Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 4:33:24 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 8:47:54 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:28:06 PM UTC+11, whit3rd wrote:
On Friday, November 18, 2022 at 5:44:38 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:49:40 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/17/2022 12:35 PM, a a wrote:
Breaking Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she\'s stepping down as leader of House Democrats
An odious character who vastly overstayed her welcome.
Nonsense. She got re-elected by her constituents, who know her
well enough by now. Characterization by political opponents is
trash talk.
No - you don\'t know what you are talking about:
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/pelosi-retirement-as-house-speaker-paving-way-for-new-democratic-leadership/3428149/
Flyguy is confused; she\'s been re-elected, but she\'s (graciously) handing over the head-Democrat
post to younger folk, will just be a senior congressperson rather than third in line for the Presidency.
The \'no\' is some kind of reflex? I\'ve got no idea what it refers to; don\'t we all see and recognize trash talk?
Sewage Sweeper isn\'t confused. He\'s just got fixed ideas - Republicans good , Democrats bad.
Trash talk is all he understand, and he doesn\'t recognise it as trash..
So says the KING of trash talking!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Trash talking is all that Sewage Sweeper can understand, and he doesn\'t recognise it as trash. He is equally incompetent at recognising rational responses, and likes to characterise them as trash - which gives a useful insight into his intellectual incompetence.
--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:58:30 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 2:22:02 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:41:15 PM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:43:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:55:47 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 6:56:23 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee..org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:14:52 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:02:37 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 12:44:38 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:49:40 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/17/2022 12:35 PM, a a wrote:
Breaking Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she\'s stepping down as leader of House Democrats
An odious character who vastly overstayed her welcome.
Nonsense. She got re-elected by her constituents, who know her
well enough by now. Characterization by political opponents is trash talk.
No - you don\'t know what you are talking about:
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/pelosi-retirement-as-house-speaker-paving-way-for-new-democratic-leadership/3428149/
Sewage Sweeper seems to think that an anodyne announcement that Nancy Pelosi is stepping down as house speaker but staying on as a congressional representative is some kind of evidence that whit3rd doesn\'t know he is talking about.
I am in her district and seriously thinking about running against her. She will die someday, hopefully before me.
This does suggest that you aren\'t up to much in the way of serious thought. She\'s famous, and you aren\'t. Based on what you post here, you wouldn\'t be an impressive or remotely competitive candidate, but it\'s your time and your money.
You are not reading my message carefully. I will have a chance if she is dead, eventually. She is 82. Is it illegal to wish someone dead, peacefully?
You didn\'t write your message carefully. \"I am in her district and seriously thinking about running against her.\" doesn\'t suggest that you are going to wait until she is dead before you run, and if you did wait, you\'d be running against somebody else.
I am running against her now and the dems deficit spending. You can write-in me if you are in our district. But wait, you are not even in our country.
No amount of careful reading can pick up the fact that you\'d changed your mind in mid-post. The message didn\'t make a lot of sense, but your posts mostly don\'t.
You said the same thing about my complaints with spending and inflation last couple of years. You implicitly promised us inflation would not be a problem.
It\'s not serious inflation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
and it is an inconvenience rather than a problem. I didn\'t promise you anything - implicitly or otherwise,
You just did it again. Implicitly promising that inflation is not a problem.
I\'m not promising anything, just pointing out that US inflation isn\'t currently isn\'t at problematic levels.
and getting upset about the Democrats when the main problem is Russia\'s invasion of the Ukraine is what half-witted Republicans love doing.
Oil price caused by Putin invasion is almost back to last year\'s level, but price levels are still up.
It\'s not the oil price but the natural gas (and thus electricity) prices that are the real problem.
Blaming Russia on inflation is what half-witted commentator love doing.
The sort of economic commentators that do it aren\'t half-witted.
And I am dependent to the right, not Republican.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ... John Donald-Trump=has-common-sense Larkin makes the same claim, no more convincingly.
--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:51:18 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:58:30 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 2:22:02 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 7:41:15 PM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 8:43:27 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 1:55:47 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 6:56:23 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:14:52 AM UTC+11, Ed Lee wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:02:37 AM UTC-8, bill.....@ieee.org wrote:
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 12:44:38 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:49:40 PM UTC-8, whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/17/2022 12:35 PM, a a wrote:
Breaking Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she\'s stepping down as leader of House Democrats
An odious character who vastly overstayed her welcome.
Nonsense. She got re-elected by her constituents, who know her
well enough by now. Characterization by political opponents is trash talk.
No - you don\'t know what you are talking about:
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/pelosi-retirement-as-house-speaker-paving-way-for-new-democratic-leadership/3428149/
Sewage Sweeper seems to think that an anodyne announcement that Nancy Pelosi is stepping down as house speaker but staying on as a congressional representative is some kind of evidence that whit3rd doesn\'t know he is talking about.
I am in her district and seriously thinking about running against her. She will die someday, hopefully before me.
This does suggest that you aren\'t up to much in the way of serious thought. She\'s famous, and you aren\'t. Based on what you post here, you wouldn\'t be an impressive or remotely competitive candidate, but it\'s your time and your money.
You are not reading my message carefully. I will have a chance if she is dead, eventually. She is 82. Is it illegal to wish someone dead, peacefully?
You didn\'t write your message carefully. \"I am in her district and seriously thinking about running against her.\" doesn\'t suggest that you are going to wait until she is dead before you run, and if you did wait, you\'d be running against somebody else.
I am running against her now and the dems deficit spending. You can write-in me if you are in our district. But wait, you are not even in our country.
No amount of careful reading can pick up the fact that you\'d changed your mind in mid-post. The message didn\'t make a lot of sense, but your posts mostly don\'t.
You said the same thing about my complaints with spending and inflation last couple of years. You implicitly promised us inflation would not be a problem.
It\'s not serious inflation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
and it is an inconvenience rather than a problem. I didn\'t promise you anything - implicitly or otherwise,
You just did it again. Implicitly promising that inflation is not a problem.
I\'m not promising anything, just pointing out that US inflation isn\'t currently isn\'t at problematic levels.
and getting upset about the Democrats when the main problem is Russia\'s invasion of the Ukraine is what half-witted Republicans love doing.
Oil price caused by Putin invasion is almost back to last year\'s level, but price levels are still up.
It\'s not the oil price but the natural gas (and thus electricity) prices that are the real problem.
Blaming Russia on inflation is what half-witted commentator love doing..
The sort of economic commentators that do it aren\'t half-witted.
And I am dependent to the right, not Republican.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ... John Donald-Trump=has-common-sense Larkin makes the same claim, no more convincingly.
Putin just put a premium on top of Joe Biden\'s ALREADY high price hike on oil. Remember, Joe Biden PROMISED to put oil companies out of business, and has done EVERYTHING in his power to do that. The Dems WANT high gas prices, or are you too STUPID to understand that?