R
rbowman
Guest
On 08/26/2022 02:43 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=51818
9.7 billion cubic feet per day is nothing to sneeze at.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:54:26 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
fredag den 26. august 2022 kl. 21.49.47 UTC+2 skrev Ed Lee:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 12:44:43 PM UTC-7, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 26. august 2022 kl. 21.41.56 UTC+2 skrev jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:32:46 GMT, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:09:16 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
8tkhgh9lioqvmrnd7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/08/26/govt-energy-regulator-confirms-britons-will-be-hammered-80-per-cent-bill-hike/
Gosh, civilization was working pretty well for a while.
They have been misguided by US [lacking]intelligence to leave the EU
Same US forced them to dict Huawei
and replace their near perfect VTOL fighter aircraft by F35 crap.
Boris Nonsense was a US clown.
We should keep our LNG at home. You guys can wear three pairs of sox
and burn candles, or euros.
if you had a bunch of LNG and someone would pay 3x for it would you keep it at home?
Yes, because it costs 2x to liq., ship and deliq. That\'s why prices are over 5x.
ok, if prices are 5x will you keep it at home?
For political reasons, yes. But the 5x assumes liquefaction and
shipping costs, at the destination.
And we don\'t have enough LNG facilities to export much of our NG. And
there\'s a lot more waiting to be fracked.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=51818
9.7 billion cubic feet per day is nothing to sneeze at.