Arafat Denies Being Dead

Paul Burridge · Nov 4, 2004

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

John Larkin · Nov 4, 2004

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

He is apparently among the Undead:

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_10.html

John

Paul Burridge · Nov 4, 2004

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:35:34 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

He is apparently among the Undead:

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_10.html

Reads like yet more Israeli propaganda.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

budgie · Nov 5, 2004

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge <pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk>
wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

Won't need to. I see two certainties:

1. he won't return except in a box
2. there will be a power struggle against the background of increased
terrorism, with the Israelis somehow blamed for his death and what follows.

Rich Grise · Nov 5, 2004

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

Why not? They got his boy elected.

Thanks,
Rich

Paul Burridge · Nov 5, 2004

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:22:52 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

Why not? They got his boy elected.

Perhaps we ("we" meaning George Bush in this context) should *impose*
a new leader on the Palestinians (in the interests of a peaceful
solution, of course). Any nominations? Henry Kissinger, perhaps? Or
Paul Wolfowitz..?
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

Keith Williams · Nov 5, 2004

In article <vb5no05v2cmqfo57fioviql06ukv1j9rul@4ax.com>,
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk says...

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:22:52 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

Why not? They got his boy elected.

Perhaps we ("we" meaning George Bush in this context) should *impose*
a new leader on the Palestinians (in the interests of a peaceful
solution, of course). Any nominations? Henry Kissinger, perhaps? Or
Paul Wolfowitz..?

Jimmy Carter.

--
Keith

Frithiof Andreas Jensen · Nov 5, 2004

"Paul Burridge" <pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote in message
news:meqko0h0m774ics283ol5eq7v8qumgv2dt@4ax.com...

What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

There is no need - the democratic process in that region consists of murder,
terror and kidnappings until the worst goon with the hardest men ends up on
top. He is then called 'prince'.

Is is, naturally, a Jewish Conspiracy if one happened to drop ones AK-74 on
ones foot on the way to 'the polling station'!!!

John Larkin · Nov 6, 2004

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

John

Tim Wescott · Nov 6, 2004

John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

John

No no! His organs are still functioning!

I think they need to maintain the fiction that he's alive until the
Palestinian factions get their stuff together. If they do the ball will
be Israel's to fumble.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Rich The Philosophizer · Nov 6, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:10:34 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

Hey, would everybody shit their pants if he croaked, got buried,
and three days later, arose?

;^j
Rich

Rich The Philosophizer · Nov 6, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:22:16 -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

John

No no! His organs are still functioning!

I think they need to maintain the fiction that he's alive until the
Palestinian factions get their stuff together. If they do the ball will
be Israel's to fumble.

Give him some chicken soup!

;^j
Rich

Terry Given · Nov 6, 2004

Rich The Philosophizer wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:10:34 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

Hey, would everybody shit their pants if he croaked, got buried,
and three days later, arose?

;^j
Rich

ROFLMAOPIMP

Cheers
Terry

PS I used to have a T-shirt that said "Nuke the holy land"

Paul Burridge · Nov 6, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:10:34 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:43:28 +0000, Paul Burridge
pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

He had to issue a rebuttal following a report on Israel's lunchtime
news.
What are the Israelis up to? Surely they wouldn't try to foment a
power struggle in his absence, would they?

This morning French doctors declare that his condition "has not
worsened" in the last 24 hours. Translated, I think it means "he's
still dead."

That report has compelled him to issue a further strong denial.
"Strong" by a dead person's standards, that is.

What a nice bloke he was, though, eh? I mean, another prominent,
iconic figure of the last 40/50 years bows out. Kinda sad, really. :-(
Whoever next? Castro?
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

Jim Thompson · Nov 6, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:33:31 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
<null@example.net> wrote:

[snip]

Give him some chicken soup!

;^j
Rich

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Rich The Philosophizer · Nov 6, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 15:48:23 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:33:31 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
null@example.net> wrote:

[snip]

Give him some chicken soup!

;^j
Rich

From those in the know... he got chicken soup alright, with a little
ricin tossed in for spice... looks like his own kind bumped him off.

Hey, we used to have ricin chicken soup all the time! I've heard that
in Louisiana, ricin red beans are very popular. And, of course, you
can't beat the Japanese and their fried ricin! My mom tried her
hand at potato ricin, but the ricer broke.

Dablubbadablubbadablubbadablubbada......

Tim Wescott · Nov 6, 2004

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:33:31 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer
null@example.net> wrote:

[snip]

Give him some chicken soup!

;^j
Rich

From those in the know... he got chicken soup alright, with a little
ricin tossed in for spice... looks like his own kind bumped him off.

...Jim Thompson

Where did you hear that? And how do you know it wasn't provided by some
helpful member of the Israeli intelligence services?

Not that I'd be surprised either way -- he's pissed off some of his own
people, and Sharon hates him.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Paul Hovnanian P.E. · Nov 7, 2004

Can we really trust anything hes says?

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto

aul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop Continental Drift! Re-unite Gondwanaland!

Paul Hovnanian P.E. · Nov 7, 2004

Arafat: I'm not dead!

The French: 'Ere. He says he's not dead.

Sharon: Yes he is.

Arafat: I'm not!

The French: He isn't.

Sharon: He will be soon. He's very ill.

Arafat: I'm getting better!

Sharon: You're not. You'll be stone dead in a few minutes.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto

aul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
APL is a write-only language. I can write programs in APL, but I
can't read any of them.
-- Roy Keir

Paul Burridge · Nov 7, 2004

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:05:48 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<Paul@Hovnanian.com> wrote:

Arafat: I'm not dead!

The French: 'Ere. He says he's not dead.

Sharon: Yes he is.

Arafat: I'm not!

The French: He isn't.

Sharon: He will be soon. He's very ill.

Arafat: I'm getting better!

Sharon: You're not. You'll be stone dead in a few minutes.

Apparently, they're looking into the possibility that he was poisoned
by Mossad. The problem seems to be liver failure.

--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

Arafat Denies Being Dead

Paul Burridge

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

Paul Burridge

Guest

budgie

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

Paul Burridge

Guest

Keith Williams

Guest

Frithiof Andreas Jensen

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

Tim Wescott

Guest

Rich The Philosophizer

Guest

Rich The Philosophizer

Guest

Terry Given

Guest

Paul Burridge

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Rich The Philosophizer

Guest

Tim Wescott

Guest

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Guest

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Guest

Paul Burridge

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor