american beer inferier?

  • Thread starter Peter Lucas (SAS RET)
  • Start date
On 05/12/2010 10:20 PM, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Dec 5, 5:06 pm, ravenlynne<ravenly...@somecraphere.com> wrote:
On 12/5/2010 7:40 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

Back in 2002 I was in Golden Colorado to visit some friends. We had gone
down tot he hotel bar for happy hour and their special was buy one draft
beer get one free. I asked the bar tender if it was Coors. His answered
"No sir. We have some good beers too"

LOL! That's awesome.


In a beer bar in Bruges they talked me out of ordering a Blanche de
Bruges, for the same reason: the local product was clearly inferior.

The day we passed through Bruges we ended up staying in Ypres. It was a
hot summer day and I ordered a glass of beer. It was incredible. I was
too busy enjoying the best beer of my life to find out what it was. It
was incredible.
 
William Sommerwerck wrote:
I don't get this light beer thing. What is the point? Beer
should have some body and flavour. You don't have to
drink it until it's coming out your nose.

It's a social thing. Shmoozing with your buddies for hour after hour, while
downing beer after beer, is a mark of True Masculinity. So a lower-calorie
beer seems desirable.

There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s, long before low-carb
became a trend. I remember seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
the name.

Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to 18 year olds,
while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was commonly referred to as 'Near
beer'.


--
For the last time: I am not a mad scientist, I'm just a very ticked off
scientist!!!
 
In article <o9adnUJjidcdi2DRnZ2dnUVZ_s8AAAAA@earthlink.com>,
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to 18 year olds,
while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was commonly referred to as 'Near
beer'.
I remember 3.2, but I don't remember that law. In my home state, you
could drink any alcohol at 18. Neighboring state was 21 so we had quite
an influx of partyers on weekends.
 
There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
the name.

Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.
True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.
 
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:24:23 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

I don't get this light beer thing. What is the point? Beer
should have some body and flavour. You don't have to
drink it until it's coming out your nose.

It's a social thing. Shmoozing with your buddies for hour after hour, while
downing beer after beer, is a mark of True Masculinity. So a lower-calorie
beer seems desirable.

There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s, long before low-carb
became a trend. I remember seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
the name.
The beer was called Gablingers and it was brewed by Rheingold so it
was available in NY, NJ. and New England. Chuck
 
There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
long before low-carb became a trend. I remember seeing
the ads in New York, but don't remember the name.

The beer was called Gablinger's. and it was brewed by
Rheingold, so it was available in NY, NJ, and New England.
Thanks. I was going crazy trying to remember the name.
 
"Peter Lucas (SAS RET)" <psyop@lawyer.com> wrote in message
news:2dfc8571-5943-46b9-ae4b-3bb902d7e431@d24g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
What do Urine and american Beer have in common?
They both taste the same going in and comming out!!

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Q:Do you like Beef?
A:Well suck my C.O.C.K Its Dripping!

sticking it to ''Politcal Correctness'' since 2008

so, would you explain exactly how you tasted the beer coming out ?

I mean like how do the mechanics of that work ?

is that an Australian custom ?

do you taste it when it comes out again too ?
 
Bryan wrote:
On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" ?grizzledgee...@comcast.net?
wrote:
? ?? There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
? ?? long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
? ?? seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
? ?? the name.
? ? Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
? ? 18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
? ? commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.
?
? True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer. Why do people blow out their
asses? Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

Do you have proof that it wasn't referred to 'near beer' by kids in
parts of the US 50 years ago, or is your head up your ass and you need
your glass belly button to see your keyboard?


--
For the last time: I am not a mad scientist, I'm just a very ticked off
scientist!!!
 
Bryan wrote:
3.2 beer is not the same as near beer. Why do people blow out their
asses? Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.
I'm not sure who appreciates that concept more...
The electronics, incest, cooking, ebay or pentecostal
newsgroups.


Lumpy

You were the Tidy Bowl Guy?
Yes. I'm cleaning your bathroom bowl.
www.LumpyMusic.com
 
On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net>
wrote:
There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
the name.
Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.

True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.
3.2 beer is not the same as near beer. Why do people blow out their
asses? Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

--Bryan
 
The last time I had a Budweiser I shat myself~~~


On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net
wrote:
There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s, long before
low-carb became a trend. I remember seeing the ads in New York, but
I don't remember the name.
Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to 18 year olds,
while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was commonly referred to as
'Near beer'.

True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer. Why do people blow out their
asses? Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

--Bryan
 
On Dec 25, 5:58 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Bryan wrote:

On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" ?grizzledgee...@comcast.net?
wrote:
? ?? There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
? ?? long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
? ?? seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
? ?? the name.
? ? Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
? ? 18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
? ? commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.
?
? True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer.  Why do people blow out their
asses?  Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

   Do you have proof that it wasn't referred to 'near beer' by kids in
parts of the US 50 years ago, or is your head up your ass and you need
your glass belly button to see your keyboard?

Really stupid kids can call a sheep a goat, and that doesn't make it
so. In Missouri, the only beer you could buy on Sundays was that 3.2
junk. I drank my share of it. When the piece of shit John Ashcroft
finally left office, the laws against Sunday sales were repealed.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/near+beer

--Bryan
 
On Dec 25, 6:23 pm, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
Bryan wrote:
3.2 beer is not the same as near beer.  Why do people blow out their
asses?  Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

I'm not sure who appreciates that concept more...
The electronics, incest, cooking, ebay or Pentecostal
newsgroups.
The incest and Pentecostal groups are not one and the same?
--Bryan
 
On Dec 25, 5:50 pm, Yasser Butterfat <fa...@al-awda.org> wrote:
The last time I had a Budweiser I shat myself~~~

On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net
wrote:
There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s, long before
low-carb became a trend. I remember seeing the ads in New York, but
I don't remember the name.
Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to 18 year olds,
while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was commonly referred to as
'Near beer'.

True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer.  Why do people blow out their
asses?  Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

--Bryan
=You must have drunk a keg of it...serves you right.
==
 
On Dec 5, 6:30 pm, BrotherBart <notha...@nomail.net> wrote:
On 12/5/2010 6:09 PM, ravenlynne wrote:> On 12/5/2010 5:59 PM, Alex Clayton wrote:

When I was a youngster they did not sell Coors here (WA), so people
would drive over the mountains to Idaho to buy it. They would come back
with a trunk full of the stuff and it was a big thing to go to a "Coors
party". The first time I got to taste one I said "if we did not have
horse shit here would you drive to Idaho to buy it"? They were quite
offended and needless to say I was no longer invited to any more Coors
parties. My loss I'm sure.

Sounds like a win to me. Coors is awful.

Yeah. AB Natural Light is the only good beer.
When we go camping in the Ozark back country we see lots of empty cans
of Nat Light thrown on the side of the gravel roads. The yokels drink
a lot of the stuff. That and Busch.

--Bryan
 
On Dec 25, 3:38 pm, Bryan <bryangsimm...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" <grizzledgee...@comcast.net
wrote:

There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
the name.
Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.

True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer.  Why do people blow out their
asses?  Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.
The definition of non-intoxicating beer was changed from 0.5% alcohol
to 3.2% by Act of Congress in 1933. "Near beer" has no legal
significance. Why do people blow out their asses, indeed.
 
"Bryan" wrote in message
news:5c593a54-ff51-4e52-9f29-7f9521920bc9@s5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Really stupid kids can call a sheep a goat, and that doesn't make it
so. In Missouri, the only beer you could buy on Sundays was that 3.2
junk. I drank my share of it. When the piece of shit John Ashcroft
finally left office, the laws against Sunday sales were repealed.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Oregon, until at least the late 70's, all we had was 3.2 beer. Folks used
to go across to Vancouver, WA to buy Coors. Coors was the beer of choice for
beer runs across the river.
 
Bryan wrote:
On Dec 25, 5:58 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bryan wrote:

On Dec 6, 12:00 pm, "William Sommerwerck" ?grizzledgee...@comcast.net?
wrote:
? ?? There was a short-lived low-carb beer in the late 60s,
? ?? long before low-carb became a trend. I remember
? ?? seeing the ads in New York, but I don't remember
? ?? the name.
? ? Some states allowed the sale of 3.2% alcohol beer to
? ? 18 year olds, while you had to be 21 to buy 6%. It was
? ? commonly referred to as 'Near beer'.
?
? True, but that wasn't what I was referring to.

3.2 beer is not the same as near beer. Why do people blow out their
asses? Near beer has less than 0.5% alcohol.

Do you have proof that it wasn't referred to 'near beer' by kids in
parts of the US 50 years ago, or is your head up your ass and you need
your glass belly button to see your keyboard?

Really stupid kids can call a sheep a goat, and that doesn't make it
so. In Missouri, the only beer you could buy on Sundays was that 3.2
junk. I drank my share of it. When the piece of shit John Ashcroft
finally left office, the laws against Sunday sales were repealed.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/near+beer

It sounds like you've drank enough to kill most of your brain cells.


--
For the last time: I am not a mad scientist, I'm just a very ticked off
scientist!!!
 
In article <86af342a-545a-4f52-99e5-4de855dd263a@d1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
spamtrap1888 says...
The definition of non-intoxicating beer was changed from 0.5% alcohol
to 3.2% by Act of Congress in 1933.
It takes awhile, but you can get drunk on it.

Belgium has some of the finest beers I've ever tasted. I do my fair share to
keep those monks rich when I pass through the area,
 
In article <Aqadnev3zK8ji4rQnZ2dnVY3goidnZ2d@giganews.com>, Brenda Ann says...
In Oregon, until at least the late 70's, all we had was 3.2 beer. Folks used
to go across to Vancouver, WA to buy Coors. Coors was the beer of choice for
beer runs across the river.
Same was true in WV, but you could buy regular beer in the ABC stores or zip
over to Ohio. No Coors though.

I knew an Air Force fighter pilot who flew out of MacDill in Tampa in the early
70's who would pick me up a case of Coors whenever he flew out West. Obviously,
my taste in beer has changed, since I now consider that horse piss undrinkable.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top