J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 11:26:20 -0500, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> wrote:
I think DankMatter was taking issue with my statement about putting
*film* caps back to back. He is, I think, arguing that you can't put
them back-to-back, only in series. He is, I think, also being a
tedious ass, as usual.
Actually, for film caps that have an outside-foil stripe, back-to-back
does have meaning.
John
<krw@attglobal.net> wrote:
Keith,In article <5q0920h6am0rs4j7uidkulm7r04ndmglme@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:45:58 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:
DimBUlb, do you have a *clue* what an NP electrolytic is? ...I
thought not. Yikes, you are *DENSE*.
You retarded bastard. We use them in our designs at work, and we
also configure our own NP electrolytic storage configurations in house
with two caps so configured.
Then how do you explain these words (they're yours)?
There is no "back to back" with np type caps. They are just
plain "series" configured. And yes, the voltage drops across
them split, if they are of an equal value.
NP electrolytic capacitors *are* back-to-back electrolytics.
Putting them in series doesn't make them NP.
John Larkin was exactly right. You really should try to learn
from him, rather than constantly demonstrate your incompetence.
Ever see a laser pulser bank? I thought not. Try RIFA, and
Maxwell.
Again you bring up irrelevant issues to try to wiggle out of you
ignorance.
I think DankMatter was taking issue with my statement about putting
*film* caps back to back. He is, I think, arguing that you can't put
them back-to-back, only in series. He is, I think, also being a
tedious ass, as usual.
Actually, for film caps that have an outside-foil stripe, back-to-back
does have meaning.
John