Casio Wave Captor radio controlled watch, WR50M

On 26/03/2018 08:31, N_Cook wrote:
2 weeks on and no problem, passed through to daylight saving time
automatically yesterday. So perhaps cleaning battery contact points, and
bending contact metal is all that was wrong. Otherwise leaving out the
piezo spring contact-unlikely or close-handling , the big unknown

3 months on of normal 24/7 use and no problem to report.
If it ain't broke, don't poke: replacement battery and disconnected
spring contact remain on the outside.
 
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, N_Cook wrote:

On 26/03/2018 08:31, N_Cook wrote:
2 weeks on and no problem, passed through to daylight saving time
automatically yesterday. So perhaps cleaning battery contact points, and
bending contact metal is all that was wrong. Otherwise leaving out the
piezo spring contact-unlikely or close-handling , the big unknown


3 months on of normal 24/7 use and no problem to report.
If it ain't broke, don't poke: replacement battery and disconnected spring
contact remain on the outside.
I have a Waveceptor, don't know the module number, but it's "solar
powered". I don't use the backlight much, but what I remember is I got it
in the spring of 2006, and it's still running fine on the first battery.
At one time, I accidentally activated the function where if you move the
watch at a certain angle the backlight comes on, no need to press a
button. Before I figured out how to reset that, the "battery indicator"
was down one bar, I think the only time it's never been at "full power".
I paid about 20 dollars for it, wanting the "atomic watch" aspect, but
it's nice not to have to change the battery. I know on my previous Casio,
somehow the replacement battery lasted a very short time, and then the
strap broke, so I abandoned it, rather than buy a second battery so soon
on top of needing a new strap.

Michael
 
On 6/17/2018 9:43 AM, Michael Black wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, N_Cook wrote:

On 26/03/2018 08:31, N_Cook wrote:
2 weeks on and no problem, passed through to daylight saving time
automatically yesterday. So perhaps cleaning battery contact points, and
bending contact metal is all that was wrong. Otherwise leaving out the
piezo spring contact-unlikely or close-handling , the big unknown


3 months on of normal 24/7 use and no problem to report.
If it ain't broke, don't poke: replacement battery and disconnected
spring contact remain on the outside.

I have a Waveceptor, don't know the module number, but it's "solar
powered".  I don't use the backlight much, but what I remember is I got
it in the spring of 2006, and it's still running fine on the first
battery. At one time, I accidentally activated the function where if you
move the watch at a certain angle the backlight comes on, no need to
press a button.  Before I figured out how to reset that, the "battery
indicator" was down one bar, I think the only time it's never been at
"full power". I paid about 20 dollars for it, wanting the "atomic watch"
aspect, but it's nice not to have to change the battery.  I know on my
previous Casio, somehow the replacement battery lasted a very short
time, and then the strap broke, so I abandoned it, rather than buy a
second battery so soon on top of needing a new strap.

  Michael
I have had 2 of the Casios. Both of them failed when the case broke.
They still ran fine, but with a broken case they got filled with
moisture and the crystal fogged over.

Bill
 
I have a wave ceptor and the tiny antenna has separated from the indentation in the frame of the watch (my fault). Do you know if there’s any way of fixing this.
 
On 20/04/2019 14:50, jozefdzwonnik@gmail.com wrote:
I have a wave ceptor and the tiny antenna has separated from the indentation in the frame of the watch (my fault). Do you know if there’s any way of fixing this.

From what I remember of the inside of mine (no problem with it since
cleaning battery and contacts and slightly bending the contacts).
Hopefully the wire of the antenna is not work/age hardened soits
possible to unwind 1/2? turns to give scope to solder back, difficult to
believe 1or2 turns less would affect reception too much.
 
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:08:07 +0100, N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:

On 20/04/2019 14:50, jozefdzwonnik@gmail.com wrote:
I have a wave ceptor and the tiny antenna has separated from the indentation in the frame of the watch (my fault). Do you know if there’s any way of fixing this.


From what I remember of the inside of mine (no problem with it since
cleaning battery and contacts and slightly bending the contacts).
Hopefully the wire of the antenna is not work/age hardened soits
possible to unwind 1/2? turns to give scope to solder back, difficult to
believe 1or2 turns less would affect reception too much.

I've always thought the antenna was part of a tuned circuit (tuned to
exactly 60 kHz). Are you sure 1 or 2 turns wouldn't affect that
tuning?

Pat
 
On 21/04/2019 17:17, Pat wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:08:07 +0100, N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:

On 20/04/2019 14:50, jozefdzwonnik@gmail.com wrote:
I have a wave ceptor and the tiny antenna has separated from the indentation in the frame of the watch (my fault). Do you know if there’s any way of fixing this.


From what I remember of the inside of mine (no problem with it since
cleaning battery and contacts and slightly bending the contacts).
Hopefully the wire of the antenna is not work/age hardened soits
possible to unwind 1/2? turns to give scope to solder back, difficult to
believe 1or2 turns less would affect reception too much.

I've always thought the antenna was part of a tuned circuit (tuned to
exactly 60 kHz). Are you sure 1 or 2 turns wouldn't affect that
tuning?

Pat

I'm guessing its something like 100m of 0.1mm diameter wire, however
many turns that would be, minus 1 or 2 would not be noticed surely.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top