Chip with simple program for Toy

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:37:36 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

MassiveProng wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
"Homer J Simpson" ><nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

Islam isn't the problem. Religions are the problem. Lennon was right -
'Imagine'.

Hilarious, a billionaire singing "Imagine no possessions..."

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What a
sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"


That is now. In his first years, he actually authored some ... SOME
decent material that wasn't money oriented.

Now, he's just a retarded chump with a higher profile than he
deserves.

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !
It wasn't because of his name, dumbass.
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:39:49 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

MassiveProng wrote:

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What
a sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"

You cannot grasp the concept of someone singing about something he believes
in?

He's a fucking misled patsy. Nothing more.

I expect you prefer war songs !
WTF do you think sleeping with the enemy is?
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:11:01 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:12:19 +0000, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



Homer J Simpson wrote:

"Ron M." <strmbrgr2@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Does marrying a six year old child make Mo true prophet?

I thought she was 8 or 9 actually !

Actually he married her when she was 6. They then consumated the
marriage when she was 9. Real friggin sicko, wasn't he.

ISTR that 8 was the age for marriage in some US 'frontier' states - not now
I guess.

I once had a very 'mature' 12 yo want to stay the night !

---
Did you let him?

Hahaha... just read this. My response a few minutes ago was
similar.
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:22:22 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:39:49 +0000, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



MassiveProng wrote:

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What
a sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"

You cannot grasp the concept of someone singing about something he believes
in?

He's a fucking misled patsy. Nothing more.

I expect you prefer war songs !

---
And I suspect you prefer "YMCA".
Which one of the village idiots... errr people do you think he
likes to dress like?
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:07:40 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Homer J Simpson wrote:
"Ron M." <strmbrgr2@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Does marrying a six year old child make Mo true prophet?

I thought she was 8 or 9 actually !

Actually he married her when she was 6. They then consumated the
marriage when she was 9. Real friggin sicko, wasn't he.

ISTR that 8 was the age for marriage in some US 'frontier' states - not now
I guess.

I once had a very 'mature' 12 yo want to stay the night !

---
Did you let him?

Her silly, a lovely blonde too btw and a total sweetie. She seemed to be under the
erroneous impression I had my own flat (apartment).

I wasn't in a position to comply. I was only 15 myself. I'm sure it would have
been great though.

Figures... no danger of criminality, and yet you passed it up.
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:09:44 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
MassiveProng wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:
"Homer J Simpson" ><nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

Islam isn't the problem. Religions are the problem. Lennon was right -
'Imagine'.

Hilarious, a billionaire singing "Imagine no possessions..."

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What a
sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"


That is now. In his first years, he actually authored some ... SOME
decent material that wasn't money oriented.

Now, he's just a retarded chump with a higher profile than he
deserves.

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !

---
As usual, you're being disingenuous with your selective ignorance.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Islam#Denial_of_entry_into_the_United_States

" Customs agents alerted the Transportation Security Administration, which then
diverted his flight to Bangor, Maine, where he was detained by the FBI.

The following day, Yusuf Islam was deported back to the United Kingdom. "

Please explain my error.
His name was on the list, and triggered the action, but his name is
NOT what got his ass on the list, dipshit.

Can you really be THAT stupid?
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:16:48 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:10:56 +0000, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
MassiveProng wrote:
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

You cannot grasp the concept of a rich man who can think for himself? What
a sad little world you inhabit.

You cannot grasp the concept of a guy who sings what he knows will
make him a lot of money? Google "Cat Stevens"

You cannot grasp the concept of someone singing about something he believes
in?

He's a fucking misled patsy. Nothing more.

I expect you prefer war songs !

---
And I suspect you prefer "YMCA".

That is such a lame repsonse !

Nothing better to offer ?

---
Sure, but why waste a Howitzer on a fly?

I prefer to drop a big pile of shit... attract a lot more flies, and
then give 'em a MOAB for desert!
 
BTW- If you ever need to measure light intensity directly, such as
lumens/candela etc it is possible to do this with the built-in light
meter most 35mm cameras are equipped with. I did this many moons ago so
I don't recall the details.

Here is an explanation I just now found in google about the procedure,
just in case any one is interested:

http://fins.actwin.com/aquatic-plants/month.9711/msg00049.html

saxum g.n.
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:03:52 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:4f20v29p3i112575nsq8lmjitioirrc11g@4ax.com...

That was exactly my point. They sing what will sell.

And engineers design crap no one wants for no pay?
I haven't had that experience. Have you?

John
 
hapticz wrote:

the developer/xylene (or whatever it is)

Safety reminder: If you use Xylene don't forget that this liquid is as
flammable as gasoline. Vapors of xylene from an open container or an
evaporating source can crawl invisibly and without detection of it's
odor to an ignition point (pilot light, static discharge, electric range
etc.)

Xylene should be used in a well-ventilated area nowhere near any flame
or possible spark.

saxum g.n.
 
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:18:54 -0800, saxum@webtv.net (Grostle News)
wrote:

BTW- If you ever need to measure light intensity directly, such as
lumens/candela etc it is possible to do this with the built-in light
meter most 35mm cameras are equipped with. I did this many moons ago so
I don't recall the details.

Here is an explanation I just now found in google about the procedure,
just in case any one is interested:

http://fins.actwin.com/aquatic-plants/month.9711/msg00049.html
Good tip. That should work fine with more modern - even digital - SLR
cameras, as long as they have a full manual mode, eg; any Canon or
Nikon DLSR. The only problem is that the table in that post is for
ASA/ISO 25, which isn't available on many DSLRs. Fortunately, that's
easy to correct, by converting it for ISO 100 (2 stops faster), which
most DSLRs have, then shifting the shutter speed by 2 stops to
compensate:

*OLD* ASA/ISO 25 @ 1/60:
f-stop foot-candles
2 100
2.8 200
4 400
5.6 800
8 1,600
11 3,200

*NEW* ISO 100 @ 1/250:
f-stop foot-candles
2 100
2.8 200
4 400
5.6 800
8 1,600
11 3,200

Please note the comments about metering on white objects vs green,
etc, in the original post at that URL.

--
W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
. | ,. w ,
\|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
 
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:27:56 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:03:52 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:4f20v29p3i112575nsq8lmjitioirrc11g@4ax.com...

That was exactly my point. They sing what will sell.

And engineers design crap no one wants for no pay?



I haven't had that experience. Have you?

Oh no! LOOK! A speed trap!

Bwuahahaha!
 
"Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at> wrote in message
news:45f0b575$0$26578$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at...
Radiosrfun wrote:

I can understand what you're saying - it just seems strange - a man
who spoke in such strange ways and offers that up. As I said, it
could have been stated a much better way that done. Sometimes I have
to wonder if "he" was all he was supposed to be. Where he got some of
his notions. The older I get, the less I want to believe.


A Religion is strong through its believers.

Christianity do also have its intelligent and wise people. Saecularism
brings nothing new... Christianity fetched the human duality thousand
of years before ;) (Islam and the Koran limps after the event, in my
humble opinion. Allthough, you may not forget the power of them,
social-structures, married-life, magic, art, music.... everything is
very other. I call many friends of mine believer of Islam culture.
Egypt, Iran, and possibly some other states, I know only that two big
one in the moment.... where I know friends from. After some time you
recognise the Koran totally harmless, but not so left right directed as
the bible, though.)

Hint: You may not read the Bible like an instruction booklet. Also many
ceremonial outsays are strange. back again... Have you ever seen a
ceremony with flesh instead of wafer and blood instead of vine?

Before mentioning a religion (you actually mentioned islam in the same
post, too), you should mention your way of believing.
Spitting war-cries makes you not cool :), hiding behind a religion, or
two.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
I'm not sure I followed you completely - this trip. "I" am not hiding behind
"any" religions. I "once" felt part of the Christianity religion. Now - as I
said in my last post, I have my doubts. And I'm sure not leaning towards any
others - particularly Islam. There isn't a man alive who could convert me to
such a lame and diabolical religion. As for the Quoran/Koran - pick your own
spelling, I'd wipe my ass with it. I do not "study" the bible, I merely
remember what I was told and hear from time to time from those who preach on
TV - when flipping the channels. "I" would not fight over or for "any"
religion. It isn't worth my time. Not a one of them - can prove themselves
in my mind. Trying to prove there is an Allah/God/whoever - is like trying
to prove there is a Santa Claus. You "can't" see them, you "don't" see them
and yet - you're asked to believe. Gee - I'd like to believe I"m a rich man
too, but I don't see my millions laying around anywhere close by. So, if
I'm arguing "any" religion, it isn't being done in the process of hiding
behind any others. I'm not "spitting" war cries - well, second thought if
you want to put it that way - have at it; but I will slam Islam any damned
day of the week - for the fanatical - ball-less - yellow bellied bunch of
pussies that it represents or represents it. They hate people who disagree
with them - and their religion and they can count me among them. They speak
of Infidels..... I may be an infidel, but at least I got balls to stand up
to someone and fight like a man - not some gutless <faggot> coward. If
"Islam" is so great of a religion, and those spineless assholes are
misrepresenting it, then the masses of the good - ought to speak up. Because
these spineless assholes are hiding in their mosques and so on - making them
all look just as guilty.
 
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:45:07 -0500, "Radiosrfun"
<Radiosrfun@radiosrfun.com> Gave us:

ought to speak up. Because
these spineless assholes are hiding in their mosques and so on - making them
all look just as guilty.
ACtually a lot of the "good ones" are speaking out about what the
"bad ones" are doing to their very existence.

The bastards stayed too many centuries behind the rest for too long.

The solution isn't killing them, it is taking ALL their weapons of
ANY kind, and keeping other stupid countries like Russia and China and
such from feeding them new loads of crap.

If they learn to get along with each other and bury their hatchets
somewhere besides in each others' skulls, THEN they can begin to
integrate into the societies of the rest of the civil world with a
slight modicum of trust again.

The bugger picker Arafat is to blame for ALL this crap if you ask
me.

Why the Nobel folks gave that fucking terrorist bastard a nobel,
I'll never know. They are nearly as bad as the UN or our dopey
politicians that want to look the other way on illegal immigration.

The window of opportunity for them to become civil is closing fast
though. We might have to kill a whole bunch of 'em before the
survivors wise up. Shame that big bombs don't discern between the
ones that don't want any part of these violent fucktard mindsets, and
the "down with USA" rallytards.

I say, it will require at least one teardrop of the sun to fall
again before it is over, and I put the location for it squarely in
Iran.

Those folks that want change ther need to act fast and not sit on
their fucking hands anymore.

The word for the year is COUP.

It's their only fucking chance to achieve escape velocity from the
hatred quagmire.
 
"MassiveProng" <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in
message news:86t1v2dpbn40hpk58bjfcjbfjd6vfkedrb@4ax.com...
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:45:07 -0500, "Radiosrfun"
Radiosrfun@radiosrfun.com> Gave us:

ought to speak up. Because
these spineless assholes are hiding in their mosques and so on - making
them
all look just as guilty.


ACtually a lot of the "good ones" are speaking out about what the
"bad ones" are doing to their very existence.

The bastards stayed too many centuries behind the rest for too long.

The solution isn't killing them, it is taking ALL their weapons of
ANY kind, and keeping other stupid countries like Russia and China and
such from feeding them new loads of crap.

If they learn to get along with each other and bury their hatchets
somewhere besides in each others' skulls, THEN they can begin to
integrate into the societies of the rest of the civil world with a
slight modicum of trust again.

The bugger picker Arafat is to blame for ALL this crap if you ask
me.

Why the Nobel folks gave that fucking terrorist bastard a nobel,
I'll never know. They are nearly as bad as the UN or our dopey
politicians that want to look the other way on illegal immigration.

The window of opportunity for them to become civil is closing fast
though. We might have to kill a whole bunch of 'em before the
survivors wise up. Shame that big bombs don't discern between the
ones that don't want any part of these violent fucktard mindsets, and
the "down with USA" rallytards.

I say, it will require at least one teardrop of the sun to fall
again before it is over, and I put the location for it squarely in
Iran.

Those folks that want change ther need to act fast and not sit on
their fucking hands anymore.

The word for the year is COUP.

It's their only fucking chance to achieve escape velocity from the
hatred quagmire.
I'll agree with you in principle. I said somewhere - Killing isn't the
"right" solution. But I leaned in preventing disease - by innoculation. And
there's only one kind that cures that kind of disease. Unfortunately it
leads right back to "killing". They've proven the point themselves, that if
we don't erradicate them, they'll always be trying it with us and even their
own people - it seems.

Yeah, I have heard "some" Muslims speaking out - but it is a bit too
little - too late. Like trying to shut the barn door after the horses are
out. If they "really" want the world to see them as Peaceful, then they all
need to start speaking out very loudly - every damned chance they get.

As for Nobel Prizes, seems any ass hole can do something and get one. I had
forgotten about that particular award presentation. Hell, it's a wonder
Saddam Insane didn't get one too. Give em enough time, Bin Laden might win
one. Problem is, delivering it to his hole in the ground. Its hard to tell
what hole the snake is in.
Yeah, I often wonder about some of those "coveted" awards. Come to think of
it, wasn't Arafat and Insane - Time's cover boys? You really have to wonder
about them too. Making assholes look like someone special.

Yeah, I agree about the big ones. Undoubtedly there will be some "innocents"
killed in the process of clearing out the diseased population. IF there are
ANY Martyrs out of that mess, it would be the INNOCENT who get killed
because of the scum. Iran, Iraq, wipe em all out. Blow the shit out of
them - and maybe the rest will get the message. It's a shame, that seems the
"only" answer - but they are choosing it.
 
John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !

---
As usual, you're being disingenuous with your selective ignorance.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Islam#Denial_of_entry_into_the_United_States

" Customs agents alerted the Transportation Security Administration, which then
diverted his flight to Bangor, Maine, where he was detained by the FBI.

The following day, Yusuf Islam was deported back to the United Kingdom. "

Please explain my error.

---
Not an error, the intentional " 'land of freedom' (tm) ! " slur
based upon the fact that he was turned away, but without supplying
a link to the story. As usual, your cowardly way of trying to stack
the deck.
Calling the USA the "land of freedom" is a slur ?

Well... OK you said it.

Graham
 
MassiveProng wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:
Homer J Simpson wrote:

ISTR that 8 was the age for marriage in some US 'frontier' states - not now
I guess.

I once had a very 'mature' 12 yo want to stay the night !

In your case, it was probably a male, and your idea of "very mature"
was you staring at his crotch.
Pitiful. She was a real sweetie actually.

Graham
 
MassiveProng wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !

It wasn't because of his name, dumbass.
Yes it was actually. Read it up.

Graham
 
MassiveProng wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Homer J Simpson wrote:
"Ron M." <strmbrgr2@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Does marrying a six year old child make Mo true prophet?

I thought she was 8 or 9 actually !

Actually he married her when she was 6. They then consumated the
marriage when she was 9. Real friggin sicko, wasn't he.

ISTR that 8 was the age for marriage in some US 'frontier' states - not now
I guess.

I once had a very 'mature' 12 yo want to stay the night !

---
Did you let him?

Her silly, a lovely blonde too btw and a total sweetie. She seemed to be under the
erroneous impression I had my own flat (apartment).

I wasn't in a position to comply. I was only 15 myself. I'm sure it would have
been great though.


Figures... no danger of criminality, and yet you passed it up.
Actually it would be a crime in the UK at least technically. There's the slight issue
of not wanting to make a baby too.

Aside from anything else it took my rather by surprise actually. I've been surprised
like that a few times in fact, even rather more recently but she was about 21 not 12.

Graham
 
MassiveProng wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

And his name is now Yusuf Islam which led to him being deported from the 'land of
freedom' (tm) !

---
As usual, you're being disingenuous with your selective ignorance.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_Islam#Denial_of_entry_into_the_United_States

" Customs agents alerted the Transportation Security Administration, which then
diverted his flight to Bangor, Maine, where he was detained by the FBI.

The following day, Yusuf Islam was deported back to the United Kingdom. "

Please explain my error.


His name was on the list, and triggered the action, but his name is
NOT what got his ass on the list, dipshit.

Can you really be THAT stupid?
*HIS* name wasn't on the list actually.

Then again if you choose a daft name such as Islam (or Mohammed even for that matter)
theere's going to be a lot of ppl around with very similar names.

To save you the trouble of looking he was confused with a Youssef Islam.

Graham.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top