Chip with simple program for Toy

On Apr 11, 7:35 pm, "Ron M." <strmbr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 11, 12:59 am, jaya kala <jayakala.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

 http://123maza.com/75/latest149/

Don't do it. It's a trap!!
Yeah I won a car too! I sent it to my Nigerian banker. He's got my
winnings from the Spanish lottery...

Say, if we linked all the scam/spams together would they eat each
other?

George H.
 
George Herold wrote:
On Apr 11, 7:35 pm, "Ron M." <strmbr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 11, 12:59 am, jaya kala <jayakala.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://123maza.com/75/latest149/

Don't do it. It's a trap!!

Yeah I won a car too! I sent it to my Nigerian banker. He's got my
winnings from the Spanish lottery...

Say, if we linked all the scam/spams together would they eat each
other?

I doubt if they even look at their incoming email of anything - they
live off the nincompoops that send them their money sight-unseen.

It seems like there's always some story about another old person that
gets scammed out of thousands of dollars, and I always wonder, "How
did somebody so stupid ever get all that money in the first place?"

Cheers!
Rich
 
"Rich Grise" wrote in message news:io22ki$8kt$2@dont-email.me...

It seems like there's always some story about another old person
that gets scammed out of thousands of dollars, and I always
wonder, "How did somebody so stupid ever get all that money
in the first place?"
Sometimes it is early stage of dementia, where normal activities pose no
major problem, but judgment skills may be impaired. But also they may have
made a lot of money from a job that requires little skill and intelligence,
but with wages inflated by union contracts and/or so-called equal
opportunity incentives. Fortunately, as the economy tanks, these unnatural
hiring paradigms will be subject to Darwinian selection, and the great
leveler of a global economy, where only the truly exemplary hard-working
employees and brilliant entrepreneurs will make such high wages, and those
who aren't, won't.

Paul
 
"P E Schoen" wrote in message news:io26tt$250$1@speranza.aioe.org...

"Rich Grise" wrote in message news:io22ki$8kt$2@dont-email.me...

It seems like there's always some story about another old person
that gets scammed out of thousands of dollars, and I always
wonder, "How did somebody so stupid ever get all that money
in the first place?"
Sometimes it is early stage of dementia, where normal activities pose no
major problem, but judgment skills may be impaired. But also they may have
made a lot of money from a job that requires little skill and intelligence,
but with wages inflated by union contracts and/or so-called equal
opportunity incentives. Fortunately, as the economy tanks, these unnatural
hiring paradigms will be subject to Darwinian selection, and the great
leveler of a global economy, where only the truly exemplary hard-working
employees and brilliant entrepreneurs will make such high wages, and those
who aren't, won't.

Paul

Are you saying that Professor Abdomma Bugatta is not going to be sending me
my 25 Million American Dollars?
 
Tom Biasi wrote:

Are you saying that Professor Abdomma Bugatta is not going to be sending
me my 25 Million American Dollars?
We are talking about the same guy who offered a single
'congratulation' when 'congratulations' aren't really
that much more expensive.

--Winston
 
On Apr 11, 8:19 pm, George Herold <gher...@teachspin.com> wrote:
On Apr 11, 7:35 pm, "Ron M." <strmbr...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 11, 12:59 am, jaya kala <jayakala.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

 http://123maza.com/75/latest149/

Don't do it. It's a trap!!

Yeah I won a car too!   I sent it to my Nigerian banker.  He's got my
winnings from the Spanish lottery...

Say, if we linked all the scam/spams together would they eat each
other?

George H.
I had one from Hong Kong try me once. I played along (sorta) and they
sent me a certificate of deposit for the Central Bank of China. Now
the funny part. The name on the certificate was Kisie Myas Biotch.
They never even caught on. What a chuckle I got from that one.
 
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:52:04 -0700, Rich Grise
<richg@example.net.invalid> wrote:

Chris S. wrote:
"Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:iph4j9$4at$1@dont-email.me...
We may both be wrong..
They look like RCA But they are in fact imports used on Antenna
Connections to Signal Amplifiers.

It's the TV antennae cable plug being used in Hong Kong, which was ruled
by UK before 1997. It's not RCA, the pin is shorter.

I wanna know the TECHNICAL name of that plug design.

Isn't it just a push-on non threaded F Connector?

No, the center conductor is too fat. It's an ordinary RCA plug, but
with the solid shell to impress the audiophools.

The push-on F connectors I have here have the slotted shell, but the center
conductor is about 22 or 24 AWG and there's a springy loop around the
shell leaves.
There are some without the springy loop, and I also have some that
won't fit in my female F-connectors, one piece outer circle too loose
iirc. but they don't look like the OP's photo either. If I ever
really need an answer, I'll post a picture.
Hope This Helps!
Rich
 
On Apr 30, 5:52 pm, Rich Grise <ri...@example.net.invalid> wrote:
Chris S. wrote:
"Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toy...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:iph4j9$4at$1@dont-email.me...
We may both be wrong..
They look like RCA But they are in fact imports used on Antenna
Connections to Signal Amplifiers.

It's the TV antennae cable plug being used in Hong Kong, which was ruled
by UK before 1997. It's not RCA, the pin is shorter.

I wanna know the TECHNICAL name of that plug design.

Isn't it just a push-on non threaded F Connector?

No, the center conductor is too fat. It's an ordinary RCA plug, but
with the solid shell to impress the audiophools.

The push-on F connectors I have here have the slotted shell, but the center
conductor is about 22 or 24 AWG and there's a springy loop around the
shell leaves.

Hope This Helps!
Rich
NOT ITS NOT.
 
The Ghost in The Machine wrote:
On Apr 30, 5:52 pm, Rich Grise <ri...@example.net.invalid> wrote:
Chris S. wrote:

Isn't it just a push-on non threaded F Connector?

No, the center conductor is too fat. It's an ordinary RCA plug, but
with the solid shell to impress the audiophools.

The push-on F connectors I have here have the slotted shell, but the
center conductor is about 22 or 24 AWG and there's a springy loop around
the shell leaves.

NOT ITS NOT.
OK, what IS it then, or are you just having a tantrum?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:52:04 -0700, Rich Grise
<richg@example.net.invalid> wrote:

Chris S. wrote:
"Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:iph4j9$4at$1@dont-email.me...
We may both be wrong..
They look like RCA But they are in fact imports used on Antenna
Connections to Signal Amplifiers.

It's the TV antennae cable plug being used in Hong Kong, which was ruled
by UK before 1997. It's not RCA, the pin is shorter.

I wanna know the TECHNICAL name of that plug design.

Isn't it just a push-on non threaded F Connector?

No, the center conductor is too fat. It's an ordinary RCA plug, but
with the solid shell to impress the audiophools.
It's nothing of the kind.

In the "olden days" here in Oz they were simply referred to as
Belling-Lee coax connectors, after the British manufacturer.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_aerial_plug

Nowadays they are typically called "PAL connectors" here, as they are
still widely used for antenna-side RF connectors in our PAL analog TV
and into the digital TV also.

One supplier's catalog page
http://www.altronics.com.au/index.asp?area=prod&grp=364
 
"Rich Grise"
"The Ghost in The Machine"

OOPS!!! ON SECOND VIEWING THE ONE IN THE PIX IS USING CLASSY RCA
PLUGS,

** Wrong again.

Well, they looked like audiophool-grade RCAs to me; if not, then what
ARE they, or are you just having another tantrum?

** Others have given the right ID.

Known for decades as " Belling Lee" connectors for TV antennas and such.

Came into widespread use in Australia with the arrival of PAL colour TV and
FM broadcasting in 1975/6.

Poms loves 'em.


..... Phil
 
On May 1, 2:18 am, Rich Grise <ri...@example.net.invalid> wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"The Ghost in The Machine"

OOPS!!! ON SECOND VIEWING THE ONE IN THE PIX IS USING CLASSY RCA
PLUGS,

** Wrong again.

Well, they looked like audiophool-grade RCAs to me; if not, then what
ARE they, or are you just having another tantrum?

Thanks,
Rich
YEAH FUCK THAT SHIT.....IF HE WAS REALLY PAYING ATTENTION HE'D NOTICE
I CORRECTED AND POSTED MY VIEWS DOWN POST........I'D SWEAR THEY ARE
CHINESE CABLES FOR RF DEVICES...BUT THEY MAY FIT A FEMALE RCA
JACK....LET'S TRY ONE OUT, TELL HIM TO GIVE YOU HIS ADDRESS.

TGITM
 
On May 1, 2:18 am, Rich Grise <ri...@example.net.invalid> wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"The Ghost in The Machine"

OOPS!!! ON SECOND VIEWING THE ONE IN THE PIX IS USING CLASSY RCA
PLUGS,

** Wrong again.

Well, they looked like audiophool-grade RCAs to me; if not, then what
ARE they, or are you just having another tantrum?

Thanks,
Rich
THEY ARE REFINED CHINESE ANTENNA CABLES.....HE CAN POINT OUT AN ERROR
BUT FAILS TO POINT OUT THE FORRECT AMSWER HIMSELF....THE BIG BABY.

TGITM
 
On 5/1/2011 2:17 AM, Rich Grise wrote:
mm wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:23:18 +0100, "Stephen"<i.want.spam@spam.com

PAL refers to the type of analogueTV standard rather than he type of
connector

There are at least three analogue TV broadcast systems, PAL, (Phase
Alternate Line), NTSC (National Television Standards Committee) and SECAM
(a variant of PAL where the audio and colour is carried in a different
way)

Belling Lee is a connector standard, nothing to do with PAL so its a
mistake on the website.

And for that matter, BNC twist on, so why are they in this discussion
at all (in other posts)? I just learned that B stands for bayonet.

I once had a salesman tell me it simply means "Bayonet Connector";
presumably the BN is BayoNet, as in TTY for TeleTYpe. :)

Cheers!
Rich
Wiki has a pretty good summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNC_connector

--
aem sends...
 
The Ghost in The Machine wrote:
YEAH FUCK THAT SHIT...
Please stop shouting. There should be a key just to the left of your
"A" key, labeled "Caps Lock." Press that once, and watch for the little
green CAPS LOCK LED on your keyboard to extinguish.

Thanks,
Rich
 
Rich Grise wrote:

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.


I'll never ever waste my money on NiMH batteries again. They're the
crappiest excuse for batteries I've ever encountered. After about six
months of use, and charge/use cycles, their useful life (per charge)
deteriorates to a matter of seconds.

Anyone who spends money on NiMHs, even with a "smart" charger, is an
idiot.

And you misspelled "losing."

Hope This Helps!
Rich

The trick is to not keep them on a charger at all times. And also, it's
good to cycle them..

I've a 2 old laptops that I bring out from time to time for specific
things and their batteries still charge well and hold.

Jamie
 
Rich Grise wrote:

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.


THERE IS NO APOSTROPHE IN THE POSSESSIVE ITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please clue up.

Rich Grise, Self-Appointed Chief,
Internet Apostrophe Police

Does that help your battery issue?

Jamie
 
On Sun, 01 May 2011 13:47:52 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.

I'll never ever waste my money on NiMH batteries again. They're the
crappiest excuse for batteries I've ever encountered. After about six
months of use, and charge/use cycles, their useful life (per charge)
deteriorates to a matter of seconds.
You obviously mishandled them. There is nothing inherently wrong with NiMH
batteries. Less, in fact, than NiCd.

Anyone who spends money on NiMHs, even with a "smart" charger, is an
idiot.
Anyone who can't figure out how to use a "smart" charger, obviously isn't. ;-)

And you misspelled "losing."
 
On Sun, 01 May 2011 17:05:48 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Sun, 01 May 2011 13:47:52 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
wrote:

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.

I'll never ever waste my money on NiMH batteries again. They're the
crappiest excuse for batteries I've ever encountered. After about six
months of use, and charge/use cycles, their useful life (per charge)
deteriorates to a matter of seconds.

You obviously mishandled them. There is nothing inherently wrong with NiMH
batteries. Less, in fact, than NiCd.

Anyone who spends money on NiMHs, even with a "smart" charger, is an
idiot.

Anyone who can't figure out how to use a "smart" charger, obviously isn't. ;-)

And you misspelled "losing."
---
Why are you being so combative?

--
JF
 
On Sun, 01 May 2011 18:16:22 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 01 May 2011 17:05:48 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Sun, 01 May 2011 13:47:52 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
wrote:

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.

I'll never ever waste my money on NiMH batteries again. They're the
crappiest excuse for batteries I've ever encountered. After about six
months of use, and charge/use cycles, their useful life (per charge)
deteriorates to a matter of seconds.

You obviously mishandled them. There is nothing inherently wrong with NiMH
batteries. Less, in fact, than NiCd.

Anyone who spends money on NiMHs, even with a "smart" charger, is an
idiot.

Anyone who can't figure out how to use a "smart" charger, obviously isn't. ;-)

And you misspelled "losing."

---
Why are you being so combative?
Me? If you're talking about the misspelling slam, wasn't me. If you're
talking about something else, learn how to reply.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top