F
Francesco Poderico
Guest
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 16:35:29 UTC, Nico Coesel wrote:
I agree...It is very difficult to compete with China, but not impossible if we point on quality.
it's challenging but not impossible.Francesco Poderico wrote:
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:16:57 UTC, Bruce Varley wrote:
wrote in message
news:c1ad2481-696a-4257-8242-a8c92169124b@googlegroups.com...
Hi all,
I've started designing a 200 MSPS Oscilloscope with a 25 MHz analog
bandwidth, 3Ksample/channel buffer.
The oscilloscope can be connected to a PC via USB, and eventually via
Ethernet and WiFi.
The trigger is ( at moment) rising, falling... auto, normal.
I would appreciate suggestions and or comment for possible improvement
and functionality that could make this oscilloscope interesting.
Thanks,
Francesco
Been there done that. Spent many weeks putting together a box that I was
very proud of, then purchased a Rigol that does everything it does plus a
lot more and a lot better. Is this really a good use of your time and
energy?
I get the point... and your are not the first one to tell me that.
but I believe that an oscilloscope is still an instruments a lot of electronic enthusiastic would love to have it if priced correctly.
Marketing will be the biggest challenge in a market so competitive.
Did you look what a Siglent scope costs on Ebay? IIRC its about US
$180 including shipping from China. How do you expect to beat that?
BTW Lecroy sells the exact same scope for a lot more.
--
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply
indicates you are not using the right tools...
nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
--------------------------------------------------------------
I agree...It is very difficult to compete with China, but not impossible if we point on quality.