Current limiting with a mosfet?...

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:17:31 -0700, boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:56:14 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:25:06 -0700, boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:19:21 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:19:23 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-15 01:23, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16jf5imhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount?
Or is it not that easy?

Dissipation is your issue, using a MOSFET in series
50 A with a voltage drop over it will bake it
volts multiplied by voltage dropped makes watts.

You could use a switcher with filter.
So define what you find \'simple\'
?


Not to mention that a good many modern FETs have safe operating areas
that are hard to distinguish from the Y axis. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

On. Off. What else is there?



Gas. Some of those jokey IR datasheets give new meaning to ‘vaporware’.

As in, exploded all over the inside of a box.

I blew a fet across a room once. I didn\'t know the soldering iron was grounded.

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".


That FET is perfect for this application. BUT it will still have to
just turn OFF when you exceed your 50 amp threshold.
You can not use it in a linear voltage regulating mode at these high
values of current. And you won\'t be able to keep the tab at 25
degrees C either.

He precisely wants to use it as a 50 amp linear regulator.



You COULD turn it into a switcher though and buck converter to reduce
the voltage. Just add some switching circuitry, FET drive and an
inductor and capacitor basically.

Forget trying to dissipate hundreds of watts in that one FET.

He would dissipate 50 watts or less. One big fet on a giant heat sink
could do that, but not a surface-mount dpak sort of thing.


That particular FET is about the best junction to case resistance you
are going to get for the price. Even a TO-247 is not going to be much
better, if at all. These D-Squared-pak FETs are FULL of silicon.

But they can\'t \"easily\" dissipate 50 watts I would say. Maybe with a
lot of air blowing. How much does he want to spend on this ? I guess
that is really the question.

However, he could parallel FETs and make it a bit easier but then you
know how that goes for a linear stage of FETs.


I was recently playing with the idea of mounting power fets on a cpu
cooler-fan assembly, as a programmable dummy load, for maybe 200
watts. Turns out that lots of fets are available in TO-247 and the
same chip in TO-220, and the thermal resistance is the same. So I may
as well use TO-220s, cause I can fit more on a cooler.

The Dynatron R25 is a beast. Lots of copper surface for mounting fets
on, like eight TO-220s maybe.

We use TO-220s on big heat sinks too. We also make D2PAK FETs work
well through PCB heat transfer. Much easier to work with than TO-220s
but a bit less good of sinking of course.

boB

I\'ll need to insulate my fets from the copper cooler, with AlN
insulators, so a TO-220 and a screw is a good way to clamp each one
down.

I could fit six TO-247s or eight TO-220s, but the 220\'s would be
better thermally. The more power dissipation I can spec, the more
people might buy one.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:45:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.
 
On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:19:21 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:19:23 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-15 01:23, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16jf5imhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount?
Or is it not that easy?

Dissipation is your issue, using a MOSFET in series
50 A with a voltage drop over it will bake it
volts multiplied by voltage dropped makes watts.

You could use a switcher with filter.
So define what you find \'simple\'
?


Not to mention that a good many modern FETs have safe operating areas
that are hard to distinguish from the Y axis. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

On. Off. What else is there?



Gas. Some of those jokey IR datasheets give new meaning to ‘vaporware’.

As in, exploded all over the inside of a box.

I blew a fet across a room once. I didn\'t know the soldering iron was grounded.

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs
 
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 5:01:11 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
C...@nospam.com> wrote:

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It has lower heat capacity than water, it doesn\'t CONVECT heat very well.
If the heat removal figure-of-merit was about simple conduction, fluids would be needlessly messy.
 
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:42:23 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 5:01:11?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
C...@nospam.com> wrote:

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It has lower heat capacity than water, it doesn\'t CONVECT heat very well.

It doesn\'t conduct very well either. Numbers like 0.15 w/mk. Copper is
over 300. Water is around 0.6.

AlN is the best transistor insulator, given that BeO is so toxic. AlN
is around 150, close to some common aluminum alloys.
 
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:26:07 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:19:21 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:19:23 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-15 01:23, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16jf5imhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount?
Or is it not that easy?

Dissipation is your issue, using a MOSFET in series
50 A with a voltage drop over it will bake it
volts multiplied by voltage dropped makes watts.

You could use a switcher with filter.
So define what you find \'simple\'
?


Not to mention that a good many modern FETs have safe operating areas
that are hard to distinguish from the Y axis. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

On. Off. What else is there?



Gas. Some of those jokey IR datasheets give new meaning to ‘vaporware’.

As in, exploded all over the inside of a box.

I blew a fet across a room once. I didn\'t know the soldering iron was grounded.

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

You buy lunch next time.
 
On a sunny day (Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:53:02 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16m46odwmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:15:40 +0100, boB <boB@k7iq.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:41:50 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:18:04 +0100, boB <boB@k7iq.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:37:16 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 18:31:09 +0100, boB <boB@k7iq.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 18:07:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount? Or is it not that easy?

If it\'s simpler, a potentiometer to vary the voltage drop across the mosfet would do.

I\'m trying to balance a few power supplies all running in parallel, so they do the same work each. I don\'t mind tweaking
a potentiometer on each one to make the current about equal on each.


You could make a circuit that shuts the FET OFF when you hit 51
amps. If you want to limit current by lowering the output voltage
using that FET, then you are asking for blown up FET I think.

You\'d need a huge amount of dissipation to make that work and maybe
you don\'t want to reduce the output voltage.

But just shutting off could work fairly easily.

Shutting it off would worsen the problem - the other supplies would then be likely to hit their limits.

Surely the TO-247 MOSFETs can take a high current? Or is that only when turned fully on? I guess it would be complicated
to make them pulse, and probably upset the SMPS it\'s adjusting.

At the moment I\'m just going to sort out the biggest imbalance - two of the supplies being 12.85V, two being 12.35V, and
one adjustable. The two high voltage ones I can put big TO-220 schottkys on to drop half a volt.

Well, if you have, say, a 1 milliOhm FET which are obtainable, then at
50 amps that is 2.5 watts which can be OK with a good heat sink.

If you were to say, drop 1 volt across the FET at 49 amps, now you are
talking a out 1 X 49 = 49 watts which is NOT going to work even with
a TO-247 package.

A TO-247 on a big heatsink and fan arrangement could easily dissipate 50W.

So, you turn off the FET and latch off if you want to limit current
and then it only dissipate a few watts at most while fully on.

But I want to LIMIT the current, not fuse it.


OK then.

Use an N-channel FET with a small Ohm resistor in series with its
source for the output. 15 milli-Ohms is about right for this one.

Drain goes to your source voltage. 12V here, right ?

Then, tack in a small NPN transistor with its emitter to the output
load, its base to the source of the FET and its collector to the gate
of the FET. Choose a series R that drops around 0.7 volts at 50 amps
and then the NON will turn on, reducing the gate-source voltage and
therefore reducing the output current. That\'s about the simplest
that can be done.

You will need to use a resistor driving the gate so that the NPN can
easily reduce that Vgs to limit the current.

That sounds feasible, apart from dropping 0.7 volts. I\'ve got supplies at 12.35V, and supplies at 12.85V. I want to drop the
12.85 to match the 12.35 ones. If they drop below 12.35 I\'d have to put something on the 12.35V ones too, and end up with less
than 12V on the load, which works best nearer the max of 12.6V rather than the min of 11.4V.

It is probably better to use some hall effect based current sensor modules to reduce voltage drop.
I\'ve got some HX-10P for a few dollars from the army surplus...
https://www.lem.com/en/product-list/hx-10p
But there exist many, those need a supply voltage and give an analog output:
https://nl.mouser.com/c/sensors/current-sensors/?current%20rating=100%20A
https://nl.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Tamura/L01Z100S05?qs=sGAEpiMZZMsPDRSCoHb1X%252BZeKswU%2FiXZ3JYpEoxUrSU%3D
 
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 6:44:27 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:42:23 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 5:01:11?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
C...@nospam.com> wrote:

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It has lower heat capacity than water, it doesn\'t CONVECT heat very well..
It doesn\'t conduct very well either. Numbers like 0.15 w/mk. Copper is
over 300. Water is around 0.6.

Nomenclature alert: that\'s watts per meter-kelvin, W/m-K in SI nomenclature..
I was puzzled by the units before I realized \'m\' wasn\'t intended to be milli-
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:54:41 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:15:01 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:43:42 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:12:48 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:37:58 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:49:22 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:03:50 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 21:57:37 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:17:42 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:45:13 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:58:43 +0100, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:

On a sunny day (Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:58:58 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16klskj8mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:23:51 +0100, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:

On a sunny day (Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16jf5imhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount? Or is it not that easy?

Dissipation is your issue, using a MOSFET in series
50 A with a voltage drop over it will bake it
volts multiplied by voltage dropped makes watts.
You could use a switcher with filter.
So define what you find \'simple\'
?

Can I just do this?

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/377246/how-do-mosfets-and-potentiometers-work-together

What would the minimum voltage drop be?

That is a source follower,
Basicaly you put a voltage on the gate, the drain goes to the power supply output,
and the load to the source.
The problem is that at 50 A and when you drop 5 V over the MOSFET,
it will dissippate 5 x 50 = 250 W when the load is 50 A, less with a lower load current.
Basically the MOSFET will melt.
If it is on a heatsink and heatsink plus thermal resistance of the MOSFET is 1.5 degrees C per Watt then at 250 W it will rise
in temperature by 1.5 * 250 = 375 degrees C.
Add the 350 to say 20 degrees C ambitient temperature and the MOSFET internal will then be at 395 degrees C.
See the problem?

But I\'m not dropping 5V. I\'m dropping about 0.5V.

Plus you need a high enough voltage at the gate to go all the way up to 12 V, a souce follower does not provide that.

Doesn\'t it try to match the voltage? If I put 12.85V form the supply into the gate, it will fully open to 12.85V through the source-drain path.

The minimum voltage drop depends on the MOSFET\'s \'on\' resistance and you can find that in the dataheets as Rds_on,
it maybe very low, some milli-ohms,

I found one with 1 milliohm.

it will not get very hot in such a case at 50 A (but still calculate it
and use a heatsink, for example 50 mOhm Rds_on at 50 A, gives P = i^2 x R so 50 * 50 * .05 still makes 125 Watt!

The 1 milliohm one at 50A will produce only 2.5W when fully on, and 25W when dropping 0.5V.

If you just want to limit to 50 A as in blowing a fuse
then you need a sensing shunt and a trigger circuit to quickly switch the MOSFET off.

As a switch you could use the MOSFET upside down like I do here for example to get enough gate drive:
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/cb/tx_power_switch2.jpg
but even that is 30 A peak, not continous...

So maybe simpler to just use a fuse?

No, I definitely don\'t want it cutting out. Then the other supplies would be even more overloaded, they would cut out, and I\'d have no power.

There is more to it.
Else just get a few power MOSFETs and play with those in some test circuit to get the hang of it.

I have ordered some and will play around with them and some lightbulbs as a load and see what voltages I can get.

Why not use resistors or, as someone has suggested, wire?

Because I want to be able to tweak it. A variable resistor of that power output, and at fractions of an ohm, is impossible to obtain.

Measure the power suppies and pick the resistor or wire length.

I\'ve never seen milliohm huge variable resistors.

If the mosfet works, I can just turn a dial until my amp clamp says they\'re leveled.

I\'ve found a 200A 1 milliohm mosfet, that oughta do the trick. FFS I had to order it from America, couldn\'t even find stock in China.

We stock IXFH400N075T2, a 1000 watt, 1000 amp mosfet. 2.3 mohms with
10 volts on the gate. You\'ll need 10 mohms, roughly.

Too late, already paid the ludicrous postage.

How much would two of yours have cost me to get shipped to Scotland if you\'re not in Scotland. Judging by \"highland\" I\'m guessing you are.


No, San Francisco.

I started my biz in the basement of my old Victorian house on Highland
Avenue. I decided to incorporate and my lawyer asked me for the
company name so I said \"Umm, Highland Technology?\"

This is the Highland Avenue Bridge, which hops over the old Bernal
Cut, originally a railroad track.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/422n7y4bkany7zwwvp7mr/Highland_Bridge.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=rujkh96w0ksjmh35rs7wha5ej

Do you want some fets? We could ship you a couple.

I don\'t need any now as I bought them from mouser. Might do in the future. How much would you charge to ship say 6 fets capable of this sort of thing to Scotland?

I just give stuff to Matt and he ships it.

Ah, so I\'d get fets from you for free :)

Since you are always so nice, yes.

I have to be the least nice person here :)
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:26:07 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Copper\'s marginally better at conducting heat anyway. And cheaper, I think. Judging by the prices of copper wire, maybe not.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:00:46 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:45:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It\'s better than air, and computers dislike being filled with water.

Don\'t they cool transformers with oil?
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 17:57:49 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:54:41 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:15:01 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:43:42 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:12:48 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:37:58 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:49:22 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:03:50 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 21:57:37 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:17:42 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:45:13 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:58:43 +0100, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:

On a sunny day (Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:58:58 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16klskj8mvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:23:51 +0100, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:

On a sunny day (Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:59:32 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.16jf5imhmvhs6z@ryzen.home>:

Is it easy to make a simple circuit to limit a 12V DC current to 50A using a mosfet?

Can I just give it a variable voltage to turn it on a certain amount? Or is it not that easy?

Dissipation is your issue, using a MOSFET in series
50 A with a voltage drop over it will bake it
volts multiplied by voltage dropped makes watts.
You could use a switcher with filter.
So define what you find \'simple\'
?

Can I just do this?

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/377246/how-do-mosfets-and-potentiometers-work-together

What would the minimum voltage drop be?

That is a source follower,
Basicaly you put a voltage on the gate, the drain goes to the power supply output,
and the load to the source.
The problem is that at 50 A and when you drop 5 V over the MOSFET,
it will dissippate 5 x 50 = 250 W when the load is 50 A, less with a lower load current.
Basically the MOSFET will melt.
If it is on a heatsink and heatsink plus thermal resistance of the MOSFET is 1.5 degrees C per Watt then at 250 W it will rise
in temperature by 1.5 * 250 = 375 degrees C.
Add the 350 to say 20 degrees C ambitient temperature and the MOSFET internal will then be at 395 degrees C.
See the problem?

But I\'m not dropping 5V. I\'m dropping about 0.5V.

Plus you need a high enough voltage at the gate to go all the way up to 12 V, a souce follower does not provide that.

Doesn\'t it try to match the voltage? If I put 12.85V form the supply into the gate, it will fully open to 12.85V through the source-drain path.

The minimum voltage drop depends on the MOSFET\'s \'on\' resistance and you can find that in the dataheets as Rds_on,
it maybe very low, some milli-ohms,

I found one with 1 milliohm.

it will not get very hot in such a case at 50 A (but still calculate it
and use a heatsink, for example 50 mOhm Rds_on at 50 A, gives P = i^2 x R so 50 * 50 * .05 still makes 125 Watt!

The 1 milliohm one at 50A will produce only 2.5W when fully on, and 25W when dropping 0.5V.

If you just want to limit to 50 A as in blowing a fuse
then you need a sensing shunt and a trigger circuit to quickly switch the MOSFET off.

As a switch you could use the MOSFET upside down like I do here for example to get enough gate drive:
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/cb/tx_power_switch2.jpg
but even that is 30 A peak, not continous...

So maybe simpler to just use a fuse?

No, I definitely don\'t want it cutting out. Then the other supplies would be even more overloaded, they would cut out, and I\'d have no power.

There is more to it.
Else just get a few power MOSFETs and play with those in some test circuit to get the hang of it.

I have ordered some and will play around with them and some lightbulbs as a load and see what voltages I can get.

Why not use resistors or, as someone has suggested, wire?

Because I want to be able to tweak it. A variable resistor of that power output, and at fractions of an ohm, is impossible to obtain.

Measure the power suppies and pick the resistor or wire length.

I\'ve never seen milliohm huge variable resistors.

If the mosfet works, I can just turn a dial until my amp clamp says they\'re leveled.

I\'ve found a 200A 1 milliohm mosfet, that oughta do the trick. FFS I had to order it from America, couldn\'t even find stock in China.

We stock IXFH400N075T2, a 1000 watt, 1000 amp mosfet. 2.3 mohms with
10 volts on the gate. You\'ll need 10 mohms, roughly.

Too late, already paid the ludicrous postage.

How much would two of yours have cost me to get shipped to Scotland if you\'re not in Scotland. Judging by \"highland\" I\'m guessing you are.


No, San Francisco.

I started my biz in the basement of my old Victorian house on Highland
Avenue. I decided to incorporate and my lawyer asked me for the
company name so I said \"Umm, Highland Technology?\"

This is the Highland Avenue Bridge, which hops over the old Bernal
Cut, originally a railroad track.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/422n7y4bkany7zwwvp7mr/Highland_Bridge.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=rujkh96w0ksjmh35rs7wha5ej

Do you want some fets? We could ship you a couple.

I don\'t need any now as I bought them from mouser. Might do in the future. How much would you charge to ship say 6 fets capable of this sort of thing to Scotland?

I just give stuff to Matt and he ships it.

Ah, so I\'d get fets from you for free :)

Since you are always so nice, yes.

I have to be the least nice person here :)

No, Sloman is the clear winner. He is only here to insult everyone.

Ricky comes in a distant second.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:23:01 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 6:44:27?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:42:23 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 5:01:11?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
C...@nospam.com> wrote:

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It has lower heat capacity than water, it doesn\'t CONVECT heat very well.
It doesn\'t conduct very well either. Numbers like 0.15 w/mk. Copper is
over 300. Water is around 0.6.

Nomenclature alert: that\'s watts per meter-kelvin, W/m-K in SI nomenclature.
I was puzzled by the units before I realized \'m\' wasn\'t intended to be milli-

Pedant alert: Thermal conductivity is expressed in the obvious units.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedant

And oil is a terrible heat conductor.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:03:02 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:00:46 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:45:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It\'s better than air, and computers dislike being filled with water.

But don\'t cool your TO247 mosfets with oil or air. They need a metal
heat sink first.

Don\'t they cool transformers with oil?

Cool and insulate. On big ones, the oil is pumped around because
convection isn\'t enough.

Oil and even air will cool things pretty well if you move a lot of it
across the surfaces.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:01:47 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:26:07 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Copper\'s marginally better at conducting heat anyway. And cheaper, I think. Judging by the prices of copper wire, maybe not.

Why can\'t I have isotopically pure solid diamond heat sinks?
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 11:36:09 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:01:47 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:26:07 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Copper\'s marginally better at conducting heat anyway. And cheaper, I think. Judging by the prices of copper wire, maybe not.

Why can\'t I have isotopically pure solid diamond heat sinks?

I think I recall an article where they did just that, and the thermal
conductivity was noticeably better than for the ordinary isotope mix.
Or it could have been Silicon.

I was a big deal to get more than a flyspeck of these materials.

Joe Gwinn
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 19:34:12 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:03:02 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:00:46 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:45:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It\'s better than air, and computers dislike being filled with water.

But don\'t cool your TO247 mosfets with oil or air. They need a metal
heat sink first.


Don\'t they cool transformers with oil?

Cool and insulate. On big ones, the oil is pumped around because
convection isn\'t enough.

Oil and even air will cool things pretty well if you move a lot of it
across the surfaces.

Presumably oil is way better than air at conducting. And since in a computer, the heatsinks stay and oil replaces air, it should improve. However.... I wonder if they change the fans to something capable of shifting oil? Which conducts better, almost stationary oil (I assume you can\'t pump it very fast) or fast moving air?
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 19:59:45 +0100, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 11:36:09 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:01:47 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:26:07 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-16 17:45, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

That\'s my half! He can\'t have it!

Copper\'s marginally better at conducting heat anyway. And cheaper, I think. Judging by the prices of copper wire, maybe not.

Why can\'t I have isotopically pure solid diamond heat sinks?

I think I recall an article where they did just that, and the thermal
conductivity was noticeably better than for the ordinary isotope mix.
Or it could have been Silicon.

I was a big deal to get more than a flyspeck of these materials.

Aren\'t they made now instead of mined, so dirt cheap?

I bet you can get Chinese diamond. Measure the conductivity the same way you measure Chinese amps.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:00:13 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 19:34:12 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:03:02 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 01:00:46 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 00:21:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 22:45:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:16:29 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:43:59 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:58:05 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:16:02 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

You mean the dpaks that run at 200 amps?

Uh oh....
I got these: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77646/sum40014m.pdf

375 watts is absurd for that toy fet. Even 125 is crazy.

I don\'t like the package. I like them screwed firmly to the heatsink like TO-247. Those are the size I see inside 1-3kW supplies.

Phil is referring to IR posting absurd specs for their fets, like
ignoring the leads, or submerging them in boiling coolants to get the
ratings. So, everybody else had to do it to be competitive.

It does say \"at 25C\".

Solder it to half the universe made of silver.

I could use a liquid nitrogen setup like some crazy folk do with their CPUs to gain a few GHz. Or fill the whole computer with oil.

Oil doesn\'t conduct heat very well.

It\'s better than air, and computers dislike being filled with water.

But don\'t cool your TO247 mosfets with oil or air. They need a metal
heat sink first.


Don\'t they cool transformers with oil?

Cool and insulate. On big ones, the oil is pumped around because
convection isn\'t enough.

Oil and even air will cool things pretty well if you move a lot of it
across the surfaces.

Presumably oil is way better than air at conducting.

Ballpark 5:1, but you can move air a lot faster than you can move oil.
So it sort of cancels out.

Air is a lot nicer to work with than oil, too.


>And since in a computer, the heatsinks stay and oil replaces air, it should improve. However.... I wonder if they change the fans to something capable of shifting oil? Which conducts better, almost stationary oil (I assume you can\'t pump it very fast) or fast moving air?

Cray submerged their logic in refrigerated, pumped liquid freon.

Are any computers oil cooled? I think giant server farms are air or
water cooled.
 
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:34:42 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:00:13 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 19:34:12 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:03:02 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

Don\'t they cool transformers with oil?

Cool and insulate. On big ones, the oil is pumped around because
convection isn\'t enough.

Oil and even air will cool things pretty well if you move a lot of it
across the surfaces.

Presumably oil is way better than air at conducting.

Ballpark 5:1, but you can move air a lot faster than you can move oil.
So it sort of cancels out.

Air is a lot nicer to work with than oil, too.

Mechanics don\'t seem to mind it, yet they refused to service my car because it was too dirty inside.

And since in a computer, the heatsinks stay and oil replaces air, it should improve. However.... I wonder if they change the fans to something capable of shifting oil? Which conducts better, almost stationary oil (I assume you can\'t pump it very fast) or fast moving air?

Cray submerged their logic in refrigerated, pumped liquid freon.

Are any computers oil cooled? I think giant server farms are air or
water cooled.

It\'s an enthusiast thing: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/36/c8/93/36c89379950d73025025caa92497ed78.jpg

I wonder if they replaced the fans in there? Maybe the fans are happy to turn slowly in the thicker oil? The oil would stop the motor overheating.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top