B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 2:42:08 PM UTC+11, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unfortunately for James Arthur, he's a much better example of Orwellian double-think than he seems to realise. When the news doesn't present reality the way he wants them to, he's happy to accuse them of distorting reality, when the real problem is that they don't see what's going on from his bizarre point of view.
Why not? Republicans always cut taxes more than they should, and Trump ought to have had more sense than to go along with them, but Republican presidents never take balancing the budget as seriously as romancing their richer supporters.
Not because of the new tax rules, excerpt perhaps from the new tariffs which rip off the consumers who end up paying them
Which companies have repatriated anything? They've mostly moved from China to other low wage nations.
The Democrats have worked out that adequate welfare pays off in the long term. It hasn't hurt the Swedish economy, and there the children of single mothers do just as well as the children of couples.
Trump is great on public relations. Less effective at getting anything useful to happen.
The Republican's sham enthusiasm for fiscal restraint doesn't extend to balancing the budget.
> America's a pretty nice country, a beacon of hope and freedom.
If you are in the part of the population that has an income in the top 1% of the income distribution.
It unique selling point amongst advanced industrial countries is it's very high level of income inequality, which seems to be associated with low life expectancy, expensive health care that doesn't serve the bulk of the population particularly, and a host of social problems that correlate with income inequality on a US state to US state basis to much the same extents as the correlate between advanced industrial countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level_(book)
James Arthur seems to have spent enough time in right-wing de-education programs to be immunised against this kind of exposition of inconvenient facts..
At the moment the pointy-headed top 1% of the US income distribution - who do very well out of the USA as it is - are spending loads of money to keep it running in the way that suits them. The country's capacity to train able people and take advantage of the innovations that they might come up with is going down the tubes, but the Republicans don't care - the people taht own the country are governing the country in a way that seems to them to work to their short-term advantage.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 10:37:20 PM UTC-5, George Herold wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 7:05:24 PM UTC-5, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 4:27:55 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:38 +0200, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com
wrote:
On 2/9/2020 1:47, Les Cargill wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 2:34:27 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Americans buy the products that work, whether Scientists were
involved or not. Often, they weren't.
Somehow, Americans bought President Trump.  It's not working.
Works for me.
Not just "somehow" - the guy's a master manipulator. He went "Boo!" at the Republican Party and by the time they changed their pants, he was the nominee. "Insane Clown President" covers this....
This was a master stroke, really.
Yes. But I think he clearly does not possess half the brains it takes
to mastermind what happened.
Hillary's team had a mountain of brains, and money, and lost.
Who is the real puppeteer can only be speculated in a conspiracy
theory mode of course (I do not think it was the Russians though
they did some of the work, nor do I think it was anyone US based....),
we are unlikely to know the truth in our lifetimes.
I don't think Trump knows that himself either.
He has common sense, a will to win, and luck.
Super smart people I admire have met with Trump privately.
They were blown away. They say the man's brilliant.
Trump is loved here. I've never seen anything like it.
(I'm ~60) I see no such enthusiasm on the left.
And much as I like Joe Rogan, if Bernie was the D nominee..
I'd be hard pressed to vote for either he or T.
I'm amazed at the level of his opposition's ignorance. PBS'
Newshour's Mark Shields and David Gergen, for example.
I try to listen to as little news as possible.
Sports and weather are OK. Except for my below average
hockey team.
I mostly keep up with events on the internet, which makes it easy
to check what is and is not true. For example, I'll read the
news coverage, then watch video of the president making a
statement, and marvel that the coverage isn't anything like
what was actually said. It's amazing. Orwellian.
Unfortunately for James Arthur, he's a much better example of Orwellian double-think than he seems to realise. When the news doesn't present reality the way he wants them to, he's happy to accuse them of distorting reality, when the real problem is that they don't see what's going on from his bizarre point of view.
Easing obnoxious regs and lowering the marginal corporate tax
rate have re-ignited half the country (or more).
Yeah more deficit spending. If you can borrow at ~zero interest
it seems silly not to... but it's not what I would do.
Deficit spending eventually destroys a country. But we can't blame
the president.
Why not? Republicans always cut taxes more than they should, and Trump ought to have had more sense than to go along with them, but Republican presidents never take balancing the budget as seriously as romancing their richer supporters.
The president's policies have raised more revenues,
but the House of Representatives sets the spending, and they insist
on spending it all and more.
Revenues are up under the new tax rules, not down.
Not because of the new tax rules, excerpt perhaps from the new tariffs which rip off the consumers who end up paying them
Booming economy
and companies repatriating have added overall revenue.
Which companies have repatriated anything? They've mostly moved from China to other low wage nations.
But the Dems wanted more welfare, and the Repubs weren't averse to spending in
their states, either.
The Democrats have worked out that adequate welfare pays off in the long term. It hasn't hurt the Swedish economy, and there the children of single mothers do just as well as the children of couples.
I heard a good piece today pointing out that the president's
budget request promotes fiscal restraint, which the Congress
insists on larding up with gimmedats.
Trump is great on public relations. Less effective at getting anything useful to happen.
But no one's backed him on it, so there's been no point in the
prez going after the deficit -- it's a losing battle. A second
term sans witch hunts might include that fight.
Which leaves us here: Dems always wanting to spend much more is
a given, so if Repubs won't fight for fiscal sanity, insanity
shall prevail.
The Republican's sham enthusiasm for fiscal restraint doesn't extend to balancing the budget.
> America's a pretty nice country, a beacon of hope and freedom.
If you are in the part of the population that has an income in the top 1% of the income distribution.
It unique selling point amongst advanced industrial countries is it's very high level of income inequality, which seems to be associated with low life expectancy, expensive health care that doesn't serve the bulk of the population particularly, and a host of social problems that correlate with income inequality on a US state to US state basis to much the same extents as the correlate between advanced industrial countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level_(book)
James Arthur seems to have spent enough time in right-wing de-education programs to be immunised against this kind of exposition of inconvenient facts..
The world would be a much worse place without it. It sure would
be a shame to have world-wide freedom and self-rule collapse in
a fiscal conflagration, just because some pointy-headed People
Who Know Better couldn't live within our means.
At the moment the pointy-headed top 1% of the US income distribution - who do very well out of the USA as it is - are spending loads of money to keep it running in the way that suits them. The country's capacity to train able people and take advantage of the innovations that they might come up with is going down the tubes, but the Republicans don't care - the people taht own the country are governing the country in a way that seems to them to work to their short-term advantage.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney