Apple throttled your iPhone by cutting its speed almost in H

In article <p35g7f$m94$2@dont-email.me>, rickman
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

"unless failure has occurred due to a defect in materials or workmanship."

it's not a defect in materials or workmanship.

*all* batteries degrade over time. there is no getting around that, at
least with today's technology.

maybe at some point in the future there will be an eternal power source
that never wears out. that time is not now.

Yep, all batteries degrade with time and use.

exactly the point.

But the batteries in question
degraded more and faster than Apple expected requiring action on their part
after the sale.

no they didn't.

they are well within normal expected range.
 
In article <p35gc8$m94$3@dont-email.me>, rickman
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

The only test I really care about is running the phone the way it did when
new. If it doesn't do that the diagnostic test is pointless.

it's not a pointless test.

there's a big difference between a battery that's at 95% capacity after
a year (well within normal range) versus one that's at 60% capacity in
the same time frame, or has swollen or some other defect.

A diagnostic is used to catch eminent failures or batteries that are
degrading faster than expected. It is not the criteria for replacing a
battery. If the battery won't operate the phone as the phone was intended
to be operated, it doesn't matter what the diagnostic says.

yes it does matter what the diagnostic says. that's why it's called a
diagnostic.

and the battery is *not* degrading faster than expected either.
 
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 11:54:12 AM UTC-5, rickman wrote:

It's still covered by a warranty, why are you so dense you don't GET it?

Which has nothing to do with the phone. You keep conflating the two.
 
Fox's Mercantile <jdangus@att.net> wrote:
On 1/10/18 9:02 AM, rickman wrote:

I don't own an Apple Phone

So you don't even have a dog in this race.

He does, it's just his dog lives under a bridge. ; )

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
 
rickman <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
nospam wrote on 1/10/2018 10:44 AM:

it's not a defect in materials or workmanship.

*all* batteries degrade over time. there is no getting around that, at
least with today's technology.

maybe at some point in the future there will be an eternal power source
that never wears out. that time is not now.

Yep, all batteries degrade with time and use. But the batteries in question
degraded more and faster

That's your trollish assumption. Repeating it doesn't make it factual.
There's no actual evidence that Apple's batteries degrade faster than
others.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
 
rickman <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
Done here.

Bye, Felicia.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
 
On 2018-01-10, rickman <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
BK@Onramp.net wrote on 1/7/2018 2:01 PM:

It had nothing to do with avoiding the warranty. Period.

How can you make that assertion?

Since you are the one who originally stated "the user experience is
being impacted to mitigate the problems of a battery that is degrading
prematurely in order to avoid warranty replacements", the onus is on
you. So go right ahead and prove that's the case, if you can.

We'll wait...

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
 
On 2018-01-10, rickman <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
nospam wrote on 1/10/2018 10:02 AM:

if the battery fails a diagnostic test (or any other component) it
will be replaced under warranty. if it passes, then there's no reason
to replace it.

The only test I really care about is running the phone the way it did
when new. If it doesn't do that the diagnostic test is pointless.

You don't even own an iPhone.

Meanwhile I know plenty of people (including me) who use their iPhones
for 3-5 years with no problem without replacing the battery. There's no
evidence of a widespread defect in Apple's batteries, just like there's
no evidence that the majority of them die within a year.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
 
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:53:31 -0500, rickman
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

BK@Onramp.net wrote on 1/7/2018 2:01 PM:

It had nothing to do with avoiding the warranty. Period.

How can you make that assertion?

Because I've followed it starting with IOS 10.1 that explained what
they were doing.
 
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 1:13:59 PM UTC-5, Jolly Roger wrote:

Meanwhile I know plenty of people (including me) who use their iPhones
for 3-5 years with no problem without replacing the battery. There's no
evidence of a widespread defect in Apple's batteries, just like there's
no evidence that the majority of them die within a year.

My wife walked into the Apple Store in Willow Grove, PA on December 28th. They took one look at her phone (I-6) and replaced her battery - no cost. Her complaint was that it did not hold a charge. It did not. Verizon sent her to Apple as they do not cover batteries or the physical phone itself.

Her phone two (2) years old.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:02:49 -0500, rickman
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

joe wrote on 1/10/2018 9:51 AM:
On 01/10/2018 08:44 AM, rickman wrote:
joe wrote on 1/10/2018 9:06 AM:
On 01/10/2018 07:53 AM, rickman wrote:
BK@Onramp.net wrote on 1/7/2018 2:01 PM:

It had nothing to do with avoiding the warranty. Period.

How can you make that assertion?


Worn out batteries may not be covered by the warranty.

"May not"? Why wouldn't a battery be covered under warranty? It isn't
specifically excluded.



I said "may" as warranties vary by country. In the US: "This Warranty does
not apply: (a) to consumable parts, such as batteries..."

Go read the warranty for your location.

I don't own an Apple Phone

Then:
1. What's your complaint?
2. Why are you posting to an iPhone newsgroup?
 
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 9:01:10 AM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
nospam wrote on 1/7/2018 1:42 PM:
In article <p2tke2$sk9$3@dont-email.me>, rickman
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

I think a battery that prevents the device from running at full speed
because the unit shuts down would be considered to be "truly defective".

if *you* were the product manager, what would *you* do, given that
batteries age and there's no getting around that?

Everything wears out. If I sold autos and gave a 3 year, 36,000 mile
warranty and had customers who's cars used a quart or two of oil between
changes during the warranty period, would you think it reasonable that I
said, "engines wear, oil burns, no warranty claim" and then secretly updated
firmware in all my customer's engines, that prevented the oil leak/burn but
prevented the engine from running at full capacity?

No one would tolerate this from any manufacturer.

Harry may be a bit of a odd ball, but he is right that you are blowing smoke
about this. The fact that batteries wear does not mean a phone can't be
designed that won't have it's performance limited by the battery during the
warranty period. Get over it and quit saying "batteries age" like it is a
holy mantra. Yeah, they age and the product should be designed with that in
mind so the product still works 100% during the warranty period.

and if you are going to make an update that effects performance,
don't try to keep it secret.
 
Or more probably, work at 75% performance potential throughout the warranty period. Throttled from day 1 so that no degradation is applied.

This is more common than you might imagine!

Terry

Yeah, they age and the product should be designed with that in
mind so the product still works 100% during the warranty period.

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998
 
On 1/10/18 11:13 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
That's your trollish assumption. Repeating it doesn't
make it factual.

“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled
to your own facts.”

― Daniel Patrick Moynihan



--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com
 
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 4:04:50 PM UTC-5, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 1/10/18 11:13 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
That's your trollish assumption. Repeating it doesn't
make it factual.

“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled
to your own facts.”

― Daniel Patrick Moynihan

A better quote:

“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”

- Harlan Ellison

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
On 1/10/2018 7:18 AM, rickman wrote:

So they don't work "fine".  My understanding is if Apple didn't install
software to throttle the CPU the battery would cause the phone to
shutdown. That's not working "perfectly fine".

No.

Whether the battery is brand new, or three years old, if it's in a low
state of charge it could shut down under heavy processor demand.

Here are the good choices:

1. Shut the phone down before the battery is discharged to a level that
would cause an unexpected shutdown if high demand were placed on the
battery. If this event occurs after an abnormally short amount of
operating time, inform the user that a battery replacement is needed.

2. Reduce performance only when the battery is discharged to a level
that would cause an unexpected shutdown if high demand were placed on
the battery.

3. Give the user the option of a "battery-saver" mode that would reduce
performance in order to increase the operating time.
 
On 1/10/2018 7:22 AM, rickman wrote:

<snip>

> Or it can be designed with adequate passive cooling.

That would needlessly reduce performance in most use. A lot of devices
are now designed with thermal sensors that allow a performance level
that cannot be sustained for long periods of time under certain conditions.
 
In article <p360em$s0o$1@dont-email.me>, sms
<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

So they don't work "fine".  My understanding is if Apple didn't install
software to throttle the CPU the battery would cause the phone to
shutdown. That's not working "perfectly fine".

No.

Whether the battery is brand new, or three years old, if it's in a low
state of charge it could shut down under heavy processor demand.

state of charge is not the issue. it's aging to where it can't supply
peak loads anymore, even if it's at full soc.

Here are the good choices:

1. Shut the phone down before the battery is discharged to a level that
would cause an unexpected shutdown if high demand were placed on the
battery. If this event occurs after an abnormally short amount of
operating time, inform the user that a battery replacement is needed.

that exists now.

2. Reduce performance only when the battery is discharged to a level
that would cause an unexpected shutdown if high demand were placed on
the battery.

that's what apple is doing (and some android makers even though they
refuse to outright admit it).

3. Give the user the option of a "battery-saver" mode that would reduce
performance in order to increase the operating time.

that also exists now.
 
In comp.mobile.android Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
On 2018-01-10, rickman <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
nospam wrote on 1/10/2018 10:02 AM:

if the battery fails a diagnostic test (or any other component) it
will be replaced under warranty. if it passes, then there's no reason
to replace it.

The only test I really care about is running the phone the way it did
when new. If it doesn't do that the diagnostic test is pointless.

You don't even own an iPhone.

Meanwhile I know plenty of people (including me) who use their iPhones
for 3-5 years with no problem without replacing the battery. There's no
evidence of a widespread defect in Apple's batteries, just like there's
no evidence that the majority of them die within a year.

Still using an old iPhone 4S with its original battery. I don't use it
much. Its batttery life does suck badly (e.g., could shut it down within
30 minutes with Pokemon Go), but the key part is not to use it often and
under control. Also, I keep its cellular, backaground apps, etc. in
control. I wonder how much longer I can keep using it before replacing
it or its battery (probably not worth it since its iOS is so old, slow,
and unsupported).

--
Quote of the Week: "All good work is done the way ants do things: Little by little." --Lafcadio Hearn
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
/ /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
| |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link.
\ _ /
( )
 
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:04:40 -0600, Fox's Mercantile wrote:

+IBw-You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled
to your own facts.+IB0-

Bear in mind that Fox' Mercantile is the utter moron Snit, who is again,
lamely following people around the net like the little retard child he is.

This is a moving graph of what Snit/Fox's Mercantile claimed was dB!
<http://wetakepic.com/images/2017/10/11/wifi_sweetspots.jpg>

All Fox's Mercantile/Snit saw was a moving graph for heavens' sake.

Snit/Fox's Mercantile is *that* stupid!

Just look at this hilarious video, where he makes an utter fool of himself,
and doesn't even realize that he probably the *dumbest* of all the Apple
Apologists, even dumber than is Jolly Roger and Lewis (which is hard to
fathom).

Proof that Snit/Fox's Mercantile is an utter moron Apple Apologist:
<https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo>

Snit === Fox's Mercantile
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top