Aussie solar car fastest in world

"fritz the fuckwit "
<
" Kym is full of Horeshit and a raving NUT CASE "


Reckon that is no more air drag than experienced by a racing cyclist
on a
velodrome.

It would have to be a lot less.

Suspicion seems to be confirmed.


** Not one tiny bit is has !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Power = Force x speed

What is the relevance of that equation ?

** Good grief.

The speed and input powers are both known.

So the total amount of drag force is known = 49N.


The topic is air drag. Otherwise known as frontal area (A) times drag
coefficient (Cd)
Specifically, the air drag of the Sunswift vs. a racing cyclist.

Preliminary investigation indicates that the Sunswift does have a much
lower Cd,

** The data shows that the amounts of drag are similar.

The Sunswift uses about 900 watts (or 1.2 hp) to overcome aerodynamic
rag - see graph.

http://www.eevblog.com/images/projects/SunSwiftDragGraph.png

A good cyclist outputs about that same figure when sprinting.


..... Phil
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p1qfrF2s8U1@mid.individual.net...
"fritz the fuckwit "
Here we go again, the latent abusive, probably psychotic trait of Phil emerges.....
Philly boy, you have serious psychological problems.
Why do you suddenly resort to calling me "fritz the fuckwit " when 99% of the people on this
newsgroup would agree that YOU are the fuckwit, based on your previous posts ?

If you can't beat 'em, insult 'em is the Phil Allison way...........as usual................

" Kym is full of Horeshit and a raving NUT CASE "


Reckon that is no more air drag than experienced by a racing cyclist on a
velodrome.

It would have to be a lot less.

Suspicion seems to be confirmed.


** Not one tiny bit is has !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Power = Force x speed

What is the relevance of that equation ?


** Good grief.

The speed and input powers are both known.

So the total amount of drag force is known = 49N.

What is the CdA for the Sunswift and a racing bike ?
Please fill in the following ...

Racing bike CdA =
Sunswift CdA =


The topic is air drag. Otherwise known as frontal area (A) times drag coefficient (Cd)
Specifically, the air drag of the Sunswift vs. a racing cyclist.

Preliminary investigation indicates that the Sunswift does have a much lower Cd,


** The data shows that the amounts of drag are similar.
Fill in the CdA table above...if you don't know how to do it then shut up.


The Sunswift uses about 900 watts (or 1.2 hp) to overcome aerodynamic rag - see graph.

http://www.eevblog.com/images/projects/SunSwiftDragGraph.png

A good cyclist outputs about that same figure when sprinting.
The subject is air drag, CdA, specifically comparing the CdA of a racing bike
to the Sunswift.
 
"fritz the TOTAL fuckwit "

Here we go again,
** The lying fool is bullshitting wildly - as usual.


Power = Force x speed

What is the relevance of that equation ?


** Good grief.

The speed and input powers are both known.

So the total amount of drag force is known = 49N.


What is the CdA for the Sunswift and a racing bike ?

** Not my problem - fuckwit.

Shame you cannot follow the simple point being made.

Power = Force x speed


Preliminary investigation indicates that the Sunswift does have a much
lower Cd,


** The data shows that the amounts of drag are similar.

Fill in the CdA table above..

** Not my problem - fuckwit.

Shame you cannot follow the simple point being made.

Power = Force x speed


The Sunswift uses about 900 watts (or 1.2 hp) to overcome aerodynamic
ag - see graph.

http://www.eevblog.com/images/projects/SunSwiftDragGraph.png

A good cyclist outputs about that same figure when sprinting.

The subject is air drag,

** Yep.

Shame you cannot follow the point being made.

Power = Force x speed

Basic physics is all way over your pointy, fuckwit head.



.... Phil
 
On 11/01/2011 12:37 PM, Phil Allison the coksmoker wrote:
come to Brisbane philthy I reakon we could find you a nice spot on
Eagle St
>
 
atec77 <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 11/01/2011 12:37 PM, Phil Allison the coksmoker wrote:
come to Brisbane philthy I reakon we could find you a nice spot on
Eagle St
Why, is there a shoestore there with sales staff needing leadership training?

--
[Pushing the button:]
You are now in the killfile.
-- John J Stafford <john@stafford.net>, 09 Dec 2010 19:21:27 -0600
 
On 11/01/2011 2:05 PM, kym@kymhorsell.com wrote:
atec77<atec77@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 11/01/2011 12:37 PM, Phil Allison the coksmoker wrote:
come to Brisbane philthy I reakon we could find you a nice spot on
Eagle St

Why, is there a shoestore there with sales staff needing leadership training?

what makes you think I would know

flood maps http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/#maps

--
X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On Jan 11, 1:08 pm, "fritz" <yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
What is the CdA for the Sunswift and a racing bike ?
My latest document for the Sunswift 4 does not say, but from a
document for Sunswift 3:
http://www.sunswift.com/documents/media/FastFacts_Jan09.pdf

CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
You could assume Sunswift 4 would be the same or marginally better.

Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

Dave.
 
"David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote in message news:0db3ff2b-9048-468c-a506-6473727004b8@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 11, 1:08 pm, "fritz" <yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
What is the CdA for the Sunswift and a racing bike ?
My latest document for the Sunswift 4 does not say, but from a
document for Sunswift 3:
http://www.sunswift.com/documents/media/FastFacts_Jan09.pdf

-CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
-You could assume Sunswift 4 would be the same or marginally better.

-Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

-Dave.

That's what I suspected.
Looks like philthy phil has egg all over his face, yet again.
 
"fritz the fuckwit lying pig ignorant cunt "

My latest document for the Sunswift 4 does not say, but from a
document for Sunswift 3:
http://www.sunswift.com/documents/media/FastFacts_Jan09.pdf

-CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
-You could assume Sunswift 4 would be the same or marginally better.

-Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

-Dave.

That's what I suspected.
Looks like philthy phil has egg all over his face, yet again.

** My god are one pig ignorant, lying fucking cunt.

Force = Power / Speed

and we have the numbers for both the quantities on the RHS.



...... Phil
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p4ejiFlk3U1@mid.individual.net...
"fritz the fuckwit lying pig ignorant cunt "
Phil shows his pathetic vocabulary skills again............
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p4ejiFlk3U1@mid.individual.net...
"fritz the fuckwit lying pig ignorant cunt "

My latest document for the Sunswift 4 does not say, but from a
document for Sunswift 3:
http://www.sunswift.com/documents/media/FastFacts_Jan09.pdf

-CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
-You could assume Sunswift 4 would be the same or marginally better.

-Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

-Dave.

That's what I suspected.
Looks like philthy phil has egg all over his face, yet again.


** My god are one pig ignorant, lying fucking cunt.
Then you better stop praying to your god(s), if you think so badly of them.
Or learn English.

Let's get the record straight here...Philthy has resorted to abusive language,
typical for him when he cannot formulate a logical argument - if you can't
beat 'em, use every foulmouthed word you can think of. Hint - it makes you
look REALLY stupid - you ain't fooling anyone with your abusive language.

Philthy said
Reckon that is no more air drag than experienced by a racing cyclist on a velodrome.
I replied
It would have to be a lot less.
That is when Phithy went crazy and unleashed his boring-as-usual vitriolic spam, which he
always does when someone disagrees with his self-appointed majesty. Philthy really does
go nuts from time-to-time, resorting to infantile insults that belong in a primary school yard.

Anyway, Philthy got it wrong, as usual. The Sunswift has a substantially lower CdA figure than a
racing cyclist.

CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

Expect more foul-mouthed replies with no data.
 
"fritz the fuckwit lying pig ignorant cunt "


** Go learn some basic physics

- you FUCKING CRIMINAL MORON !!!!!!!!!!


And don't come back here posting any more INSANE SHIT



..... Phil
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p71d8F31uU1@mid.individual.net...
"fritz the fuckwit lying pig ignorant cunt "
Expect more foul-mouthed replies with no data.

As expected......
 
" fritz = fuckwit, lying, pig ignorant cunt "


** Go learn some basic physics

- you FUCKING CRIMINAL MORON !!!!!!!!!!


And don't come back here posting any more INSANE SHIT



..... Phil
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p71qdF50dU1@mid.individual.net...
" fritz = fuckwit, lying, pig ignorant cunt "
You resort to pathetic abuse because you cannot post anything that makes sense, as everyone here knows.
** Go learn some basic physics
Sure toaster boy, like
-CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
-You could assume Sunswift 4 would be the same or marginally better.
-Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

The egg is still all over your face, pottymouth.
 
Philthy Phil wrote
** My god are one pig ignorant, lying fucking cunt.
Then you better stop praying to your god(s), if you think so badly of them.
Or learn English.

Let's get the record straight here...Philthy has resorted to abusive language,
typical for him when he cannot formulate a logical argument - if you can't
beat 'em, use every foulmouthed word you can think of. Hint - it makes you
look REALLY stupid - you ain't fooling anyone with your abusive language.

Philthy said
Reckon that is no more air drag than experienced by a racing cyclist on a velodrome.
I replied
It would have to be a lot less.
That is when Phithy went crazy and unleashed his boring-as-usual vitriolic spam, which he
always does when someone disagrees with his self-appointed majesty. Philthy really does
go nuts from time-to-time, resorting to infantile insults that belong in a primary school yard.

Anyway, Philthy got it wrong, as usual. The Sunswift has a substantially lower CdA figure than a
racing cyclist.

CdA for Sunswift III is 0.11
Optimised bikes seem to be typically around 0.7-0.8 at best?

Expect more foul-mouthed replies with no data.







Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:8p71qdF50dU1@mid.individual.net...
 
"Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:8ov50uF993U1@mid.individual.net...
"David L. Jones"


For those interested in some details, at 90km/h the aerodynamic drag
accounts for over 70% of the driving power.


** Thanks for that confirmation of my original opinions.

The heretics here are seriously looney.


BTW

The actual drag force on the solar car from all sources at the record
speed ( 88kph) amounts to no more than 5kg.

1200/24.4/9.8 = 5



.... Phil


Who the fuck cares?
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top