you that.





The fact is, I don't, but what rankles me is that when
self-important, know-nothing idiots start trying to fool everyone
into believing that their way is the right way and they can't back
it up with something other than opinion, then I like to challenge
that stance.



We are all self-important, think about it.

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

If someone has a different understanding of a fact or even an incorrect
understanding that doesn't make he/she a know-nothing idiot, you like to
split hairs John, even a cockroach surely knows something.

---
LOL, in one breath you chastise me for splitting hairs and then you
do the same thing (split hairs) with your cockroach example.
Shouldn't it be tit for tat?
---

When you let fly with the insults you are no longer challenging their
stance,
your loosing control.

---
I suspect that what you're saying is that if _you_ let an insult fly
that would indicate a loss of control on your part. That may very
well be true for _you_, but it doesn't mean that _I_ have to suffer
with that limitation. I see insults as tools (or weapons, if you
like) to be used to evoke desired emotional responses from
opponents. Anger, primarily, accompanied by the opponent's
frustration in not being able to return a superior insult if the
received insult was crafted skillfully enough.

Did you feel a little twinge when you read the part about "suffering
with that limitation"? That's how it works, and normally it would
have been issued If I felt I had been challenged by your taking the
position that I don't know what I'm doing. In this instance,
though, it was just an example.
---

You do take pleasure in putting others down.
If there was no pleasure in it, why do it?

---
I take pleasure in being able to stand my ground and defend my
position, and in this medium, which is infested with bullies and
trolls, the only weapons we have to take them out with is words and
the effects they have on their minds.

I also take pleasure in banter, just for the sport of it, if it's
not insipid.
---

What comes around goes around. Life has a weird way of doing that.
Perhaps
this kid today, with the missing electrolyte, will be in a position to
make
a decision someday. Your name comes up as a potential contractor for a
new
design. He shit cans your proposal and you never know why you didn't
get
the job. Sounds like I'm reaching, I know, but it happens more than you
might think. Or the guy with the dam books, maybe he works for Northrop
Grumman. Hell, how about me, you have no idea who I am....

---
Nor do I care.

I'm not here looking for a job or trying to be politically correct
because kissing someone's ass might be expedient for some pecuniary
gain downstream, I'm here to help out anyone I can who has a design
problem and needs a solution.

As far as that electrolyte thing goes, all that happened was that he
got pissed because I told him he was wrong and left it for him to
find out why. I do the asshole a favor, and he gets pissed because
I didn't do him a big enough favor? Fuck him.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

----------------
---
LOL, in one breath you chastise me for splitting hairs and then you
do the same thing (split hairs) with your cockroach example.
Shouldn't it be tit for tat?
---

I wasn't chastising you, I said, "you like to split hairs John", so I
split
one too.

---
Not true. You used the hair-splitting comment in a pejorative way
and then, unknowingly split a hair, yourself, in order to try to
prove your point.

Had you known what you were doing, you wouldn't have hoisted
yourself on your own pitard.
---

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

You're starting to stutter. It could be sign of loosing control.. :^)
(Couldn't pass it up)

---
I don't understand what you mean by "stutter". Would you mind
explaining?
---

---
Did you feel a little twinge when you read the part about "suffering
with that limitation"? That's how it works, and normally it would
have been issued If I felt I had been challenged by your taking the
position that I don't know what I'm doing. In this instance,
though, it was just an example
----

No sir, I grinned.

---
Ah, Then it didn't escape you?
---

---
I suspect that what you're saying is that if _you_ let an insult fly
that would indicate a loss of control on your part
---

I meant what I said.

---
OK, but did you say what you meant?
---

----
As far as that electrolyte thing goes, all that happened was that he
got pissed because I told him he was wrong and left it for him to
find out why. I do the asshole a favor, and he gets pissed because
I didn't do him a big enough favor? Fuck him.
----

Was he? Seriously, I do not know.

---
Well, Here's the exchange:

"Alexander:

But at least ThanX for confirming my statement and not saying its
not true without giving a reason as someone else did.

You:

Your welcome, I thought you deserved a respectful reply..."

So _you_ figure it out.

Sounds to me like what you were trying to do was stroke your way
into his heart by declaring my reply disrespectful.
---

Electric current can be used to slow or even stop the corrosion. With the
absence of an electrolyte and a voltage applied with the correct polarity,
would the reaction happen?

---
What "correct polarity"?

You obviously don't know what you're talking about, since in the
absence of an electrolyte, corrosion wouldn't be possible.

To elaborate on your question, however, if you had two dissimilar
metals in contact with each other and you passed current through
their junction, first one way and then the other, what would happen
at the junction in each instance?

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

------

---
Not true. You used the hair-splitting comment in a pejorative way
and then, unknowingly split a hair, yourself, in order to try to
prove your point.
---

Not true. The hair was split with knowingly.

Had you known what you were doing, you wouldn't have hoisted
yourself on your own pitard.

My own what?

I don't understand what you mean by "stutter". Would you mind
explaining?

To speak or utter with a spasmodic repetition or prolongation of sounds.

---
OK, but did you say what you meant?
---
Yes sir.

Sounds to me like what you were trying to do was stroke your way
into his heart by declaring my reply disrespectful

No sir, I do not need to be in his heart. I was trying to respond in a
respectful manner. I truly thought he deserved it. I did think you where
being short with him. At the time we where debating your dressing down of
the bookseller.



I did, however, preface my response with "If I recall correctly", as to
say I am not certain if my answer is correct, and it was not, as you most
eloquently pointed out to me in the preceding comments, for which I
acknowledged your correction.

To elaborate on your question, however, if you had two dissimilar
metals in contact with each other and you passed current through
their junction, first one way and then the other, what would happen
at the junction in each instance?

How are these two metals joined?

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:33:45 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
<celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gbs4f1ladjtmgrrsdtm9060us80ko7rvhb@4ax.com...

---
Not true. You used the hair-splitting comment in a pejorative way
and then, unknowingly split a hair, yourself, in order to try to
prove your point.
---

Not true. The hair was split with knowingly.

---
Then you considered my hair-splitting to be OK and your comment
about it was for what purpose?
---

Had you known what you were doing, you wouldn't have hoisted
yourself on your own pitard.

My own what?

---
Sorry, "petard"
---

I don't understand what you mean by "stutter". Would you mind
explaining?

To speak or utter with a spasmodic repetition or prolongation of sounds.

---
Yes. I'm aware of the definition of the word. What I was asking for
was an explanation of your use of it in the context of the statement
which I made.
---

---
OK, but did you say what you meant?
---
Yes sir.

Sounds to me like what you were trying to do was stroke your way
into his heart by declaring my reply disrespectful

No sir, I do not need to be in his heart. I was trying to respond in a
respectful manner. I truly thought he deserved it. I did think you where
being short with him. At the time we where debating your dressing down of
the bookseller.

---
It's not "where", it's "were".

Other than perhaps because of the necessity to limit time to subject
"a" in order to devote more of it to subject "b", why do you you
think the two discussions were related?
---

I did, however, preface my response with "If I recall correctly", as to
say I am not certain if my answer is correct, and it was not, as you most
eloquently pointed out to me in the preceding comments, for which I
acknowledged your correction.

---
OK, but what does that have to do with this?
---

To elaborate on your question, however, if you had two dissimilar
metals in contact with each other and you passed current through
their junction, first one way and then the other, what would happen
at the junction in each instance?


How are these two metals joined?

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:27:45 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.

Oops...

Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and are oriented such that axial lines
which are drawn normal to the plane of the incident circle will be
orthogonal to lines drawn normal to the plane of the opposing
tangential circle.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[DBLEXPOSURE]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:2c35f1h0gma05okpnn7pq2aucdbc1f31uh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:33:45 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gbs4f1ladjtmgrrsdtm9060us80ko7rvhb@4ax.com...

---
Not true. You used the hair-splitting comment in a pejorative way
and then, unknowingly split a hair, yourself, in order to try to
prove your point.
---

Not true. The hair was split with knowingly.

---
Then you considered my hair-splitting to be OK and your comment
about it was for what purpose?
---

Had you known what you were doing, you wouldn't have hoisted
yourself on your own pitard.

My own what?

---
Sorry, "petard"
---

I don't understand what you mean by "stutter". Would you mind
explaining?

To speak or utter with a spasmodic repetition or prolongation of sounds.

---
Yes. I'm aware of the definition of the word. What I was asking for
was an explanation of your use of it in the context of the statement
which I made.
---

---
OK, but did you say what you meant?
---
Yes sir.

Sounds to me like what you were trying to do was stroke your way
into his heart by declaring my reply disrespectful

No sir, I do not need to be in his heart. I was trying to respond in a
respectful manner. I truly thought he deserved it. I did think you where
being short with him. At the time we where debating your dressing down of
the bookseller.

---
It's not "where", it's "were".

Other than perhaps because of the necessity to limit time to subject
"a" in order to devote more of it to subject "b", why do you you
think the two discussions were related?
---

I did, however, preface my response with "If I recall correctly", as to
say I am not certain if my answer is correct, and it was not, as you most
eloquently pointed out to me in the preceding comments, for which I
acknowledged your correction.

---
OK, but what does that have to do with this?
---

To elaborate on your question, however, if you had two dissimilar
metals in contact with each other and you passed current through
their junction, first one way and then the other, what would happen
at the junction in each instance?


How are these two metals joined?

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

---
Yes. I'm aware of the definition of the word. What I was asking for
was an explanation of your use of it in the context of the statement
which I made.
---

I will repost the exchange that has mysteriously gone missing.

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

You're starting to stutter. It could be sign of loosing control.. :^)
(Couldn't pass it up)

John, this is something I normally would not do but since you enjoy pointing
out every typo and spelling error I make I thought you might see the humor.

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.
--

I wasn't asking about the geometry but how the two where fastened to one and
other.

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 19:32:37 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
<celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:2c35f1h0gma05okpnn7pq2aucdbc1f31uh@4ax.com...
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:33:45 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:

I will repost the exchange that has mysteriously gone missing.

---
There's no mystery about it, you excised it.

I don't know whether it was intentional or not but your 'style'
seems to tend to clip for obfuscation.

I'll be looking forward to your repost
---

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

You're starting to stutter. It could be sign of loosing control.. :^)
(Couldn't pass it up)

John, this is something I normally would not do but since you enjoy pointing
out every typo and spelling error I make I thought you might see the humor.

---
Well, not _every_ one... To do that would take more time than I'm
willing to invest in this thread, But but I see the humor, thanks.

---

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.
--

I wasn't asking about the geometry but how the two where fastened to one and
other.

---
One another? I doesn't matter much as long as they're insulated
from each other except at the point of contact.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[DBLEXPOSURE]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:i1d5f11kutimntob1h2onjgmcc0e9j9ubk@4ax.com...

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 19:32:37 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:2c35f1h0gma05okpnn7pq2aucdbc1f31uh@4ax.com...
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:33:45 -0500, "DBLEXPOSURE"
celstuff@hotmail.com> wrote:

I will repost the exchange that has mysteriously gone missing.

---
There's no mystery about it, you excised it.

I don't know whether it was intentional or not but your 'style'
seems to tend to clip for obfuscation.

I'll be looking forward to your repost
---

---
I don't believe that's true. Some people don't even consider
themselves worthwhile, let alone important, but but the sense I was
trying to convey was one of exaggerated importance, or unwarranted
self-importance, if you will. But I understand your point.
---

You're starting to stutter. It could be sign of loosing control.. :^)
(Couldn't pass it up)

John, this is something I normally would not do but since you enjoy
pointing
out every typo and spelling error I make I thought you might see the
humor.

---
Well, not _every_ one... To do that would take more time than I'm
willing to invest in this thread, But but I see the humor, thanks.

---

---
Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and with lines normal to the circles
which define their planes of contact as orthogonal.
--

I wasn't asking about the geometry but how the two where fastened to one
and
other.

---
One another? I doesn't matter much as long as they're insulated
from each other except at the point of contact.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

-----------

---
One another? I doesn't matter much as long as they're insulated
from each other except at the point of contact.


---

We all matter John, Don't be so hard on yourself (passive-aggressive)



---

Let's say they're right circular cylinders with circumferences
which touch, tangentially, and are oriented such that axial lines
which are drawn normal to the plane of the incident circle will be
orthogonal to lines drawn normal to the plane of the opposing
tangential circle.
---



A butt splice?





Whenever electrical current flows through two dissimilar conductors the
Peltier effect occurs. Depending on the direction of current flow, the
junction of the two conductors will either absorb or release heat, the basis
for solid-state heat pumps.



In the reverse, without an electrical current applied, and the joint is
heated a voltage will be developed across the open ends of the wires. This
is called the Seedbeck effect.



I would also imagine, in reference to the Peltier effect, that current in
the circuit would be slightly different depending on which direction the
voltage is applied. This point I am not certain of, perhaps you could
elaborate.



And to be honest, I didn't pull any of this out of my ass. I was aware off
the effect but for the life of me could not remember what it was called.



The opportunity to do a little research appreciated.