Chip with simple program for Toy

[Daniel Mandic]

Radiosrfun wrote:

I'm not sure I followed you completely - this trip. "I" am not hiding
behind "any" religions. I "once" felt part of the Christianity
religion. Now - as I said in my last post, I have my doubts. And I'm
sure not leaning towards any others - particularly Islam. There isn't
a man alive who could convert me to such a lame and diabolical
religion. As for the Quoran/Koran - pick your own spelling, I'd wipe
my ass with it. I do not "study" the bible, I merely remember what I
was told and hear from time to time from those who preach on TV -
when flipping the channels. "I" would not fight over or for "any"
religion. It isn't worth my time. Not a one of them - can prove
themselves in my mind. Trying to prove there is an Allah/God/whoever
- is like trying to prove there is a Santa Claus. You "can't" see
them, you "don't" see them and yet - you're asked to believe. Gee -
I'd like to believe I"m a rich man too, but I don't see my millions
laying around anywhere close by. So, if I'm arguing "any" religion,
it isn't being done in the process of hiding behind any others. I'm
not "spitting" war cries - well, second thought if you want to put it
that way - have at it; but I will slam Islam any damned day of the
week - for the fanatical - ball-less - yellow bellied bunch of
pussies that it represents or represents it. They hate people who
disagree with them - and their religion and they can count me among
them. They speak of Infidels..... I may be an infidel, but at least I
got balls to stand up to someone and fight like a man - not some
gutless <faggot> coward. If "Islam" is so great of a religion, and
those spineless assholes are misrepresenting it, then the masses of
the good - ought to speak up. Because these spineless assholes are
hiding in their mosques and so on - making them all look just as
guilty.

heh....


Islam is dangerous ?????

Their influence here is maybe 1%.

Their influence in Air is heavily here. If I could talk to the Islam
ppl, which have much earth-oil, I would ask them to stop delivering
that.
In Earth we have not the slightest probs with Islam. The last
mentionable danger were the Turks, 600y before. Errrm, what have you
done at that time?? ))) (english scoundrels, IMO. The rest from
other european states, scoundrels as well, too , burglar, thiefs,
liars, double-thinker, neo nazi-advocates. 50%. 50:50 shitter,
destroyer, damager, horseplayer, invader, anti-social politic,
long-babbler and nothink knower)
Water we have PLENTY.
And Fire is in our Petrol Tanks

Here I tried... fruitless. They rather like to drive their cars and
terrorize (and killing, from time to time) unguilty persons, in and out
of the street, with cars. One here became a 'murder-death-kill',
because of the fact, someone other looked his car too suspiciously
(probably he tried to fetch the Time of the Car Clock. Not one scratch
or some other bodily harm, the new word here for property damage ,
indeed, was done to the car). He killed him just with hands. Now he is
sitting, I hope for at least 30y.

You see, the terror begins where it is blown out. (exhaustors)




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Daniel Mandic]

MassiveProng wrote:

Right now, Iran is feeding war ordinance into Iraq, not so much
because they want US out, but because they want the country. They
being the same terrorist fuckers that fed Lebanon and made blood
there.

As much you take care about other states, as much your own will be
orphaned.

These idiots think they have a cause, when the only thing they do is
spill blood. Mostly that of their direct brethren, butt a lot of
their worldwide extended brethren as well. That's ALL men, not just
your select list.

Men... you see too much form the patriarchic side. You cannot fuck
(flicken, =patching) the whole world. Fuck in your own, as it is
prepared (actually stolen, IMO) for doing so.
Do not fuck so much in the Car and eat your meal at home, on a table.

My shoulder may be bruised but you will be comatose or dead... if
there is even anything left to give a prognosis on.

You should heal the probs on the world as you do it at home with
dangerous and satanic ppl. Just Police, and/or Doctors.

Our Doctors go around the world for help, yours should do the same!


I know only inquest-staff and mil-staff from you, going out for
helping!!?
You do not help, you know.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Jon Slaughter wrote:

Its not religion. Ok, maybe it is. But religion can be good. I'm an
atheist(well technically I should call myself an agnostic since
anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than those that
have believe) but I can see that some religions are better than
others. Ultimately I think we can do without them but also it could
hurt. There has been many great things inspired by religion that
probably would not exist without it. Although I wonder how much has
been due to Islam? All I have seem Islam produce is destruction of
those great works. (Such as the giant budda)

Wise words (>anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than
those that have believe)


But you're not better, just reminding it two times.

So you are an agnostic-atheist.



)))) ROTFL!



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: dual-thinker!!!!

 

[Eeyore]

Radiosrfun wrote:

"zoir" <zoiree@gmail.com> wrote
MassiveProng <MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
"zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> Gave us:

Ok guys I see how you are aggressive.
The point I tried to show Islam itself, the essentials of it.
But you are politizing subject.
Note that El-qaide is not representative of Islam, because they are
violating basic rules which states "you can not kill innocent people"
and "you can not reach heaven by committing suicide".

Well Bucky, you might be right - but it is just the opposite image being
shoved down our throats and they have no one else to blame but themselves
for that action. Aside from innocent people being killed in the process, if
all those stupid bastards want to blow themselves up - why the hell should
"I" care? Like I said, put them all in one place - and blow the hell out of
it. Mission accomplished.

You'd condemn an entire ppl on the basis of the behaviour of say 0.001% of them
?

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

MassiveProng wrote:

Right now, Iran is feeding war ordinance into Iraq, not so much
because they want US out, but because they want the country.

Actually, recent reports I've heard suggest that this is just a US invented lie
like the alleged existence of Iraqi WMDs to get ppl to agree to another idiotic
war.

You really need to be more sceptical.

Graham

 

[zoir]

On 9 Mart, 12:21, "Radiosrfun" <Radiosr...@radiosrfun.com> wrote:

"zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1173433494.076956.324790@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...

On 9 Mart, 10:35, MassiveProng
MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 23:29:16 -0800, "zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> Gave us:

Ok guys I see how you are aggressive.
The point I tried to show Islam itself, the essentials of it.
But you are politizing subject.
Note that El-qaide is not representative of Islam, because they are
violating basic rules which states "you can not kill innocent people"
and "you can not reach heaven by committing suicide".

Well Bucky, you might be right - but it is just the opposite image being
shoved down our throats and they have no one else to blame but themselves
for that action. Aside from innocent people being killed in the process, if
all those stupid bastards want to blow themselves up - why the hell should
"I" care? Like I said, put them all in one place - and blow the hell out of
it. Mission accomplished.

Then what is the difference between you and them. Can you say yourself
as "civilized"?
I again propose you to look links that I cited in my previous mails.
In first days of Islam there were few of Muslims. Unbelievers torture
them all time.
Do you know that Christians help them, since, there was no
disagreement between both religions in essence.
Ok it was 1400 years ago. But if you examine these religions today you
will conclude same way.

 

[Bob Masta]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:53:15 +1100, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:18:54 -0800, saxum@webtv.net (Grostle News)
wrote:

BTW- If you ever need to measure light intensity directly, such as
lumens/candela etc it is possible to do this with the built-in light
meter most 35mm cameras are equipped with. I did this many moons ago so
I don't recall the details.

Here is an explanation I just now found in google about the procedure,
just in case any one is interested:

http://fins.actwin.com/aquatic-plants/month.9711/msg00049.html

Good tip. That should work fine with more modern - even digital - SLR
cameras, as long as they have a full manual mode, eg; any Canon or
Nikon DLSR. The only problem is that the table in that post is for
ASA/ISO 25, which isn't available on many DSLRs. Fortunately, that's
easy to correct, by converting it for ISO 100 (2 stops faster), which
most DSLRs have, then shifting the shutter speed by 2 stops to
compensate:

*OLD* ASA/ISO 25 @ 1/60:
f-stop foot-candles
2 100
2.8 200
4 400
5.6 800
8 1,600
11 3,200

*NEW* ISO 100 @ 1/250:
f-stop foot-candles
2 100
2.8 200
4 400
5.6 800
8 1,600
11 3,200

Please note the comments about metering on white objects vs green,
etc, in the original post at that URL.

The problem with this approach (regarding the original photo-etch
topic in the subject line) is that it only applies to visible light,
whereas photo-resist is sensitive to UV, which is greatly
reduced by camera lenses.

So, you can't use this to make any sort of absolute measurement
of UV levels, but if you have a source that emits a broad spectrum
(like a tanning lamp) such that you can get a reading on the meter,
then it would probably be reasonable to assume that everything
scales properly. Thus, if you use that same source at a different
distance, the camera meter could tell you the *change* in
exposure.

Best regards,


Bob Masta

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Signal Generator
Science with your sound card!

 

[Bob Masta]

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:34:14 -0800, saxum@webtv.net (Grostle News)
wrote:

hapticz wrote:

the developer/xylene (or whatever it is)

Safety reminder: If you use Xylene don't forget that this liquid is as
flammable as gasoline. Vapors of xylene from an open container or an
evaporating source can crawl invisibly and without detection of it's
odor to an ignition point (pilot light, static discharge, electric range
etc.)

Xylene should be used in a well-ventilated area nowhere near any flame
or possible spark.

.... And if you manage to avoid explosions, you are not out of
the woods yet: Last time I checked, xylene was a pretty
nasty carcinogen.

Best regards,


Bob Masta

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, Signal Generator
Science with your sound card!

 

[Radiosrfun]

"zoir" <zoiree@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173439947.356017.267980@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

On 9 Mart, 12:21, "Radiosrfun" <Radiosr...@radiosrfun.com> wrote:
"zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1173433494.076956.324790@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...

On 9 Mart, 10:35, MassiveProng
MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 23:29:16 -0800, "zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> Gave us:

Ok guys I see how you are aggressive.
The point I tried to show Islam itself, the essentials of it.
But you are politizing subject.
Note that El-qaide is not representative of Islam, because they are
violating basic rules which states "you can not kill innocent people"
and "you can not reach heaven by committing suicide".

Well Bucky, you might be right - but it is just the opposite image being
shoved down our throats and they have no one else to blame but themselves
for that action. Aside from innocent people being killed in the process,
if
all those stupid bastards want to blow themselves up - why the hell
should
"I" care? Like I said, put them all in one place - and blow the hell out
of
it. Mission accomplished.

Then what is the difference between you and them. Can you say yourself
as "civilized"?
I again propose you to look links that I cited in my previous mails.
In first days of Islam there were few of Muslims. Unbelievers torture
them all time.
Do you know that Christians help them, since, there was no
disagreement between both religions in essence.
Ok it was 1400 years ago. But if you examine these religions today you
will conclude same way.

Eh, I "AM" Civilized................. My proposal is merely one to help them
assholes accomplish their feat faster - but without harming others in their
journey. All of them who are killing in the name of Allah, get together in
one building - blow the shit out if IT - and whalah - they get to Allah and
their virgin males - of any species, and we're rid of all them assholes.
Mission accomplished.

 

[Radiosrfun]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45F144AD.4F862E89@hotmail.com...

Radiosrfun wrote:

"zoir" <zoiree@gmail.com> wrote
MassiveProng <MassivePr...@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
"zoir" <zoi...@gmail.com> Gave us:

Ok guys I see how you are aggressive.
The point I tried to show Islam itself, the essentials of it.
But you are politizing subject.
Note that El-qaide is not representative of Islam, because they are
violating basic rules which states "you can not kill innocent people"
and "you can not reach heaven by committing suicide".

Well Bucky, you might be right - but it is just the opposite image being
shoved down our throats and they have no one else to blame but themselves
for that action. Aside from innocent people being killed in the process,
if
all those stupid bastards want to blow themselves up - why the hell
should
"I" care? Like I said, put them all in one place - and blow the hell out
of
it. Mission accomplished.

You'd condemn an entire ppl on the basis of the behaviour of say 0.001% of
them
?

Graham

..001% ? Damned, seems like a lot more than that! It's like this, I "hate"
Snakes, I don't care what breed it is. One is just the same as the other to
me. So - I condemn all snakes - to hell. IF it is only .001% of them, then
why don't the other 99.999% do something to clear their names - help
erradicate the world of that scum? Seems to me the majority should rule. I
don't see that happening.

 

[Radiosrfun]

"Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at> wrote in message
news:45f141db$1$25617$91cee783@newsreader02.highway.telekom.at...

Jon Slaughter wrote:

Its not religion. Ok, maybe it is. But religion can be good. I'm an
atheist(well technically I should call myself an agnostic since
anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than those that
have believe) but I can see that some religions are better than
others. Ultimately I think we can do without them but also it could
hurt. There has been many great things inspired by religion that
probably would not exist without it. Although I wonder how much has
been due to Islam? All I have seem Islam produce is destruction of
those great works. (Such as the giant budda)

Wise words (>anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than
those that have believe)


But you're not better, just reminding it two times.

So you are an agnostic-atheist.



)))) ROTFL!



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: dual-thinker!!!!

Are you on Crack or something? The man is an ATHIEST because he chooses to
not believe in a greater deity. There is no proof one exists. YOU can't
produce "SOLID" evidence! NO ONE CAN. AND - even if he - OR I did choose to
believe, which religion - oh wise one - should we choose? Which one is
guaranteed to get us to heaven? The answer is - a daily double - YOU DO NOT
KNOW - YOU ARE CLUELESS. NO ONE can come to me and say - Hey - so and so -
I'd like you to meet God/Allah, and he stand there with his hand outreached
to shake mine. That will never happen. He has his right to be an athiest
just as much as you have the right to worship some figure made out of the
imagination - and if it is Islam - full of shit - at that.

 

[Radiosrfun]

"Radiosrfun" <Radiosrfun@radiosrfun.com> wrote in message
news:45f16c46$0$8967$ecde5a14@news.coretel.net...
Here in the U.S., we have what is called "Bible Thumpers" - they all "try"
to preach the word of "God" 0r "Christ". They often go to church, often go
door to door trying to sell their pitch. YE MUST BELIEVE OR BURN IN HELL FOR
ETERNITY! Though many - even Christians (more laid back) look at them a bit
weird, it just goes to prove - "religion" - good as it is supposed to be -
is fatally flawed. It drives people over the edge. I have known a few people
who went nuts because of it. ALL tell of a so-called God, who is all
powerful, forgiving, peaceful, etc. Hmmmmm.... Islam is no different. A
great number (wouldn't want to condemn all) - are fucking nuts - and they're
doing it in the name of religion. You gotta love it. Funny thing is though -
the bible thumpers - Jehovah's Witnesses and others - don't kill you for
disagreeing. Can't say that about Islamists. Hell, I'll take our brand of
Bible Thumpers anyday.

If this GOD/ALLAH - is so loving, forgiving, peaceful, our creator, etc....
WHY does he allow illness, suffering, murder, etc. WHY NOT - reach out with
his power and strike down those or at least incapacitate those with such
ideas - to the point they learn he has control and they're not to do said
things. Hell, why did he even allow their genetics, or whatever - to be bent
to allow them to act like assholes in the first place? So much for being the
creator. If he is the creator, then, as a friend of mine says of other
issues at times - "He lost complete control". At this stage of my life, I'd
get as much positive out of being a Satanist. Religion is a "word" and
"Idea". There has never been and unlikely ever will be - any solid proof of
a greater diety. I think ya all need to put down the Poppys, leaves, pipes,
etc... and wake the hell up. Even the Indians smoked too much whacky
tobaccy, they believed in the Great Spirit. Yet they too were no better. An
early form of Islam in the U.S.???? Yeah, I know - Christianity had its days
too. ALL fighting over two so called Men/Characters/Beings who they couldn't
see or just heard of in "most" cases. They never seen God, though they
supposedly seen Angels. Man that shit they were smoking must've been good.
Some - claimed to see and walk with Christ. Big deal. Just another human who
suffered the same pain as the rest of us. He didn't die for anyone's sins.
He died due to his trying to push a thought of his religion is "the" one.
Maybe those who "supposedly" killed him were no better - but it all works
out the same - RELIGION BREEDS MURDERERS.
Pick your religion - and go for it. It is going to be one hell of a blow to
ALL religions - if they did indeed actually find Christ's bones. So much for
accession into Heaven. So much for "Christianity". So much for
God/Allah/whoever.

QUESTION:

ALL replies to this religious BULL SHIT - are WAY off topic and I'm just as
much the blame for falling into your trap to discuss this futile crap. But,
I MUST ask - what makes you bozos feel YOU have to post your RELIGIOUS
beliefs off topic as they are - to get this shit started? We all ought to
just block your stuff every time we see it - kill file it - and call it a
day and get back to speaking of Electronics. AGAIN, if you do NOT like the
replies you are getting - whether we're Atheist, don't like Islam,
whatever - SO DAMNED WHAT. LIVE WITH IT. MOVE ON. If you don't like the
heat - stay the hell out of the kitchen by NOT bringing this stupid shit up
for discussion in the first place.

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:31:38 -0800, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:22:22 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:39:49 +0000, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



MassiveProng wrote:

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What
a sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"

You cannot grasp the concept of someone singing about something he believes
in?

He's a fucking misled patsy. Nothing more.

I expect you prefer war songs !

---
And I suspect you prefer "YMCA".

Which one of the village idiots... errr people do you think he
likes to dress like?

---
Probably the cop.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:16:54 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !

---
As usual, you're being disingenuous with your selective ignorance.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Islam#Denial_of_entry_into_the_United_States

" Customs agents alerted the Transportation Security Administration, which then
diverted his flight to Bangor, Maine, where he was detained by the FBI.

The following day, Yusuf Islam was deported back to the United Kingdom. "

Please explain my error.

---
Not an error, the intentional " 'land of freedom' (tm) ! " slur
based upon the fact that he was turned away, but without supplying
a link to the story. As usual, your cowardly way of trying to stack
the deck.

Calling the USA the "land of freedom" is a slur ?

---
You know damned well that in the context in which you used it it
was, you phony troublemaking son of a bitch.
---

Well... OK you said it.

---
When I say it, I mean it.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:23:40 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

MassiveProng wrote:

Figures... no danger of criminality, and yet you passed it up.

Actually it would be a crime in the UK at least technically. There's the slight issue
of not wanting to make a baby too.

Aside from anything else it took my rather by surprise actually. I've been surprised
like that a few times in fact, even rather more recently but she was about 21 not 12.

---
We have ignorant, tasteless women in the US also.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:17:13 -0500, "Radiosrfun"
<Radiosrfun@radiosrfun.com> wrote:

"Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at> wrote in message
news:45f141db$1$25617$91cee783@newsreader02.highway.telekom.at...
Jon Slaughter wrote:

Its not religion. Ok, maybe it is. But religion can be good. I'm an
atheist(well technically I should call myself an agnostic since
anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than those that
have believe) but I can see that some religions are better than
others. Ultimately I think we can do without them but also it could
hurt. There has been many great things inspired by religion that
probably would not exist without it. Although I wonder how much has
been due to Islam? All I have seem Islam produce is destruction of
those great works. (Such as the giant budda)

Wise words (>anyone calling themselfs an atheist are no better than
those that have believe)


But you're not better, just reminding it two times.

So you are an agnostic-atheist.



)))) ROTFL!



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: dual-thinker!!!!

Are you on Crack or something? The man is an ATHIEST because he chooses to
not believe in a greater deity. There is no proof one exists. YOU can't
produce "SOLID" evidence! NO ONE CAN. AND - even if he - OR I did choose to
believe, which religion - oh wise one - should we choose? Which one is
guaranteed to get us to heaven? The answer is - a daily double - YOU DO NOT
KNOW - YOU ARE CLUELESS. NO ONE can come to me and say - Hey - so and so -
I'd like you to meet God/Allah, and he stand there with his hand outreached
to shake mine. That will never happen. He has his right to be an athiest
just as much as you have the right to worship some figure made out of the
imagination - and if it is Islam - full of shit - at that.

---
I don't think he's on Crack, he's just another anti-American (of the
Austrian flavor, I believe) who doesn't really know even basic
English yet feels compelled to wax foolosophical whenever he gets a
chance to bash the US.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On 09 Mar 2007 11:15:38 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

MassiveProng wrote:

No, dumbass. The assinine, snide way you stated it certainly was
however.


But the other stated first. Eyeore just repeated....

---
No, Graham (Eeyore) was the one who used: " 'the land of the free'
(tm) " first.
---

and you would not let him the Right to repeat others words?

---
He wasn't trying to deny him the right, he was merely stating his
opinion. You really ought to try to improve your understanding of
English.
---

I think that's an american speciality, repeating words like morons do.

---
Actually, it's an American specialty to provide morons with the
means to allow them to express themselves. You know, like USENET
and you.
---

(e.g. major defendants in the J.F.Kennedy case. Morons...)

---
???
---

Best Regards,

---
LOL!



--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:23:40 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

MassiveProng wrote:

Figures... no danger of criminality, and yet you passed it up.

Actually it would be a crime in the UK at least technically. There's the slight issue
of not wanting to make a baby too.

---
And at 15 you didn't know how to prevent that from happening?


--
JF

 

[Lionel]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:03:44 GMT, NoSpam@daqarta.com (Bob Masta)
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:53:15 +1100, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com
[...]
Please note the comments about metering on white objects vs green,
etc, in the original post at that URL.

The problem with this approach (regarding the original photo-etch
topic in the subject line) is that it only applies to visible light,
whereas photo-resist is sensitive to UV, which is greatly
reduced by camera lenses.

So, you can't use this to make any sort of absolute measurement
of UV levels, but if you have a source that emits a broad spectrum
(like a tanning lamp) such that you can get a reading on the meter,
then it would probably be reasonable to assume that everything
scales properly. Thus, if you use that same source at a different
distance, the camera meter could tell you the *change* in
exposure.

Absolutely true, because normal lenses block UV. However, one trick
that would get around that would be to put a sheet of fluorescent
material in place of your PCB, & meter off the visible light it
creates from the UV. I'd suggest a card painted with fluorescent green
poster paint.

--
W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
. | ,. w ,
\|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:36:48 -0800, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

I prefer to drop a big pile of shit...

Your affection for excrement is well established in this group.

John