An Objective Way To Out Someone Trying To Fake A Science or

[gb]

I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to
check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more
confusion; the metric simply never fails.

As qualified for casino. No 30 dollar casino warriors. There is a
level
of playing field for 1000 dollar reqirements. I figure you people out
how
you think. There is a metric. You people are in a casino.

Controversial/popular = Ceausescu. Big Brother. Posing (nogger
online).

Come out of the South.

 

[gb]

More fool you.

The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails.

Mindlessly silly.

Trying to outsmart evil will only make one the devil. Should I give
out cards? (In case
you haven't mised what I wrote. Bulgakov wrote a marvelous book about
the Devil
and the old CCCP system in his book many call the best book ever
written
'Master and Margarita'.)

 

[Bret Cahill]

Those with the least to say are often the
loudest, most prolific, and most persistent.

The right stats and search tools would help you prove your theories on
productive posters.

Right now any idiot can simply claim that you are a hypocrit and never
post anything worthwhile yourself.

In fact Rod just did.


Bret Cahill

 

[Bret Cahill]

Just google the name.

Is the name always found in the OP of many controversial / popular
threads?

This indicates an active mind.

Or a confused and simple mind, limited by obstinance.



Or is the name always flaming out at the ends of branchs?

If the poster isn't really interested in technology, or fancies it as
something other than what it really is, then he'll always wind up
saying something stupid and, after it's pointed out how stupid it was,
he'll flame out at the end of a branch.

Even more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but isn't really
interested in technology is irrational *per se.*

I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to
check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more
confusion; the metric simply never fails.

On the other hand the less crossposting the more stagnant the group.
There are a half dozen (including sock puppets) on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.

The media have deliberately dumbed down Americans on freedom of speech
by hyping naked nazi flagburner parade pseudo speech issues. Read
"The Freedom of the Press" in _Democracy In America_ and you'll
understand censorship is not the solution.

Providing the right stats on posters is the solution.

In any event everyone can agree that there is no argument against
Google compiling and publishing the stats.


Bret Cahill


"In America as in France, it's the same extraordinary power, the same
strange mixture of good and evil, without which freedom could not
survive but with which order can hardly be maintained."

-- DeTocqueville (1833)

 

[gb]

Providing the right stats on posters is the solution.

In any event everyone can agree that there is no argument against
Google compiling and publishing the stats.

One more likely becomes a stalker schizophrenic (also known as psycho
aiming to rule the world) with such 'impersonal' views
over the Internet and that no people count. Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
and they (Google) are almost infinitessimately big. Such big and small
approaches are not correct science or humanitarian approach and
often steps into radical oppression of rights and pervasive dominance
that distorts human society and norms and rights. Not allowed
assumption.

 

[Bret Cahill]

On Aug 31, 5:34�pm, gb <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Providing the right stats on posters is the solution.

In any event everyone can agree that there is no argument against
Google compiling and publishing the stats.

One more likely becomes a stalker schizophrenic (also known as psycho
aiming to rule the world) with such 'impersonal' views
over the Internet and that no people count. Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
and they (Google) are almost infinitessimately big. Such big and small
approaches are not correct science or humanitarian approach and
often steps into radical oppression of rights and pervasive dominance
that distorts human society and norms and rights. Not allowed
assumption.

 

[Bret Cahill]

Providing the right stats on posters is the solution.

Nope, not when the content is ignored.

But the content, or lack thereof, isn't ignored if the proper search
tools are included.

For example I'll go to the BE search box and type in "Rod Speed" and
get hundreds of hits where branches ended with a post by R. S.

I'll then pull up all those posts and show everyone all those flame
outs add nothing to any discussion.

Anyone and everyone will be able to prove to himself that R. S. is as
worthless as Al Gore in a dust devil.


Bret Cahill

 

[gb]

On Aug 31, 9:30 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

On Aug 31, 5:34 pm, gb <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:



Providing the right stats on posters is the solution.

In any event everyone can agree that there is no argument against
Google compiling and publishing the stats.

One more likely becomes a stalker schizophrenic (also known as psycho
aiming to rule the world) with such 'impersonal' views
over the Internet and that no people count. Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
and they (Google) are almost infinitessimately big. Such big and small
approaches are not correct science or humanitarian approach and
often steps into radical oppression of rights and pervasive dominance
that distorts human society and norms and rights. Not allowed
assumption.

Google is a dictatorial policy company, radical psycho extreme. What
does
the word Schindler remind of in connotation to 'radical psycho
extreme'?

Taking Capitalism to the extreme to radically serve infinitessimate
orient,
which is what the name Google means, basically you can't fool
humanity,
well, the black stuff, well, you can, but not in the long term which
Google
intends to be. Black and white, all pervasive with inside and outside
part
reminding of Scientology, pervasion, you know, klans kind of wonder
on this, which I am able to helpificate in terms of being a European
of
opener minds.

 

[Bret Cahill]

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)

Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.

Google also opposed the fascist BushCo regime violations of privacy by
not helping them engage in data mining users.


Bret Cahill

 

On Aug 31, 9:44 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)

Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.

Not to the day laborer in Beijing.

Google also opposed the fascist BushCo regime violations of privacy by
not helping them engage in data mining users.

Hmm. And yet, they don't mind turning in dissidents to the
fascist regime in Beijing, or helping them with their filtered
reality (censorship of vital Tianneman economic issues.)

 

[Bret Cahill]

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)

Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.

Not to the day laborer in Beijing.

The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years. The
Chinese have already gone high tech.

Soon all Chinese will have free speech.

In sharp contrast America will remain in GOP tax cut stagflation for
decades according to Soros. The "free lunch on liberty" mentality has
allowed all 4 clauses of the great charter of American freedom to come
under fierce assult from the corp. media, politicians and other
shills.

The NY Times has everyone believing Pat Robertson came over on the
Mayflower.

The ACLU has everyone believing free speech is only for naked nazi
flagburner parades.

Hollywood has nutters believing that if they "git pushed too far" thay
can "pocket veto" a black candidate.


Bret Cahill

 

On Sep 1, 7:53 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.
Not to the day laborer in Beijing.

The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years.  The
Chinese have already gone high tech.

What you mean to say is that high tech
has already moved its labor-intensive
operations to China (and Vietnam,
and Malaysia, and South Korea). All
to reap the rewards of cheap labor. The
real question is, when the price of that
labor escalates, does that mean labor
intensive industry will have to move to
Africa (the last bastion of cheap labor)?

Soon all Chinese will have free speech.

Just like that, eh? A magical effect of climbing
out of the Leftard famines of yesteryear?

In sharp contrast America will remain in GOP tax cut stagflation for
decades according to Soros.  

Thank Allah you have prophets such as Soros to tell you
what the future holds, eh? Otherwise, you might be lost
to Heisenbergian uncertainty, like people in the real world.

The "free lunch on liberty" mentality has
allowed all 4 clauses of the great charter of American freedom to come
under fierce assult from the corp. media, politicians and other
shills.

Not to mention from Obama, who wants to silence
American citizens who say bad things about his
pal, Ayers. Do you think Ayers is jealous of McVeigh
for his more destructive mad-bombing mission?

The NY Times has everyone believing Pat Robertson came over on the
Mayflower.

Well, someone was hunting witches in Salem in the
beforetime. I suppose you want everyone to think it
was a bunch of Unitarians.

The ACLU has everyone believing free speech is only for naked nazi
flagburner parades.

It's a good think the extreme left is so out of power in the
US, because you guys evidently believe that everyone is
stoopid enough to believe what you believe.

Hollywood has nutters believing that if they "git pushed too far" thay
can "pocket veto" a black candidate.

What you mean to say is that Hollywood has the moonbats
believing that people who don't misinterpret the Second
Amendment are all racists.

 

[Bret Cahill]

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.
Not to the day laborer in Beijing.

The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years. �The
Chinese have already gone high tech.

What you mean to say is

The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years. The
Chinese have already gone high tech.

.. . .

Soon all Chinese will have free speech.

Just like that, eh?

They already have free speech on economic issues. The commie party
leaders or "inner kindgom" or whatever ain't out on the dock counting
shipping containers.

.. . .

In sharp contrast America will remain in GOP tax cut stagflation for
decades according to Soros. ďż˝

.. . . .

you have prophets such as Soros to tell you
what the future holds, eh? ďż˝

Soros has a good track record.

Why aren't _you_ making billions on the markets?

The answer is because you are too dumb.


.. . . .

Hollywood has nutters believing that if they "git pushed too far" thay
can "pocket veto" a black candidate.

What you mean to say is that Hollywood has the moonbats
believing

that if they "git pushed too far" they can "pocket veto" a black
candidate.


Bret Cahill

 

[gb]

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)

Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.

Science claims 'Google controls things through its will, and no
company
can have so much power, and that Google distorts reality.' This does
not say much to an outsider. The research was conducted by an Austrian
University. Google obtains what they shouldn't and invades culture
in freedom of speech and freedom of choice-violating forms not only
in the United States but in the world. Google applies torture when
unifying aspects that cannot be unified by statements reminding of
history's horrors when Google corporately declares 'it is THE SAME
to see a street through cameras or in person'.

Google also opposed the fascist BushCo regime violations of privacy by
not helping them engage in data mining users.

Google applies piracy, as that not pro government. Instead they want
to
run a cartel.

 

[gb]

On Aug 31, 11:15 pm, Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote:

On Aug 31, 9:44 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)

Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.

Not to the day laborer in Beijing.

Google also opposed the fascist BushCo regime violations of privacy by
not helping them engage in data mining users.

Hmm.  And yet, they don't mind turning in dissidents to the
fascist regime in Beijing, or helping them with their filtered
reality (censorship of vital Tianneman economic issues.)

Oh yes, first Perestroyka, the West is better, then New Direction,
the human correction to genocide and racism and psycho fuck
in which Google does not score much. Sure, Google of course is
better with its corruption than a real wall of dictatorship.

 

On Sep 1, 8:39 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:

Google too takes up the
corporate spirit that all are almost infinitessimately small (and
don't count)
Google provodes a free speech forum to the poorest of the poor.
Not to the day laborer in Beijing.
The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years. The
Chinese have already gone high tech.
What you mean to say is

The Chinese economy will surpass the U. S. economy in 6 years.  The
Chinese have already gone high tech.

In order for China's economy to become larger than that
of the US, all that's required is a per-capita income that is
one-fourth that of the US.

Soon all Chinese will have free speech.
Just like that, eh?

They already have free speech on economic issues.  

So, obviously, your daffynition of "free speech on economic
issues" has nothing to do with real free speech on any
issue at all.

The commie party
leaders or "inner kindgom" or whatever ain't out on the dock counting
shipping containers.

Actually, they are.

In sharp contrast America will remain in GOP tax cut stagflation for
decades according to Soros.

. . . .

 you have prophets such as Soros to tell you
what the future holds, eh?

Soros has a good track record.

Wasn't he the guy who thought Nevada was going to
legalize marijuana a few years back?

Why aren't _you_ making billions on the markets?

Because Soros is holding on to vital geo resources,
of course. Ask Henry George. Geez.

The answer is because you are too dumb.

I'm guessing that's why you still can't afford that Guide
to Using Your Computer CD the corpwhores sell on TV
for people like you. "Just put the CD in that coffee cup
holder thing on your computer, fire it up, and you too
can figger out how to preserve the attributions of Usenet
posts you respond to. If you aren't 100% satisfied that
my CD's can teach you to send me an e-mail, just send
me an e-mail stating your dissatisfaction and I'll refund
your money via Catch-22 express."

Hollywood has nutters believing that if they "git pushed too far" thay
can "pocket veto" a black candidate.
What you mean to say is that Hollywood has the moonbats
believing

that if they "git pushed too far" they can "pocket veto" a black
candidate.

Ah, so now we know it's actually the moonbat wing of the
leftard parties (not some fantasy gun-oilers) that believe
these things. Thanks for being honest for once.

 

[gb]

China or Google or otherwise, Europe and humanity agrees with Barack
Obama that
discrimination power is no power, humanity can live without cold rogue
politics,
be it government of corporate pervasion against human dignities.

 

On Sep 1, 10:34 am, gb <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

China or Google or otherwise, Europe and humanity agrees with Barack
Obama that
discrimination power is no power, humanity can live without cold rogue
politics,
be it government of corporate pervasion against human dignities.

When Europe and humanity agree on anything, it's
surely a sign of the end of the civilization.

 

[gb]

China or Google or otherwise, Europe and humanity agrees with Barack
Obama that
discrimination power is no power, humanity can live without cold rogue
politics,
be it government of corporate pervasion against human dignities.

When Europe and humanity agree on anything, it's
surely a sign of the end of the civilization.

You must be from England.

 

On Sep 1, 11:00 am, gb <gb6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

China or Google or otherwise, Europe and humanity agrees with Barack
Obama that
discrimination power is no power, humanity can live without cold rogue
politics,
be it government of corporate pervasion against human dignities.

When Europe and humanity agree on anything, it's
surely a sign of the end of the civilization.

You must be from England.

LOL. Great retort.