Guest
On Sun, 19 May 2019 19:44:55 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
Now that you're here...
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 10:12:48 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 11:44:08 AM UTC+10, k...@notreal.com wrote:
On Sun, 19 May 2019 16:55:35 +0100, Martin Brown
'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/05/2019 04:45, krw@notreal.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2019 08:41:50 +0100, Martin Brown
'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 17/05/2019 02:31, krw@notreal.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2019 14:03:12 +1000, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:
On 16/5/19 1:08 pm, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 11:22:05 AM UTC+10, k...@notreal.com wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2019 11:02:34 +0100, Martin Brown
'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 15/05/2019 00:36, krw@notreal.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 21:45:36 +0100, Tom Gardner
spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 14/05/19 17:00, John Larkin wrote:
snip
There is an optimum size of difficulty of problems that can be tackled
with today's available resources. So long as Moore's Law holds you can
prove that for some hard computational problems the fastest way to the
solution is to go surfing on the beach for a couple of years and then
start building your hardware using the latest fastest CPUs and memory.
That's like saying "I'll be later getting to work if I leave now,
rather than an hour from now because the traffic is worse this time of
the day.". Absurd.
No, it's like saying "should I jump on the bus now, or wait until my
wife returns from the shops so I can drive the car to work?"'
Bullshit
You really are dumber than a rock!
You're full of shit. But we all knew that.
And you are wilfully ignorant and stupid as well.
NO, you're simply illiterate.
Here is a concrete example taken from the time when the typical
improvement in clock speed and performance was roughly a 3 fold increase
for every 5 years elapsed. Once you start running the software you are
then committed to the technology that you begin to work with.
Absolutely irrelevant.
You clearly fail to understand. That is not my problem!
Not much at thinking, either.
Not the kind of thinking that krw can follow, perhaps. Krw's thinking (such as it is) starts with the proposition that whatever krw thinks is absolutely correct, and all that needs to be thought about the area under consideration.
Krw doesn't know much, and a lot of what he thinks he knows is over-simplified to the point of being misleading.
snipped the stuff that krw didn't bother reading
This really is one bizarre collection of miscreants.
Now that you're here...