Driver to drive?

[Gunner Asch]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:51:12 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
<freedom_guy@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:27:46 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:59:13 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Fascinating that such a free country's citizens let retarded nazis like
you and your mentalities endure.

You never did get around to answering my questions about the charges,
bail and jail time.

He also seems to have a very odd definition of "free".

Of course.

But really, Gunner, why do you keep feeding this troll? And why isn't
it "Gunnar"?

Thanks,
Rich

Because its Gunner Asch. <G>

And I do it to keep the brain in good shape. And to make him look bad.
Which of of course is dead easy.

Gunner

"Lenin called them "useful idiots," those people living in
liberal democracies who by giving moral and material support
to a totalitarian ideology in effect were braiding the rope that
would hang them. Why people who enjoyed freedom and prosperity worked
passionately to destroy both is a fascinating question, one still with us
today. Now the useful idiots can be found in the chorus of appeasement,
reflexive anti-Americanism, and sentimental idealism trying to inhibit
the necessary responses to another freedom-hating ideology, radical Islam"

Bruce C. Thornton, a professor of Classics at American University of Cal State Fresno

 

[Gunner Asch]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
<UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:

Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not. Least of all over an ounce. 8 ounces is Felony
time. Some states thats 15 yrs at the least.

Gunner Asch


"Lenin called them "useful idiots," those people living in
liberal democracies who by giving moral and material support
to a totalitarian ideology in effect were braiding the rope that
would hang them. Why people who enjoyed freedom and prosperity worked
passionately to destroy both is a fascinating question, one still with us
today. Now the useful idiots can be found in the chorus of appeasement,
reflexive anti-Americanism, and sentimental idealism trying to inhibit
the necessary responses to another freedom-hating ideology, radical Islam"

Bruce C. Thornton, a professor of Classics at American University of Cal State Fresno

 

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.

Actually, yes it is.

Least of all over an ounce.

That is not possession, idiot.

8 ounces is Felony
time.

That is not possession either, you retard.

Some states thats 15 yrs at the least.

You're an idiot.

 

[Doug Miller]

In article <59ae659hivvje5gvnj32qegidhlhl9sgvr@4ax.com>, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.

Actually, yes it is.

Actually, possession of over 30g is a felony in Indiana.
So is a second offense for possession of *any* amount.

IC 35-48-4-11
Possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish
Sec. 11. A person who:
(1) knowingly or intentionally possesses (pure or adulterated)
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish;
(2) knowingly or intentionally grows or cultivates marijuana; or
(3) knowing that marijuana is growing on his premises, fails to
destroy the marijuana plants;
commits possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, a Class A misdemeanor.
However, the offense is a Class D felony (i) if the amount involved is more
than thirty (30) grams of marijuana or two (2) grams of hash oil or hashish,
or (ii) if the person has a prior conviction of an offense involving
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish.

 

[Jamie]

krw wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:18:39 -0400, Jamie
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


Rich. wrote:


"Doug Miller" <spambait@milmac.com> wrote in message
news:h3u1si$kh0$1@news.eternal-september.org...


In article <Hgt8m.7720$vp.2574@newsfe12.iad>, Jamie
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


You should see the screw up that had to be corrected, hacked if you ask
me. we had a long run, a service installed from one of our 2000 amp sub
panel over to a machine that has a 500 HP drive in it along with some
other goodies. 3 EMT pipes were run, one for each phase, 2 1000 MCM in
each pipe.


Do you see anything wrong yet?


They ran a ground wire only in one pipe.


Hint: that isn't it.


Too easy! You cannot run the phase conductors separately like that. When
running parallel feeds like that, it should've been 2 conduits with the
3 phase conductors in each.

Yes, when installations like that, you are suppose to have a ground in each.
But the problem is, our guys, me, who ever else, didn't have
anything to do with this installation. It wasn't until later down the
road when we started to take regular IR scan shots, is when the
problem was noticed.


You really are clueless!


These pipes are very high up, it's not like they're in harms way of
people how ever, we were concerned about the accumulated dust that sits
on these EMT runs and the possibility of the insulation of the internal
wire getting soft on the tight corners.


DO us all a favor - *never* touch electricity again!


You haven't lived until you've been in a building that has been in
existence for years from one business to another, wire hacks all over
the place.


The one you've worked in, I can only imagine.


I was asked once to look at some cable that had been installed at
some point (before my time), lying on top of a couple of rows of
fluorescent lights for a long run. It gets hot in the summer, and things
get warm up there. I went up in a lift truck, and notice the jacket of a
8 wire cable was breaking down. It is solidifying. That hasn't yet been
corrected but will have to be address at some point. I suppose the THHN
wires in it will survive.


Unless they let you at it, perhaps.

You don't read very?

This handy work isn't my doing. This was done before my time.

I find it very difficult to comprehend how people here can just sit
and foam at the mouth. Kind of destroys any credibility they had.

Reminds me of the days when I used to stop in on the weekends at the
bars. Which is one good reason, I stopped going. It's much cheaper to
stop in here if I want to see that kind of crap.

 

[Jamie]

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Jamie wrote:

jk wrote:


Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:




There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.


I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.

 

[Richard the Dreaded Liber]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:39:55 -0700, Joel Koltner wrote:

"Richard the Dreaded Libertarian" <freedom_guy@example.net> wrote in message
newsan.2009.07.22.01.25.46.242860@example.net...
Yes, I've been incarcerated more than once. It didn't kill me, so it must
have made me stronger. ;-D
....
respectable. There might even be a small town in, say, Texas that would
vote you in as mayor if you ever had the desire.

Hey, thanks for this!

Actually, my plan is to win $347M in the 5-state Lotto and buy the
presidency. >:->

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Richard the Dreaded Liber]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:38:26 -0500, krw wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:39:55 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
"Richard the Dreaded Libertarian" <freedom_guy@example.net> wrote in message
newsan.2009.07.22.01.25.46.242860@example.net...
Yes, I've been incarcerated more than once. It didn't kill me, so it must
have made me stronger. ;-D

Well, Rich, you're clearly choosing to live your life a bit outside the
accepted "norms," so the fact that you're willing to deal maturely with the
consequences of those choices (e.g., you're not out to murder the cops who
arrested you nor call up the ACLU for the cops not letting you read Penthouse
while incarcerated) and openly express your views (rather than saying you
believe one thing and doing another as some politicians do) is pretty
respectable. There might even be a small town in, say, Texas that would vote
you in as mayor if you ever had the desire.

Hell, Minnesota might just "elect" him Senator.

Unfortunately, I'm living in CA right at the moment. But I wouldn't mind
whupping Al Franken's ass.

When I found out he was running for real all I could think of was those
SNL bits - "Vote for me, Al Franken. You'll be glad you did."

I guess they're going to find out how glad they're going to be!

Thanks!
Rich

 

[Richard the Dreaded Liber]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot

Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not. Least of all over an ounce. 8 ounces is Felony
time. Some states thats 15 yrs at the least.

Just a year or so ago I got popped with about a gram or so, and they let
me pay $40.00 and go to "drug and alcohol school" or whatever they call
it, very much like traffic school. I live in Whittier; the pot school
was at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, a couple miles south of
Disneyland.

In about 30 minutes of waiting in line, I saw more hot white babes than
I'd seen for the last 5 years in Whittier! (it's loaded with Chicas.)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:05 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <59ae659hivvje5gvnj32qegidhlhl9sgvr@4ax.com>, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.

Actually, yes it is.

Actually, possession of over 30g is a felony in Indiana.
So is a second offense for possession of *any* amount.

IC 35-48-4-11
Possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish
Sec. 11. A person who:
(1) knowingly or intentionally possesses (pure or adulterated)
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish;
(2) knowingly or intentionally grows or cultivates marijuana; or
(3) knowing that marijuana is growing on his premises, fails to
destroy the marijuana plants;
commits possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, a Class A misdemeanor.
However, the offense is a Class D felony (i) if the amount involved is more
than thirty (30) grams of marijuana or two (2) grams of hash oil or hashish,
or (ii) if the person has a prior conviction of an offense involving
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish.

Considering that I was charged with simple possession in Indiana, and
that I had just under 100 grams at the time, I would conclude that you
are incorrect.

Does a state as dumb as Indiana even have any such thing as a
misdemeanor? Seems like too big a word for them. Especially if they
think that simple possession should be a felony offense.

The RETARDED bat's turds should be going after meth and crack dealers
and the gang element, not some kid or adult that has some weed on him.
Even then, they should concentrate on the dealers, not the user, which
they also always fail miserably at realizing.

It really is all about the money. Poor, retarded Indiana actually gets
more federal funding if they have nice, full prisons.

There isn't a single state in the union that in not corrupted in some
way because of the war on drugs.

The academies are pumping out cops every day that deny their oath by
the very policies their own academy teaches them, so they are shit before
they even hit the streets.


The fucking Nazis are back, folks. They are just too pussified to admit
that they act exactly the same, so they'll take offense to the
association.

Weirder still is that the actual neo-nazis out there will also take
offense to me calling the behavior of our cops Nazi like.

It truly is a sad world.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:49:23 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
<freedom_guy@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot

Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not. Least of all over an ounce. 8 ounces is Felony
time. Some states thats 15 yrs at the least.

Just a year or so ago I got popped with about a gram or so, and they let
me pay $40.00 and go to "drug and alcohol school" or whatever they call
it, very much like traffic school. I live in Whittier; the pot school
was at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, a couple miles south of
Disneyland.

In about 30 minutes of waiting in line, I saw more hot white babes than
I'd seen for the last 5 years in Whittier! (it's loaded with Chicas.)

Cheers!
Rich

More proof that cops abuse their oath, and their office, and their
duties, et al.

 

[Tom Horne]

On Jul 21, 6:30 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:44:51 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne



horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 20, 11:17 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:06:54 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne

horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 3:39 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:16:25 -0700 (PDT), Tom Horne

horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 19, 12:12 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:50:40 GMT, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <3mv765da9sgkg1k9t2iiq8lovjgea4m...@4ax.com>, jk <kles...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1l...@charter.net> wrote:

 There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..
A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.

Well, no, but any attempt at forcing compliance with a code that didn't exist
at the time the installation was made falls under the Constitutional
prohibitions against ex post facto legislation...

Fire codes do this all the time, particularly in commercial and rental
units.  Smoke and CO detectors being prime examples.

OK Explain how requiring the installation of smoke or CO detectors in
rental or commercial properties after the enactment of the enabling
legislation is the same as applying the current electric code to a
preexisting installation.

They're both ex post facto laws.  The buildings were existing long
before the law was passed.

To be an ex post facto law the the requirements you are complaining
about would have to require a change to what is already built.

Complaining?  No, just stating a fact.  Yes, the building was already
built.

Requiring the addition of smoke, CO, and explosive gas detectors to an
existing building as a condition of a renewal of the use and occupancy
only regulates the future condition of the building and then only as a
condition of it being used in a certain way such as rental property.

...and commercial property, and not on change of residents.
*IMMEDIATELY*.  Same with sprinkler systems.

The code in question would be an ex post facto law if it required that
the existing electrical plant be brought up to current code, that the
pitch of the stairs be changed, or that the width of doorways that met
the code at the time of construction be changed to match a new code
requirement in the absence of a change in use.  The difference is
admittedly subtle but there is a difference.

You got me there.  How is a CO detector different than any other code
item?  Just to make the point, they must be AC powered and *DO*
require renovation to the electrical system.

I wanna hear this twisting....

Site

Building.  Or do you mean "cite", as in "citation".  Vermont, 2006-7
and still going on.  All existing commercial and rental structures
were required to install *wired* CO detectors and commercial buildings
were/are (not sure of the deadline) required to install sprinkler
systems.  The VFW I frequented didn't know where they were going to
get the $100-$150K to install sprinklers (they also needed a 6" water
main to supply it would have to get a right-of-way to).  Now, tell me
that ex post facto laws are illegal.

Please excuse my misspelling but I repeat Cite. I do not mean some
vague year and state. I mean chapter and verse. As in what law,
enacted by what legislature, signed by which executive, ...
Localities try all sorts of tricks to get past the prohibition and
they get away with a fair number of them because their victims cannot
afford the cost of the legal talent to fight them. That does not make
what is done legal.
--
Tom Horne

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Jamie wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Jamie wrote:

jk wrote:


Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:




There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.

when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.

Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories..

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

The guy above you is never wrong, that is why you get shit on, and
all you see when you look up, is an ass.

So many live in closets!..




That is some chick shit oputfit you work for.


I don't question who I work for, we all have to eat.

The old Nazi excuse? I vaz only followink orders!


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

 

[Gunner Asch]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:00:51 -0700, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
<Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.


Actually, yes it is.

No..its not.

Least of all over an ounce.

That is not possession, idiot.

Snicker..your ignorance of the law is boundless..as is your utter
ignorance of Legal Terms.

8 ounces is Felony
time.

That is not possession either, you retard.

Yes..it May well be in some states.

Some states thats 15 yrs at the least.

You're an idiot.

Snicker..Im an ex cop who keeps up with the law. You on the other hand
are a convicted felon who was so butt stupid he got busted in the first
place.

And we are supposed to pay any attention to what you blither?

ROFLMAO!!

Gunner Asch

'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith
becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact
equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man
because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the
person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...
There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American,
but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag,
the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the
English language.. and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
loyalty to the American people.'
Theodore Ro osevelt 1907

 

[Gunner Asch]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:05 GMT, spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)
wrote:

In article <59ae659hivvje5gvnj32qegidhlhl9sgvr@4ax.com>, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:38:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0700, UltimatePatriot
UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:


Having "weed" is a goddamned misdemeanor in all 50 states, you retarded
dumbfucks!

Actually...no its not.

Actually, yes it is.

Actually, possession of over 30g is a felony in Indiana.
So is a second offense for possession of *any* amount.

IC 35-48-4-11
Possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish
Sec. 11. A person who:
(1) knowingly or intentionally possesses (pure or adulterated)
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish;
(2) knowingly or intentionally grows or cultivates marijuana; or
(3) knowing that marijuana is growing on his premises, fails to
destroy the marijuana plants;
commits possession of marijuana, hash oil, or hashish, a Class A misdemeanor.
However, the offense is a Class D felony (i) if the amount involved is more
than thirty (30) grams of marijuana or two (2) grams of hash oil or hashish,
or (ii) if the person has a prior conviction of an offense involving
marijuana, hash oil, or hashish.

California Law......

Possession of marijuana is a misdemeanor under California Health and
Safety Code Section 11357. Possession of one ounce (28.5 gms) or less is
punishable by a maximum $100 fine; jail time is possible for larger
amounts or for hashish, which is an optional felony ("wobbler").
Possession offenders can avoid conviction by making a preguilty plea
under Penal Code 1000, in which case their charges are dismissed upon
successful completion of a diversion program. Possession offenses are
expunged from the record after two years under Health and Safety Code
Sections 11361.5 and 11361.7.

Possession with intent to sell any amount of marijuana is a felony.
Health and Safety Code 11359. There is a medical exemption in
HS11362.775.

Cultivation of any amount of marijuana is a felony under Health and
Safety Code 11358. People who grow for personal use are eligible for
diversion under Penal Code 1000 so long as there is no evidence of
intent to sell. There are no fixed plant number limits to personal use
cultivation. It is possible to win diversion through a Williamson
Hearing.

Sale, transportation or distribution of marijuana is a felony under
Health and Safety Code Sections 11360. Transporting or giving away
(furnishing) one ounce or less is a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum
$100 fine. There is a medical exemption in HS11362.775.

Sale or distribution to minors is a felony under Health and Safety Code
11361.



'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith
becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact
equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man
because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the
person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...
There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American,
but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag,
the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the
English language.. and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
loyalty to the American people.'
Theodore Ro osevelt 1907

 

[Richard the Dreaded Liber]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:21:13 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:

Cultivation of any amount of marijuana is a felony under Health and
Safety Code 11358.

I'm still waiting for them to try to arrest God. After all, isn't She
the one who's "cultivating" the weeds? >:->

Thanks,
Rich

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:16:53 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

That is not possession, idiot.

Snicker..your ignorance of the law is boundless..as is your utter
ignorance of Legal Terms.

Look, you retarded twit, once it is over a certain amount it is
considered "possession for sale", and that is NOT "possession".

If you were any more retarded, I'd swear that you were a cop. Oh...
that's right, you was one!

You likely failed at that as well.

Simple possession is not a felony in ANY state. Possession for sale IS a
felony in ALL states, you retarded twit.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:16:53 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Snicker..Im an ex cop who keeps up with the law.

You're an idiot that was a cop with a Nazi pig mentality then, and you
still got it, twit.

You are clueless as to the cannabis laws in the states, much less your
own even.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:21:13 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

which is an optional felony ("wobbler").

Unconstitutional California practice, likely proposed by pigs, for
pigs, and ultimately the state, from a money filching POV.

You guys are famous for raping the citizenry you take oaths to protect.

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:21:13 -0700, Gunner Asch
<gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:

Possession offenders can avoid conviction by making a preguilty plea
under Penal Code 1000, in which case their charges are dismissed upon
successful completion of a diversion program.

"Offenders"? You retarded dirty cop bastards are such a fucking joke.
You are about as Unamerican as it gets. Humans self inebriate, you
retarded twit. And retards like you are the LAST type of "person" (you
barely rate) that should be in the office of a peace officer, a position
of authority. You are akin to placing a child molesting pervert at a day
care center. That is what pigs that have your mentality are. A perversion
of a civil society. Hell, you should have been kicked the fuck out based
on the spelling test results alone, much less your attitude.

They (California) dropped mine simply because I threatened to fight it,
and the fight I was proposing was one they did not want to see a
precedence set in, and they still don't.

I wouldn't expect a twit like you to understand a big word like
precedence though. Nor would I expect you to understand that folks are
fighting this retarded law, based on retarded FDA scheduling assignments
which classify cannabis as a narcotic.

A smart cop understands this. A retarded pig like you never did, and
very likely never will. You are one of those bastards that was in it for
the "abuse your fellow man" factor. That is what you rate, boy.