F
Fred Bloggs
Guest
http://www.stratosolar.com/
They have nice pictures.
They have nice pictures.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another far out solar energy collection in the stratosphere idea...
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Sloom man wrote:
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
Jan target audience seems to be people who are even more pig-ignorant than he is,
----------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Sloom man wrote:
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
Jan target audience seems to be people who are even more pig-ignorant than he is,
----------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Sloom man wrote:
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
Jan target audience seems to be people who are even more pig-ignorant than he is,
----------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^
See, you are learning from me, keep at it!
Funny language you earthlings have!
A
Aoli
Guest
Where can I buy a stylish tinfoil hat ?
A
Aoli
Guest
Where can I buy a stylish tinfoil hat ?
A
Aoli
Guest
Where can I buy a stylish tinfoil hat ?
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
<ca987ee0-fbae-4e25-b17c-87515490bfb6n@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 04-Jan-23 7:19 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
http://www.stratosolar.com/
They have nice pictures.
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 04-Jan-23 7:19 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
http://www.stratosolar.com/
They have nice pictures.
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 04-Jan-23 7:19 am, Fred Bloggs wrote:
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
http://www.stratosolar.com/
They have nice pictures.
I do wonder whether they\'ve considered how big this thing has to be to
be buoyant enough (using helium I assume) at 20km altitude to support a
500 tonne gravity generation mass. And that\'s before the weight of the
thing itself and its tethers is taken into account.
A quick search suggests that the air density at that altitude is very
roughly one tenth of its sea level density, and at sea level it takes,
again roughly, one cubic metre of helium to support 1 kg mass. So the
volume to support 500 tonnes at 20km, is about 5 million cubic metres.
Sylvia.
R
Ricky
Guest
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:20:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
ca987ee0-fbae-4e25...@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
R
Ricky
Guest
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:20:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
ca987ee0-fbae-4e25...@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
R
Ricky
Guest
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:20:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
ca987ee0-fbae-4e25...@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
--
Rick C.
+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
On a sunny day (Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:50:59 -0800 (PST)) it happened Ricky
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
<76057774-ac2d-483d-8753-aca802506f29n@googlegroups.com>:
Anyways it DOES require an above 10 IQ to understand
My sincere ape pologies if you were not in the target audio-ants group.
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
<76057774-ac2d-483d-8753-aca802506f29n@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:20:08 AM UTC-5, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Billy teh Sloomman wrote:
ca987ee0-fbae-4e25...@googlegroups.com>:
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 5:52:10 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 3:15:11 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:23:49 -0800 (PST), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 9:08:55 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
Somebody had a startup that was going to generate electricity using
kites to pull cables around windlasses.
Oh, aerial suspension with a kite of a wind turbine is a potential big win: there
are high-altitude winds available to such an object (but the right-of-way
for a stationary tether is a problem). Are you sure it was windlass energy
production?
Yes, somebody proposed that. Others have suggested windmills of
various sorts on kites. There is a project based on a propeller inside
a tubular balloon.
Somebody is doing a tethered autogyro.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon
Which would NEVER get approval because of their obvious risk to aviation. Hint: why do you think they were called \"barrage\"
balloons?
Because they originally lifted \"barrage nets\" to a height that WW1 bombers couldn\'t exceed.
Any fixed object that does constitute a risk to aviation has to carry warning lights. High rise buildings are a obvious risk
to
aviation, but that doesn\'t stop them being built.
Sewage Sweeper hasn\'t got much grasp of reality.
So that is what you do?
question one:
how does the power go o earth,
1 cable
2 RF microwave beam
Answer for 1 fly into it (LED string as warning? HAHAHA)
Answer for 2 get fried you and your equipment flying through it?, pointing errors kill the population?
question 2:
Micro and big asteroids, space orbit debris, anything goes to have it crash on people\'s head
answer : hide in CERN tunnels..
There is an other space debris shower from some burned out earh observing satellite expected soon, see news.
Chance of it hitting something was ONLY 1 in 9500, good it is not in my hemisphere.
Chances in the lottery are a lot worse!!
Have you been on drugs tonight? You aren\'t making any sense, even more so than usual.
Anyways it DOES require an above 10 IQ to understand
My sincere ape pologies if you were not in the target audio-ants group.