C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:38:14 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:
Thanks, Win, that's a real plus, believe me.
I'm carrying out some other tests in the odd minutes I get between the
phone ringing and various people calling and have ascertained the
*actual* fault appears to be in one of the preceding stages. So at the
moment, it looks like there's nothing wrong with that "partially C-E
shorted bjt" - it's simply being driven into saturation by a chain of
cause and effect from an earlier stage where the true fault *does* lie.
I'm guessing this is not unusual when you have directly-coupled stages
like these, which I'm not so much accustomed to dealing with.
I'll be investigating further over the next 8 hours as and when time and
interruptions permit and will report back in due course....
Thanks again for your invaluable assistance!
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Cursitor Doom wrote...
On 16 Oct 2019, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Well I'm mightily relieved you said that, Win, because I do happen to
have a very large amount of both polarities in stock. THANKS!!!
Just wondering if I should try to match pairs by Beta as closely as
possible. I have a nagging suspicion I really should make that extra
little bit of effort.
Although this is an old design, it adheres well to the BJT design
philopsohy I learned in the late 60s. Which is to rely on accurate
Ebers-Moll transconductance characteristics, and stay away from the
uncertain beta, and similar aspects of a transistor, in the circuit
design. So you don't need to match beta, Vbe, or other perameters.
Thanks, Win, that's a real plus, believe me.
I'm carrying out some other tests in the odd minutes I get between the
phone ringing and various people calling and have ascertained the
*actual* fault appears to be in one of the preceding stages. So at the
moment, it looks like there's nothing wrong with that "partially C-E
shorted bjt" - it's simply being driven into saturation by a chain of
cause and effect from an earlier stage where the true fault *does* lie.
I'm guessing this is not unusual when you have directly-coupled stages
like these, which I'm not so much accustomed to dealing with.
I'll be investigating further over the next 8 hours as and when time and
interruptions permit and will report back in due course....
Thanks again for your invaluable assistance!
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.