Driver to drive?

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:18:00 -0500,
hal-usenet@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Hal Murray) wrote:

In article <17if65dmihe0fodjodepqqkbmhe1bj9ipb@4ax.com>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes:

We bought some 850 nm fiber-type laser diodes that acted as if they
had a microseconds-response PIN diode built into them, in series with
the actual laser. If you applied current suddenly, the voltage would
overshoot almost 2:1, as if there were an inductor in series. As long
as the current wasn't cut off for too many nanoseconds, it behaved
like a diode. Fine for telecom and maybe for burning CDs, but terrible
for sending baseband on/off digital stuff.

The telcom guys are using baseband. They use scramblers to ensure
that there are enough transitions to do clock recovery. There isn't
much low freqency energy.

What sort of data were you sending? Were there long strings of
1s or 0s?

It's for a pure digital logic transmission link,

http://www.highlandtechnology.com/DSS/J724DS.html

where the light is supposed to follow the logic input no matter what.

A lot of lasers do goofy things when you just turn them on and off.
It's hard to make a clean step of light.

I seem to remember something about not turning something all the
way off. I have forgotten the context and reasoning.

I think the idea was to modulate it from 10% to 100% rather
than turn it all the way off in order to avoid transients/problems
like you described.

We do sometimes bias them a little below the lase threshold. That
improves prop delay and sometimes cleans up the edges. I think the
laser vendors buy their wafers in some back alleys in Taiwan; you
never really know how the next batch will work.

It might have been incandescent lamps, but I don't think so. Reminds me
of the time I went into a dark machine room many many years ago.
(I was sleeping on the couch, babysitting for an all night run.)
All the red lights on the disks were on. Wow were we in trouble!
After a few seconds I figured out that it was just the keep-warm
current to avoid the turn-on transient. Nothing was visible in
normal room light.

Sometimes keep-warm current was used to raise the resistance of
filaments so the drive transistors wouldn't die at turn-on.

John

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:07:05 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

In the 70s..most juristictions considered any amount of Pot to be a
felony.

Wrong again, retard. It was originally decriminalized, BY NIXON in the
seventies and over 11 states had it that way. It wasn't until Nazi
retards like you came around before a number of states re-criminalized
it.

In the seventies, before stupid mindsets like yours, kids were not
huffing gasoline. In the 80s, 90s, and on they do. and they die too.
Wanna know who I blame for that?

The felony years were the late fifties and sixties. Tim Leary's pot
bust was in the sixties. He was serving ten years for two joints.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:08:24 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Only in the midwest. Most other places..its Latinos who cultivate the
outside farms and long haired freaks or the money hungry who cultivate
the inside farms.

Jeez, yer such a dope.

The rest of the country is not modeled on California, idiot.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:09:16 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

You mean the California that is and has been run by Democrats for the
past 47 yrs?

That one?

It isn't about any political party, dumbfuck. You were already told
that, but your retarded, stubborn mentality has anyone that disagrees
with you as a "leftist".

You couldn't be any more retarded, and the sad part is that you chose
to be that way. A retard by choice is indeed the saddest variety of a
wanna be man there is.

No party had anything to do with the retarded mindset the academy has
been teaching you pathetic excuses for peace officers either.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:11:55 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

It appears that he has overlooked the fact that the various Laws I
provided cites to..were enacted by the predominently Democrat/Leftwing
California government.

And Ive not been a cop for about 30 yrs.

Cannabis is a schedule I narcotic. If the federal government and the
FDA were no so goddamned retarded, it would not be a schedule I narcotic,
and there would be no state laws regarding it, because it would not be a
controlled substance that you retarded doughnut pussies get to harass the
citizenry over. And MAYBE you stupid fucks would do what you were
trained and commissioned to do and go after the real criminals in the
area instead of the citizens.

Get a clue, dipshit. If it were not for McCarthyist Nazi fuck mindsets
like yours, it would not even be on your harassment list.

Had it not ever been on said list, cops would not be the way they sadly
are today, and we likely would not have the gang problem we have. So
thanks for that stupidity too.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:12:15 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

No longer true.


Cites?

Persons with medical cards can grow specific amounts as can their care
providers, which includes grow farms specifically for medical cannabis
outlets.

The federal government even announced earlier this year, that they were
no longer going to hassle the grow shops in Cali. because we voted it in,
and we deserve to be left alone over it. Grow farms and outlets have
gone back to their business and there have been no raids or hassles this
year, so shut the fuck up. Cite your ass, boy. You go look it up.

Now some retarded bastard has suggested taxing it.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:13:41 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Go ahead..provide cites so you can back up your claims. Or can we all
safely assume that you are no more than an ignorant buffoon with
delusions of self adequacy and probably a really expensive drug problem?

Gunner

Depends on whether you were a doughnut retard that wrote traffic
tickets or an abusive pussy retard that used to hassle the kids before
they even got out of high school.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:20:01 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Unless you are the typical useless pothead..

My devices is in use down at Kennedy to this day, and some have gone up
on Shuttle experiments. My accomplishments are something a useless
EX-PIG like you will never catch up to.

I'll bet your inebriant of choice has done more damage to society than
mine has. That goes for now, and throughout human history.

Wanna bet, pussy? You drunken Nazi bastard.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:28:58 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Just a few terms that Ill bet you have never heard, as stoners simply
cannot remember details....

You're a fucking retard.

There is simple possession, which should not even exist, because
"de-criminalization" SHOULD mean that it is NO LONGER ANY crime of ANY
sort.

Since it is not, we have simple possession.

The "Possession for sale" is ACTUALLY DEALING.

So it is not possession, it is DEALING.

The rest of your list is archaic, at best, just like you.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:31:06 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Hell..I could be a stoner like you,

Not in a million years. You were transparent days ago. You cannot pull
that veil back. You are scum.

 

[pyotr filipivich]

Let the Record show that Gunner Asch <gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> on
or about Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:20:01 -0700 did write/type or cause to
appear in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

If you were any more retarded, I'd swear that you were a cop. Oh...
that's right, you was one!

You likely failed at that as well.

Simple possession is not a felony in ANY state. Possession for sale IS a
felony in ALL states, you retarded twit.

Simple possession of more than an ounce is a felony in about half of
them. You mean you dont buy more than a good lid at a time when you
fork out your cash for dope? Not even for road trips, and for parties?

You recon he can afford more than a lid at a time?

Unless you are the typical useless pothead..and actually have a few
dollars..its likely you at one time or another had more than an
ounce..and are a felon. Probably a convicted one at that..but it would
be a toss up if you were convicted of a child molestation or a pot
charge..or both.

Once upon a time, I knew the price in two separate places - and
comparing pot in Pennsylvania with hash in Espana, doesn't work.
-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:14:36 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

You recon he can afford more than a lid at a time?

The word is 'reckon', Dipovich.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Gunner Asch wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:48:52 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


krw wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:09:25 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <sa3f659e49r5sbilskfehtteg1n94ov7ga@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.

If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.

Wrong yet *again*. You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself.

It's the only way he's been able to get attention since his mommy
dropped him.


27 times.

On his head.

They weren't all direct hits, or it would have driven that horn back
into his thick skull.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

 

[Doug Miller]

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The other
half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.

 

[Doug Miller]

In article <3jpf65d0mcopri22iogj997gdilsg74mnl@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:08:08 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <p73f65ll55gsk1qelpklhim0ndvh3mcmj3@4ax.com>,
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:42 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time
ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.

Youagain display the level of retardation that idiots like you have
chosen to express.

It happened in the seventies. What reason would I have to lie, you
retarded piece of shit?

I'm not a psychiatrist; I have no idea what your motivations are for making so
many false statements.

WHERE!? Idiot!

You claimed that simple possession isn't a felony anywhere -- false.
You claimed that possession to sell is a felony everywhere -- false.
You claimed that I was wrong about Indiana law regarding the above -- false.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:28:50 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:48:52 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


krw wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:09:25 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <sa3f659e49r5sbilskfehtteg1n94ov7ga@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.

If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.

Wrong yet *again*. You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself.

It's the only way he's been able to get attention since his mommy
dropped him.


27 times.

On his head.




They weren't all direct hits, or it would have driven that horn back
into his thick skull.

Ahhh... so I am a unicorn.

Better than you, with two horns.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:51:39 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <3jpf65d0mcopri22iogj997gdilsg74mnl@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:08:08 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <p73f65ll55gsk1qelpklhim0ndvh3mcmj3@4ax.com>,
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:42 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time
ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.

Youagain display the level of retardation that idiots like you have
chosen to express.

It happened in the seventies. What reason would I have to lie, you
retarded piece of shit?

I'm not a psychiatrist; I have no idea what your motivations are for making so
many false statements.

WHERE!? Idiot!

You claimed that simple possession isn't a felony anywhere -- false.

No. It is true.

You claimed that possession to sell is a felony everywhere -- false.

It is illegal and a felony to sell it anywhere in the US.

You claimed that I was wrong about Indiana law regarding the above -- false.

You are incorrect.

 

[Doug Miller]

In article <sapg65p9vk5cfjq56ektn0fkbf2mhctglt@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:51:39 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <3jpf65d0mcopri22iogj997gdilsg74mnl@4ax.com>,
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:08:08 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <p73f65ll55gsk1qelpklhim0ndvh3mcmj3@4ax.com>,
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:42 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time

ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.

Youagain display the level of retardation that idiots like you have
chosen to express.

It happened in the seventies. What reason would I have to lie, you
retarded piece of shit?

I'm not a psychiatrist; I have no idea what your motivations are for making
so
many false statements.

WHERE!? Idiot!

You claimed that simple possession isn't a felony anywhere -- false.

No. It is true.

I posted the Indiana statute that shows that it is a felony if the amount is
over 30g, or if it's a second offense regardless of the amount. Not my fault
if you didn't read it, or can't understand it.

You claimed that possession to sell is a felony everywhere -- false.

It is illegal and a felony to sell it anywhere in the US.

I posted a link to the Indiana statute that shows that it isn't a felony in
Indiana, under some circumstances. Since you apparently had trouble following
the link, here's the statute. Please note that if the amount is less than 30g,
and the intended recipient is at least 18 years old, and it's a first offense,
it is "a Class A MISDEMEANOR" (emphasis added).

Please note also that it's not my fault if you don't read it, or can't
understand it.

IC 35-48-4-10
Dealing in marijuana, hash oil, or hashish
Sec. 10. (a) A person who:
(1) knowingly or intentionally:
(A) manufactures;
(B) finances the manufacture of;
(C) delivers; or
(D) finances the delivery of;
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, pure or adulterated; or
(2) possesses, with intent to:
(A) manufacture;
(B) finance the manufacture of;
(C) deliver; or
(D) finance the delivery of;
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, pure or adulterated;
commits dealing in marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, a Class A misdemeanor,
except as provided in subsection (b).
(b) The offense is:
(1) a Class D felony if:
(A) the recipient or intended recipient is under eighteen (18)
years of age;
(B) the amount involved is more than thirty (30) grams but less
than ten (10) pounds of marijuana or two (2) grams but less than three hundred
(300) grams of hash oil or hashish; or
(C) the person has a prior conviction of an offense involving
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish; and
(2) a Class C felony if the amount involved is ten (10) pounds or more
of marijuana or three hundred (300) or more grams of hash oil or hashish or
the person delivered or financed the delivery of marijuana, hash oil, or
hashish:
(A) on a school bus; or
(B) in, on, or within one thousand (1,000) feet of:
(i) school property;
(ii) a public park;
(iii) a family housing complex; or
(iv) a youth program center.

http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title35/ar48/ch4.html

You claimed that I was wrong about Indiana law regarding the above -- false.

You are incorrect.

The Indiana law is exactly as I said it is, and I posted the link to it so
that anyone can verify it. It's not my fault that your longterm marijuana use
has caused reading comprehension problems.

 

[Doug Miller]

In article <s7pg65d5su3v7totj1fgm6ioueabmlpgqk@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:28:50 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

They weren't all direct hits, or it would have driven that horn back
into his thick skull.

Ahhh... so I am a unicorn.

No, a rhinoceros: clumsy, slow, and stupid.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Doug Miller wrote:

In article <4A67ADBB.B78F76D6@earthlink.net>, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.

Michael, half the things that Jamie thinks are violations -- aren't. The other
half are, but he doesn't know why.

That doesn't put him in a good position to be making complaints.

Then he is taking pay for a job he isn't qualified for.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!