Driver to drive?

Rich Grise · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:07:20 +0100, Nobody wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:30:25 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Best stick vehicles have a hand brake lever between the seats.

Er ... are you saying that this isn't, like, totally standard on US cars?

How would you pull away uphill without a handbrake?

Heel-and-Toe. See my other post on this thread.

Cheers!
Rich

Rich Grise · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:03:40 -0700, D from BC wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 18:39:15 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

What, exactly, is it that makes you react so venomously to
any mention of anything outside your personal box? How does
it break your bones or steal your money when somebody
mention something you don't like?

I don't like lies. Especially lies that are illegal to tag as lies.

Then, of course, you'll be happy to show me the scientific proof
that they are lies.

I'll be waiting!

BTW, what does "lies that are illegal to tag as lies" mean?

Cheers!
Rich

Rich the Philosophizer · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:03:36 -0700, Robert Baer wrote:

Rich the Philosophizer wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:03:24 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 19:28:35 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

What exactly is it about you that makes it so important to you to
convince everyone that atheism is "The Truth"?

Ohhh nooo.. Are you seeing leprechauns?

You're STILL evading the question:

What, exactly, is it that makes you react so venomously to
any mention of anything outside your personal box? How does
it break your bones or steal your money when somebody
mention something you don't like?

Is your faith in the religion of atheism really that fragile?

???? Isn't that a contradiction? "Faith" in the RELIGION of atheism???

Well, cult then. It has all of the same symptoms, just like antismokerism
and globalwarmingism - 'scuse me: climatechangeism. >:->

Cheers!
Rich

Kill Bill · May 12, 2009

Oleg Kaizerman wrote:

Maybe it would help if you used your real name, and not one stolen from
another person perhaps?
and what about U?

Someone stole my name?

-bill

Kill Bill · May 12, 2009

Soundhaspriority wrote:

kaizero1@gmail.com> wrote in message gua41c$idn$1@localhost.localdomain
Maybe it would help if you used your real name, and not one stolen from
another person perhaps?
and what about U?

What are you talking about? Robert Morein IS my real name!

http://robertmorein.blogspot.com/

"I don't really have a replacement career, it's a very gnawing thing."

Robert Morein
Dresher, PA
(310) 237-6511
(215) 646-4894

No, it's not. Your fake post are so easy to spot now, that one doesn't
even have to go and look at the source of your email anymore to spot them.

-bill

May 12, 2009

On May 11, 5:25 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Okkim Atnarivik wrote:
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@infiniteseries.org> wrote:
: On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:56:54 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
: >We were, but cutting down on the chlorofluorocarbons seems to be doing
: >the trick.
: You've obviously never seen the hole.

www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/world_avoided.html

"...the team simulated 'what might have been' if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
and similar chemicals were not banned through the treaty known as the
Montreal Protocol".

On Mar 21, 2009 10:41 PM R Agness wrote:

Having spent time in Antarctica when DR. Suzan Solomon discovered the Ozone
hole this artical is pure fiction.

Of course it is fiction - it discusses what would probably have
happened if we hadn't had the Montreal Protocol. Nonetheless it is
certainlyu a better forecast than any that you could make

Why your having spent time in Antartica gives you a better insight
into this than anybody else is difficult to understand. Obviously you
don't know any more about the chemistry involved in ozone formation
and destruction than you know about the physics involved in global
warming.

<snipped confused and confusing "explanation" of the ozone hole">

http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/hole.html

Main thing to remember the sun creates ozone in the atmospere.

And destroys it, most effectively when and where there is a lot of
free chlorine in the upper atmosphere, as there is over the Antarctic
at the end of the Antartic winter.

The hole occures only at the South Pole.

Not true. It extends well beyond Antartica, and its edges extend far
enough north to make sun-bathing in Tasmania an unusually effective
way of getting a skin cancer or two. I did my childhood sunbathing in
Tasmania before the ozone hole was well established, and seem to have
got away with it, so far.

It occurs in August through September over the South Polar region and starts to fill in
October-November.

Almost right - something of breakthrough for Eeyore.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

Greegor · May 12, 2009

On May 7, 9:33 pm, GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

Does a device that performs the following conversions and modulations
exist? If not, is it possible to construct?

Prior to being superimposed on a carrier wave, a modulator signal has
its alternating-current converted to direct-current of the same
frequency, amperage, voltage, and wattage.

What I mean by this is that before this AC-to-DC conversion, if
graphed, the current will be seen going up from the x-axis [zero] to
its peak, then down to x-axis, then below the x-axis to its negative
peak, then back up to the x-axis. Both the positive and negative peaks
are of equal distant from the x-axis. This is an AC cycle.

After AC-DC conversion, if graphed the current goes from the x-axis to
its peak, then down to the x-axis, then back up to its peak and then
down to the x-axis again. As you can see, there is no longer any
negative polarity. It goes from 0 to peak to 0 repeats. This is a DC
cycle. Once again, both peaks are equally distant from the x-axis.

No, it's full wave rectified AC.
It takes only 4 diodes, or a center tapped transformer output and 2
diodes.

After this is when the modulation occurs.

During modulation, the carrier wave [also a DC current because it
never goes below the x-axis] is affected by the modulator wave. The
carriers base frequency is zero Hz

Not a frequency.

and its base amplitude is zero watts-per-square-meter.

Nothing.

Base = without modulation

Pointless when frequency and power are zero.

When the modulator signals frequency increases, the peak-to-peak
amplitude of the carrier signal increases equivalent to the following
manner: In numbers, the peak-to-peak amplitude [in watts-per-square-
meter] of the carrier signal equates to the frequency of the modulator
signal [Hz]

When the modulator signals frequency decreases, the peak-to-peak
amplitude of the carrier signal decreases equivalent to the following
manner: In numbers, the peak-to-peak amplitude [in watts-per-square-
meter] of the carrier signal equates to the frequency of the modulator
signal [Hz]

When the modulator signals peak-to-peak amplitude increases, the
carriers frequency increases such that in numbers the frequency
of the carrier wave [in Hz] equates to the amplitude [in watts-per-
square-meter] of the modulator wave.

When the modulator signals peak-to-peak amplitude decreases, the
carriers frequency decreases such that in numbers the frequency
of the carrier wave [in Hz] equates to the amplitude [in watts-per-
square-meter] of the modulator wave.

During demodulation:
When the carrier signals frequency increases, the peak-to-peak
amplitude of the demodulated modulator signal increases equivalent to
the following manner: In numbers, the peak-to-peak amplitude [in watts-
per-square-meter] of the demodulated modulator signal equates to the
frequency of the carrier signal [Hz].

When the carrier signals frequency decreases, the peak-to-peak
amplitude of the demodulated modulator signal decreases equivalent to
the following manner: In numbers, the peak-to-peak amplitude [in watts-
per-square-meter] of the demodulated modulator signal equates to the
frequency of the carrier signal [Hz].

When the carrier signals peak-to-peak amplitude increases, the
demodulated modulator signals frequency increases such that in
numbers the frequency of the demodulated modulator wave [in Hz]
equates to the amplitude [in watts-per-square-meter] of the carrier
wave

When the carrier signals peak-to-peak amplitude decreases, the
demodulated modulator signals frequency decreases such that in
numbers the frequency of the demodulated modulator wave [in Hz]
equates to the amplitude [in watts-per-square-meter] of the carrier
wave

Thanks

stratu > Congratulations. It appears you've discovered
stratu > 'radio'. Available wherever fine electronics is sold.

LOL

Richard Crowley · May 12, 2009

"Kill Bill" wrote ...

Soundhaspriority wrote:
kaizero1@gmail.com> wrote
Maybe it would help if you used your real name, and not one stolen from
another person perhaps?
and what about U?

What are you talking about? Robert Morein IS my real name!

http://robertmorein.blogspot.com/

"I don't really have a replacement career, it's a very gnawing thing."

Robert Morein
Dresher, PA
(310) 237-6511 (215) 646-4894

No, it's not. Your fake post are so easy to spot now, that one doesn't
even have to go and look at the source of your email anymore to spot them.

McCarty does not appear to be rational, based on first-hand
observation of his online behavior. Logic is likely lost on him.

May 12, 2009

On May 12, 12:07 pm, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulf...@ppllaanneett.nnll>
wrote:

mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 7, 8:25 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
stratu...@yahoo.com wrote:

Congratulations. It appears you've discovered 'radio'. Available
wherever fine electronics is sold.
Please don't feed the 'radium' troll.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Is Green Xenon an allotrope like Red Phosphorus, Gray Selenium, Yellow
Antimony and Black Arsenic?

Michael

Nah more like luminous shit, or radiant vomit, or manure lightning....

LOL!

Digester Sludge, Anaerobic Methane?

M

whit3rd · May 12, 2009

On May 11, 2:46 pm, Anti-Spam <A...@Spam.com> wrote:

the resistor values for the voltage divider chain on a LM3914N
portable, simple read-out meter for testing solar battery
.... I am trying to design 3 versions 12V, 24V and
48V, I have also added a bridge rectifier to the input of the meter,
so that polarity is not an issue when using it.

Sorry I have no idea what you mean "the measurement is useful ONLY
because it has a mathematical connection to the physical situation"

What I meant was, the updating of this circuit for 48V has side
effects on the
accuracy you can achieve, and the addition of the bridge rectifier
changes the calibration significantly. A measurement is easy
with a meter ($10 or less); why would one prefer the colored
lights?

I'm particularly disturbed by the bridge rectifier; someone will
need to know the polarity someday, and that HIDES the information.
I lost my car for a few days, when a battery polarity was
misidentified...

Jim Thompson · May 12, 2009

On Wed, 06 May 2009 22:14:03 -0700, John Nagle <nagle@animats.com>
wrote:

I need to model the "selector magnet" of a Model 15 Teletype.
This is an electromagnet with an iron core.
DC resistance is 55 ohms. Inductance is 4 Henries.
Normal operating current is 60mA continuous, but because of the
huge inductance, the normal power source is 120VDC fed through a 2K resistor.

How do I divide up the resistance between the SPICE "series resistance"
and "parallel resistance"? Any ideas?

John Nagle

Now at device level (no behavioral)....

http://analog-innovations.com/SED/HammerDriver(J.Nagle)2.pdf

(Paste to make sure your reader gets the parentheses part).

11mW dissipation in the MOSFET ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice

D from BC · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:26:21 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:03:40 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 18:39:15 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

What, exactly, is it that makes you react so venomously to
any mention of anything outside your personal box? How does
it break your bones or steal your money when somebody
mention something you don't like?

I don't like lies. Especially lies that are illegal to tag as lies.

Then, of course, you'll be happy to show me the scientific proof
that they are lies.

Show me proof for Noah's arc and I'll show you proof that all animals
didn't come from the same spot.

I'll be waiting!

BTW, what does "lies that are illegal to tag as lies" mean?

Cheers!
Rich

It's illegal to correct the bible.
Example: Noah's arc should be tagged as a lie (a falsehood).
It's illegal to tag (note, mark, bookmark) the Noah story as a lie.
Christianity does not allow corrections.
However, Christianity correction does occur in the form of cherry
picking.
No one talks about exodus 31:15. That one is quietly sweep under the
rug..

Science allows corrections and is not under the influence of
toiletpaperless desert monkeys who wrote wild and crazy stories.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

D from BC · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:03:36 -0700, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Rich the Philosophizer wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:03:24 -0700, D from BC wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2009 19:28:35 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

What exactly is it about you that makes it so important to you to
convince everyone that atheism is "The Truth"?

Ohhh nooo.. Are you seeing leprechauns?

You're STILL evading the question:

What, exactly, is it that makes you react so venomously to
any mention of anything outside your personal box? How does
it break your bones or steal your money when somebody
mention something you don't like?

Is your faith in the religion of atheism really that fragile?

Thanks,
Rich

???? Isn't that a contradiction? "Faith" in the RELIGION of atheism???

afaik..
Atheism is not a religion because atheism can change depending on
changes in scientific evidence.
For example..
Atheists will believe in leprechauns if there is sufficient evidence.
(Ex. Leprechaun autopsy.)

Christianity is absolutism, infallibility, irrefutability and
unquestionable acceptance. It is dogma written by people who didn't
know what makes urine yellow.

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

D from BC · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:29:42 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer
<philosobphizer@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:03:36 -0700, Robert Baer wrote:
Rich the Philosophizer wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:03:24 -0700, D from BC wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 19:28:35 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

What exactly is it about you that makes it so important to you to
convince everyone that atheism is "The Truth"?

Ohhh nooo.. Are you seeing leprechauns?

You're STILL evading the question:

What, exactly, is it that makes you react so venomously to
any mention of anything outside your personal box? How does
it break your bones or steal your money when somebody
mention something you don't like?

Is your faith in the religion of atheism really that fragile?

???? Isn't that a contradiction? "Faith" in the RELIGION of atheism???

Well, cult then. It has all of the same symptoms, just like antismokerism
and globalwarmingism - 'scuse me: climatechangeism. >:-

Cheers!
Rich

The cult of the noncult???

The faith of the non-believers??

The religion of the non-religious???

D from BC
myrealaddress(at)comic(dot)com
BC, Canada
Posted to usenet sci.electronics.design

Archimedes' Lever · May 12, 2009

On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:34:38 -0700, Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com>
wrote:

And do not forget the fact that some M$ apps actively modify and
sometimes reject other apps....

Sure, bub. Yet another MS retard that can't help using the retarded
morphographic horseshit "M$" moniker. You *should* be able to say that
your mental age matured past that 13 year old maturity level CRAP decades
ago, but you cannot.

I have Office Pro 2k7, and I have installed it on my Vista drive, and
my Windows7 drive, and regardless of which one I boot, my updates work
perfectly, and I have never seen it "modify another program", like you
describe here. Cite?

Oleg Kaizerman · May 13, 2009

">

Someone stole my name?

-bill
Robert Ragon sounds familier ?

Eric Sosman · May 13, 2009

DAVID GREENE wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
RichD wrote:
Why is it, on paper currency the portrait is full
face, while on coins, it's profile?
Noses stick out in metal.
[Sigh] I guess we'll never have Dolly Parton on a coin then.

Didn't they once have a topless lady on the quarter?

She was just a two-bit-- forget it, the FCC is watching.

--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid

DAVID GREENE · May 13, 2009

"Rich Grise" <richgrise@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 04:20:48 +0000, DAVID GREENE wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <paul@hovnanian.com> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
RichD wrote:

Why is it, on paper currency the portrait is full
face, while on coins, it's profile?

Noses stick out in metal.

[Sigh] I guess we'll never have Dolly Parton on a coin then.

Didn't they once have a topless lady on the quarter?

Look for the "Standing Liberty" half-dollar, and try "Walking Liberty"
as well.

If you find one, give us a link!

Here it is, wardrobe malfunction and all. The 1916-17 Standing
Liberty US quater, just like Janet Jackson. Maybe it was to show
solidarity with the French during WWI.

http://coins.about.com/od/famousrarecoinprofiles/p/breastedliberty.htm

Apparently they put her clothes back on in 1918.

Dave Greene

don · May 13, 2009

This is great, money and religion.

Has anyone read "Angles and Demons" ?

I am looking forward to the movie.

I'll re-read the book to see how close Ron Howard followed it.

don

Mensanator · May 13, 2009

On May 12, 1:34 pm, Rich Grise <richgr...@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2009 04:20:48 +0000, DAVID GREENE wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
RichD wrote:

Why is it, on paper currency the portrait is full
face, while on coins, it's profile?

Noses stick out in metal.

[Sigh] I guess we'll never have Dolly Parton on a coin then.

Didn't they once have a topless lady on the quarter?

Look for the "Standing Liberty" half-dollar,

Nope.

http://www.usmint.gov/downloads/pressroom/2008_AEGold_Bullion_O.jpg

and try "Walking Liberty"

Nope. ("Walking Liberty" was originally on a quarter)

http://www.usmint.gov/downloads/pressroom/2008_AESilverProof_Obv.jpg

as well.

Unless these modern renditions have altered the original designs.

But the historic images avilable online don't appear topless either.

If you find one, give us a link!

Good Luck!
Rich

Driver to drive?

Rich Grise

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Rich the Philosophizer

Guest

Kill Bill

Guest

Kill Bill

Guest

Guest

Greegor

Guest

Richard Crowley

Guest

Guest

whit3rd

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

D from BC

Guest

D from BC

Guest

D from BC

Guest

Archimedes' Lever

Guest

Oleg Kaizerman

Guest

Eric Sosman

Guest

DAVID GREENE

Guest

don

Guest

Mensanator

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor