Chip with simple program for Toy

On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:53:58 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:37:24 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:05:38 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

Touch me and I'll have to kill you.

With that amount of gas, you just might.

You have no idea...

Do you smoke?

Only when I'm hot, or under duress.

Why?
With that amount of gas, you just might explode.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Why didn't Noah swat those two mosquitoes?
 
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:54:44 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:38:19 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:06:00 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

*ding*

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gary.hart/lyricsb/berryc.html

Musta been frustrating not being able to say penis in public all those years ago.

We haven't moved forward much.

It's because of the Foreskin Pogrom(tm).
The what?

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

_..._
\_.._ `'-.,--,
'-._'-. `\a\\
'. `_.' (|
`7 ||
/ .' |
/_.-' ,J
/ \
|| / ;
_.. || | | /`\.-.
.' _ `\ `\ \ | \_/__/
/ /e)-,\ '. \ /.-` .'\
/ | ,_ | /\ `;_.-'_.-'`\_/
/ '-(-.)/ \_;(((_.-;
.'--. \ ` .(((_,;`'. \
/ `\ | _.--'`__.' `\ '-;\
/` | /.-' .--' '._.'\\
.' ; /__.-'` | \ |
.'`-'_ /_.'))) \_\,_/
/ -'_.'---;`'-)))
(__.'/ /` .'`
(_.'/ /` /`
_|.' /`
.-` __.'|
.-'|| |
\_`/
`
 
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:53:58 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:37:24 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:05:38 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

Touch me and I'll have to kill you.

With that amount of gas, you just might.

You have no idea...

Do you smoke?

Only when I'm hot, or under duress.

Why?

With that amount of gas, you just might explode.
Happens all the time--I just learned to live with it.
--
ah
 
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:05:05 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:53:58 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:37:24 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

You have no idea...

Do you smoke?

Only when I'm hot, or under duress.

Why?

With that amount of gas, you just might explode.

Happens all the time--I just learned to live with it.
http://80.229.155.158/videos/People/Ignited%20fart.avi

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

They say confuscious does his crosswords with a pen.
 
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:54:44 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:38:19 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:06:00 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

*ding*

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gary.hart/lyricsb/berryc.html

Musta been frustrating not being able to say penis in public all those years ago.

We haven't moved forward much.

It's because of the Foreskin Pogrom(tm).

The what?
A concerted effort begun c. 2000 B.C. on the part of the Orgasm Police (in
association with--and under guidance of--Central Clitoris Control (C3)) to stem
the evil tide of Personal Pleasure.
--
ah
 
Dang Charles, I did exactly the same thing in 1957. If you had
asked me, I would have told you to watch out for those metal
microphones when using a Windom.
I only made that mistake once! That burn was very slow to heal, by the way.
I clearly understood several principles after that. Close-talking the mic
and over-modulation was the least of them.
 
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:05:05 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:53:58 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:37:24 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

You have no idea...

Do you smoke?

Only when I'm hot, or under duress.

Why?

With that amount of gas, you just might explode.

Happens all the time--I just learned to live with it.

http://80.229.155.158/videos/People/Ignited%20fart.avi
Do you encode this crap yourself?
--
ah
 
"Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote in
news:LpCdnUPvrpJW213enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com:

No, I mean ELECTRICALLY balanced. And with the feedline at right
angles to the antenna so that it doesn't pick up anything by
induction. It's a tricky thing to do, yet back in the old days hams
used to feed dipoles or extended double zepp antennas with open wire
line and not get much RF in the shack. I know mine didn't.

Ran a Windom in Texas in 1965 (WA5KBO) with only 150W and burned a
hole in my lip (no joke) with the RF on the metal ring around the
microphone! The Windom was a good performer, but I could not
effectively ground the rig. I was in student housing (College
Station) and was not allowed antennas but improvised!
A true windom with a single wire feed, or one of the latter-day kind with
twinlead?


--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
 
"Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@comcast.net> wrote in
news:A_SdnaQv_rICElzeRVn-gQ@comcast.com:

Dang Charles, I did exactly the same thing in 1957. If you had
asked me, I would have told you to watch out for those metal
microphones when using a Windom.

I only made that mistake once! That burn was very slow to heal, by
the way. I clearly understood several principles after that.
Close-talking the mic and over-modulation was the least of them.
This is where those artificial ground things come in handy. But the end of
the counterpoise needs to be where it can do no harm, as that's where the
artificial ground sticks the voltage.


--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
 
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 07:35:18 -0800, Don Bowey wrote:

On 1/6/06 9:34 PM, in article 43BF5267.24D39FBB@earthlink.net, "Michael A.
Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Richard Crowley wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote ...
"techie_alison" wrote:
"Grant Edwards" wrote ...
Charles Jean wrote:

Who's Mark?

[snip]

Space's brother ?:)

ROTFL! :))

(But likely lost on the younger crowd.)


Yeah, they don't know what they missed by never working on the old AP
& UPI newswire KSR33 teletypes on a leased loop.

Or the models 14, 15 and 19 that were even before your time. They seemed
hi-tech at the time. My first one at home was a 14 with the range crank on
top, front. It came from a Telco Toll office.
Some guy once gave me what I'm almost sure was a "model 13". It used a 60
mA current loop, and ran at "60 WPM" - that's words per minute, where a
"word" is five characters. So, five characters per second, and five bits
per character, with start and stop bits, that's not very many baud. Back
when I was a young stud with an 8008 and .256 KB of RAM, it wasn't that
hard to make it type stuff. ;-)

Mechanically, it was fascinating. And if you ever get one, don't spray it
with WD-40. On a mechanism like a teletype, WD-40 turns to glue. I spent
about two weeks with a typewriter brush and isopropyl alcohol cleaning
the damn thing up.

But it was kewl, toggling stuff into the ol' Scelbi 8H and having the ol'
model 13 kachunk it out. :)

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:56:27 +0000, zagga wrote:

Yeah, i had the same prob with an old smd LS244 octal, replaced it with a
74HCT244 octal and now the bloody unit doesn't work whatsoever.....oh well,
back to trying to find an original.....
Gaz
Check your soldering. An HCT should be a drop-in replacement for an LS,
unless your design actually _needs_ the slower chip, which doesn't make
any sense in any reality I've ever visited.

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:06:50 +0000, ah wrote:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:43:05 +0000, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:31:31 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:53:31 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:38:01 -0000, Rich The Newsgroup Wacko <wacko@example.com> wrote:

Visualize Whirled Peas!

I'll need some marajuana first.

You'll need a slight bit more'n that, Peter.

"Some" is not a specific quantity.

But easily identifiable--in this context--as not nearly enough.

"Some marajuana" is never anywhere near specific.

"Dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get
you through times of no dope."
-- Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers

"Dope will get you through times of no pussy better than money will."
-- some cow-orker in the EMR shop at Beale AFB, CA, ca. 1974

Cheers!
Rich

[1] EMR = Electromagnetic Reconnaissance. Or, depending whom you're
talking to, Educable Mentally Retarded. ;-P

IAWTP.
WTF IAWTP? "I Am Wet Toilet Paper?"

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:37:52 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:05:05 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:53:58 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:

Only when I'm hot, or under duress.

Why?

With that amount of gas, you just might explode.

Happens all the time--I just learned to live with it.

http://80.229.155.158/videos/People/Ignited%20fart.avi

Do you encode this crap yourself?
Some of it.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Confucius say: "Boy who go to sleep with stiff problem wake up with solution in hand."
 
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:05:16 -0000, Rich Grise <eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:06:50 +0000, ah wrote:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:43:05 +0000, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:31:31 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:

But easily identifiable--in this context--as not nearly enough.

"Some marajuana" is never anywhere near specific.

"Dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get
you through times of no dope."
-- Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers

"Dope will get you through times of no pussy better than money will."
-- some cow-orker in the EMR shop at Beale AFB, CA, ca. 1974

Cheers!
Rich

[1] EMR = Electromagnetic Reconnaissance. Or, depending whom you're
talking to, Educable Mentally Retarded. ;-P

IAWTP.

WTF IAWTP? "I Am Wet Toilet Paper?"
The stupidest one has to be IANAL.


--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

|
--====|====--
|
.-"""""-.
.'_________'.
/_/_|__|__|_\_\
;'-._ _.-';
,--------------------| `-. .-' |--------------------,
``""--..__ ___ ; ' ; ___ __..--""``
`"-// \\.._\ /_..// \\-"`
\\_// '._ _.' \\_//
`"` ``---`` `"`
 
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:05:16 -0000, Rich Grise <eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:06:50 +0000, ah wrote:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:43:05 +0000, Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:31:31 -0000, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:

But easily identifiable--in this context--as not nearly enough.

"Some marajuana" is never anywhere near specific.

"Dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get
you through times of no dope."
-- Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers

"Dope will get you through times of no pussy better than money will."
-- some cow-orker in the EMR shop at Beale AFB, CA, ca. 1974

Cheers!
Rich

[1] EMR = Electromagnetic Reconnaissance. Or, depending whom you're
talking to, Educable Mentally Retarded. ;-P

IAWTP.

WTF IAWTP? "I Am Wet Toilet Paper?"
I Agree With This Post, but I like yours better!

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

|
--====|====--
|
.-"""""-.
.'_________'.
/_/_|__|__|_\_\
;'-._ _.-';
,--------------------| `-. .-' |--------------------,
``""--..__ ___ ; ' ; ___ __..--""``
`"-// \\.._\ /_..// \\-"`
\\_// '._ _.' \\_//
`"` ``---`` `"`
 
A true windom with a single wire feed, or one of the latter-day kind with
twinlead?
Single wire feed. I was a student (living off of my wife) and used what I
could get my hands on.
 
"Reg Edwards" wrote
Single wire feed. I was a student (living off of my wife) and used
what I
could get my hands on.
=======================================

A true radio amateur!

Just get a random, bent wire into the air. A single-wire feed helps a
lot. With a modest ground and a simple tuner you have an efficient,
multi-band, go-anywhere antenna system you can be proud of.

Anybody who boasts about his G5RV has never tried anything else.
Right.....you should hear the bands open up when you launch a kite
antenna. There's nothing like a few hundred feet of random long wire up
in the air. ;-)
WARNING: No one should ever do such a thing for what should be very
obvious safety reasons.

I'm a big fan of cubical quads, but you need allot of room for them.
I'd take one over a yagi any day. I built a two element quad for 10
meters using bamboo fishing poles for the spreaders. The boom was made
from cedar. It lasted about three years before a flying tree limb took
it out. I also made an 8 element quad for 2 meters using 1/2" poplar
dowel rod spreaders and a wooden boom as well. Man was that thing hard
to tune. Weird things happen after the fifth element is added for some
reason. Might explain why most have only 4 elements. ;-) Seriously,
it really kicked ass but the tornadic storm took it out too. I'll not
be making another with that many elements, too fussy but extremely
narrow beam w/incredible back side rejection.
 
Single wire feed. I was a student (living off of my wife) and used
what I
could get my hands on.
=======================================

A true radio amateur!

Just get a random, bent wire into the air. A single-wire feed helps a
lot. With a modest ground and a simple tuner you have an efficient,
multi-band, go-anywhere antenna system you can be proud of.

Anybody who boasts about his G5RV has never tried anything else.
----
Reg.
 
Reg Edwards wrote:
Anybody who boasts about his G5RV has never tried anything else.
Reg, I replaced my 130 ft. dipole with a G5RV so I could
experiment with it. Given my modifications, Nobody can tell
it from the 130 ft. dipole so there's no reason to return
to the 130 ft. dipole. My G5RV has an SWR of less than 2:1
on all eight HF bands.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
 
"Cecil Moore" wrote
My G5RV has an SWR of less than 2:1
on all eight HF bands.
=========================================

The CIA W.M.D. department must have told you that naughty fib.

The SWR on your 380-ohm transmission line to the antenna is umpteen
times greater than that!

Isn't it time you changed the name of your SWR meter?
----
Reg.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top