Driver to drive?

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:21:13 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Cultivation of any amount of marijuana is a felony under Health and
Safety Code 11358. People who grow for personal use are eligible for
diversion under Penal Code 1000 so long as there is no evidence of
intent to sell. There are no fixed plant number limits to personal use
cultivation. It is possible to win diversion through a Williamson
Hearing.
No longer true.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:21:13 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
loyalty to the American people.'
You must have forgotten that one, when you spent all those years abusing
the citizenry.

I'd be willing to bet that you arrest record would prove it.
 
In article <p9ke65hsnb4j7v2t7b50h3221hb70jta2v@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:05 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <59ae659hivvje5gvnj32qegidhlhl9sgvr@4ax.com>,
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.

Actually, yes it is.

Actually, possession of over 30g is a felony in Indiana.
So is a second offense for possession of *any* amount.

IC 35-48-4-11
Possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish
Sec. 11. A person who:
(1) knowingly or intentionally possesses (pure or adulterated)
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish;
(2) knowingly or intentionally grows or cultivates marijuana; or
(3) knowing that marijuana is growing on his premises, fails to
destroy the marijuana plants;
commits possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, a Class A misdemeanor.
However, the offense is a Class D felony (i) if the amount involved is more
than thirty (30) grams of marijuana or two (2) grams of hash oil or hashish,
or (ii) if the person has a prior conviction of an offense involving
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish.


Considering that I was charged with simple possession in Indiana, and
that I had just under 100 grams at the time, I would conclude that you
are incorrect.
Considering that what I posted is a direct quote from the current Indiana
Code, available online at
http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title35/ar48/ch4.html
I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time
ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.
Does a state as dumb as Indiana even have any such thing as a
misdemeanor?
Obviously we do; apparently you have a reading comprehension problem, possibly
due to marijuana use.

Seems like too big a word for them. Especially if they
think that simple possession should be a felony offense.
Obviously, first-time simple possession of less than one ounce is *not* a
felony in Indiana; apparently, you have a reading comprehension problem,
possibly due to marijuana use.
 
In article <66se6511g1rjg17s36h2om8qsg3ark9e8m@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
Simple possession is not a felony in ANY state. Possession for sale IS a
felony in ALL states, you retarded twit.
Wrong yet *again*. Twice in one paragraph, even.
(Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?)

http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title35/ar48/ch4.html

IC 35-48-4-11
Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.
Simple possession of any amount, as a repeat offense, is a felony in Indiana.

IC 35-48-4-10
Possession with intent to sell is a *misdemeanor* in Indiana as long as it's a
first offense, the recipient is an adult, and the amount involved is less than
30 grams.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:42 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time
ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.

Youagain display the level of retardation that idiots like you have
chosen to express.

It happened in the seventies. What reason would I have to lie, you
retarded piece of shit?
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.
If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:31:05 -0400, Jamie
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

krw wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:18:39 -0400, Jamie
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


Rich. wrote:


"Doug Miller" <spambait@milmac.com> wrote in message
news:h3u1si$kh0$1@news.eternal-september.org...


In article <Hgt8m.7720$vp.2574@newsfe12.iad>, Jamie
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


You should see the screw up that had to be corrected, hacked if you ask
me. we had a long run, a service installed from one of our 2000 amp sub
panel over to a machine that has a 500 HP drive in it along with some
other goodies. 3 EMT pipes were run, one for each phase, 2 1000 MCM in
each pipe.


Do you see anything wrong yet?


They ran a ground wire only in one pipe.


Hint: that isn't it.


Too easy! You cannot run the phase conductors separately like that. When
running parallel feeds like that, it should've been 2 conduits with the
3 phase conductors in each.

Yes, when installations like that, you are suppose to have a ground in each.
But the problem is, our guys, me, who ever else, didn't have
anything to do with this installation. It wasn't until later down the
road when we started to take regular IR scan shots, is when the
problem was noticed.


You really are clueless!


These pipes are very high up, it's not like they're in harms way of
people how ever, we were concerned about the accumulated dust that sits
on these EMT runs and the possibility of the insulation of the internal
wire getting soft on the tight corners.


DO us all a favor - *never* touch electricity again!


You haven't lived until you've been in a building that has been in
existence for years from one business to another, wire hacks all over
the place.


The one you've worked in, I can only imagine.


I was asked once to look at some cable that had been installed at
some point (before my time), lying on top of a couple of rows of
fluorescent lights for a long run. It gets hot in the summer, and things
get warm up there. I went up in a lift truck, and notice the jacket of a
8 wire cable was breaking down. It is solidifying. That hasn't yet been
corrected but will have to be address at some point. I suppose the THHN
wires in it will survive.


Unless they let you at it, perhaps.

You don't read very?
No, you're wrong. I read very.

This handy work isn't my doing. This was done before my time.
You don't even know what's wrong with it, yet keep talking about
stupid ground wires. You're so wrong you make DimBulb look smart;
dangerously wrong.

I find it very difficult to comprehend how people here can just sit
and foam at the mouth. Kind of destroys any credibility they had.
At least we have credibility to "destroy", unlike clueless idiots like
you.

Reminds me of the days when I used to stop in on the weekends at the
bars. Which is one good reason, I stopped going. It's much cheaper to
stop in here if I want to see that kind of crap.
Go back to the bar. You're less dangerous after you've passed out.
 
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:35:05 -0700, Capt. Cave Man
<ItIsSoEasyACaveManCanDoIt@upyers.org> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:30:16 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:44:51 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne
hornetd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 20, 11:17 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne



horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 3:39 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:16:25 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne

horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 12:12 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:50:40 GMT, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <3mv765da9sgkg1k9t2iiq8lovjgea4m...@4ax.com>, jk <kles...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1l...@charter.net> wrote:

 There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..
A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.

Well, no, but any attempt at forcing compliance with a code that didn't exist
at the time the installation was made falls under the Constitutional
prohibitions against ex post facto legislation...

Fire codes do this all the time, particularly in commercial and rental
units.  Smoke and CO detectors being prime examples.

OK Explain how requiring the installation of smoke or CO detectors in
rental or commercial properties after the enactment of the enabling
legislation is the same as applying the current electric code to a
preexisting installation.

They're both ex post facto laws.  The buildings were existing long
before the law was passed.

To be an ex post facto law the the requirements you are complaining
about would have to require a change to what is already built.

Complaining?  No, just stating a fact.  Yes, the building was already
built.

Requiring the addition of smoke, CO, and explosive gas detectors to an
existing building as a condition of a renewal of the use and occupancy
only regulates the future condition of the building and then only as a
condition of it being used in a certain way such as rental property.

...and commercial property, and not on change of residents.
*IMMEDIATELY*.  Same with sprinkler systems.

The code in question would be an ex post facto law if it required that
the existing electrical plant be brought up to current code, that the
pitch of the stairs be changed, or that the width of doorways that met
the code at the time of construction be changed to match a new code
requirement in the absence of a change in use.  The difference is
admittedly subtle but there is a difference.

You got me there.  How is a CO detector different than any other code
item?  Just to make the point, they must be AC powered and *DO*
require renovation to the electrical system.

I wanna hear this twisting....

Site

Building. Or do you mean "cite", as in "citation". Vermont, 2006-7
and still going on. All existing commercial and rental structures
were required to install *wired* CO detectors and commercial buildings
were/are (not sure of the deadline) required to install sprinkler
systems. The VFW I frequented didn't know where they were going to
get the $100-$150K to install sprinklers (they also needed a 6" water
main to supply it would have to get a right-of-way to). Now, tell me
that ex post facto laws are illegal.


How did they get classified as a business?
It's open to the public, DimBulb.

Install a mini-halon system, and drop down masks. That would have to
be cheaper with no easement rights needed.
If you wrote that in all caps it would look like Roy's work.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:18:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne
<hornetd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 21, 6:30 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:44:51 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne



horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 20, 11:17 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne

horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 3:39 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:16:25 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne

horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 12:12 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:50:40 GMT, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <3mv765da9sgkg1k9t2iiq8lovjgea4m...@4ax.com>, jk <kles...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1l...@charter.net> wrote:

 There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..
A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.

Well, no, but any attempt at forcing compliance with a code that didn't exist
at the time the installation was made falls under the Constitutional
prohibitions against ex post facto legislation...

Fire codes do this all the time, particularly in commercial and rental
units.  Smoke and CO detectors being prime examples.

OK Explain how requiring the installation of smoke or CO detectors in
rental or commercial properties after the enactment of the enabling
legislation is the same as applying the current electric code to a
preexisting installation.

They're both ex post facto laws.  The buildings were existing long
before the law was passed.

To be an ex post facto law the the requirements you are complaining
about would have to require a change to what is already built.

Complaining?  No, just stating a fact.  Yes, the building was already
built.

Requiring the addition of smoke, CO, and explosive gas detectors to an
existing building as a condition of a renewal of the use and occupancy
only regulates the future condition of the building and then only as a
condition of it being used in a certain way such as rental property.

...and commercial property, and not on change of residents.
*IMMEDIATELY*.  Same with sprinkler systems.

The code in question would be an ex post facto law if it required that
the existing electrical plant be brought up to current code, that the
pitch of the stairs be changed, or that the width of doorways that met
the code at the time of construction be changed to match a new code
requirement in the absence of a change in use.  The difference is
admittedly subtle but there is a difference.

You got me there.  How is a CO detector different than any other code
item?  Just to make the point, they must be AC powered and *DO*
require renovation to the electrical system.

I wanna hear this twisting....

Site

Building.  Or do you mean "cite", as in "citation".  Vermont, 2006-7
and still going on.  All existing commercial and rental structures
were required to install *wired* CO detectors and commercial buildings
were/are (not sure of the deadline) required to install sprinkler
systems.  The VFW I frequented didn't know where they were going to
get the $100-$150K to install sprinklers (they also needed a 6" water
main to supply it would have to get a right-of-way to).  Now, tell me
that ex post facto laws are illegal.

Please excuse my misspelling but I repeat Cite.
No misspelling. Wrong word.

I do not mean some vague year and state.
Not vague at all. I told you the state and the year, within one.

I mean chapter and verse.
If you can't see how *clearly* you're wrong, I'm not about to waste my
time chasing down details that you're going to ignore anyway.

As in what law, enacted by what legislature, signed by which executive, ...
Are you totally illiterate?

Localities try all sorts of tricks to get past the prohibition and
they get away with a fair number of them because their victims cannot
afford the cost of the legal talent to fight them. That does not make
what is done legal.
It is punishable by a fine and imprisonment, it's the law. In case
you hadn't noticed, no one pays attention to ugly details, like the
Constitution anymore.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Jamie wrote:

jk wrote:


Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:




There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.


I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!
The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.
 
Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:Xns9C50420FC16Azoodlewurdle@216.196.109.145:

Does anyone have any spice models of DVD writer type laser diodes?
Possibly anything will do, I just want to explore whether there's much
point to modelling with them, or whether it's enough to set soem basic
parameters. I'm totally new to spice so I have no idea. But I know that
many laser diodes are very sparsely documented, so the idea alone that
someone might have spice- modelled one is entertaining, if nothing else.
In case anyone's following this (and I opened it from alt.lasers to two
electronics newsgroups), I'm still after laser diode spice models...

And I found this:
http://www.freeda.org/doc/elements/dhld.html

I'm still very new to spice, so if anyone is feeling very helpful and can
write a conversion of this I can use in LTspice, please do.

Also, a quote of my earlier posts so people in the electronics groups can see
them:
"I've seen a few lines specifying diode models last night and gathered some
for general use, and I'll look into what the parameters mean, so even a few
known ones in spice format will help me, even without a full model. But I do
want to know what parameters are important to laser diodes, and what values
they ought to have for a DVD writer diode. I suspect they will be similar for
most if not all DVD diodes.."
And:
"Does anyone have access to the Journal of Lightwave Technology vol.15, no.4,
april 1997, page 717? I read that there's a spice model there, but I have no
access to this."

In short, I want electrical models of DVD writer type diodes. I don't need
extreme accuracy, or the optical details, (didn't think spice went there
anyway). They just have to be realistic electrically, and I'd like some
simple direct guidance on what parameters I need to change in an LTspice
model of a diode, as that's the context I'm using.
 
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:38:04 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
<Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:31:09 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:27:46 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:59:13 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:17:53 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Fascinating that you have had so much contact with cops over the
years...isnt it?

Fascinating that such a free country's citizens let retarded nazis like
you and your mentalities endure.

You never did get around to answering my questions about the charges,
bail and jail time.

Embarassed?

Clearly not, but DimBulb should be too embarrassed to post.

How can I answer to a pile of horseshit that he is making up?
In the affirmative, of course.

I know it was hard to accomplish, but you managed to be even more
retarded than he is, Keith. Good job!
At least I can be right, AlwaysWrong.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:45:39 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
<freedom_guy@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:38:26 -0500, krw wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:39:55 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
"Richard the Dreaded Libertarian" <freedom_guy@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.22.01.25.46.242860@example.net...
Yes, I've been incarcerated more than once. It didn't kill me, so it must
have made me stronger. ;-D

Well, Rich, you're clearly choosing to live your life a bit outside the
accepted "norms," so the fact that you're willing to deal maturely with the
consequences of those choices (e.g., you're not out to murder the cops who
arrested you nor call up the ACLU for the cops not letting you read Penthouse
while incarcerated) and openly express your views (rather than saying you
believe one thing and doing another as some politicians do) is pretty
respectable. There might even be a small town in, say, Texas that would vote
you in as mayor if you ever had the desire. :)

Hell, Minnesota might just "elect" him Senator.

Unfortunately, I'm living in CA right at the moment. But I wouldn't mind
whupping Al Franken's ass.
Why would your residence matter? Votes don't.

When I found out he was running for real all I could think of was those
SNL bits - "Vote for me, Al Franken. You'll be glad you did."

I guess they're going to find out how glad they're going to be!
We all will. The idiot is on Judiciary.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:10:58 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

It's open to the public, DimBulb.
That doesn't make an NPO a business, jackass.
 
In article <p73f65ll55gsk1qelpklhim0ndvh3mcmj3@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:33:42 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

I would conclude that either the incident you mention happened a long time
ago, or (more likely) you are FOS.

Youagain display the level of retardation that idiots like you have
chosen to express.

It happened in the seventies. What reason would I have to lie, you
retarded piece of shit?
I'm not a psychiatrist; I have no idea what your motivations are for making so
many false statements.
 
In article <sa3f659e49r5sbilskfehtteg1n94ov7ga@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.

If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.
Wrong yet *again*. You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself.
 
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:26:11 -0700, Capt. Cave Man
<ItIsSoEasyACaveManCanDoIt@upyers.org> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:10:58 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

It's open to the public, DimBulb.

That doesn't make an NPO a business, jackass.
AlwaysWrong, is once again - wrong.
 
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:09:25 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <sa3f659e49r5sbilskfehtteg1n94ov7ga@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.

If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.

Wrong yet *again*. You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself.
It's the only way he's been able to get attention since his mommy
dropped him.
 
krw wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:19:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Jamie wrote:

jk wrote:


Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:




There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.


I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.


The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!

The idiot can't question who he works for. He clearly hasn't the
brains.

Or the guts. A real man would turn them in for all the violations
before people die.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
Doug Miller wrote:
In article <sa3f659e49r5sbilskfehtteg1n94ov7ga@4ax.com>, UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:43:18 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

Simple possession of over 30 grams is a felony in Indiana.

If they class it as a felony, then it isn't "simple possession" you
stupid fucktard.

Wrong yet *again*. You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself.

So much so that he needs 56 sock puppets to be enough of a fool.


THE DIMBULB SCORECARD

Abbey Somebody <abnormal@castlefrankenstein.org>
AnimalMagic <AnimalMagic@petersbackyard.org>
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org>
AwlSome Auger <AwlSomeAuger@BuyOneGetOneFree.org>
Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org>
Bungalow Bill <BugalowBill@AbbeyRoad.UKCOM>
Capt. Cave Man <ItIsSoEasyACaveManCanDoIt@upyers.org>
ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org>
Chieftain of the Carpet Crawlers
<theslipperman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Corbomite Carrie <Corbomite@maneuver.org>

DarkMatter <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
DarkSucker <DarkSucker@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Do I really need to say? <rael@thescree.org>
Dorothy with the Red Shoes on <Dorothy@notinkansas.org>
Dr. Heywood R. Floyd <Heywood@thebarattheendofthemonolith.org>
FatBytestard <FatBytestard@somewheronyourharddrive.org>
FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor <FunkShunPoignter@yermomma.org>
FunkyPunk FieldEffectTrollsistor <FunkShunPointer@yermomma.org>
GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement
<GoldIntermetallicEmbrittlement@youdontknowjack.org>
Hattori Hanzo <OutintheSnow@billsbackyard.org>

Herbert John \Jackie\" Gleason" <BufordTJustice@Texarkanacops.gov>
HiggsField <higgdfield@whutthableapduyoukno.org>
IAmTheSlime <TheSlimeFromYourVideo@oozingacrossyourlivingroomfloor.org>
ItsASecretDummy <secretasianman@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Jupiter Jaq <JupiterJaq@BuyOneGetOneFree.org>
Kai <kai@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
LargeMarge <LargeMarge@thetentwoposition.org>
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
MadManMoon <TheWholePlanetIsMine@hereandnow.org>
MakeNoAttemptToAdjustYourSet <DoNotAttemptToAdjustYourSet@anytime.org>

MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
Mr.Eko <ekointhedirt@lostisland.org>
Mr. Haney <mrhaney@thebarattheendofthefarmroad.org>
Mycelium <myceliumgrows@underyourshrooms.org>
Neanderthal <dance@gottafindawomanrighton.org>
Phat Bytestard <PhatBytestard@getinmahharddrive.org>
RoyLFuchs <RoyLFuchs@urfargingicehole.org>
scorpius
<scorpius@thewormholethatemptiesontheothersideoftheuniverse.org>
SkyPilot <somewhere@theedgeofspace.org>
SomeKindOfWonderful
<SomeKindOfWonderful@allthegirlsintheworldbeware.org>

SoothSayer <SaySooth@TheMonastery.org>
Spurious Response <SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org>
StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org>
Sum Ting Wong
<SumTingWong@thebarattheendoftheVenusianLightnigBoltmonolith.org>
SuspendedInGaffa <suspendedingaffa@kateshouse.org>
Sum Ting Wong <SumTingWong@thebarattheendoftheVenusianLightnigBolt.org>
The Great Attractor
<SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org>
TheGlimmerMan <justaglimmer@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
TheKraken <ReachUpandSuckYouDowntotheDepths@yup.org>
The Last Mimsy <mimsy@TheOtherSideoftheLookingGlass.org>

TheQuickBrownFox <thequickbrownfox@overthelazydog.org>
TutAmongUs@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
<TutAmongUs@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
UltimatePatriot <UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org>
UpGrade <UpGrade@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
ValleyGirl <LuvYerNailz@LikeIWouldGiveIt.Comeon>
WallyWallWhackr <wallywallwhackr@thematrixattheendofthemushroomstem.org>
--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top