P
Phil Allison
Guest
"John Fields is a FUCKING IDIOT "
** And 1100 is not 3000.
** The real number is more like 700 - 800 %.
Makes no difference to the POINT at all !!!
You CRIMINAL FUCKHEAD !!!!!!!!
** ROTFLMAO !!
"There are none so blind as those who will not see"
The tempco of Nichrome is NOT 0.0004 / C and it is NOT fixed.
The resistance barely changes from room temp to red hot.
http://www.wiretron.com/nicrdat.html
You are using YOUR ERROR in your false proof.
Piss off to HELL - you fucking LYING TWAT.
.... Phil
Nichrome has about a tenth the tempco of tungsten:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/rstiv.html
** Arrant nonsense.
See table at bottom of this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nichrome
The actual tempco is slightly non linear and WAAAY less than tungsten
or
copper.
Plus 6% at 2000C.
Tungsten is nearly plus 1200 % at the same temp.
---
Note that the resistance increase you refer to is for is at about 1100C,
while a
tungsten filament runs at about 3000C:
** Totally irrelevant.
---
Not at all, since what would be fair would be to compare the
resistances of the wires over the same temperature range.
** And 1100 is not 3000.
What you've done is to look at the 6% increase for nichrome from 20C
to about 1100C, while claiming an increase for tungsten of 1200% over
the same range,
** The real number is more like 700 - 800 %.
Makes no difference to the POINT at all !!!
You CRIMINAL FUCKHEAD !!!!!!!!
With that in mind we can say:
Rt = Ro (1 + alpha T)
** Nichrome ( along with other low tempco alloys) does NOT follow that
formula.
---
I can't see why not,
** ROTFLMAO !!
"There are none so blind as those who will not see"
The tempco of Nichrome is NOT 0.0004 / C and it is NOT fixed.
The resistance barely changes from room temp to red hot.
http://www.wiretron.com/nicrdat.html
You are using YOUR ERROR in your false proof.
Piss off to HELL - you fucking LYING TWAT.
.... Phil