chivalry lives?

Winfield Hill · Dec 10, 2004

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/

--
Thanks,
- Win

Active8 · Dec 10, 2004

On 10 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0800, Winfield Hill wrote:

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/

This is either the same thing from last year, or someone posted this
at the beginning of 2004, when it would have been too early to pick
winners.

Hey. IT's still funny.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

Rich Grise · Dec 10, 2004

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:03:55 -0500, Active8 wrote:

On 10 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0800, Winfield Hill wrote:

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/

This is either the same thing from last year, or someone posted this
at the beginning of 2004, when it would have been too early to pick
winners.

Hey. IT's still funny.

I don't think the Irish guy should get a prize for merely letting his
friend carry her own beer. ;-)

Thanks,
Rich

Active8 · Dec 11, 2004

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:55:47 GMT, Rich Grise wrote:

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:03:55 -0500, Active8 wrote:

On 10 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0800, Winfield Hill wrote:

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/

This is either the same thing from last year, or someone posted this
at the beginning of 2004, when it would have been too early to pick
winners.

Hey. IT's still funny.

I don't think the Irish guy should get a prize for merely letting his
friend carry her own beer. ;-)

She *does* look like the greater consumer, eh?

--
Best Regards,
Mike

martin griffith · Dec 11, 2004

On 10 Dec 2004 11:30:55 -0800, in sci.electronics.design Winfield Hill
<hill_a@t_rowland-dotties-harvard-dot.s-edu> wrote:

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/
stolen from

http://www.vojvodic.com/~ivan/fun/balkan/ManOfTheYear.html

martin

Serious error.
All shortcuts have disappeared.
Screen. Mind. Both are blank.

Richard Henry · Dec 11, 2004

"Scott Stephens" <scottxs@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:QMBud.483106$wV.308329@attbi_s54...

<snip!!!!!!!!!!>

I'm sorry. Did someone step on your foot?

Winfield Hill · Dec 11, 2004

Richard Henry wrote...

"Scott Stephens" <scottxs@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:QMBud.483106$wV.308329@attbi_s54...

snip!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sorry. Did someone step on your foot?

A political issue? I simply thought it was funny. Apparently
SOMETHING got to Scott, who knows what. Maybe the reference to
chivalry in the subject? What title would Scott have chosen?

--
Thanks,
- Win

Dirk Bruere at Neopax · Dec 11, 2004

Kryten wrote:

And most of us heed the wise words of the Monty Python song "Never be rude
to an Arab".
Annoying Arabs is foolish and often fatal, as recent events show.

Good point! In order to enjoy the benefits of not having people annoy us we
should kill those who do.
Excellent!

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

John Woodgate · Dec 11, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that Dirk Bruere at Neopax
<dirk@neopax.com> wrote (in <320n88F3fjbq2U2@individual.net&gt

about
'chivalry lives?', on Sat, 11 Dec 2004:

Kryten wrote:

And most of us heed the wise words of the Monty Python song "Never be rude
to an Arab".
Annoying Arabs is foolish and often fatal, as recent events show.

Good point! In order to enjoy the benefits of not having people annoy us
we should kill those who do.
Excellent!

No, because when you kill one you annoy all his relatives. Think
Cerberus.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Kryten · Dec 11, 2004

"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
news:320n88F3fjbq2U2@individual.net...

Kryten wrote:

And most of us heed the wise words of the Monty Python song "Never be
rude to an Arab".
Annoying Arabs is foolish and often fatal, as recent events show.

Good point! In order to enjoy the benefits of not having people annoy us
we should kill those who do.
Excellent!

That wasn't my point at all.

I can't see any logical steps to arrive at that statement.

Murdering people just for merely being annoying is not 'excellent'.

YD · Dec 11, 2004

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:31:44 GMT, Scott Stephens <scottxs@comcast.net>
wrote:

Winfield Hill wrote:

THE 2004 MAN OF THE YEAR AWARDS
http://www.rickysplace.com/moty/

<snip rant>

Oooh, wow. All this over a bit of humour.

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.

John Larkin · Dec 11, 2004

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:55:33 GMT, Scott Stephens <scottxs@comcast.net>
wrote:

No, I'm just fucking pissed about people who have projected servility on
me my whole life.

Repeat after me:

"No"

It's a very useful word.

John

keith · Dec 12, 2004

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:44:55 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:55:27 -0800, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:47:17 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:35:01 GMT, "Kryten"
kryten_droid_obfusticator@ntlworld.com> wrote:

"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
news:320n88F3fjbq2U2@individual.net...
Kryten wrote:

And most of us heed the wise words of the Monty Python song "Never be
rude to an Arab".
Annoying Arabs is foolish and often fatal, as recent events show.

Good point! In order to enjoy the benefits of not having people annoy us
we should kill those who do.
Excellent!

That wasn't my point at all.

I can't see any logical steps to arrive at that statement.

Murdering people just for merely being annoying is not 'excellent'.

Sometimes it is necessary. I keep hoping "W" will apply the
Hiroshima/Nagasaki method, but I'm not sure if it will work with an
*ungoverned* people.

...Jim Thompson

I read an account by an American guy who went into Hiroshima just a
few days after the Japanese surrender, to observe the effects of the
bomb. I think he had one GI as an escort. The Japanese were
universally polite and helpful, and after the initial concern he said
he felt perfectly safe.

John

That was also my father's impressions... universally polite, and he
had no safety concerns... just couldn't cope with sashimi ;-)

Particularly the glow-in-the-dark kind.

I too think it may be time for glow-in-the-dark camels. ...though perhaps
we missed our chance.

--
Keith

John Woodgate · Dec 12, 2004

I read in sci.electronics.design that Scott Stephens
<scottxs@comcast.net> wrote (in <a0Kud.175565$5K2.93651@attbi_s03&gt

about 'chivalry lives?', on Sat, 11 Dec 2004:

I don't believe you can be good by doing good things for bad people.

Didn't someone come to call just sinners to repentance?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Mark Jones · Dec 12, 2004

Winfield Hill wrote:

Scott Stephens wrote...
Therefore I concluded you are probably a Boleshevic pig that wants
to make men feel guilty and worthy of servility. "Once is an accident,
twice coincidence, three times enemy action".

Pure unadulterated BullShit.

OMG! Did Winfield actually CUSS??? lol!

Winfield Hill · Dec 12, 2004

Mark Jones wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote:

Pure unadulterated BullShit.

OMG! Did Winfield actually CUSS??? lol!

Does that qualify as a cuss? It isn't a swear, is it?

--
Thanks,
- Win

Richard Henry · Dec 12, 2004

"Scott Stephens" <scottxs@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ETXud.747985$8_6.542879@attbi_s04...

Winfield Hill wrote:

Many profs are Boleshevic deluded fools.

What is "Boleshevic"?

So, you call half the country communist? Shame on you. Get a life.

Yea, half the country is nuts, IMHO.

Slightly more than half, actually.

Winfield Hill · Dec 12, 2004

Jim Thompson wrote...

Losers always feel that way ;-)

All things said, I'd rather you were feeling that way than me. :&gt

--
Thanks,
- Win

Rich Grise · Dec 12, 2004

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:33:55 -0800, Winfield Hill wrote:

Mark Jones wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote:

Pure unadulterated BullShit.

OMG! Did Winfield actually CUSS??? lol!

Does that qualify as a cuss? It isn't a swear, is it?

I'd say not. 'Shit' is merely a 'bad word'. It's one of those things that
people like to pretend they don't do, like 'fuck'.

Hope this helps!
Rich

Richard Henry · Dec 12, 2004

"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:na5pr0hen7j1i052ct76pfnuds1nepftgj@4ax.com...

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 10:48:42 -0800, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com
wrote:

"Scott Stephens" <scottxs@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ETXud.747985$8_6.542879@attbi_s04...
Winfield Hill wrote:

Many profs are Boleshevic deluded fools.

What is "Boleshevic"?

So, you call half the country communist? Shame on you. Get a life.

Yea, half the country is nuts, IMHO.

Slightly more than half, actually.

Losers always feel that way ;-)

My statement was intended as sarcastic understatement since I did not
support either of the leading two candidates.

chivalry lives?

Winfield Hill

Guest

Active8

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Active8

Guest

martin griffith

Guest

Richard Henry

Guest

Winfield Hill

Guest

Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Kryten

Guest

YD

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

keith

Guest

John Woodgate

Guest

Mark Jones

Guest

Winfield Hill

Guest

Richard Henry

Guest

Winfield Hill

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Richard Henry

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor