Driver to drive?

On 7 Oct 2004 19:08:12 -0700, kaisers_sun@yahoo.com (Brian Raab)
wrote:

Tested it on myself, unfortunately something went wrong and it reduced
my IQ from 150 to 15.

What can I do now?
Get a lawyer and sue the twenty people that answer this question.
 
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 10:27:50 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:29:12 +0100, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 18:11:39 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

He's a professor at Cornell, and my brat is a freshperson there. We
have tickets for a lecture/performance by him later this month, during
freshmen parents week; free, or at least included in the cost of
tuition. Should be fun.

JC is a professor at Cornell?? Are you serious? What subject does he
teach?

http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/04/9.30.04/Cleese_lect.html
Well, blow me!
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
John Fields wrote:

They takes little time, because I am simply
expressing an observation of hatemongers like you, rather than doing
extensive analysis.


---
They takes little time because you is a sloppy cunt bitch who don't
want to take the time to try and do it right because you knows that no
matter what you does it'll still be fucked when you is done.
LOL- too funny!!
 
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 01:50:53 GMT, Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote:

On Friday 08 October 2004 09:46 am, John Larkin did deign to grace us with
the following:

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:15:27 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlog
DOTyou.knowwhat> wrote (in <6nbdm09f2e9338ci0o7btl10561qctd4ti@4ax.com>)
about 'Something to ponder', on Fri, 8 Oct 2004:

I'd rather you posted something on generating precise nanosecond-range
delays. ;-)

Lengths of coax?

There are several suppliers for variable delay lines that use physical
conductors as the delay medium.

http://www.gigabaudics.com/PDDL10/pddl10.html

and a few others. My favorites are the big boxes full of trombones and
leadscrews and stepper motors...

http://www.colbyinstruments.com/pdl-30a.htm


Building a continuously-variable "analog" delay line is an interesting
problem.

Hmmm, what's the mathematics of a trombone line? Say you launch a wide
pulse into it, almost filling it up, and during the pulse you scrunch
it down (rather quickly, obviously). The pulse that comes out is
shorter. How is energy conserved? This is a nastier version of the
charged variable capacitor problem.

As if I didn't have enough to think about already.

I think "energy conservation" will be very low on the list of priorities
as you engineer this slider that moves at 0.85c. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
Maybe a servo instead of a stepper, you think?

John
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 05:31:14 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:



Tom Seim wrote:

From today's Wall Street Journal:

One of John Kerry's claims to the White House is that his diplomacy
would better control nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea
than President Bush's alleged truculence. So it is newsworthy that a
spokesman for Tehran's Foreign Ministry has just dismissed out of hand
the centerpiece of Mr. Kerry's arms-control offer to the mullahs.

We'll just let WSJ stick with their business news and leave the
international security assessments alone. It is Bush's truculence that
has induced N.Korea and Iran to accelerate their weapons programs



Clinton signed a treaty with the K's in the early 90's, providing them
with oil in exchange for their not doing nuclear development. They
took the oil and played him for a fool from the outset. How can you
consider the current administration to be blamable for inheriting a
mess? The trends and forces we face now have been evolving for
centuries.

John
N. Korea hardly rises to the status of a 'mess'- a minor challenge to
our monitoring capability. The 'mess' is Bush's missile defense program-
billions of dollars down the drain, and to think the warhead will be
delivered in one of those 96% of millions of ship containers entering
the country without inspection.
 
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:


The emotional need to embrace those who are hate filled and evil only
to satisfy an ignorant pressure group (nazis and people like you) show
extreme weakness and inability to stand up for what is right. I cannot
embrace your disgusting perversion because I cannot accept the horrible
wrongs that you embrace.

Frankly, one of my favorite co-workers was a communist (in the true sense),
but he wasn't hate filled and horridly destructive like you. Frankly,
I'd show you some respect, even with your beliefs, only if you personally
deserved it.

Whatever dislike that you might have for me, you don't meet my minimal
standards for respect. This means that whatever disdain that you might
have for me, you don't even meet the criteria for me to have minimal
human respect for you. You hate yourself by hating me (and others.)
---
I don't hate you, Dyson, you're just not important enough for me to
give a shit about.

Consequently, all that bleating and whining you do about that crap you
call respect and what's important to you and what isn't and blah, and
blah, and blah, is falling on deaf ears.

Tell it someone who cares, I'm just here for the amusement of slapping
you around a little, that's all...

--
John Fields
 
John S. Dyson wrote:

In article <ck96da0ga0@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> writes:

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote...

God does the killing.

A lightning bolt from heaven striking Kerry down, no doubt.


Perhaps, perhaps not... Again, why did you think about murder?
Why is murder so forward in your mind? Have you been associating
that idea with the current president, President Bush? Are you really
considering the murder of President Bush? Don't you think that you
should talk to a psychiatrist first?
Why does he need an accomplice qualified in psychiatry?
Unless he's going to make Bush face his 'inner demons' (actually, pretty outer
ones at present) in the hope he'll shoot himself out of remorse...

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
John S. Dyson wrote:

In article <ck96da0ga0@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> writes:

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote...

God does the killing.


A lightning bolt from heaven striking Kerry down, no doubt.


Perhaps, perhaps not... Again, why did you think about murder?
Why is murder so forward in your mind? Have you been associating
that idea with the current president, President Bush? Are you really
considering the murder of President Bush? Don't you think that you
should talk to a psychiatrist first?


Why does he need an accomplice qualified in psychiatry?
Unless he's going to make Bush face his 'inner demons' (actually, pretty
outer ones at present) in the hope he'll shoot himself out of remorse...
Fat chance! The idiot would miss.
 
In article <41681E03.4020005@nospam.com>,
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
Tom Seim wrote:
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<41675DA0.6090709@nospam.com>...

John S. Dyson wrote:


He seems to have had personality degradation, or perhaps was always
very hate filled. If purchasing something that funds hatred, it is
good to find an alternative. For example, I would avoid purchasing
any kind of good (e.g. literature, books) from someone who is going
to fund hate of any kind. I wouldn't purchase anything that would
fund "nazis" of either a right wing or left wing bias.

John

Interesting that you should talk about pulling "finding" from bad
businesses, because that is exactly what William C. Thompson, New York
City Comptroller decided to do with investments in Halliburton- and
specifically because of their dealings with State Sponsors of Terrorism
like Syria, Libya, Iran, Iraq, and the Sudan. Many prominent investment
groups have pulled the plug on Halliburton stocks and a few other
businesses. And this is not just a "liberal" slant- it is integrity-
these people know exactly how to investigate and assess an illegal and
immoral involvement, and unlike the DoJ and a criminal standard of
proof- the exercise of integrity is driven by a reasonably probable
cause. It is the height of hypocrisy and fraud that the vice president
of the US should have any connection with a company like that, and in
these times under these circumstances; or that the administration should
have made them a major contractor in Iraq under any circumstances:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/22/60minutes/main595214.shtml
It is quite revealing that GW Bush wants to wage war on terrorism up to
the point and short of interfering with US business dealings- then he
backs off. The idiot must think that war exclusively means application
of military force. This is just the tip of the iceberg of their
stupidity- the US is going to pay dearly with an attack on the homeland
in the near future.


You must be furious with France, Germany and Russia who were taking
illegal bribes from Sadam.

We will wait for the UN Volcker investigation report before we condemn
people on a politically motivated allegation.

Note that the UN investigation will likely be truncated due to other
political concerns. The existance of relatively fresh French munitions
in Iraq, along with the already proven involvement between Chirac and
Saddam is enough to convict France as being a non-ally. France has
made policy 'longer term than just the current president' that America
is to be shunned. This is NOT a Bush legacy issue, but a realization
of France's actual historical position relative to the US.

It is enough for them to go out of their way to set-up a phony
subsidiary in the Cayman Islands.

We will wait until there is a conviction against Halliburton. However,
the dishonest spin from the left is certainly more believable to you
than the hard and fast proof against France? Hmmm....

John
 
In article <b2hgm0hrrci9677baap74jjljekjnjgnlh@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> writes:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:53:54 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:

In article <41681931.10204@nospam.com>,
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> writes:


John S. Dyson wrote:


John Fields, you are exactly an example of the mental problems that I have
been describing.

John


Lucidity is not the first thing that comes to mind when one reads your
desultory blather.

Remember, it is you who is so full of hatred. I tend not to proofread
my postings, but they are pretty good considering the small amount of
time in composition.

---
Decomposition is more like it. They're shit,

Thank you so much for your astute analysis, and that is obviously
the limit of your ability.

Still waiting for an explanation of your hate speech... Who
built up so much emotional damage in you? Do you have any
other problems that make your own emotional illness worse than the
problems might be in a more healthy person?

John
 
In article <4lhgm0la9pc9npo680mhs7gcqdq4o9e478@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> writes:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:


The emotional need to embrace those who are hate filled and evil only
to satisfy an ignorant pressure group (nazis and people like you) show
extreme weakness and inability to stand up for what is right. I cannot
embrace your disgusting perversion because I cannot accept the horrible
wrongs that you embrace.

Frankly, one of my favorite co-workers was a communist (in the true sense),
but he wasn't hate filled and horridly destructive like you. Frankly,
I'd show you some respect, even with your beliefs, only if you personally
deserved it.

Whatever dislike that you might have for me, you don't meet my minimal
standards for respect. This means that whatever disdain that you might
have for me, you don't even meet the criteria for me to have minimal
human respect for you. You hate yourself by hating me (and others.)

---
I don't hate you, Dyson, you're just not important enough for me to
give a shit about.

(Are you trying to change the subject?)

The issue has been hate speech against politicians. You are being
dishonest (as usual) by trying to redirect hate related issues to me.

I have IN NO WAY made any comments that would imply the harming of another
individual. However, the leftist hate speech experts have been talking about
killing the president. THAT isn't even in my vocabulary.

John
 
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:

In article <2l8gm0tfsgec42smsj3c954451mee0te7o@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> writes:
On 9 Oct 2004 10:16:26 -0700, Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote...

God does the killing.

A lightning bolt from heaven striking Kerry down, no doubt.

---
From Dyson's rhetoric, I was thinking more along the lines of Dyson
with instructions from the voices and a gun.

I don't even own a gun.
---
That's probably a good thing since if you did you probably would have
blown yourself away long ago and deprived us all of this look into the
psyche of a madman.
---

However, it is clear that you seem to have
some prejudice against religion also?!?!? I am not religious, but
do see a kind of wierd, communicable evil being manifest by people
like you. This hate thing is really imponderable. I don't associate
with people like you,
---
Sure you do. What do you think this is, a unilateral discourse where
you can throw shit around and not get soiled?
---

and that is probably one reason why I haven't
contracted this odd hate-filled mental illness.
---
You haven't contracted it, Dyson, because you're the carrier and you
have been since before you were born.

--
John Fields
 
John S. Dyson wrote:

In article <ck92f805go@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> writes:

John S. Dyson wrote...

Winfield Hill writes:

John S. Dyson wrote...

... the very lousy traitor against America, John Kerry. ...
... If John Kerry did become president, it JUST MIGHT be time
for even those who are non-religious to pray for some divinity
to deliver us from John Kerry, who would be (at least partially)
elected based upon 'evil and destructive hatred.'

You are making a veiled suggestion that should John Kerry
be elected, he should be killed?

Of course not -- however, your comment does show that that
killing is in your mind.

Don't be silly.


Horrible little people like you seem to bring up murder. It must
already be something that you think about.


But please explain exactly what you mean by
divinity delivering us from John Kerry, should he win?


Why can't you consider possibilities other than the actions of
a murderer? Why do you keep on worrying about murder, where I hadn't
even considered it?
Well, I suppose it could come down to a tie again with Florida and Little Bro
counting hanging chads once again.
Halleluja! It's another divine miracle!

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:

Rich Grise wrote:

I'd even take a mere moronic fuckup. There's intentional death and
destruction going on, and GWB seems to be the figurehead. I'm really
saddened that doublethink has got so bad that people can convince
themselves that long-distance murder has anything to do with "defense."


Half the population is below average intelligence, and the other half
are mostly fools. They are busy building the future they deserve.
The history of the human race is that of one armed nation taking what
they want from a weaker nation. "The strong do as they will, the weak
suffer what they must".

Our government makes cheap excuses about WMD and such, but its about oil
and military dominance of where oil comes from.

And the reason we peasants are not informed of this fact, is because the
class-structure is based on an aristocracy which keeps its peasants
enslaved with altruistic lies about "freedom", "morality", "human
rights", "God".

--
Scott

**********************************

DIY Piezo-Gyro, PCB Drill Bot & More Soon!

http://home.comcast.net/~scottxs/

Those who sow excuses shall reap excuses

**********************************
 
John S. Dyson wrote:

Making someone 'face their inner demons' is not the same thing as the
action associated with murdering another human being. It isn't uncommon
to show anger short-term, but the long term hatred as being continually
regenerated by the hate speech from ignorant people will cause both
persistent psychiatric problems and perhaps (in the worse case) even a
national emergency.
If that's your sincere belief then it is your *duty* as a citizen to
report your findings to the FBI, Secret Service, and Homeland Security.
Please do that right away.
 
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:

Perhaps its better to face the true God having ignorantly believed in
a false one, than face truth having believed in nothing, shirking
responsibility for risking being wrong in search for the truth.


And which Hank would that be, and do we have to kiss Karl's ass as well?
As Hank is apparently the metaphor for God, perhaps we should choose the
atheist one, on account of Occam's Razor. Why bother with crude
symbols or concepts to wrap the real thing?

The paradox, the irony about it, is those that don't believe in "Hank"
are likely to play sick little zero-sum games that wreck themselves and
the town they live in in their quest for their path of least-action. A
path of least-action oblivious to the same notion in the minds of their
neighbors.

Hank is more than a metaphor for a make-believe deity-parent, its a
metaphor for life and the characteristic organizing pattern it realizes.
As long as atheists keep demanding "theres no objective basis for
morality" they can plunder and loot their neighbors and children, hoping
theist-suckers will clean up the mess.

They fail to realize theists make up excuses to get their way as readily
as atheists. It is the pattern, a kleptocrasy, which is inculcated by
the delusion.

Another great lesson in politics we can learn in this "mean season".
Get your way by criticizing those in power because they aren't
perfect. You can always find some fault to blame, if you're not
responsible for doing any better.


We don't ask for perfect, just for not total moronic fuckup.
I don't expect perfect, just not a crook that lies about saying he's
acting on your behalf while robbing you with taxes which subsidies the
thieving cronies which have bribed him, and subsidizing propaganda sewers.


--
Scott

**********************************

DIY Piezo-Gyro, PCB Drill Bot & More Soon!

http://home.comcast.net/~scottxs/

Those who sow excuses shall reap excuses

**********************************
 
John S. Dyson wrote:

In article <2sr072F1nkrv6U1@uni-berlin.de>,
Dirk Bruere at Neopax <dirk@neopax.com> writes:

John S. Dyson wrote:


In article <ck96da0ga0@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> writes:


Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote...


God does the killing.

A lightning bolt from heaven striking Kerry down, no doubt.


Perhaps, perhaps not... Again, why did you think about murder?
Why is murder so forward in your mind? Have you been associating
that idea with the current president, President Bush? Are you really
considering the murder of President Bush? Don't you think that you
should talk to a psychiatrist first?

Why does he need an accomplice qualified in psychiatry?
Unless he's going to make Bush face his 'inner demons' (actually, pretty outer
ones at present) in the hope he'll shoot himself out of remorse...


Making someone 'face their inner demons' is not the same thing as the
action associated with murdering another human being. It isn't uncommon
to show anger short-term, but the long term hatred as being continually
regenerated by the hate speech from ignorant people will cause both
persistent psychiatric problems and perhaps (in the worse case) even a
national emergency.

Frankly, I doubt that Winfield Hill, John Fields or Fred Bloggs have the
courage to murder anyone, but even then, their rational selves will hopefully
stop them from doing it. If their hatred is allowed to spiral, then their
insanity might overcome their fear, and we all might have some problems.

The hate speech on this group is only a small subset of the hatred being
genned up by the Democrat party. There have already been numbers
physical attacks orchestrated by the Democrat party, and when allegedly
'educated' people are falling prey to hate speech, then there is a serious
problem.
Well, shooting presidents seems to be an American hobby.
I assume it's Leftists shooting Rightist Presidents?
Or am I wrong?

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
In article <omigm0tup6b6b67c4drm1cekspo7gn2bav@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> writes:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC), toor@iquest.net (John S.
Dyson) wrote:

In article <2l8gm0tfsgec42smsj3c954451mee0te7o@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> writes:
On 9 Oct 2004 10:16:26 -0700, Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote...

God does the killing.

A lightning bolt from heaven striking Kerry down, no doubt.

---
From Dyson's rhetoric, I was thinking more along the lines of Dyson
with instructions from the voices and a gun.

I don't even own a gun.

---
That's probably a good thing since if you did you probably would have
blown yourself away long ago and deprived us all of this look into the
psyche of a madman.
---

Actually, I just don't have the reality that a gun is necessary. On the
other hand, the low life scum in your reality might require a gun for
protection? Going to a Democrat block meeting would be a very gun/drug
dealer filled experience.

Now, it is indeed clear that you are manifesting a problem that could
lead to mental illness. Trying to deflect your hate onto me isn't going
to help you.

John
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top