J
Jon Kirwan
Guest
On Mon, 11 May 2009 08:15:23 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/antarctica/domec/domec_epica_data.html
Other linked sources for paleoclimatology are also found nearby on
that site:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/education.html
Jon
Epica Dome C goes back another 300kyr, as well.On May 11, 12:27 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Andrew wrote:
bill.slo...@ieee.org> wrote
Eeyore wrote:
In 30 years, the largest figure according to your choice of smoothing
etc and data source is about 0.2C.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/07/april-global-temperature-anomal...
Graham
-So what? You keep on getting excited about short term noise, as if it
-said anything about the long term trend generated by the build up in
-C02 in the atmosphere.
The whole AGW hypothesis is based on short term data.
The Vostock ice-core data goes back some half a million years, but
since you don't see its relevance to AGW you probably aren't aware of
this.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/antarctica/domec/domec_epica_data.html
Other linked sources for paleoclimatology are also found nearby on
that site:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/education.html
Jon