M
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
"Rich." wrote:
Then blame the idiot who configured it for 220, which hasn't been the
specification in decades. It wasn't you, was it?
--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
"Doug Miller" <spambait@milmac.com> wrote in message
news:I054m.1906$cl4.1129@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com...
In article <h2qf18$8mn$1@news.eternal-september.org>, "William
Sommerwerck" <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
1) 245VAC is *not* a problem in a nominal 240VAC supply.
That is correct until you factor in that the taps were set to 220v. If the
taps were set at 240, then 245v would never have been a problem.
Then blame the idiot who configured it for 220, which hasn't been the
specification in decades. It wasn't you, was it?
--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!