K
keith
Guest
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:10:38 +0000, Kryten wrote:
involved, even more so.
wrong address. ...perhaps not. ;-)
"aiming".
who hasn't been shot at. Have you?
--
Keith
Nope. They hit what they're aiming at. ...if nukes are"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2004.12.12.05.12.20.903326@att.bizzzz...
You would think about inflatable rubber camels.
I dare to think the unthinkable
I'm sure you want to mix your genes with camels, inflatable or otherwise.
You'd be mistaken, but there are people who are out in the desert away from
their wives for long periods. People have needs, is all I'm saying...
The Air Force doesn't "miss".
It does, and far too often.
involved, even more so.
They were aiiiming at that crossroads. Perhaps someone gave them theA British camera crew were filming when a USAF plane bombed the wrong
crossroads - the one they were on.
wrong address. ...perhaps not. ;-)
Mistakes happen. My bet is that the mistaike was well upstream of theTheir interpreter was killed. Maybe American station don't show video
that shows their own side making mistakes.
"aiming".
When they're shootin' at me, I'm shottin' first. Seems reasonable to oneEveryone makes mistakes in wartime. It just seems that the American rule
of thumb is "if in doubt, fire" whereas other armies say "if in doubt,
don't fire".
who hasn't been shot at. Have you?
Again, "friendly"?...though it's apparent you "missed" the point.
No, I know what you meant.
ducks to avoid 'friendly fire'
"friendly"?
Yes, that's the military euphemism for being shot at by your own side.
--
Keith