Can electrolytic capacitors get loose wires inside?

[rickman]

pfjw@aol.com wrote on 10/20/2017 7:28 AM:

On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-4, olds...@tubes.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), "pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com
wrote:

Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each
piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst
and even the most basic concepts.


At least I'm not an arrogant fuck like you, who replies to people asking
serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them......
But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the
electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase
your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by
demeaning others.

PLONK

If you were trying to learn anything - you would have been way ahead of this issue - but, no, you are looking for someone to confirm your warped view of reality. Learning is the furthest thing from your goal.

You will note that your first pass at any given question usually gets a straightforward answer. It is when you display invincible ignorance that things go off the rails.

So why do you feel the need to reply with something nasty? If you don't
like his questions (I'm not suggesting they don't show the problems you
mention) why bother to respond?

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998

 

[John-Del]

On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 12:23:17 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:

pfjw@aol.com wrote on 10/20/2017 7:28 AM:
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-4, olds...@tubes.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), "pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com
wrote:

Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each
piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst
and even the most basic concepts.


At least I'm not an arrogant fuck like you, who replies to people asking
serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them......
But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the
electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase
your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by
demeaning others.

PLONK

If you were trying to learn anything - you would have been way ahead of this issue - but, no, you are looking for someone to confirm your warped view of reality. Learning is the furthest thing from your goal.

You will note that your first pass at any given question usually gets a straightforward answer. It is when you display invincible ignorance that things go off the rails.

So why do you feel the need to reply with something nasty? If you don't
like his questions (I'm not suggesting they don't show the problems you
mention) why bother to respond?

--

Peter may not suffer fools gladly, but he suffers them with far more patience than most. I've "known" Peter for almost 20 years on usenet and know for a fact he's far more the gentleman than the vast majority of users are.

John
Wolcott, CT

 

[pfjw@aol.com]

Once upon a time, we had a 10-year old, very stubborn Golden Retriever. He was getting arthritic, cranky, and generally set in his ways. Then, our daughter gave us a golden retriever puppy.

It gave our old guy a new lease on life. He dropped dead just under five years later while tugging on a stick with the then-five year old. Proving even old dogs can learn something.

Might apply to Oldschool - although liberal applications of various clue-sticks may be required - we have found in his case that treats do not work. Does with dogs.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

 

[rickman]

John-Del wrote on 10/20/2017 1:19 PM:

On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 12:23:17 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
pfjw@aol.com wrote on 10/20/2017 7:28 AM:
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-4, olds...@tubes.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), "pfjw@aol.com" <pfjw@aol.com
wrote:

Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each
piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst
and even the most basic concepts.


At least I'm not an arrogant fuck like you, who replies to people asking
serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them......
But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the
electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase
your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by
demeaning others.

PLONK

If you were trying to learn anything - you would have been way ahead of this issue - but, no, you are looking for someone to confirm your warped view of reality. Learning is the furthest thing from your goal.

You will note that your first pass at any given question usually gets a straightforward answer. It is when you display invincible ignorance that things go off the rails.

So why do you feel the need to reply with something nasty? If you don't
like his questions (I'm not suggesting they don't show the problems you
mention) why bother to respond?

--



Peter may not suffer fools gladly, but he suffers them with far more patience than most. I've "known" Peter for almost 20 years on usenet and know for a fact he's far more the gentleman than the vast majority of users are.

His diplomatic side is not showing here, but I guess we all suffer that
problem from time to time. Who me???

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998