Driver to drive?

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:24:24 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

Assuming those were included in your scope of work for the
'allotted time", then your company is in willful violation.

So was your mother when she willfully failed to flush the piece of shit
that you are down the toilet she shat you into. She was such a piece of
shit for failing to do that basic gene pool cleansing act.

She should be put in prison, and you and the rest of your bloodline
should all be made into crocodile bait.

 

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:24:24 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

assuming you are in an area subject
to OSHA.

Shows how little you know. There is no work area that is not under
their purview.

 

[jk]

spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:

In article <Hgt8m.7720$vp.2574@newsfe12.iad>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

You should see the screw up that had to be corrected, hacked if you ask
me. we had a long run, a service installed from one of our 2000 amp sub
panel over to a machine that has a 500 HP drive in it along with some
other goodies. 3 EMT pipes were run, one for each phase, 2 1000 MCM in
each pipe.

Do you see anything wrong yet?

Yeah, I started laughing at this point too.

They ran a ground wire only in one pipe.

Hint: that isn't it.

jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:
As others have pointed out your clueless lies on "ID" I will leave
that alone,

You ain't real bright, are ya boy?
Fair to middlin.

Well, I know that going in, considering that you do not even know how to
set your fucking clock.
Ahh I see, you conflate my choosing to have my clock on this machine

set the way it is, with an inability to set it. So WHY do you care???

So I KNOW that you have no clue as to any other
aspect of Usenet, much less what a header is or how to discern its
contents.

Been doing USENET since it was a store and forward propagation system
composed primarily of peer to peer connections over dial up, with a
few limited connections to an internet backbone.

As it states... My ID is in EVERY post I make. It has NOTHING to do
with the nym used.
Oh back to that lie, unless you ARE a computer. But I think not since

even the smartest AI system, couldn't be that lame.

Wake the fuck up and smell your own stupidity, boy.
At last a little (very y little) variety.

jk

 

[jk]

Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:56:00 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

just because one small part of your ancestry has fairy
in it.

I am related to Presidents. You?

jk

 

[jk]

Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:56:00 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

just because one small part of your ancestry has fairy
in it.

I am related to Presidents. You?
Big deal BIlly carter was a direct relation to one, What did that

prove.


If that is YOUR biggest claim to fame, be sure to tell your social
worker.

jk

 

[jk]

Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org> wrote:

Except that it is a laser world and you are the one behind the curve,
jackass.

YOu totally stumbled in the middle of that analogy. Don't worry, it
comes with practice.

I am miles ahead of you Klessig. Particularly since you are
too retarded

Ahh your favorite word again.

to manage a task as simple as the setting of your clock.
If for NO OTHER reason than to drive you up a wall, it is worth it.

You really show your true intellectual stripes there. Well... the lack
thereof, actually.

jk

 

[jk]

Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:56:00 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:


Go away, you clueless little online gaming dope. When someone cusses
you out here, it is NOT spamming, game pussy.
No, that was the impolite and foul mouthed part.

(Oh ye of limited comprehension)

jk

 

[jk]

Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..
A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have

allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.



jk

 

[jk]

Bart! <B@rt_The_Sheriff_Is_A_Nig**!.org> wrote:

Usenet is an anonymous forum, dumbshit. Do you actually think I would
want you and ANY of the other dipshits in here knowing my real name?
So now you ADMIT you are hiding.

(Apparently with what you consider a good reason)
Take a good look at those "conventions" you CLAIM (mostly in the
breach) to hallow.

Usenet is NOT email,
NO one said it was, sock puppet.

you retarded twit, and NOBODY here has ANY
Your constant use of that word, makes me think you fear such a label

yourself.


jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:46:16 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:


demonstrated yourself capable of doing that. So the obvious conclusion is that
you're a prepubescent, snot-nosed kid.


Well snot nosed is REALLY more of an inference is it not?

Wasn't really talking TO you sock puppy, but

You are that immature little retarded bastard.

Once again your favorite self reference. You DO like to talk about
yourself.

jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

No. You are, however, the total retard that
blah blah blah

Do you even know more that two or three variations of your greatest
fear.

More proof of how clueless you are. Ever heard of attached storage,
dipshit? That is as temporary as it gets.
Not really.

jk

 

[jk]

spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:

demonstrated yourself capable of doing that. So the obvious conclusion is that
you're a prepubescent, snot-nosed kid.

Well snot nosed is REALLY more of an inference is it not?

jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:24:24 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:
Assuming those were included in your scope of work for the
'allotted time", then your company is in willful violation.

So was your.....Snipage .... crocodile bait.

Tsk-Tsk...

Couldn't come up with something original, OK crocodile bait is a
little off beat.

jk

 

[jk]

Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.

You're correct, there isn't, that has long been past.
when the change was done, there was a time period allotted to us, to
update the electrical to match the change.
Not all of it has been done in many of the old mills/factories.

Assuming those were included in your scope of work for the
'allotted time", then your company is in willful violation.

The issue is that, a lot of portable equipment is used from one
process to another, locations change and so on. One has the correct
plug, where the other does not. So, most of the time, the shortest way
is taken during portable equipment relocation.
Dream site for an OSHA inspector, assuming you are in an area subject

to OSHA. I presume you are, since you have referenced the NEC as I
recall.

When you have plant managers constantly at you, you tend to find the
fastest way to make them happy. Of course, when something goes wrong,
the big guy simply goes down the food chain. Facts of life.

Sounds to me like you admit that you are doing work that you KNOW to
be both unsafe and in violation of the COde.


jk

 

[jk]

spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:

In article <3mv765da9sgkg1k9t2iiq8lovjgea4mo96@4ax.com>, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:
Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


There was a transition period
allowed to give plenty of time for the switch over, mean while, they
simply did things like 480 volts in a 240 volt receptacle..
A particular inspectior in a particular jurisdiction might have
allowed this, but it would not be to code, and ther eIS NO GRANDFATHER
CLAUSE any where in the NEC.

Well, no, but any attempt at forcing compliance with a code that didn't exist
at the time the installation was made falls under the Constitutional
prohibitions against ex post facto legislation...

Arguable, but it is the usual interpretation, but.... as soon as there
are ANY changes in the facility wiring, they technically could require
the entire facility be brought up to the most recent code.

That is not the general interpretation, but it has been done.
Generally the inspectors/jurisdiction only require that the
new/modified work be compliant.
This can get a little dicey in hospitals and other health care
facilities, with the(relatively)new "fully selective coordination "
requirement, which can require changes back to the service entrance
and E gen.

jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:24:24 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

assuming you are in an area subject
to OSHA.

Shows how little you know. There is no work area that is not under
their purview.
WHat a small minded, geographically limited moron you are. There are

loads of places their writ does not run.


Name one you say,???
Albania, Afghanistan, Algeria......Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe inclusive,
with one exception in the U's

And even there, I think you will find that the Halls of Congress, and
many other federal institutions are not subject to Osha.

jk

 

[jk]

It also makes you a troll as you have been told by
others that you are not posting it correctly,
That does no , by itself a troll make. As you well know.

so your blatant disregard
for the protocol means ....

Make your mind up is it a "protocol", or a "convention".

....that your presence here is for no other reason
than to ignore the conventions that have been in place for decades.
Decades longer than you have been. But you seem to blindly and

blatantly disregard such conventions as YOU see fit, so lighten up,
get a clue, take your meds, or whatever else floats your boat.
You haven't been getting any real traction here, but they seem to love
you in alt.flame.

when you have something useful to say, raise your hand.



jk

 

[jk]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:24:15 -0700, jk <klessig@suddenlink.net> wrote:

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt <Zarathustra@thusspoke.org> wrote:

Ahh your favorite word again, try looking up another type of "nym"
(Synonym). Or is that too much like your 9th grade summer school
homework.

The word is Psuedonym, you retarded twit.
Proving you have little or no reading comprehension. Read it again

you scurvy boned lackwit.

By refusing to set your PC clock
correctly, you epitomize one that would and well should have it coming.

But you seem to be the only one who really cares. So get over it.

A few of your claimed attributes are projections by you from looking in
the mirror, however.

WHy thank you. I realize you didn't intend it, and lack the logic to
comprehend it, but thanks.

I've yet to see YOU post ANY useful content on ANY thing you have
commented on.

I have yet to see any document where you were commissioned to make any
such assessment.
No one needs such a "Commission", such as I don't expect you have

one from "PC clockwatcher Anon." and yet here you are, guarding the
internet against the evils of clocks YOU deem incorrectly set.

Of course you have yet to explain your fetish. Your clock fetish that
is, you have illuminated some of your others.

You are unqualified,
unsolicited, unprofessional, and too deeply entrenched into the muck that
is your flawed personality to ever make any such assessment on anyone.

Wow.... A WHOLE sentence without using your favorite insult, or
vulgarity.

As if a dope like you could declare anything as being dubious

I see you do not claim it isn't dubious. We all know why.
jk

 

[jk]

krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

Fire codes do this all the time, particularly in commercial and rental
units. Smoke and CO detectors being prime examples.

So do other codes, such as those used to force people to no longer
park their RVs in a driveway, and so on. Any ordinance that requires
abatement action probably also does this.
jk