CR2023? CR2032 Batteries

In message <lavgr8$nj8$1@reader1.panix.com>,
vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com writes
I could swear the battery I removed was 2023 but when I went to the store
I pulled out a 2032 which might have gotten confused when I looked for
2023. But the 2032 I bought fit into the socket.

The computer in question still has CMOS errors,
so I'm wondering if I popped the wrong battery in.
But it fit perfectly in the socket.

THis is a 1995 Gateway (GW2k) P5-75 CMOS battery.

If it was 2023 I lost the 2023. Are they similar enough? Is there any way to
check which one was used by Gateway? (I had found a completely different one
online when I searched a few months ago which is why I was susprised which
one I found)

Is this thread still active? If so, just a bit of information.
Click to expand...

Just last week I was in a shop, looking for a CR2032 among all the other
batteries. Those on the hook marked CR2032 all appeared to be 2023
(which I've never heard of), shown vertically on the lower right side of
the dual pack. It then spotted CR2032 written horizontally and slightly
smaller, at the top left corner of the pack. I then realised that 2023
was the 'best before' date!
--
Ian
 
There are 2023,2032 and 2025 batteries. My blood test meter calls for 2023. Don't know if the others will work equally well even though they are the same diameter.
 
On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-5, mtfo...@gmail.com wrote:
> There are 2023,2032 and 2025 batteries. My blood test meter calls for 2023. Don't know if the others will work equally well even though they are the same diameter.

The differences are load capacity. See the chart below:

Voltage Capacity
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

All other specs are the same.

Dan
 
On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 6:35:26 PM UTC-5, Wolfgang Allinger wrote:
On 13 Jan 17 at group /sci/electronics/repair in article 1c7a749f-4080-4db7-8a00-0b0ac417e649@googlegroups.com
dansabrservices@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-5, mtfo...@gmail.com wrote:
There are 2023,2032 and 2025 batteries. My blood test meter calls for 2023.
Don't know if the others will work equally well even though they are the
same diameter.

The differences are load capacity. See the chart below:

Voltage Capacity
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

All other specs are the same.

Nope! Look for the thickness 2.3 2.6 and 3.2 mm!!!!


Saludos (an alle VernĂźnftigen, Rest sh. sig)
Wolfgang

--
Ich bin in Paraguay lebender Trollallergiker :) reply Adresse gesetzt!
Ich diskutiere zukĂźnftig weniger mit Idioten, denn sie ziehen mich auf
ihr Niveau herunter und schlagen mich dort mit ihrer Erfahrung! :p
(lt. alter usenet Weisheit) iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, iRak, iDiot
Click to expand...

Agreed. I was looking at the electrical characteristics not the physical ones. I should have been clear.

Dan
 
In article <8262f4db-c610-4d54-9d2d-2836b686c31c@googlegroups.com>,
mtfoley41@gmail.com says...
There are 2023,2032 and 2025 batteries. My blood test meter calls for 2023. Don't know if the others will work equally well even though they are the same diameter.
Click to expand...

First two digits are the width of the cell in MM, last two digits are
the thickness in fractional MM>

2023 = 20mm x 2.3 mm thick.

2032 = 20mm x 3.2 mm thick.

the voltages are the same in all, the thicker cells last longer and
provide more current if needed.

you should be able to use the 2032 cell if it isn't too thick to
close the cover.
 
On 13 Jan 17 at group /sci/electronics/repair in article 1c7a749f-4080-4db7-8a00-0b0ac417e649@googlegroups.com
<dansabrservices@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-5, mtfo...@gmail.com wrote:
There are 2023,2032 and 2025 batteries. My blood test meter calls for 2023.
Don't know if the others will work equally well even though they are the
same diameter.

The differences are load capacity. See the chart below:

Voltage Capacity
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

All other specs are the same.
Click to expand...

Nope! Look for the thickness 2.3 2.6 and 3.2 mm!!!!


Saludos (an alle Vernünftigen, Rest sh. sig)
Wolfgang

--
Ich bin in Paraguay lebender Trollallergiker :) reply Adresse gesetzt!
Ich diskutiere zukünftig weniger mit Idioten, denn sie ziehen mich auf
ihr Niveau herunter und schlagen mich dort mit ihrer Erfahrung! :p
(lt. alter usenet Weisheit) iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, iRak, iDiot
 
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:44:55 -0800 (PST), dansabrservices@yahoo.com
wrote:
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh
Click to expand...

That can't be right? The thinnest one has the highest capacity. A
typo, maybe? I'd guess 125 mAh would be about right.
--
RoRo
 
Robert Roland prodded the keyboard with:

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:44:55 -0800 (PST), dansabrservices@yahoo.com
wrote:
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

That can't be right? The thinnest one has the highest capacity. A
typo, maybe? I'd guess 125 mAh would be about right.
Click to expand...

That 2023 is a typo, should be 125mAh

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
 
On 14/1/2017 6:52 PM, Robert Roland wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:44:55 -0800 (PST), dansabrservices@yahoo.com
wrote:
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

That can't be right? The thinnest one has the highest capacity. A
typo, maybe? I'd guess 125 mAh would be about right.
Click to expand...

I am giving you a medal, with distinction, for spotting this mistake! :)

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
 
On 14/1/2017 8:46 PM, Baron wrote:
Robert Roland prodded the keyboard with:

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:44:55 -0800 (PST), dansabrservices@yahoo.com
wrote:
2023 3V 225mAh
2026 3V 163mAh
2032 3V 210mAh

That can't be right? The thinnest one has the highest capacity. A
typo, maybe? I'd guess 125 mAh would be about right.

That 2023 is a typo, should be 125mAh
Click to expand...

I am giving you a medal, with distinction, for spotting and explaining
this mistake!

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
 
On 14/1/2017 7:36 AM, Wolfgang Allinger wrote:
Nope! Look for the thickness 2.3 2.6 and 3.2 mm!!!!
Click to expand...

Thickness is usually a reflection of capacity!

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
 
On 14 Jan 17 at group /sci/electronics/repair in article o5d9nv$913$7@dont-email.me
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> (Mr. Man-wai Chang) wrote:

On 14/1/2017 7:36 AM, Wolfgang Allinger wrote:

Nope! Look for the thickness 2.3 2.6 and 3.2 mm!!!!


Thickness is usually a reflection of capacity!
Click to expand...

so you also think, that price is a reflection of qualtiy SHRUGGGH



Saludos (an alle Vernünftigen, Rest sh. sig)
Wolfgang

--
Ich bin in Paraguay lebender Trollallergiker :) reply Adresse gesetzt!
Ich diskutiere zukünftig weniger mit Idioten, denn sie ziehen mich auf
ihr Niveau herunter und schlagen mich dort mit ihrer Erfahrung! :p
(lt. alter usenet Weisheit) iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, iRak, iDiot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top