Death & Destruction of a Fluke Multimeter

The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
Dave.

Dave,


You should make what was left the prize in a competition.



Nial
 
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:00:05 -0600, Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov>
wrote:

what's the point of destroying a multimeter?
Electronic BDSM. There is a small sub-culture of individuals in the
electronics business that is dedicated to torturing test equipment. I
don't pretend to understand the motivation, but there is ample
evidence of it on the authors blog:
<http://www.eevblog.com>
under the thinly disguised cover of "testing". The practice is
apparently widespread, as shown by the condition of used test
equipment found at flea markets and surplus sales.

Unfortunately, electronic BDSM sites are flourishing on the internet.
Many technicians and test equipment users apparently find some
perverse pleasure at watching their daily tools flogged into eWaste.
This must end as the next generation will certainly presume that such
abuse is the normal method of operation. We learn by example and such
sites are certainly a bad example of proper behavior.

While it is socially unacceptable to inflict pain on humans, there is
no such stricture to not do the same to test equipment. I suspect
that the Humane Society will eventually expand its scope to include
test equipment and other devices that are unable to protect themselves
from abuse. Meanwhile, the best I can suggest, to avoid repetition
and possible expansion, is to demand that test equipment be produced
and tested in a non-violent manner.



--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Franc Zabkar wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +1100, "David L. Jones"
altzone@gmail.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ

Dave.

My AUD$3K Fluke PM97 failed from normal use. The batteries wouldn't
hold a charge from day 1,
And you didn't send it back ?!!

geoff
 
On Mar 8, 12:13 am, "Mark Zacharias" <mark_zachar...@sbclobal.net>
wrote:
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:hn0430$v62$1@news.albasani.net...

On a sunny day (Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +1100) it happened "David L.
Jones"
altz...@gmail.com> wrote in <BJGkn.72617$K81.22...@newsfe18.iad>:

The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ

Well, why bother, I have a 5 Euro multimeter,
if it blows I will get an other 5 Euro multimeter.
But it says it is 100% protected.
Why burn so many $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$? Just for the show???
Makes no sense to me.

If you had seen some of his earlier videos, you'd know why. By all means use
your cheaper meter if you like, but there is such a thing as, "measurement
confidence". If your work is important, perhaps with lots of money or even
someone's life potentially at stake, which meter would I rather rely on? I
think the answer is pretty obvious.
I own meters large and small, el cheapos and better ones. But when I really
need to know, right now and with no bullshit, I reach for the Fluke.

Mark Z.

Agree.

I have had a fluke 87 for about 15 years, it has never let me down. It
has survived drops, rough conditions and other abuse that happens in
the trade. The only thing I have ever done is replace the probes once,
and a fuse when I accidentally blew it once - and that is NOT the
meter's fault.
I cannot be stuck with dodgy equipment when I'm on a job 200km from
the workshop. Been there, done that, when I started out many years
ago.

To me, the cost of time and money and goodwill by having to go back
would be excess of the cost of a decent meter.


I wouldn't hesitate to buy another, and Dave's reviews have confirmed
my belief in their products. I can see also where the internal design
has been improved a lot.

Im not just pushing Fluke products either, while I havent used or seen
them, due to industry competition, Im sure that HP, TEK and others
have made comparable quality meters.
 
On Mar 9, 12:54 am, "Nial Stewart"
<nial*REMOVE_TH...@nialstewartdevelopments.co.uk> wrote:
The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
Dave.

Dave,

You should make what was left the prize in a competition.

Nial
Wonder if you could return it under warranty ? ;)
 
David L. Jones wrote:
The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ

Dave.
Amazing. I doubted the 3M drop spec. Not any more.

Ed
 
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:44:21 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> put finger to keyboard and composed:

My AUD$3K Fluke PM97 failed from normal use. The batteries
wouldn't hold a charge from day 1, the AC adapter failed after
only a short time, one of the probes failed soon after, and then
the meter itself failed.

Then why wasn't it repaired/replaced under warranty?
I bought it in Australia, but I took it to Singapore. I suppose I
could have made the effort to have the batteries replaced, but I
relied on the AC adapter, until it failed.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
 
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:21:35 +1100, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote:

The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ

Dave.
More tests beyond specification:

Drive over it with a car.
Drive over it with a heavy truck.
Have good athletes kick it into a concrete wall.
Put it into a cement mixer running for 10 minutes (first dry then with water and finally with concrete).

>:))
 
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:48:46 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:

On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:00:05 -0600, Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov
wrote:

what's the point of destroying a multimeter?

Electronic BDSM. There is a small sub-culture of individuals in the
electronics business that is dedicated to torturing test equipment. I
don't pretend to understand the motivation, but there is ample
evidence of it on the authors blog:
http://www.eevblog.com
under the thinly disguised cover of "testing". The practice is
apparently widespread, as shown by the condition of used test
equipment found at flea markets and surplus sales.

Unfortunately, electronic BDSM sites are flourishing on the internet.
Many technicians and test equipment users apparently find some
perverse pleasure at watching their daily tools flogged into eWaste.
This must end as the next generation will certainly presume that such
abuse is the normal method of operation. We learn by example and such
sites are certainly a bad example of proper behavior.

While it is socially unacceptable to inflict pain on humans, there is
no such stricture to not do the same to test equipment. I suspect
that the Humane Society will eventually expand its scope to include
test equipment and other devices that are unable to protect themselves
from abuse. Meanwhile, the best I can suggest, to avoid repetition
and possible expansion, is to demand that test equipment be produced
and tested in a non-violent manner.
Well, how do you get around using a reflow oven or some other soldering?
 
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:42:37 +1100, Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote:

On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:44:21 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> put finger to keyboard and composed:

My AUD$3K Fluke PM97 failed from normal use. The batteries
wouldn't hold a charge from day 1, the AC adapter failed after
only a short time, one of the probes failed soon after, and then
the meter itself failed.

Then why wasn't it repaired/replaced under warranty?

I bought it in Australia, but I took it to Singapore. I suppose I
could have made the effort to have the batteries replaced, but I
relied on the AC adapter, until it failed.

- Franc Zabkar
Just the same, i think i would have force fed it to the local dealer instead.
At that price, i might well have flown back and force fed it to the dealer that
was foolish enough to sell me a clearly defective unit.
 
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:54:46 -0000, "Nial Stewart" <nial*REMOVE_THIS*@nialstewartdevelopments.co.uk> wrote:

The title says it all really.
See what happens when I try to destroy Fluke's new 28-II Multimeter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA7-fh5nDQ
Dave.


Dave,


You should make what was left the prize in a competition.



Nial

He couldn't do that, it was on loan for the torture test.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top