Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem was that it was contaminated with dioxins and when sprayedOn Friday, April 1, 2022 at 9:44:04 PM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Hiroshima Nagasaki nuclear attacks on civilians
No, Tokyo would have been the place to hit lots of civilians; those
chosen coastal towns were supporting the Japanese navy
Vietnam Agent Orange used on civilians.
That\'s a weed killer, not \'used on civilians\'
Iraq depleted uranium used as ammo
... antitank armor-piercing, and a heavy-metal poison a lot like old lead paint was
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:01:32 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
So the ukrainian nazis have a carte blanche from you?
Bit like US accused Germany of in WW2?
NATO has changed from a defense club to a pawn of the US imperialist robbers.
NATO are just commie haters.
US is just sending its CIA agent warmongers all over the world to create wars and sell weapons
That\'s a real hodgepodge of dismissive half-truths, there.
US does\'t \'sell weapons\' indiscriminately. Time was, USSR was fighting Nazis in german
uniforms, and they got US material support of the lend/lease type. Nowadays, Russia is trying
to claim a similar mission, but the US isn\'t buying the story.
NATO is an alliance, not a hate group; NATO doesn\'t have pawn-like attributes, either.
whit3rd wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:01:32 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
So the ukrainian nazis have a carte blanche from you?
Bit like US accused Germany of in WW2?
NATO has changed from a defense club to a pawn of the US imperialist
robbers.
NATO are just commie haters.
US is just sending its CIA agent warmongers all over the world to
create wars and sell weapons
That\'s a real hodgepodge of dismissive half-truths, there.
US does\'t \'sell weapons\' indiscriminately.  Time was, USSR was
fighting Nazis in german
uniforms, and they got US material support of the lend/lease type.
Nowadays, Russia is trying
to claim a similar mission, but the US isn\'t buying the story.
NATO is an alliance, not a hate group; NATO doesn\'t have pawn-like
attributes, either.
You guys keep falling for Jan\'s trolling. He says off-the-wall stuff,
you guys explode, he laughs and keeps doing it.
It\'s been going on for years and years now.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 01.02.30 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
onsdag den 30. marts 2022 kl. 23.44.35 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:36:19 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 3/30/2022 3:40 PM, John Larkin wrote:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/brainstorming-over-beers-does-alcohol-fuel-creativity-annie-grace
I think google or Apple or someone big provides alcohol at
brainstorming meetings. I keep a bottle of good rum in my office.
This
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316453382
talks about using alcohol to get your frontal cortex out of the way so
you can think.
I hear some figure they drive better that way, too
That\'s possible, at the sub-0.1% level.
unless you really meant to write per mil not per cent you are way off
The legal BAC limit for driving is 0.08% in California. That is
sub-0.1%.
What would \"per mil\" mean?
parts per 1000, like percent is parts per 100
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_mille
here 0.5-1.2% is a fine of a months net income and you have 3 months
to redo your drivers license test, both theory and practice
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 20.52.28 UTC+2 skrev Phil Hobbs:
Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 19.17.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 01.02.30 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
onsdag den 30. marts 2022 kl. 23.44.35 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:36:19 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 3/30/2022 3:40 PM, John Larkin wrote:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/brainstorming-over-beers-does-alcohol-fuel-creativity-annie-grace
I think google or Apple or someone big provides alcohol at
brainstorming meetings. I keep a bottle of good rum in my office.
This
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316453382
talks about using alcohol to get your frontal cortex out of the way so
you can think.
I hear some figure they drive better that way, too
That\'s possible, at the sub-0.1% level.
unless you really meant to write per mil not per cent you are way off
The legal BAC limit for driving is 0.08% in California. That is
sub-0.1%.
What would \"per mil\" mean?
parts per 1000, like percent is parts per 100
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_mille
here 0.5-1.2% is a fine of a months net income and you have 3 months
to redo your drivers license test, both theory and practice
Seems like a waste of legislation. 1% is usually fatal.
should have been a \"â°\" so 0.05% 0.12%
You get fined a month\'s income for 0.05%? That\'s pretty draconian.
just looked it up, it\'s multiplied by the per mille, so half a month\'s income for 0.05%
a months income for 0.1%
I think 0.5 permille is the limit in most of Europe
One
drink can get you there. (Not at my body mass, of course.)
yeh, one or two drinks. Simpler to just not drink at all if driving
On 3/31/2022 3:48 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 20.52.28 UTC+2 skrev Phil Hobbs:
Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 19.17.18 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
torsdag den 31. marts 2022 kl. 01.02.30 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
onsdag den 30. marts 2022 kl. 23.44.35 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:36:19 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 3/30/2022 3:40 PM, John Larkin wrote:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/brainstorming-over-beers-does-alcohol-fuel-creativity-annie-grace
I think google or Apple or someone big provides alcohol at
brainstorming meetings. I keep a bottle of good rum in my office.
This
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316453382
talks about using alcohol to get your frontal cortex out of the way so
you can think.
I hear some figure they drive better that way, too
That\'s possible, at the sub-0.1% level.
unless you really meant to write per mil not per cent you are way off
The legal BAC limit for driving is 0.08% in California. That is
sub-0.1%.
What would \"per mil\" mean?
parts per 1000, like percent is parts per 100
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_mille
here 0.5-1.2% is a fine of a months net income and you have 3 months
to redo your drivers license test, both theory and practice
Seems like a waste of legislation. 1% is usually fatal.
should have been a \"â°\" so 0.05% 0.12%
You get fined a month\'s income for 0.05%? That\'s pretty draconian.
just looked it up, it\'s multiplied by the per mille, so half a month\'s income for 0.05%
a months income for 0.1%
I think 0.5 permille is the limit in most of Europe
One
drink can get you there. (Not at my body mass, of course.)
yeh, one or two drinks. Simpler to just not drink at all if driving
Most bars in the US would go out of business if people couldn\'t drive to
get there.
On 8/27/2022 21:43, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:01:32 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
So the ukrainian nazis have a carte blanche from you?
Bit like US accused Germany of in WW2?
NATO has changed from a defense club to a pawn of the US imperialist
robbers.
NATO are just commie haters.
US is just sending its CIA agent warmongers all over the world to
create wars and sell weapons
That\'s a real hodgepodge of dismissive half-truths, there.
US does\'t \'sell weapons\' indiscriminately.  Time was, USSR was
fighting Nazis in german
uniforms, and they got US material support of the lend/lease type.
Nowadays, Russia is trying
to claim a similar mission, but the US isn\'t buying the story.
NATO is an alliance, not a hate group; NATO doesn\'t have pawn-like
attributes, either.
You guys keep falling for Jan\'s trolling. He says off-the-wall stuff,
you guys explode, he laughs and keeps doing it.
It\'s been going on for years and years now.
Indeed so, but he believes most if not all of it.
I know it looks crazy to you to a point of just not being plausible
but trust me, this is the case. I know a few other people who are
not stupid at all, have decent knowledge in our field etc. and are
completely brainwashed by the Russian propaganda nonsense in the
same way.