Can this be accomplished?

G

GreenXenon

Guest
Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.


Thanks
 
On May 9, 10:14 pm, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org>
wrote in http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/0e0c01ece9b726d6?hl=en
:

On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:57:48 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon

glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.

Thanks


Come back when you finally get the right terms down.
Click to expand...

Where are the terms wrong?
 
"GreenXenon" <glucegen1x@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec36f@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Hi:

with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.
Click to expand...


Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ? Coper
wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range? Audio?
Radar?
 
Cwatters wrote:
Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ? Coper
wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range? Audio?
Radar?
Click to expand...
It's obviously a raygun.
 
"GreenXenon" <glucegen1x@gmail.com
wrote in message
news:6acd9b7e-679c-4bba-91db-47f728baadbb@v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 10:40 pm, Mark Harriss <bi...@blartco.co.uk> wrote:

Yep

"Yep" to what?
Click to expand...
You being a completely moronic troll.

MrT.
 
"Mark Harriss" <billy@blartco.co.uk> wrote in message
news:yaSdnYbFKKnHEJvXnZ2dnUVZ8rFi4p2d@westnet.com.au...
Cwatters wrote:

Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ?
Coper wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range?
Audio? Radar?

It's obviously a raygun.
Click to expand...
A Ronny Raygun to be precise.
 
As to your question, I should think the problem would be how to measure
electrons. I searched google.com for the words...

measuring electrons

And came up with some interesting things. Might want to try that.

As to the negative replies, I suggest you try asking your question on
individual groups instead of posting to 5 groups with the same post. Then
you can see which groups offer constructive suggestions and which do not.
Then ask your future questions on the more positive groups.

Also you can search for the word forum along with a general topic word like
electronics and find some interesting discussion groups.


"GreenXenon" wrote in message
Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.


Thanks
 
Alan Rutlidge wrote:
"Mark Harriss" <billy@blartco.co.uk> wrote in message
news:yaSdnYbFKKnHEJvXnZ2dnUVZ8rFi4p2d@westnet.com.au...
Cwatters wrote:

Not enough info. You will have to explain what the output media is ?
Coper wire? Air? Water? Constant area or variable? What frequency range?
Audio? Radar?

It's obviously a raygun.

A Ronny Raygun to be precise.
Click to expand...

You're thinking of Ronny Re-gun, who rebuilt picture tubes.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
GreenXenon wrote:
On May 10, 9:06 am, Stuart <Spam...@argonet.co.uk> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.engineering.electrical/msg/977409bf5d65aa1e?hl=en
:

In article
43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi:
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] " and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.

Most things can be accomplished if we knew what the hell you were talking
about. Frequency changing can be done, yes, but what the rest of your post
is about is anybody's guess.

In an electronic signal, amplitude measure the amount of electron-
per-second-per-square-meter. More electron-per-second-per-square-
meter means more amplitude.
Click to expand...

In what medium? You talk big for a peabrain.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
 
"Bill" <billnomailnospamx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:76o741F1e6mh9U1@mid.individual.net...
As to your question, I should think the problem would be how to measure
electrons.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you could just measure the power and ground current. The difference
is the output current.
 
On May 10, 9:06 am, Stuart <Spam...@argonet.co.uk> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.engineering.electrical/msg/977409bf5d65aa1e?hl=en
:

In article
43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi:
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] " and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.


Most things can be accomplished if we knew what the hell you were talking
about. Frequency changing can be done, yes, but what the rest of your post
is about is anybody's guess.
Click to expand...

In an electronic signal, amplitude measure the amount of electron-
per-second-per-square-meter. More electron-per-second-per-square-
meter means more amplitude.
 
On Sun, 10 May 2009 09:44:01 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon
<glucegen1x@gmail.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

-
per-second-per-square-meter. More electron-per-second-per-square-
meter means more amplitude.
Click to expand...

electrons-per-second-per-square-meter sounds like a unit for current
density in a very sensitive photomultiplier.

Otherwise your post makes no sense.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
 
GreenXenon wrote:
Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.


Thanks
Click to expand...

A convoluted way of asking for something like a voltage-to-frequency
converter?
 
On Sat, 09 May 2009 22:42:54 -0700, GreenXenon wrote:


Come back when you finally get the right terms down.

Where are the terms wrong?
Click to expand...
Let me see, you cross post to a number of unrelated groups and ask a
question that involves animal, vegetable and mineral and
transmogortification. Either you do not have a clue as to what you want
or your education is nil or you are a troll.

If you seriously want an answer, correct one of the three and try again
next year/decade/century.
 
GreenXenon wrote:
Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.
Click to expand...

The question is based on a completely erroneous assumption. Electrons
per second per square meter is a current density, if an electron's
charge is accounted for. In electronics, it is usually current, not
current density, that matters.

The OP typically asks abstruse questions that, on analysis, are only
approximately meaningful. I can imagine that he was praised as a child
for asking what the adults around him thought were deep questions, and
that he has essentially retarded himself deliberately in an attempt to
relive the days of easy praise. There's a line in Gilbert and Sullivan's
/Patience/: "If this young man expresses himself in terms too deep for
me, Why, what a very singularly deep young man this deep young man must
be!" Poor young man!

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
 
GreenXenon wrote:
On May 10, 5:53 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote:

GreenXenon wrote:

Hi:
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.

The question is based on a completely erroneous assumption. Electrons
per second per square meter is a current density, if an electron's
charge is accounted for. In electronics, it is usually current, not
current density, that matters.

So the amplitude is determined by the amperage?
Click to expand...

No. With real signals, amplitude is often taken to be voltage, although
power is sometimes used (think decibels). With digital signals,
amplitude is a number interpreted according to some convention or rule.

You do much better at asking questions than at making assumptions.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
 
On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:53:24 -0400, Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:

GreenXenon wrote:
Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.

The question is based on a completely erroneous assumption. Electrons
per second per square meter is a current density, if an electron's
charge is accounted for. In electronics, it is usually current, not
current density, that matters.

The OP typically asks abstruse questions that, on analysis, are only
approximately meaningful. I can imagine that he was praised as a child
for asking what the adults around him thought were deep questions, and
that he has essentially retarded himself deliberately in an attempt to
relive the days of easy praise. There's a line in Gilbert and Sullivan's
/Patience/: "If this young man expresses himself in terms too deep for
me, Why, what a very singularly deep young man this deep young man must
be!" Poor young man!

Jerry
Click to expand...


That's deep.
 
On Sun, 10 May 2009 19:03:23 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon
<glucegen1x@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 10, 5:53 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote:

GreenXenon wrote:

Hi:

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square-
meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct
one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron-per-second-per-square-meter
will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron-per-second-per-square-meter.


The question is based on a completely erroneous assumption. Electrons
per second per square meter is a current density, if an electron's
charge is accounted for. In electronics, it is usually current, not
current density, that matters.

So the amplitude is determined by the amperage?
Click to expand...


Amplitude is a pressure. Current is akin to how much has passed in
what time frame, not how exited )pressured( it was to pass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top