Driver to drive?

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
"ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote

Command of the Queen's English?

BBC headline...

"Israelis shoot dead armed woman"


I've heard of a "dead leg" but not a dead arm.

The woman was dead, not her arm.

Dead, armed woman.

Requires an apostrophe you see.

That is a COMMA,
Apologies, it was late.

Graham
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:24:29 -0700, Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:

Hello,

Like usual the TV distribution amps in our house have those darn
F-connectors. I hate them.

Its predecessor was even worse. They only accepted copper braided RG
59 with a solid center conductor, and had no threads. You had to strip
the coax, insert it directly into the chassis mount connector, and crimp
the loose crimp ring over the jacket.


Long story short, I ran out of the
gold-plated "good stuff", can't get it in the local stores anymore,
could only buy a nickel plated F-connector. Dimensions checked out to be
the same as this example:

The nickel meet all FCC requirements, and used properly are as good,
or better than the gold plated connectors. Most of the gold plated I
tested were crap. The absolute worst was a batch of very high quality
unplated brass that corroded in months. If they had proper plating, we
would have switched all our CATV systems to that brand.


http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002ZPFBW/ref=asc_df_B0002ZPFBW754974?smid=A385A0XNQBW8HY&tag=shopzilla_rev_1108-20&linkCode=asn

190mils center ID, slides over center nicely. 330mils ID for the
ferrule, and for the life of me I can't get that over the quad shield
with the shield strands brushed back. This was never a problem with the
good stuff but since I used that all up I have no idea what their
ferrule ID was.

Any tricks?

Only queers, fairies and Democrats "crimp".

And CATV companies who have to meet FCC RF leakage regulations. They
used to use a double shielded copper braid, with a silver plated center
conductor for CATV head ends. The crimp type made air tight connection
to the body, and kept it. Unlike those soft plastic compression types
where the plastic slowly flows and reduces the pressure on the braid.

Those Ideal connectors don't impress me. We used to buy a better
grade of 'F' connector in multiples of 25,000. The Raychem wasn't bad,
but a lot of connectors failed our lab tests, and were blacklisted.


--
And another motherboard bites the dust!
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:59:20 -0700, Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:24:29 -0700, Joerg
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:

Hello,

Like usual the TV distribution amps in our house have those darn
F-connectors. I hate them. Long story short, I ran out of the
gold-plated "good stuff", can't get it in the local stores anymore,
could only buy a nickel plated F-connector. Dimensions checked out to be
the same as this example:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002ZPFBW/ref=asc_df_B0002ZPFBW754974?smid=A385A0XNQBW8HY&tag=shopzilla_rev_1108-20&linkCode=asn

190mils center ID, slides over center nicely. 330mils ID for the
ferrule, and for the life of me I can't get that over the quad shield
with the shield strands brushed back. This was never a problem with the
good stuff but since I used that all up I have no idea what their
ferrule ID was.

Any tricks?

Forgot... There ARE dimension differences on Type-F for different coax
such as RG-6 and RG-59. Read carefully!


I know, this one was for RG6. But probably not for the quad-shield kind.
The RG59 version is smaller, I've got those here as well.

Thanks for the hint regarding Lowes, we've got a store in the area, 15
miles or so.

Those Ideal (brand) connectors are so easy to work with. That hand
tool is actually a _press_.

Unlike crimping, I never have a binding or distortion problem.

I never had that problem with good quality hex crimp connectors, and
the right crimpers. Lots of cheap, imported crap out there.


--
And another motherboard bites the dust!
 
bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:

On Apr 5, 10:48 pm, Fred Abse <excretatau...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:16:25 -0700,bill.slomanwrote:
Probably

"Israelis shoot and kill an armed woman"

but it's longer than

"Israelis shoot dead armed woman"

and headlines have to be short.

So why not:

"Israelis shoot armed woman dead"

Exactly same character count.

Seems fine to me - it does split the infinitive, but ony pedants worry
about that.
Certainly not Star Trek.

Graham
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

[...]

The nickel meet all FCC requirements, and used properly are as good,
or better than the gold plated connectors. Most of the gold plated I
tested were crap. The absolute worst was a batch of very high quality
unplated brass that corroded in months. If they had proper plating, we
would have switched all our CATV systems to that brand.
My gold plated ones probably fall into that category. The gold flaked
off upon crimping. But they work since years, no corrosion and most of
all I could push them on, and that's all I really care about.

If they do corrode 40 years from now, oh well ...

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
 
I saw several of your replies in abse, but don't understand what you are
trying to tell me. Can you explain in text please?

Jim

--
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it."
--Aristotle
 
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:52:54 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

snip
It's also off topic on s.e.d.
I agree. And this is new information, how?

Jon
 
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:07:30 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

I saw several of your replies in abse, but don't understand what you are
trying to tell me. Can you explain in text please?

Jim
Did you download the attached spreadsheets?

Did you hit the shortcut key, and see that only the correctly marked
pages showed up in the print preview?

If so, then you see the sheet works as well as the macro. SO, if yours
does not (mine originally didn't), I concluded that it MUST be due to
cell formatting issues, as the macro works, and mine was fixed by hunting
down improperly formatted cells. Your formula returns a numeric zero
value, so the cell you are filling has to be filled with a numeric figure
as well as be formatted numeric. A numeric cell will hold an alpha
content, including a text based zero, which causes the failure.

My sheet skips any page with an N or a 0 in the F52 cell position. You
can also nest another IF statement in there and have it skip sheets that
have an empty cell value there as well. In fact, you can nest 7 levels
of IF statements in there and test for several values in any cell
position, so you have a lot of options.

The macro works. In print preview mode, you have to step through each
page. In the full print command mode, it should go straight to the
printer.

I don't know what I left out, but you didn't explain what you were
confused about either. :)
 
Joerg wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

[...]


The nickel meet all FCC requirements, and used properly are as good,
or better than the gold plated connectors. Most of the gold plated I
tested were crap. The absolute worst was a batch of very high quality
unplated brass that corroded in months. If they had proper plating, we
would have switched all our CATV systems to that brand.


My gold plated ones probably fall into that category. The gold flaked
off upon crimping. But they work since years, no corrosion and most of
all I could push them on, and that's all I really care about.

The push on connectors are 'G' connectors. Leave it to marketing
types to call anything that comes close 'F' connectors. :(


If they do corrode 40 years from now, oh well ...

Some didn't last 40 hours.


--
And another motherboard bites the dust!
 
I really appreciate your help, but I am firmly convinced that if every
engineer in the world were forced to teach a freshman circuit analysis class
for a couple of years that there would be far less confusion in the world.
You soon find out that a "simple base bias circuit" ain't so simple if you
haven't been doing it for a few dozen years.

Jim

--
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it."
--Aristotle


"Archimedes' Lever" <OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote in message
news:usokt4524idpecbvevklln1lgip4o090pt@4ax.com...
Did you download the attached spreadsheets?
Yes I did. There were about five or six of them as I recall. THere was no
comment on the difference between any of them.


Did you hit the shortcut key, and see that only the correctly marked
pages showed up in the print preview?
What's a shortcut key? What is a "correctly marked" page?


If so, then you see the sheet works as well as the macro. SO, if yours
does not (mine originally didn't), I concluded that it MUST be due to
cell formatting issues, as the macro works, and mine was fixed by hunting
down improperly formatted cells. Your formula returns a numeric zero
value, so the cell you are filling has to be filled with a numeric figure
as well as be formatted numeric. A numeric cell will hold an alpha
content, including a text based zero, which causes the failure.
That's nice. What is the solution?



My sheet skips any page with an N or a 0 in the F52 cell position. You
can also nest another IF statement in there
In where?



and have it skip sheets that
have an empty cell value there as well. In fact, you can nest 7 levels
of IF statements in there and test for several values in any cell
position, so you have a lot of options.
I understand nested IFs. What is the point? All I care about is putting a
character in a cell and if that character is there skipping the page in
print mode.



The macro works. In print preview mode, you have to step through each
page. In the full print command mode, it should go straight to the
printer.
So do you have to run the macro every time you print, or is there some
"magic" autoload feature I'm not familiar with? What is a "print command"
mode?

I don't know what I left out, but you didn't explain what you were
confused about either. :)
All of the above {;-)

Jim
 
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:24:45 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

I really appreciate your help, but I am firmly convinced that if every
engineer in the world were forced to teach a freshman circuit analysis class
for a couple of years that there would be far less confusion in the world.
You soon find out that a "simple base bias circuit" ain't so simple if you
haven't been doing it for a few dozen years.

Jim
Teaching is the ultimate educator. Having to explain something to
another makes it sink into your own skull.

To this day I can teach Calculus and Circuit Analysis, sans book, all
I need is an outline, so I don't forget a topic ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money. You can keep the change.
 
Teaching is the ultimate educator. Having to explain something to
another makes it sink into your own skull.

To this day I can teach Calculus and Circuit Analysis, sans book, all
I need is an outline, so I don't forget a topic ;-)

I really didn't know how to fly until I started teaching it. That's sort of
scary.

Jim
 
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:24:45 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

I really appreciate your help, but I am firmly convinced that if every
engineer in the world were forced to teach a freshman circuit analysis class
for a couple of years that there would be far less confusion in the world.
You soon find out that a "simple base bias circuit" ain't so simple if you
haven't been doing it for a few dozen years.

Jim

--
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it."
--Aristotle
When you jack off with a top posted reply like this, the least you could
do is remove the fucking sig flag.


"Archimedes' Lever" <OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote in message
news:usokt4524idpecbvevklln1lgip4o090pt@4ax.com...

Did you download the attached spreadsheets?

Yes I did. There were about five or six of them as I recall. THere was no
comment on the difference between any of them.

The differences were easy to note. It jumped from 5 to 7 worksheets so
you could see that only the even numbered pages would print.

Did you hit the shortcut key, and see that only the correctly marked
pages showed up in the print preview?

What's a shortcut key?
You have already forgotten how you assigned a key combination to your
macro in order to make it 'run' the macro? So did I, and that key
combination is commented on the worksheet (the first worksheet) as an
instruction.

What is a "correctly marked" page?
Some pages are marked as PRINT, and others as SKIP. In each case, the
field YOU wanted to be referenced to is tested. "Correctly marked"
refers to pages that were marked with a zero or N in F52. They were not
supposed to print. They do not.

If so, then you see the sheet works as well as the macro. SO, if yours
does not (mine originally didn't), I concluded that it MUST be due to
cell formatting issues, as the macro works, and mine was fixed by hunting
down improperly formatted cells. Your formula returns a numeric zero
value, so the cell you are filling has to be filled with a numeric figure
as well as be formatted numeric. A numeric cell will hold an alpha
content, including a text based zero, which causes the failure.

That's nice. What is the solution?

Did you not read any of my replies throughout the thread? It is cell
formatting, and cell filling. Your formula needs to fill f52 with a
numeric 0, so the cell must be numerically formatted. Such a cell will
accept text as well, but numerals are handled differently. Text cells
will handle numeric data, but it is handled differently.

The posts in abse were just the files. This thread here is where any
answers were given.


My sheet skips any page with an N or a 0 in the F52 cell position. You
can also nest another IF statement in there

In where?
In the macro formula, silly!
and have it skip sheets that
have an empty cell value there as well. In fact, you can nest 7 levels
of IF statements in there and test for several values in any cell
position, so you have a lot of options.

I understand nested IFs. What is the point? All I care about is putting a
character in a cell and if that character is there skipping the page in
print mode.

Which is what the workbook I posted does. It used your EXACT macro,
and your EXACT cell references. A nested IF would only allow checking
the location for other characters as well. That is why I mentioned it.

The macro works. In print preview mode, you have to step through each
page. In the full print command mode, it should go straight to the
printer.

So do you have to run the macro every time you print,
No, you and your idiot crew (based on your descriptions) does.

If you want managed print jobs, YOU have to include AND USE the macro
each time you want managed printing.

or is there some
"magic" autoload feature I'm not familiar with? What is a "print command"
mode?

The macro uses "Print Preview" mode right now. To print, one line gets
commented out, and another gets un-commented. That switched the macro
from print preview to just "Print". When that call is invoked by the
macro, it prints the result. There is no stopping at each page.

I don't know what I left out, but you didn't explain what you were
confused about either. :)

All of the above {;-)
I find it hard to imagine that you could not see how the test sheet
works, or how the fact that it works would help you fix your sheet.

It is a simple matter of making sure that the cells that get examined
have the right cell formatting, so that the formula that performs the
test "sees" the right data type.

Otherwise the macro fails. Unless you had been reading all of my
replies to you and others, you would likely miss the things I did to make
your macro work.
 
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:03:51 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

Teaching is the ultimate educator. Having to explain something to
another makes it sink into your own skull.

To this day I can teach Calculus and Circuit Analysis, sans book, all
I need is an outline, so I don't forget a topic ;-)



I really didn't know how to fly until I started teaching it. That's sort of
scary.

Jim


I have always contended that I could without any training.
 
The macro uses "Print Preview" mode right now. To print, one line gets
commented out, and another gets un-commented. That switched the macro
from print preview to just "Print". When that call is invoked by the
macro, it prints the result. There is no stopping at each page.
OK, I got it all to work ... with one minor problem. In Excel when you
print, unless you check the "print the whole workbook" you have to print one
page at a time, move to the next page, print that page, and so on. The
macro simply sends the whole workbook whose pages have been "selected" to
the printer one sheet at a time.

To a real printer that's not a problem. However, when printing to a file
like a .pdf, you have to save one sheet at a time and then when all the
sheets are printed one pdf file at a time, you can combine them in a single
pdf. The saving one sheet at a time is nearly as time intensive as printing
the whole thing to a .pdf and then manually deleting the zero sum sheets.

Is there a nice way in the macro to tell Excel to print the selected sheets
as one file and not page at a time?

All of the above {;-)

I find it hard to imagine that you could not see how the test sheet
works, or how the fact that it works would help you fix your sheet.
I am continuously amazed at how basic a student's mind is when it is so
obvious to me because I've done it a few thousand times.

It is a simple matter of making sure that the cells that get examined
have the right cell formatting, so that the formula that performs the
test "sees" the right data type.
I got it. That was the missing link.


Otherwise the macro fails. Unless you had been reading all of my
replies to you and others, you would likely miss the things I did to make
your macro work.
Reading is one thing. COmprehending quite a different matter. Thanks for
your help.

Jim
 
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:08:32 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
<jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

OK, I got it all to work ... with one minor problem. In Excel when you
print, unless you check the "print the whole workbook" you have to print one
page at a time, move to the next page, print that page, and so on. The
macro simply sends the whole workbook whose pages have been "selected" to
the printer one sheet at a time.
Yes, it does, and that is what you wanted when you made your post. Your
test to fill F52 based on whether the sheet has changed or whatever is
how that selection gets made. The macro merely tests the value of that
field, prints if true, and cycles through to the next sheet. You could
run the test first, and then run the print job based on the test.
Currently it: tests, prints, steps, repeats. You need it to: test, flag,
print.

You make NO selection on printing from ANY menu one would use in excel.

The MACRO selects it, remember? The macro also flags which sheets to
print based on the contents of the cell you fill. It merely does the
print function after testing each sheet. You need to find a way to
compile the print session into a single print job. You could 'print to
file' each page, then use a batch file to pipe it to the printer
directly, which would be a single print job from all observations.

In the macro, the current "print preview" mode my sheet is in will
ALWAYS step trough each sheet. With it set to print it out, they should
all fly without ANY user interaction. If your print dialog is coming up
at all when the macro is set to actual print mode, a different print
command is needed inside the macro. I will make a sheet that has
two buttons so you can choose preview or print. You can use those
buttons on your sheet. You paste the button as an image, and hyperlink
the image to a function. Then, it is a button you can use to call the
macro.

There is a way to modify the macro to highlight 'changed sheets' that
have specific data in F52, then run a standard print call which would
print those highlighted sheets all at once, instead of stepping through
each sheet, then printing it, it would step through each sheet,
highlighting it's tab, then calling the print job at the end.

You can also highlight ALL the worksheet tabs yourself using the shift
or alt keys and mouse cursor. All highlighted sheets will print. You do
not have to use the "print whole workbook" dialog at all.
 
Yes, it does, and that is what you wanted when you made your post.
Not quite. The original macro was given to me in this thread when I made a
fairly detailed description of what I was trying to do.



Your
test to fill F52 based on whether the sheet has changed or whatever is
how that selection gets made. The macro merely tests the value of that
field, prints if true, and cycles through to the next sheet. You could
run the test first, and then run the print job based on the test.
Currently it: tests, prints, steps, repeats. You need it to: test, flag,
print.
I understand that. I'm simply trying my level best to come up with a
solution to a problem ... namely to make a single pdf file from all the
sheets in the workbook that have a nonzero value in cell F52. So far I've
been able to format that cell as a number and the "print preview" routine
gives me those sheets and those sheets only. Now my task is to figure a way
to print only those sheets in a batch to a single pdf file.

You make NO selection on printing from ANY menu one would use in excel.
I don't believe that I said that I did. I did comment that unless you hit
the "print the entire workbook" button in the standard Excel print menu that
you have to do the job one page at a time, which is a royal pain in the time
fanny.


The MACRO selects it, remember? The macro also flags which sheets to
print based on the contents of the cell you fill. It merely does the
print function after testing each sheet. You need to find a way to
compile the print session into a single print job. You could 'print to
file' each page, then use a batch file to pipe it to the printer
directly, which would be a single print job from all observations.
That's one way to do it, but that entails the user (dummy, remember?) to
figure out how to "print to file" and then how to run a batch file. Somehow
I would think that all that could be done inside the macro, but I'm too
ignorant of VB to know how to do it.


In the macro, the current "print preview" mode my sheet is in will
ALWAYS step trough each sheet. With it set to print it out, they should
all fly without ANY user interaction. If your print dialog is coming up
at all when the macro is set to actual print mode, a different print
command is needed inside the macro. I will make a sheet that has
two buttons so you can choose preview or print. You can use those
buttons on your sheet. You paste the button as an image, and hyperlink
the image to a function. Then, it is a button you can use to call the
macro.
Yes, I understand that, and that is how the macro prints also...sheet at a
time rather than selected sheets of the workbook in one swell foop. No
print dialog other than the pdf writer asking me for a new file name for
each sheet that it prints. No buttons are necssary; I'll presume that the
user is at least smart enough to remember that "CTRL-z" will get them the
workbook printed with selected sheets and the plain old print menu will give
them the whole book no matter what is in cell F52.


There is a way to modify the macro to highlight 'changed sheets' that
have specific data in F52, then run a standard print call which would
print those highlighted sheets all at once, instead of stepping through
each sheet, then printing it, it would step through each sheet,
highlighting it's tab, then calling the print job at the end.
Can you elucidate that for me a bit? What might the mod look like?

You can also highlight ALL the worksheet tabs yourself using the shift
or alt keys and mouse cursor. All highlighted sheets will print. You do
not have to use the "print whole workbook" dialog at all.
I didn't know that. Evidently my knowledge of Excel is rudimentary at best.

I'll post the whole darned spreadsheet up on abse so that you can see what
I'm working with and the formulas that I'm using.

Jim
 
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:18:31 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
<OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:03:51 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:


Teaching is the ultimate educator. Having to explain something to
another makes it sink into your own skull.

To this day I can teach Calculus and Circuit Analysis, sans book, all
I need is an outline, so I don't forget a topic ;-)



I really didn't know how to fly until I started teaching it. That's sort of
scary.

Jim


I have always contended that I could without any training.
Wings either.
 
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:38:27 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:24:45 -0700, "RST Engineering \(jw\)"
jim@rstengineering.com> wrote:

I really appreciate your help, but I am firmly convinced that if every
engineer in the world were forced to teach a freshman circuit analysis class
for a couple of years that there would be far less confusion in the world.
You soon find out that a "simple base bias circuit" ain't so simple if you
haven't been doing it for a few dozen years.

Jim

Teaching is the ultimate educator. Having to explain something to
another makes it sink into your own skull.
I taught a couple of CS courses at the local college (asked the Dean
once if I taught all the courses did I get the degree - MAIT) and
several at work, in the '80s. Putting together a course teaches a
lot. Standing up and teaching and (answering the questions) really
drives the subject home. After teaching for three hours I was pooped!

To this day I can teach Calculus and Circuit Analysis, sans book, all
I need is an outline, so I don't forget a topic ;-)
 
I taught a couple of CS courses at the local college (asked the Dean
once if I taught all the courses did I get the degree - MAIT) and
several at work, in the '80s. Putting together a course teaches a
lot. Standing up and teaching and (answering the questions) really
drives the subject home. After teaching for three hours I was pooped!
I'm teaching one theory and two tinbending classes next semester where the
three campuses are about 150 miles apart. One on Monday, one on Tuesday,
and one on Wednesday. I can do three hours of lecture without too much
problem, but the Monday class is half lecture, half lab and the other two
are all lab. Now LAB is what really poops you out.

Jim
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top