DEOS: cute isolated analog link Re: InGaAs avalanche photodiode receivers on eBay...

[server]

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:19:57 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

On 04/03/22 03:18, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 3:32:44 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:18:50 -0500, Phil Hobb <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:42:27 -0500, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
On 03/03/2022 05:20, Phil Hobbs wrote:

snip

Most of my interaction with JT was technical. He liked to insult
people.

He did that--I don\'t remember your ever starting one of those fights.
But you are a bit of a lightning rod at times, you must admit.

I have ideas, and a lot of people here are instantly hostile to unapproved ideas.

Actually they are hostile to bad and silly ideas, and that does cover most of the \"ideas\" you post here.

I\'m not worried by bad or silly ideas, and I\'ve encouraged
my daughter to come up with them.

I am irritated/annoyed/dismayed if they are repeated after
their inadequacies have been demonstrated/discussed.

The discussion/demonstration usually reverts to \"you are stupid.\"

And the people who \"demonstrate inadequacies\" rarely have any
expertise in the subject, which is why they respond to concepts with
insults.

These serial insulters are invariantly bad with electronics.
Interesting correlation.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 2:08:49 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:19:57 +0000, Tom Gardner
spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

On 04/03/22 03:18, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 3:32:44 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:18:50 -0500, Phil Hobb <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:42:27 -0500, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
On 03/03/2022 05:20, Phil Hobbs wrote:

snip

Most of my interaction with JT was technical. He liked to insult
people.

He did that--I don\'t remember your ever starting one of those fights..
But you are a bit of a lightning rod at times, you must admit.

I have ideas, and a lot of people here are instantly hostile to unapproved ideas.

Actually they are hostile to bad and silly ideas, and that does cover most of the \"ideas\" you post here.

I\'m not worried by bad or silly ideas, and I\'ve encouraged
my daughter to come up with them.

I am irritated/annoyed/dismayed if they are repeated after
their inadequacies have been demonstrated/discussed.

The discussion/demonstration usually reverts to \"you are stupid.\"

You do seem to get a lot of that. Your habit of re-posting climate change denial propaganda and treating it as it were real information is demonstrably stupid.

> And the people who \"demonstrate inadequacies\" rarely have any expertise in the subject, which is why they respond to concepts with insults.

Your idea of what constitutes \"expertise\" is a little strange, and decidedly self-serving.

> These serial insulters are invariantly bad with electronics.

And John Larkin thinks that he is \"good\" with electronics. He does seem to be able to fool his customers, and the more expert people he gets to deal with have learned to respect his delusions on this subject (otherwise he won\'t keep on dealing with them). More objective observers credit him with rather more persistence than skill.

> Interesting correlation.

And it tells us quite a bit about the guy making the correlation, and how he lets his emotional reactions over-ride what judgment he might have.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Chris Jones]

On 05/03/2022 01:24, Phil Hobbs wrote:

Chris Jones wrote:
On 04/03/2022 00:42, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
On 03/03/2022 05:20, Phil Hobbs wrote:


Now that olduse.net has shut down--it was fun while it lasted--we
should maybe bring back an old thread occasionally.  The Hills and
Woodgates and Schulze-Clewings and Wescotts and Willamses and AESes
and even Thompsons and Misos of yore had some good things to
contribute.  (We don\'t have to rescuscitate the Eeyores and Roberts
and Uncle Als.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


I\'d add Genome / DNA to that list.

Which one?

This one:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070306191630/http://www.genomerics.org/
I hope he is ok.

I meant, \"which list?\"

Ah ok, he definitely goes on the good list.