I know you are.
You're still unable to comprehend a simple three word question, I see.
So you being a fascist is "nothing."
That's a cruder way of describing what you do.flipper wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:41:48 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex" <its@casual.com
wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:40:18 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:
flipper wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:55:05 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
This will send a chill down your spine...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts-Are-Stubborn-Things/
Big brother is watching... big time :-(
Might I suggest an E-mail flood ?
...Jim Thompson
Even scarier is the Administration apparently thinks that hurling
accusations and simply repeating the same thing over and over,
while ignoring the arguments presented, is a 'rebuttal'.
Isn't Hitler who said that if a lie is told often enough that it
becomes believed / the truth?
That's commonly thought but Hitler's oft quoted commentary on the
subject, expressed in Mein Kampf, was the "Big Lie" theory.
"All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true in
itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of
credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more
easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than
consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of
their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the
small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths,
and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to
distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove
this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will
still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be
some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves
traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which
is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire
together in the art of lying."
-Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X
Interestingly enough, that quote is often taken out of context
because, it one looks at the preceding paragraph, he is actually
accusing 'the Jews and Marxists' of doing that.
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for
falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to Justice."
That doesn't mean Hitler wasn't a liar, only that you can't 'prove'
it by using a quote where he's accusing the Jews and Marxists of
being liars.
Goebbels included both 'repetition' and 'big lie' in his theory but
there's no doubt of his intent.
""If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for
such time as the State can shield the people from the political,
economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes
vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress
dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by
extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
In this day where there is much discussion about 'the role of
government' it is interesting to note that Goebbles theory prizes
vitality of the State and he apparently concludes the State must, of
necessity, lie and, so, it is (or else it would not be) "vitally
important' for the State to repress truth and dissent.
A Constitutional democracy is diametrically opposite. It prizes the
vitality of the people and the 'State' comes and goes at their will.
Goebbels, again, on repetition
""The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success
unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it
must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over"
The modern left adds their own twist to the technique: regardless of
what they say accuse all dissenters of lying and, as Sen Hillary
Clinton demonstrated with Gen Petreus, do so before they even speak.
I often wax long and hard about logic and fallacies
Not as long as you do when using them. =)
You just demonstrated two of your, and the left's, favorites: hurling
an accusation with no evidence whatsoever
Made-up crazyassed crap.
When do yours end?
The answer is that you are too dim to google it for yourselfOn Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:57:04 -0400, Jamie wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman
On Aug 8, 3:23 am, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:47:22 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:46:28 -0700, Jim Thompson
Written by a doctor (orthopedic surgeon) acquaintance of ours...
Is Canada's health care system perfect? No. That being said, compared
to the US the data indicate that Canada gets slightly better results..
A couple of indicators:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder...
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder...
And just how long is the waiting list for, say, and MRI or CAT scan?
How long is the waiting list for a transplant? How long is the waiting
list for a coronary bypass?
Oh, that's right - they get around the rationing by coming to the US to
get treatment.
Well, you can kiss that safety valve goodbye if Obama's socialized
medicine gets passed.
Right. They'd have to go to England and "go private" there. The U.K.
National Health system provides perfectly adequate health care for
everybody, but there's enough spare capacity to service people who
want to buy faster service - when my ruptured intervertebral had taken
a long time to recover I spent a couple of hundred pouds on a private
magnetic resonance scan; and X-ray scan would have been half the
price, but I didn't fancy absorbing 4% of the lethal radiation dose.
Pity...
Be nice
And still no answer to my "how long is the watiting list" question.
Wonder why that could be?
/sarcasm
Any PCB fab house that has been business a number of years has good
Hello,
For as far as I understand there was once a world where artist and so would
live in the gutter because they couldn't earn money with their
work/hobby/passion.
That world is long gone thanks to social wellfair.
Being an artist is about createn art and that sort of works because you do
it with love, with passion, because you enjoy it, or find it interesting...
and not because to get filthy rich from it.
I say: Scrap the copyrightlaw it's not needed anymore and it will only
create many problems now and in the future !
Scrapping it is necessary to create a pleasent and free information
world/society.
I fear that if this copyrightlaw is not scrapped we will start to slide
further towards a very nasty world !
Also don't work to hard good people, many artist don't as well nowadays...
Only the red copy button is pressed and the rest goes fully automatic ! =D
Be carefull/sparefull with your hard earned cash !
Bye,
Skybuck.
Well, you are consistently nuts; put another mark on that chalkboard..
<snip>
I wonder why Jim thinks that this comment has any logical relationship
Jim does seem to be projecting here . If he was a little less over the--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice
| E-mail Icon athttp://www.analog-innovations.com| 1962 |
How severe can senility be? Just check out Slowman.
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:45:42 -0600, "Don T" <-painter-@louvre.org
wrote:
"daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:h5q7en12lar@news2.newsguy.com...
Don T wrote:
"Richardson" <member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:JYWdncZmtr_K2uPXnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...
Again power is not measured in AMP, but in WATT you stupid jerks, Give it
up now suckers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you know it all answer me this. Why are tools like electric drills and
even shop vacuums listed as having 6.0 AMP etc. motors?
http://www.blackanddecker.com/ProductGuide/CategoryOverview.aspx?cPath=1496.2050
Because it makes better advertising copy than 0.48 horsepower??
daestrom
=> snicker <=
Probable, but it makes the statement that "power is never measured in
ampere units" quite wrong.
The 6 amp motor means it draws 6 amps from the mains. It does not mean
ANYTHING as far as how much power it produces, other than that it
cannot produce more than 690 watts at 115 volts
I did say 'If you want the facility to switch reverb on and off, put a
See above ...
My apologies. I've never encountered any of this particular
Bob said: 'Pick an amplifier.'
'Unfortunately this is practically impossible' - true and, as I pointed
--
That's an interesting paper as far as voltage noise is concerned, but
Technically he says "...because they are not needed AND I want to
I've worked with enough electronics to expect the unexpected. I would
Is it possible not everyone is as intelligent or motivated as you to
A Hard bypass does not necessarily mean a short. Although I see your
Keep running.
(Other pathetic, delusional lies snipped)
and degrade every one else's achievements in the process by lowering the
Jim, this is the system implemented in Denmark at present. If you're
)In other words, no cite, just more nothing from the nothing.
More nothing from the nothing.
More nothing from the nothing.