Driver to drive?

Tim Shoppa · May 14, 2009

On May 13, 4:19 pm, zekfr...@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:

I recall some markings for aircraft. That would worry you.

I like the pylons on the 747 used to transport the space shuttle. One
reads "Attach orbiter here, black side down" and the other reminds
"Righty tighty, leftie loosie".

Tim.

Baron · May 14, 2009

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases. See
Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to discard
all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with known
aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

Jim Thompson · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron
<baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases. See
Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to discard
all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with known
aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

Baron · May 14, 2009

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases.
See Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for
one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to
discard all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with
known aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

I presume deleting the "obvious" leaves a valid E-mail address?

...Jim Thompson

Sure does !

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

Jim Thompson · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:41:20 +0100, Baron
<baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases.
See Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for
one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to
discard all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with
known aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

I presume deleting the "obvious" leaves a valid E-mail address?

...Jim Thompson
Sure does !

Baron · May 14, 2009

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:41:20 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding
him, he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases.
See Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com
for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to
discard all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with
known aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

I presume deleting the "obvious" leaves a valid E-mail address?

...Jim Thompson
Sure does !

Sent! Don't share with any untrustworthy types ;-)

...Jim Thompson
Got it ! Thanks.

I'll go and have a play...

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

Paul Hovnanian P.E. · May 14, 2009

Nobody wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 09:41:10 -0700, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:

Actually, how are you supposed to pull away on the flat? I know that, in
practice, most people just use the footbrake. But if you do that on the UK
driving test, you'll fail; you're not supposed to release the handbrake
until the clutch bites (i.e. no freewheeling at any point).

[Note to Rich: heel-and-toe will also cause you to fail. Pedals aren't
supposed to be operated with the heel.]

You take the test with an automatic transmission.

If you do that in the UK, you get a driving licence only allows you to
drive vehicles with automatic transmission. This would be a significant
drawback when 90% of cars (and nearly all vans) have manual transmission,
so very few people do so.

Interesting. I didn't know they made such distinctions on licenses over
there.

Here in the USA, although we do have a 'commercial drivers license'
class for people who drive large trucks commercially, one can drive the
same sized vehicle for personal use (even licensed as a 'passenger car')
with no special license endorsements. Stick shifts, vehicle size,
trailers, nothing dealing with vehicle characteristics requires a
special license. Except motorcycles.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto

aul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, but you're taking the universe out of context.

May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
<myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.

Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.

You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.

Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

Thanks,
Rich

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.

I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?

Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.

The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.

Many other creatures have unique features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Ok good translation of line one.

How about lines two and three?

And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.

Rich Grise · May 14, 2009

On Wed, 13 May 2009 19:20:26 -0500, Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

http://www.kentech.co.uk/index.html?/&2

LOL. I guess it depends on who are their customers. There are quite many
people who would consider this mission statement offensive.

So it's a pre-filter! Who needs such dour customers anyway? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

Abbey Somebody · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
<bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the reaction
he wants, apparently. Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases. See
Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to discard
all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with known aliases.

And the why? Because someone called him a dumbfuck for making a
dumbfuck post.

Sorry, but making a note that someone that made a stupid post IS
stupid, does NOT make me a troll, and Mike Terrell is the LAST dumbfuck
ANYONE should be listening to.

He should filter himself from us.

Corbomite Carrie · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:22:20 +0100, Baron <baron@linuxmaniac.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 08:25:40 -0400, Rich Webb
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten> wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:05:41 +0100, Baron
baron.nospam@linuxmaniac.nospam.net> wrote:

Corbomite Carrie Inscribed thus:
...
You are as retarded as it gets in Usenet, boy!

PLONK

There's no point in announcing you're plonking him; that's the
reaction he wants, apparently.

Nope. If everyone would plonk NymNuts instead of troll-feeding him,
he'd be dead meat.

Please! Everyone join in.

Even less point of plonking just one out of the
several dozen (really) sockpuppets he uses.

Michael Terrell has recently been posting lists of recent aliases. See
Message-ID: <uf2dnT7rjZ4_vZjXnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> for one.

So if your nntp client can't filter on the fields necessary to discard
all of them, you can at least "prime" your killfile with known
aliases.

Agent users contact me directly for "Jim's secret sauce"... it's
easier to filter NymNuts than you think ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I'd like to sample the sauce ! ;-)

This absolute retard Baron isn't even using Agent, yet he responds to
the ThompsonTard to get help.

This Baron retard knows about as much about Usenet as Casey Anthony
does about wading through her shit puddle she put herself into. Fucking
NIL. He's not a Linux Maniac, he's a goddamned newbie Linux maniac wanna
be. Bwuahahahhaahhahahahha!

Abbey Somebody · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:32:32 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

I presume deleting the "obvious" leaves a valid E-mail address?

Christ! You're more retarded than he is!

Abbey Somebody · May 14, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 13:01:48 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

Sent! Don't share with any untrustworthy types ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Worried about 'sharing' your filter list? What a fucking idiot!

What is the worry, pussy boy?

Michael A. Terrell · May 15, 2009

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Nobody wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 09:41:10 -0700, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:

Actually, how are you supposed to pull away on the flat? I know that, in
practice, most people just use the footbrake. But if you do that on the UK
driving test, you'll fail; you're not supposed to release the handbrake
until the clutch bites (i.e. no freewheeling at any point).

[Note to Rich: heel-and-toe will also cause you to fail. Pedals aren't
supposed to be operated with the heel.]

You take the test with an automatic transmission.

If you do that in the UK, you get a driving licence only allows you to
drive vehicles with automatic transmission. This would be a significant
drawback when 90% of cars (and nearly all vans) have manual transmission,
so very few people do so.

Interesting. I didn't know they made such distinctions on licenses over
there.

Here in the USA, although we do have a 'commercial drivers license'
class for people who drive large trucks commercially, one can drive the
same sized vehicle for personal use (even licensed as a 'passenger car')
with no special license endorsements. Stick shifts, vehicle size,
trailers, nothing dealing with vehicle characteristics requires a
special license. Except motorcycles.

I used to drive a 6150 pound Chevy Stepvan with non commercial
tags. 292 straigh six, five speed manual transmission, and rated for
over two ton cargo capacity.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

JosephKK · May 15, 2009

On Wed, 13 May 2009 19:53:30 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 07:13:40 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
"JosephKK"<quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 16:48:38 -0700, John Larkin
Seeing as how this is not Highland...Rich [/QUOTE] And it is still not fun for me.

JosephKK · May 15, 2009

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:16:19 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

http://www.kentech.co.uk/index.html?/&2

LOL. I guess it depends on who are their customers. There are quite many
people who would consider this mission statement offensive.

Who wants that kind of anal retentive customer?

Suits and repressed suits.

JosephKK · May 15, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:07:20 +0100, Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:30:25 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Best stick vehicles have a hand brake lever between the seats.

Er ... are you saying that this isn't, like, totally standard on US cars?

How would you pull away uphill without a handbrake?

Back then i just tri-pedaled. That is controlling brake and
accelerator with right foot and clutch with left foot.

JosephKK · May 15, 2009

On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:34:24 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2009 11:45:12 -0700, John E. <incognito@xbjcd.com
wrote:

Why do we want to put humans back on the moon?

Employment. Ya gotta spend $$ to employ all those hands.

Ever since the end of WW II the best our government can come up with is 1)
build military stuff and 2) build space stuff.

That sort of employment just burns resources - including scientists
and engineers - which could have done productive things. Why not hire
scientists and engineers to dig holes and fill holes?

We did *not* get velcro, teflon cookware, silicon transistors, or
anything else useful from the manned spaceflight programs. We did get
to observe spiders weaving in zero-G, and semiconductors not being
fabricated behind wake shields.

John

And corelle, many food preservation and delivery techniques. Sirius

radio and satellite TV.

May 15, 2009

Since undersea cable has taken over, other then meteosats, early
warning, and a few military comsats, plus navstar/GPS, why do we need
space launch at ALL?

BTW, The technology for viewing on earth is a laser guide star, a
pulsed yellow laser tuned to the sodium "D" line excites sodium in the
upper atmosphere, providing a point source at 90 Km up.
Now you have a point source beacon to use to correct the wavefront in
the telescope. If you make the telescope secondary mirror in lots of
segments, you can move the segments with piezos and correct the image
in real time.

I don't know if it surpases Hubble, but its close...

Steve

D from BC · May 15, 2009

On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:24:00 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:52 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:26:10 -0600, qrus19@mindspring.com wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, D from BC
myrealaddress@comic.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2009 21:10:24 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:26:19 -0700, D from BC wrote:

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I don't have to. I don't make any claims about Noah's ark.

Best not too.. Noah's evidence is so thin that the existence for Darth
Vader is better.

You're the one who is wildly, stridently proclaiming that there couldn't
possibly be any Power Greater Than Yourself, and demanding "scientific
proof" of "fairy tales" from those who believe otherwise.

Yes, I do claim there's no quasihyperhomosapienGod based on the
scientific evidence.
Yes, I do demand people to prove their fairy tales.

Well, put your money where your mouth is! Start coming up with some
scientific proofs of your own!

Otherwise, shut your pie hole, dipstick.

Thanks,
Rich

And Noah has once again made someone resort to pie hole dipstick name
calling..

Religion is division.

Noah sucks..and there's no evidence.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

As evidence of a higher being one farther above humans than we are
above the ameba I offer the miricle that is human thought. As
evideince that said being doesn't exist I offer the miracle that is
human thought. oops same proof now what do I do I know the supreme
being likes to play jokes on humans as evidience of this I offer Bill
S , Eyore and the arguements for and against those who have faith in
said supreme being.

I'll try to translate the above...
'We think therefore there is a God' ..<<Is that it?
That's the evidence?

Human thought began as a mutation for survival.
The more thinking the better the survival.

The unique feature of thinking is not evidence for a we.so.specialGod.

Many other creatures have unique features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamprey
Studies reported in Nature suggest that lampreys have a unique type of
immune system with parts that are unrelated to the antibodies found in
mammals.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Ok good translation of line one.

How about lines two and three?

They need to be written better.

And by the by so far as we can tell intelligence actually does make us
better at survival, unless of course we kill ourselves off with
something our intelligence develops. D from BC I really don't care if
you are an atheist but I do dislike the fact that those who are
atheist demand that those that believe in God or Shiva or Gia or *Add
diety* here not believe or are stupid.

Christianity teaches how to think defectively. Defective thinking
people are only good at sayyy... flipping burgers at McDonalds.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Driver to drive?

Tim Shoppa

Guest

Baron

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Baron

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Baron

Guest

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Guest

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Abbey Somebody

Guest

Corbomite Carrie

Guest

Abbey Somebody

Guest

Abbey Somebody

Guest

Michael A. Terrell

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

JosephKK

Guest

Guest

D from BC

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor