Albert Einstein

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Ken Smith
<kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote (in <cu85qs$abc$3@blue.rahul.net&gt
about 'Albert Einstein', on Mon, 7 Feb 2005:

Perhaps we should have a law requiring everyone to marry outside their
race. We'd all end up chinese if we did.

The Chinese wouldn't.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <MOPNd.44084$K7.1630@fe2.news.blu
eyonder.co.uk&gt about 'Albert Einstein', on Mon, 7 Feb 2005:

What additional set of fields did you have in mind?

John, Sid, Gracie, Killing....
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <8f7f015nuehl3jj4shvkptkqea35mbhu5g@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
[...]

I always kid my wife, that the reason we have such neat kids, is her
family ancestry and mine have absolutely no overlaps... vastly
different originating parts of Europe, different settlement on this
side of the pond.

Its extra important for us humans since we went through that choke point a
few 100K years ago so we don't have all that wide of a gene pool.


--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <R5qBYFF5G6BCFwa6@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
John Woodgate <noone@yuk.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Ken Smith
kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote (in <cu85qs$abc$3@blue.rahul.net&gt
about 'Albert Einstein', on Mon, 7 Feb 2005:

Perhaps we should have a law requiring everyone to marry outside their
race. We'd all end up chinese if we did.

The Chinese wouldn't.

Logic applied to a silly quip: I think they are the largest minority in
the world so fairly quickly everyone would be some part Chinese.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <bm7f01d2un64hc77dv3kscvdf8sjs375g5@4ax.com>,
Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:
[...]

Chinese are only 25% or so of the world total. We'd end up kind of a
golden brown with black hair and brown eyes. They are going to have a
huge shortfall of females in China, so they may end up having to
intermarry. Probably mostly with SE Asian women, but I understand
Russian blondes are in high demand too.

They could kill of a chunk of the male population by having a war. Large
numbers of unmarried males are not good for stability.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Richard the Dreaded Liber]

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:52:35 -0500, Boris Mohar wrote:

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:05:04 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:


The gang problem is primarily caused by "the war on drugs" which is a
tacit war on blacks. Ultimately, the war on drugs is a war on everyone.

Thanks,
Rich

Did somebody say war on drugs? See what Penn and Teller have to say.

http://www.pot-tv.net/archive/shows/pottvshowse-2705.html

How? This link leads to, essentially, nothing. A couple of people saying,
"Yeah, neat show, is it legal?"

WTF?

Thanks,
Rich