Driver to drive?

john jardine · Oct 2, 2004

"Tim Shoppa" <shoppa@trailing-edge.com> wrote in message
news:bec993c8.0410010459.2ae41db2@posting.google.com...

Everybody's favorite app note writer was on NPR recently for
his hi-tech sculptures:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4053122

Now we see where the pictures of prototypes at the end of the
Linear Technology app notes come from .

Tim.

Looks like he collaborated with Fred B on design #4

John Woodgate · Oct 2, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote (in <415E8143.6050306@nospam.com&gt

about '48 Nobel Laureates
Endorse Kerry', on Sat, 2 Oct 2004:

"We can't have a 21st century military unless we're using 21st century
technology and preparing our forces for 21st century threats. We need a
military that is equipped for the next fight, not the last one,"

He wants to overturn perfectly normal 20th century military policy?
Those generals always want to fight the battles of their youth over
again. (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Fred Bloggs · Oct 2, 2004

Tom Seim wrote:

Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<415E7D45.6090102@nospam.com>...

Tom Seim wrote:

You must have been taking oratory lessons from Teresa.

At least she isn't a paid prostitute like your wife.

How did you know I am secretly married to Teresa?

That's clearly another lie- Theresa prefers virile men.

That leaves you out (she told me so).

I am more for Martha Stewart anyway- no way in hell a wimp like you
could handle her.

Fred Bloggs · Oct 2, 2004

Tom Seim wrote:

I said it was a huge factor, not the ONLY one. Clearly, the war could
be justified by the invasion alone.

You are a liar! There is no reality in your world. You are such a sick
worthless psychopath that by your worthless idiotic reasoning the entire
function of mankind since the time of Adam and Eve has culminated in
your new god, GW BUsh. What a sick p.o.s. you are!

Jim Thompson · Oct 2, 2004

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:06:05 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

[snip]

Phil Hobbs has a paper on his web site analyzing a bootstrap PD amp.
He winds up getting something like a 50x improvement.

John

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Jonathan Kirwan · Oct 2, 2004

On 2 Oct 2004 07:44:55 -0700, soar2morrow@yahoo.com (Tom Seim) wrote:

I said it was a huge factor, not the ONLY one.

I demonstrated through citations from the administration about their own
reasonings and by the purpose of the UN resolutions they worked for and then
relied upon that it was not a "huge factor." I'm open to clear evidence to the
contrary, Tom.

Jon

John Larkin · Oct 2, 2004

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:57:27 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:06:05 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

[snip]

Phil Hobbs has a paper on his web site analyzing a bootstrap PD amp.
He winds up getting something like a 50x improvement.

John

John, Do you have a URL for the paper? I can't seem to Google my way
to it. Thanks!

...Jim Thompson

http://users.bestweb.net/~hobbs/

http://users.bestweb.net/~hobbs/frontends/frontends.pdf

Incidentally, his book is more than worth its exhorbitant price. Lots
of good stuff and fun to read.

John

ChrisGibboGibson · Oct 2, 2004

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

Scam?

That's just rude.

Gibbo

Rich Grise · Oct 2, 2004

On Friday 01 October 2004 09:18 pm, confused soul did deign to grace us with
the following:

Hello Everyone,

I am a Masters student in Electrical Engineering. I want to do my
thesis in Mixed Signal Design. In my university, my advisor doesnt do
any *research*, so he asked me to pick a topic for my master thesis
myself. Can you guys please give me some hints or links from where I
can start off on deciding my thesis.

Thanks in Advance,
ConfusedSoul

Um, what have you been doing for the last 5 years? Pick one of them.
Maybe your weakest subject, and your thesis could be about self-improvement
by RTFM or something.

Good Luck!
Rich

Jim Thompson · Oct 2, 2004

On 02 Oct 2004 19:14:35 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com
(ChrisGibboGibson) wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

Scam?

That's just rude.

Gibbo

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

ChrisGibboGibson · Oct 2, 2004

Jim Thompson wrote:

On 02 Oct 2004 19:14:35 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com
(ChrisGibboGibson) wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

Scam?

That's just rude.

Gibbo

And what do you call that "Marketing blurb" that lays out nothing but
extreme vagaries?

You sure couldn't sell me one ;-)

Naaah you missed the point of the question. The description of the software is
valid. I just don't know what to call it !

It genuinely does work. If you were in the market concerned I'd give you one
knowing you'd be back for more (marketing told me to say that).

Gibbo

ChrisGibboGibson · Oct 2, 2004

wrote:

On 02 Oct 2004 19:33:23 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com
(ChrisGibboGibson) wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On 02 Oct 2004 19:14:35 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com
(ChrisGibboGibson) wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

Scam?

That's just rude.

Gibbo

And what do you call that "Marketing blurb" that lays out nothing but
extreme vagaries?

You sure couldn't sell me one ;-)

Naaah you missed the point of the question. The description of the software
is
valid. I just don't know what to call it !

It genuinely does work. If you were in the market concerned I'd give you one
knowing you'd be back for more (marketing told me to say that).

Gibbo

OK ;-) Sno-o-o-o-ort!

Disbeliever ! ;-)

I'm almost tempted to send you one.

Gibbo

Jonathan Kirwan · Oct 2, 2004

On 02 Oct 2004 19:07:52 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com (ChrisGibboGibson) wrote:

Suggestions ?

"self-tuning" and "auto-tuning" and "adaptive tuning" has been used for PIDs.
(I've seen this kind of thing on closed-loop control products for years.) I
suppose "smart" has been used, too. Some of these products seem similar in
principal to what you are saying, in the sense that they start with an assumed
response function which is deconvolved with the desired output function to yield
an input control function. Then the assumed response function is "improved"
over time as actual input functions versus output functions are evaluated, and
saved.

But I'm sure the sales folks will find something they like better than anything
an engineer might say about it. Perhaps they should test the waters with their
customers to see which terms turn them off and which terms sound good. Just let
them figure it out and they'll be happier, I think.

Jon

Fred Bloggs · Oct 2, 2004

Rich Grise wrote:

I am a Masters student in Electrical Engineering. I want to do my
thesis in Mixed Signal Design. In my university, my advisor doesnt do
any *research*, so he asked me to pick a topic for my master thesis
myself. Can you guys please give me some hints or links from where I
can start off on deciding my thesis.

Thanks in Advance,
ConfusedSoul

Um, what have you been doing for the last 5 years?

Clemson...

ChrisGibboGibson · Oct 2, 2004

Jonathan Kirwan wrote:

On 02 Oct 2004 19:07:52 GMT, chrisgibbogibson@aol.com (ChrisGibboGibson)
wrote:

Suggestions ?

"self-tuning" and "auto-tuning" and "adaptive tuning" has been used for PIDs.
(I've seen this kind of thing on closed-loop control products for years.) I
suppose "smart" has been used, too. Some of these products seem similar in
principal to what you are saying, in the sense that they start with an
assumed
response function which is deconvolved with the desired output function to
yield
an input control function. Then the assumed response function is "improved"
over time as actual input functions versus output functions are evaluated,
and
saved.

But I'm sure the sales folks will find something they like better than
anything
an engineer might say about it. Perhaps they should test the waters with
their
customers to see which terms turn them off and which terms sound good. Just
let
them figure it out and they'll be happier, I think.

I like "adaptive" but not the "tuning"

Adaptive *something" would be good I think.

Cheers

Gibbo

Fred Bloggs · Oct 2, 2004

Clarence wrote:

If Bush fired everyone in government who made a mistake he would have no one in
the government at all, starting with the Democrats who like to point out that
everything Bush people do are mistakes! }) Not that it would be all bad
to fire all the democRats first!

You are paid Bush campaign operative- you are a disruptive troublemaker,
slanderer, liar, and crook- just like your candidate! Bush stands for
CRIMINAL TRAITOR to America.

Rich Grise · Oct 2, 2004

On Saturday 02 October 2004 12:06 am, Kevin Aylward did deign to grace us
with the following:

You seem to have this trouble with hypothetical arguments that are used
to showed contradictions, thereby showing that said hypothetical
argument is false. You seem to think that one is actually claiming the
arguments are true absolutely.

Again, why do I bother. I am conversing with children.

Or mirrors.

Whatever.

Charles Schuler · Oct 2, 2004

Adaptive logic

Dave VanHorn · Oct 2, 2004

An I-V amplifier for the read side will work wonders.

--
KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org
Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR

ChrisGibboGibson · Oct 2, 2004

"Charles Schuler" wrote:

Adaptive logic

Nicer

Gibbo

Driver to drive?

john jardine

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Fred Bloggs

Guest

Fred Bloggs

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Jonathan Kirwan

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

ChrisGibboGibson

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

ChrisGibboGibson

Guest

ChrisGibboGibson

Guest

Jonathan Kirwan

Guest

Fred Bloggs

Guest

ChrisGibboGibson

Guest

Fred Bloggs

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Charles Schuler

Guest

Dave VanHorn

Guest

ChrisGibboGibson

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor