Guest
On Mar 10, 12:24 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
wrote:
you don't understand what you see, your eyes aren't all that useful.
they are well brought up, they don't describe things that they ought
to appreciate as shit, but you were brought up in Texas.
both are making money reflects a certain lack of sophistication in
your customer base. From time to time I've been asked to present my
designs as John Larkin does - as insanely good and so forth - but I've
never been good enough at keeping a straight face to make that kind of
exaggerated claim. Which is not to say that I haven't come up with
clever solutions to specfic problems, merely that I've always been
able to see how they could have been made even better.
plagarised something from someone who can write. Possibly me.
you don't seem to have access to what is available.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
wrote:
No, and you wouldn't do any worse if you were wearing blindfolds. IfOn Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:02:47 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:04 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:56:07 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:14:07 -0800 (PST), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:20 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink..net
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:53:52 -0800 (PST), bill.slo...@ieee.org wrote:
The part that is working hard on setting up its own personal global
extinction.
Insanely absurd, unless you always trust extrapolation and always
ignore feedbacks.
If he doesn't understand a simple aluminum electrolytic, how can he
claim to understand the so called global warming?
Michael Terrell doesn't appreciate that you can make better
electrolytic capacitors with tantalum than aluminium.
---
I don't think that's a valid extrapolation since all he claimed was that
you don't understand simple aluminum electrolytics.
True. I do know the difference, and where not to use a tantalum.
Its just his usual half assed attempt to cover the fact that he's
incompetent.
He still can't remember that I have both of his .ieee and Google
accounts filtered so he's becoming senile, as well. That is probably
why he's 30 or more years out of date.
That's why I say SHUN Slowman.
He should be us>ed to it, by now. People have shunned the loser his
whole life. He makes Rodney Dangerfield look like the life of the
party.
Nice to see Jim enjoying himself with his fan club.
---
It's good to see us _all_ enjoying ourselves, but it's not a fan club.
It's more like a party where we get to play pin-the-tail-on-the-Sloman
(sorry, Grahambut we don't have to wear blindfolds.
you don't understand what you see, your eyes aren't all that useful.
Kids do prefer toys and candy to the kind of stuff adults value. IfIt'd be more fun if you were like a pińata, but a pińata is full of fun
toys and candy, not shit.
---
they are well brought up, they don't describe things that they ought
to appreciate as shit, but you were brought up in Texas.
From what I can see of your "products" and Jim's, the fact that youNone of them have an ounce of sense,
---
Geez, both Jim and I are running businesses and making money, and
Michael is rebuilding computers and giving them away, pro bono, to old
folks like you, while being severely handicapped.
both are making money reflects a certain lack of sophistication in
your customer base. From time to time I've been asked to present my
designs as John Larkin does - as insanely good and so forth - but I've
never been good enough at keeping a straight face to make that kind of
exaggerated claim. Which is not to say that I haven't come up with
clever solutions to specfic problems, merely that I've always been
able to see how they could have been made even better.
Job hunting, with little prospect of success.And what are you doing?
Not so much fighting as exposing their pretensions.Nothing but fighting with people whom you say have no sense.
You aren't really equipped to see sense.That makes no sense to me.
You think I'm going to take you seriously?If you want to make a point, and make it believable, then propose it and
back it up with data instead of worthless opinion.
That is what I ought to do, but I'm bored.Or, if your audience is senseless, save everyone some grief and don't
respond at all.
---
Aren't we all?so they are free admire one another's pathetic
attempts at wit.
---
Oh, and now you're a judge of wit?
Your vocabulary has suddenly expanded or - more likely - you'veIn the first place, your command of the written language isn't good
enough that the subtlety of 'wit' is available to you and, in the second
place, you seem to consider 'wit' a more deliciously devious way to
issue an insult than a coarse, "fuck you".
plagarised something from someone who can write. Possibly me.
True. You do get excited about typo's.As far as "In the first place" goes, you wrote:
"so they are free admire one another's pathetic
attempts at wit."
Unless I'm mistaken, you should have written:
"so they are free to admire one another's pathetic
attempts at wit."
Ran out of inspiration? There's not a lot of it around in Texas, andFeel free to respond by whining about that your language skills aren't
that great but that you still have something to say and, hopefully, you
won't trip up on that, as well.
And, as far as second place goes, figure it out for yourself.
you don't seem to have access to what is available.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen